When you use the Wien and Boltzmann equations using the maxwellian focus with the spectrometer pointed on the whole plasma image we see in http://www.ecatskdemo.com , which factor do you consider based on the shift between your spoectrum and the theoretical Maxwellian integral?
Sam:
I am very sorry. Adrian was a great engineer and we have been honoured of his attention to our work and of his always intelligent comments on this blog.
My deepest condolences to his family.
Andrea Rossi
Interesting that you say a permanently self-sustaining heat-producing E-Cat is very close. Can you help me understand what exactly you mean?
1. Will you need an external power source to start the E-Cat reaction?
2. Will the control system need to be connected to an external power source continuously?
3. Do you need to have access to grid electricity for this?
Victor:
My health is very good, my wife is no more able to beat me 6-0 6-0, now it’s 6-1 6-1. And I have a great Team helping me ( in the work, not in tennis ). Who is working with me is the best of the best in his field.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Scotty:
We patent eberything we do, also because already happened in 2015 that IH made a patent without my permission copying the publication of the Lugano experiment. But it has also to be said that all those patent applications are totally worthless, because the Patent Office rejects any application that copies anything that has been already either patented or made public in any way. We obtained the revoke of several patents copied from prior art. The application made by IH copied from the Lugano Report has been duly rejected from the USPTO. Somebody needs to produce paper, to sell it, obtaining valuations totally out of reality God knows how, independently from its real value. Others work like dogs to make real work and sell real things.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jean Paul Renoir:
To make the Ecat in permanent self sustaining mode, without external power source, to make heat the probability is high. We are very, very close. Then also a Carnot cycle becomes an ssm system to make electricity.
To make the same producing electricity directly from the plasma in a quantity enough to yield substantial electricity for sale or other uses, much work more has to be done.
The first mode is easier, due to the fact that the Ecat SK has a very low consume of electricity.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea:
how many probabilities do you have as of today to reach a permanent self sustaining mode, I mean an Ecat that generates all the energy necessary for it to work plus energy for other utilizations or for sale?
JPR
Are you patenting all the new modifications you are making to the Ecat? Attention, because Industrial heat copies everything that is published and makes patent applications about all they copy (see what happened to Francesco Celani !)
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
How is your health? You are under strong stress years since and you are in this moment the most important person in the world, if it is true that you are making an Ecat able to generate energy without necessity to draw energy from ouside itself.
Godspeed,
Victor
Steven N. Karels:
Thank you for your insight, but the mechanism is completely different. As probably you read on my researchgate paper, we are thinking to nothing like these hypothesis.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Regarding the previous question on Fusion vs Fission on JONP, it appears from your referenced paper that you are suggesting that a “long-range” transfer of effectively one neutron from one type of atom to another is occurring. It would be of the form (A(pA,nA) + B(pB,nB) -> A(pA, nA-1) + B(pB, nB+1)).
Questions:
to be effective, would the all or some of the following be required:
1. The combined mass of the original atoms be less than the combined mass of the resulting atoms? (i.e., excess energy is produced)
2. The resulting atoms must be stable?
3. No proton shifting is allowed (no new elements removed or produced)
I am considering developing a computer program to see what combinations are effective and the amount of net energy produced.
The Louvre Museum in Paris is organizing from October 24th, 2019 to February 24th, 2020 an exceptional exhibition on Leonardo da Vinci on the occasion of the five hundredth anniversary of his death
Those interested will find all the information on the Louvre website.
Industrial Heat has made a patent application copying all the work of Francesco Celani, without his authorization. This fact shows how desperate they are…and also that Tom Darden is still the one so well described by Sifferkoll.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Watching carefully http://www.ecatskdemo.com
I discovered that the Teslameter indicated clearly an electromagnetic field generated by the plasma, which means that electric current was generated too. Is this observation that started your R&D on the direct production of electricity from the plasma?
Thank you if you can answer,
Anna
WaltC:
It will be very hard and difficult. Part of the electric energy would supply the energy necessary to the Ecat to work. The implications are enormous. #We do not have it yet, but we are working very hard on it. Some of us is getting no sleep. Theoretically, it is not impossible, as we discovered, or, at least, we think we discovered.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi,
With respect to the possibility of achieving 90% electricity, 10% heat: I find that possibility so very exciting; I wish you every possible success.
If successful, it would be an amazing, break-through product, useful in just about every industry and in every corner of the world. On top of that, it would be an unparalleled engineering achievement and, I have to believe, a seminal scientific advancement.
Just a few questions:
1. Have you already scaled-up the production of heat producing E-cats or are you still assessing/improving the running plants performances?
2. Does the Electric E-cat require considerable changes of the reactor itself, or is it more the control system that needs to change?
And a remark:
Maybe that this invention can also help you to generate electricity in an efficient way: http://news.rice.edu/2019/07/12/rice-device-channels-heat-into-light/
(I assume this invention can also be used to bring the UV level EM radiation of the E-cat to the most efficient frequencies suitable for PV).
Kind regards, Gerard
Dr Rossi, Prof Neri Accornero
July 12, 2019 at 6:34
I asked you a question among the most important.
“If the reaction is a” interaction “of plasma electrons, rather than a nuclear reaction, you should find far fewer obstacles in the production permit and for the home system, given that plasma generators have long been sold for metal processing.”
You did not answer by answering more serious questions.
I live on earth. This is very important to me E-Cat, 10 kW for the home.
Do we have hope?
Thank you for your hard work.
Sorry for the bad language. Google helps me.
Daniel G.Zavela:
In the Ecat SK plasma we have a situation that has a strong potential to eskew the issues we had with the Ecatbefore.
The importance is enormous with the efficiency we expect, that before did not exist.
Thank you for your kind wishes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
You stated many times that the E-Cat requires an external power source for safety reasons.
Would the same safety concerns occur with the “Electric E-Cat” you are now doing R&D on?
I wonder what inspired you to consider investing so much time, energy and money toward the direct production of electricity from the E-Cat?
Best of Luck on your R&D. Many you acquire the all the resources you need to successfully complete your task.
Samuel Snopek:
Thay do not affect us, on the contrary, their work gives evidence of the fact that they fear us, which gives evidence they recognize our importance. This is the subliminal message that actually they send to the public. Maybe among them there is myself… ( he,he,he )
Warm Regards.
AR.
Dr Rossi,
your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
it is explained very well also how an apparent low energy effect like the Casimir effect can trigger a nuclear interaction. Very fascinating intuition
Ad majora,
Giovanni
When you use the Wien and Boltzmann equations using the maxwellian focus with the spectrometer pointed on the whole plasma image we see in http://www.ecatskdemo.com , which factor do you consider based on the shift between your spoectrum and the theoretical Maxwellian integral?
Frank Acland:
1- no
2- no
3- no
But be careful: ” very close ” does not mean ” done ” ( so far ).
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Sam:
I am very sorry. Adrian was a great engineer and we have been honoured of his attention to our work and of his always intelligent comments on this blog.
My deepest condolences to his family.
Andrea Rossi
Dear Andrea,
Interesting that you say a permanently self-sustaining heat-producing E-Cat is very close. Can you help me understand what exactly you mean?
1. Will you need an external power source to start the E-Cat reaction?
2. Will the control system need to be connected to an external power source continuously?
3. Do you need to have access to grid electricity for this?
Thank you very much,
Frank Acland
Hello DR Rossi
Adrian Ashfield who was a supporter
of you and your work on the LENR
Blogs has passed away.
https://www.legacy.com/obituaries/thedailyjournal/obituary.aspx?n=adrian-ashfield&pid=193147752&fhid=29188
Regards
Sam
Sam:
Thank you !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello DR Rossi
Push play sample on this link
for a short talk on Nicola Tesla that I hope inspires
you in your work.
https://play.google.com/store/audiobooks/details/ColdFusion_Presents_New_Thinking_From_Einstein_to_?id=AQAAAEDM5Auk1M&hl=en_CA
Regards
Sam
Victor:
My health is very good, my wife is no more able to beat me 6-0 6-0, now it’s 6-1 6-1. And I have a great Team helping me ( in the work, not in tennis ). Who is working with me is the best of the best in his field.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Scotty:
We patent eberything we do, also because already happened in 2015 that IH made a patent without my permission copying the publication of the Lugano experiment. But it has also to be said that all those patent applications are totally worthless, because the Patent Office rejects any application that copies anything that has been already either patented or made public in any way. We obtained the revoke of several patents copied from prior art. The application made by IH copied from the Lugano Report has been duly rejected from the USPTO. Somebody needs to produce paper, to sell it, obtaining valuations totally out of reality God knows how, independently from its real value. Others work like dogs to make real work and sell real things.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jean Paul Renoir:
To make the Ecat in permanent self sustaining mode, without external power source, to make heat the probability is high. We are very, very close. Then also a Carnot cycle becomes an ssm system to make electricity.
To make the same producing electricity directly from the plasma in a quantity enough to yield substantial electricity for sale or other uses, much work more has to be done.
The first mode is easier, due to the fact that the Ecat SK has a very low consume of electricity.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea:
how many probabilities do you have as of today to reach a permanent self sustaining mode, I mean an Ecat that generates all the energy necessary for it to work plus energy for other utilizations or for sale?
JPR
Are you patenting all the new modifications you are making to the Ecat? Attention, because Industrial heat copies everything that is published and makes patent applications about all they copy (see what happened to Francesco Celani !)
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
How is your health? You are under strong stress years since and you are in this moment the most important person in the world, if it is true that you are making an Ecat able to generate energy without necessity to draw energy from ouside itself.
Godspeed,
Victor
Steven N. Karels:
Thank you for your insight, but the mechanism is completely different. As probably you read on my researchgate paper, we are thinking to nothing like these hypothesis.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Regarding the previous question on Fusion vs Fission on JONP, it appears from your referenced paper that you are suggesting that a “long-range” transfer of effectively one neutron from one type of atom to another is occurring. It would be of the form (A(pA,nA) + B(pB,nB) -> A(pA, nA-1) + B(pB, nB+1)).
Questions:
to be effective, would the all or some of the following be required:
1. The combined mass of the original atoms be less than the combined mass of the resulting atoms? (i.e., excess energy is produced)
2. The resulting atoms must be stable?
3. No proton shifting is allowed (no new elements removed or produced)
I am considering developing a computer program to see what combinations are effective and the amount of net energy produced.
Raffaele Bongo:
Thank you for the information !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello A. Rossi,
hello to all readers
For information
The Louvre Museum in Paris is organizing from October 24th, 2019 to February 24th, 2020 an exceptional exhibition on Leonardo da Vinci on the occasion of the five hundredth anniversary of his death
Those interested will find all the information on the Louvre website.
Best regards
Raffaele
Anna:
Also.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
CC:
Thank you for your attention to our work,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Chuck:
No comment.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Industrial Heat has made a patent application copying all the work of Francesco Celani, without his authorization. This fact shows how desperate they are…and also that Tom Darden is still the one so well described by Sifferkoll.
Dr Rossi,
your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
is not only the most read among the 15 million papers published by researchgate, it is also one of the most important papers published in the last ten years.
All the best,
CC
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Watching carefully
http://www.ecatskdemo.com
I discovered that the Teslameter indicated clearly an electromagnetic field generated by the plasma, which means that electric current was generated too. Is this observation that started your R&D on the direct production of electricity from the plasma?
Thank you if you can answer,
Anna
Jefferson:
It is not impossible.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Is it impossible that you will show your Ecat SK leonardo with direct production of electricity by the end of the year?
Rod Walton:
Thanks for the update,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
On Power Engineering July 16 2019: Rebalancing the Energy Approach- interview with Mario Azar, president of Black and Veatch Power
Rod Walton
WaltC:
It will be very hard and difficult. Part of the electric energy would supply the energy necessary to the Ecat to work. The implications are enormous. #We do not have it yet, but we are working very hard on it. Some of us is getting no sleep. Theoretically, it is not impossible, as we discovered, or, at least, we think we discovered.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi,
With respect to the possibility of achieving 90% electricity, 10% heat: I find that possibility so very exciting; I wish you every possible success.
If successful, it would be an amazing, break-through product, useful in just about every industry and in every corner of the world. On top of that, it would be an unparalleled engineering achievement and, I have to believe, a seminal scientific advancement.
Best wishes! (And Wow!)
WaltC
Yrka:
Neri Accornero is right.
Of course we have hope !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Don:
1- enough so far
2- I hope so, but certification is still an issue
Warm Regards,
A.R.
How many e cats are supplying heat to customers? Are you any closer to a home ecat
Donald G. Chandler:
Thank you for this interesting link.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi
This might be of interest to you.
https://phys.org/news/2019-07-scientists-hydrogen-nanovoid-interaction-metals.html
Glenn Hornes:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Victor:
We should be able to reach 90% electricity, 10% heat if this will be the demand. Still fighting, though.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ugo:
Stunning.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gerard McEk:
1. still assessing – improving the working ones
2. this is a very complex issue
3. thank you for the link
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Just a few questions:
1. Have you already scaled-up the production of heat producing E-cats or are you still assessing/improving the running plants performances?
2. Does the Electric E-cat require considerable changes of the reactor itself, or is it more the control system that needs to change?
And a remark:
Maybe that this invention can also help you to generate electricity in an efficient way: http://news.rice.edu/2019/07/12/rice-device-channels-heat-into-light/
(I assume this invention can also be used to bring the UV level EM radiation of the E-cat to the most efficient frequencies suitable for PV).
Kind regards, Gerard
Dr Rossi, Prof Neri Accornero
July 12, 2019 at 6:34
I asked you a question among the most important.
“If the reaction is a” interaction “of plasma electrons, rather than a nuclear reaction, you should find far fewer obstacles in the production permit and for the home system, given that plasma generators have long been sold for metal processing.”
You did not answer by answering more serious questions.
I live on earth. This is very important to me E-Cat, 10 kW for the home.
Do we have hope?
Thank you for your hard work.
Sorry for the bad language. Google helps me.
Yury Isaev
Engineer
Tyumen, Russia
Dear Dr Rossi:
Your publication on researchgate hase reached 29 000 full readings…and counting!
Cheers
Ugo
Dr Rossi,
Can you say which will be the maximum ratio between electricity and heat in case electricity is the main object of demand?
Are you still using the Ecat QX for R&D? Due to the physics in it, I think it is a unique-in-the-world source of information for pure research.
Glenn
Daniel G.Zavela:
In the Ecat SK plasma we have a situation that has a strong potential to eskew the issues we had with the Ecatbefore.
The importance is enormous with the efficiency we expect, that before did not exist.
Thank you for your kind wishes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
You stated many times that the E-Cat requires an external power source for safety reasons.
Would the same safety concerns occur with the “Electric E-Cat” you are now doing R&D on?
I wonder what inspired you to consider investing so much time, energy and money toward the direct production of electricity from the E-Cat?
Best of Luck on your R&D. Many you acquire the all the resources you need to successfully complete your task.
Best Regards,
Daniel G. Zavela
Pat:
Yes, of course! We are learning much from the operating Ecats.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments arrived today to other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Samuel Snopek:
Thay do not affect us, on the contrary, their work gives evidence of the fact that they fear us, which gives evidence they recognize our importance. This is the subliminal message that actually they send to the public. Maybe among them there is myself… ( he,he,he )
Warm Regards.
AR.