I think this can be of interest for you and the readers:
Google: Tesla’s battery researcher tests 1 million mile battery cell
Warm Regards,
Chuck Davis
1) Does the plasma ball within the E-Cat SK achieve the Langmuir Condition which is what seems to define a “strong” double layer rather than a “weak” double layer?
2) Does the plasma ball within the E-Cat SK achieve a relativistic state?
Dear Andrea, As a follow up to my previous post that refers to structure as energy, I will now explain how to embody the previously described macro unit of energy into a useful mechanism that specifically relates to a propulsion unit that relies upon unified fields of air. The mechanism relies upon a binary system of interaction with regards its structure and also that of which it structures i.e. air. There is no name at present for this particular mechanism when the propulsion unit is installed into that of an aircraft design and therefore I shall refer to the mechanism as a ‘Unifying Field Oscillator’. Note, aircraft because this particular description refers entirely to a propulsion system that operates within an atmosphere because it uses the atmosphere to form interacting structures that provide the propulsion. It is necessary to refer back to previous notes so as to maintain clarity and understanding. The mechanism is in two parts comprising of four mobile structures that interact as binary systems and that are mounted upon a plasm constructed of four static dimensions. The plasm is a geometric metal structure formed of four triangles, apex in, enclosed within a metallic circle that forms their base (Four triangles represent a square). Another metallic circle is embedded within the central position of the triangles i.e. between point and periphery (see previous post for correct understanding). This central circle divides the triangles into two compartments. The inner compartments of size dimensions are as apposed to that of the outer compartments being of volume dimensions or positives as apposed to negatives. Thereby four positives, four negatives and four triangles and two outer dimensions. The two outer dimensions one inner and one outer to that of the four triangles represent zones of force potentials. The positives and negatives within the triangles represent four neutrals i.e. one within each pyramid, each neutral is a gate i.e. in and out of the cube via the two major gates i.e. the negative force in and the the positive force out . The combined inner and the outer represent two loops i.e. circuits of flow that circumvent the cube and insulate the cube by their oscillating helical trajectories. Thereby four neutrals and two forces equals six dimensions i.e. one cube. Now we have to project this structure into a macro dimension from that of a micro dimension to provide information of an important understanding. Every cube being a unit of energy is comprised of six dimensions. The negative compartments, structure negative cubes. The positive compartments, structure positive cubes within the macro cube because the macro cube forms a unified field of four dimensions i.e. N.S.E.West of the structure. Each dimension is formed/comprised of minor cubes that within the macro cube eventually merge over a distance that equates as a period of time forming a neutral. Before the merge each potential is of a distinct curvature oscillating force that maintains identity with regards the two potentials i.e. the positive and the negative remain as isolated units within their respective compartments. Two curvature forces, one being the positive and one being the negative that upon merging create a linear force being a force of neutral unity that occurs slowly over a period of time until full unity. It’s the linear force that provides the propulsion of the mechanism. This aspect of understanding is physically demonstrated within the mechanism. What the two units do i.e. eight in total, is descend into a more positive zone on their helical trajectories i.e. eight in total that oscillate in eventual unison because the positive unit is in the lead position dictating the necessary path to achieve a unified field. What has to be understood is that it is geometry and maths that dictates the pattern of nature i.e. the evolutionary system from a fuzzy none understanding to a clearer vision. I will now explain the physical aspects with regards the ‘Unifying Field Oscillator’ of how it is built and why, being a reference to its pattern in the greater sphere of things. The static dimension being the plasm is formed of metallic plates. The plasm is designed specifically with regards the mobile units, these being propellers with a given pitch. The propellers should have a square pitch i.e. to climb/form a cube with one rotation. Each propeller is mounted at the central position within each triangle. Each propeller blade almost touch at the apex of their triangle and each blade is mounted at a 90 degree angle to each other so as to rotate in sync without propeller strike i.e. a 50% binary overlap. The plasm must accommodate the structure formed within each compartment of each triangle. The plasm thereby has an inner and outer depth to comply with the dimension of the inner compartment to that of the outer compartment. As an example a sixteen inch propeller i.e. two eight inch blades requires each triangle to be four inches depth at the apex, three inches depth at the central position and two inches at the outer base/circle. However because of the need to accommodate an outer static dimension of force, the plasm extends out beyond the outer circle. Thereby 4 – 3 – 2 – 1 – 0 inches depth of entire plasm. 4 – 3 – 2 – being triangle compartments 2 – 1 – 0 being outer chambers to amplify the inner oscillations of the inner flows. At the outer zero position a skirt is dropped down four inches to enclose the outer chamber/chambers. Above the outer chambers and beyond is the fuselage. What this propulsion system represents is a collapsed cube forming a disk with a positive negative flow surrounded by a static boundary layer to form an insulation from environmental objects in close proximity. There are two distinct flows to the mechanism, one inner ‘internal economy flow’ that circumvents from the positive force to the negative force passing by the outer chambers on the inner side. These flows are on oscillating helical trajectories and thereby contain gravity which provides a density of structure and that thereby provide the propellers with an added lift due to a greater density of air drawn towards the apexes of the triangles from the outer bases across the plane of the propellers. What these ‘economy flows’ do is knit the structure together i.e. they unify. The outer flows do the same i.e. knits the structure together but on greater loops. This method of propulsion provides an extremely powerful thrust that is completely silent because its fields are unified. How big could this type of thruster be made?. As big as a building, depends on its purpose. It obviously needs fuel to power the system but fuel that compliments the technology i.e. whether it be an aircraft or an interplanetary vehicle (to be explained) and this is why an advanced form of clean energy is an absolute must in the near future besides being beneficial to our planet as a whole at this present time.
Regards, Eric Ashworth
In the greater scheme of things, the mechanism can be compared to containing ten planets. Each compartment contains a planet comprised of four sets that oscillates as a structure, the pivot upon which the propellers rotate represents an empty space of interacting energy i.e. sun. Consequently eight planets with one always coming in and one always going out, ten in total on a continuous never ending cycle with regards the major unit. N.S.E,W represent four seasons thereby ten.
You said the tennis article i sent
did not help your tennis game.
But this line in the article
reminded me of you.
She plays her best when she’s up against it, fearless. Her coach Sylvain Bruneau calls her a warrior and a “street fighter” — Andreescu relishes people doubting her.
1) Are your clients with SK installations aware of each other?
2) Do they communicate directly with each other to collaborate on improving their installations?
A reveal of their use of your wonderful technology would be more powerful if done jointly.
Dr Joseph Fine:
Thank you for the information and for the link !
The model of the atomic nucleus of Prof Norman Cook remains the more convincing to me and is fit in the theoretical bases I proposed in my last paper http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
I strongly suggest the reading of this new book of our great master, Prof Norman Cook.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, At the beginning of May (four months ago) you mentioned you were having problems with the first wave of reactors and that you consider you were still in the R&D phase, not production.
Q1:Can you tell us if you have resolved these issues?
Q2:Have you been able to start or restart production and shipping of your reactors?
Q3: If you are shipping reactors, what is the current estimated delivery time?
I do not have the Table of Contents for this book and, unfortunately, Dr. Norman Cook passed away about 3 months ago. If there are any questions about the books’ contents, contact Infinite-Energy Magazine.
Dear Steve_save_the_climate, With what I am saying will be said but you have to have patience so as to understand what I am saying. I appreciate your comment but this is not about me. It is information that I believe people need to be made aware of for consideration. It is important but only to certain individuals able to put together what I am saying so as to understand embodied concepts that are to follow and thereby arrive at a meaningful understanding at the various levels that are required i.e. with regards a persons acumen.
Regards Eric Ashworth
Dear Andrea,
you are tryng a difficult balance between electricity and heat production in a single e-cat.
Isn’t better to use a cluster of two or more e-cats, the first tuned to get only elecricity, and with this electricity you can pilot the same e-cat (if it has a good efficiency) and also the second (or more tha two) e-cat to produce heat, or elecricity, depends on what you need?
In percentage terms, at this time what do you think the probability is that you will be able to demonstrate an E-Cat operating with no external source of energy input in 2019?
Gerard McEk:
1- There has been a theoretical evolution that appears evident if you go through the publications of mine, now all published on Researchgate.
2- No
3- Yes
4- N.A.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Stephen:
If you want to correct your insight, please do.
The JoNP does not respond of the insights of the Readers and publish their points of view as they are.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Thanks for correcting my error in the post from keV to MeV but unfortunately I suppose the remainder of that paragraph that I wrote about it being less than electron pair production is also not really correct.
Dear Andrea,
With regards to how the reaction in the E-cat work and your recent insight that you believe the generated energy doesn’t come from mass to energy conversion:
1. Do you still believe that the energy generated by the SK plasma is based on the same principles as of the first generation lower temperature ECats?
Some other questions:
2. When you do not succeed to make SSM work for the SK Leonardo, would that stop bringing the E-cat SK to the market as a heat energy source?
3. There is a huge upcoming market for heat distribution to houses in the Netherlands. Would you be willing to supply centralized heating stations in domestic areas for that purpose?
4. If ‘no’ for 3: What is the main reason?
Thank you. Kind regards, Gerard
I just found this interesting paper that could be relevant to both your work with Carl Oscar Gulström and to Holmlids work with dense Hydrogen decay. After starting to understand better the interesting concepts in your recent paper I thought it might be useful or relevant:
I know you don’t discuss others work but there may be convergence in someways here.
I suspect for you the resonances could be interesting and for Holmlid the decay paths which also include decays to neutral Kaon and pion pairs in some cases.
The first two f0 type resonances are quite low energy 500 MeV and 980 MeV which is below typical nucleon resonances and even below those of electron positron pair generation.. I wonder when you talk about particle resonances in the e-cat if these are a candidate?
Another point I’ve been wondering is if there analogies or lessons that can be learnt from the Chiral Bag model of the nucleon?
I sometimes wonder if one was to use Wyttenbach’s (very interesting to me) SO(4) approach if different models and approaches at different scales can be resolved in a very elegant way. I guess time will tell.
Matt:
1- yes
2- no, with exception of the replications made of my process. I have experts that do it for us, we do not have time presently. I’d take personally care of items should they be really interesting
3- not so far, but I know only the ones that have been published, I cannot know if there out is some “dark matter”…
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Sam:
This does not depend on me. So far our Clients prefer not to be exposed.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello DR Rossi
I was wondering if you could ask
one of your customers if they could
be interviewed by Frank Acland
of E-Cat World blog.
Regards
Sam
Rod Walton:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
on Power Engineering issue of Sep-tember 10 2019:
Sunshine State utilities prefer gas fired power for new capacity.
Rod Walton
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to read the comments published today on other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Chuck Davis:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I think this can be of interest for you and the readers:
Google: Tesla’s battery researcher tests 1 million mile battery cell
Warm Regards,
Chuck Davis
Giovanni Speziale:
Thank you for your attention to the hard work of our Team,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Thank you for this wonderful post, I am glad I detected this in internet.
Your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
united with the video
http://www.ecatskdemo.com
are making history.
Giovanni Speziale
PlasmaFan:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonymous:
It is never wrong to make a hypothesis.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
PlasmaFan:
1- no
2- no
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Here is site with info on these structures.
https://www.plasma-universe.com/double-layer/
Dear Andrea,
1) Does the plasma ball within the E-Cat SK achieve the Langmuir Condition which is what seems to define a “strong” double layer rather than a “weak” double layer?
2) Does the plasma ball within the E-Cat SK achieve a relativistic state?
Here is a document you might find useful.
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5ff3/56d747f501d678c4da0ba2d04e33d2d24913.pdf
Thank you.
Eric Ashworth:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, As a follow up to my previous post that refers to structure as energy, I will now explain how to embody the previously described macro unit of energy into a useful mechanism that specifically relates to a propulsion unit that relies upon unified fields of air. The mechanism relies upon a binary system of interaction with regards its structure and also that of which it structures i.e. air. There is no name at present for this particular mechanism when the propulsion unit is installed into that of an aircraft design and therefore I shall refer to the mechanism as a ‘Unifying Field Oscillator’. Note, aircraft because this particular description refers entirely to a propulsion system that operates within an atmosphere because it uses the atmosphere to form interacting structures that provide the propulsion. It is necessary to refer back to previous notes so as to maintain clarity and understanding. The mechanism is in two parts comprising of four mobile structures that interact as binary systems and that are mounted upon a plasm constructed of four static dimensions. The plasm is a geometric metal structure formed of four triangles, apex in, enclosed within a metallic circle that forms their base (Four triangles represent a square). Another metallic circle is embedded within the central position of the triangles i.e. between point and periphery (see previous post for correct understanding). This central circle divides the triangles into two compartments. The inner compartments of size dimensions are as apposed to that of the outer compartments being of volume dimensions or positives as apposed to negatives. Thereby four positives, four negatives and four triangles and two outer dimensions. The two outer dimensions one inner and one outer to that of the four triangles represent zones of force potentials. The positives and negatives within the triangles represent four neutrals i.e. one within each pyramid, each neutral is a gate i.e. in and out of the cube via the two major gates i.e. the negative force in and the the positive force out . The combined inner and the outer represent two loops i.e. circuits of flow that circumvent the cube and insulate the cube by their oscillating helical trajectories. Thereby four neutrals and two forces equals six dimensions i.e. one cube. Now we have to project this structure into a macro dimension from that of a micro dimension to provide information of an important understanding. Every cube being a unit of energy is comprised of six dimensions. The negative compartments, structure negative cubes. The positive compartments, structure positive cubes within the macro cube because the macro cube forms a unified field of four dimensions i.e. N.S.E.West of the structure. Each dimension is formed/comprised of minor cubes that within the macro cube eventually merge over a distance that equates as a period of time forming a neutral. Before the merge each potential is of a distinct curvature oscillating force that maintains identity with regards the two potentials i.e. the positive and the negative remain as isolated units within their respective compartments. Two curvature forces, one being the positive and one being the negative that upon merging create a linear force being a force of neutral unity that occurs slowly over a period of time until full unity. It’s the linear force that provides the propulsion of the mechanism. This aspect of understanding is physically demonstrated within the mechanism. What the two units do i.e. eight in total, is descend into a more positive zone on their helical trajectories i.e. eight in total that oscillate in eventual unison because the positive unit is in the lead position dictating the necessary path to achieve a unified field. What has to be understood is that it is geometry and maths that dictates the pattern of nature i.e. the evolutionary system from a fuzzy none understanding to a clearer vision. I will now explain the physical aspects with regards the ‘Unifying Field Oscillator’ of how it is built and why, being a reference to its pattern in the greater sphere of things. The static dimension being the plasm is formed of metallic plates. The plasm is designed specifically with regards the mobile units, these being propellers with a given pitch. The propellers should have a square pitch i.e. to climb/form a cube with one rotation. Each propeller is mounted at the central position within each triangle. Each propeller blade almost touch at the apex of their triangle and each blade is mounted at a 90 degree angle to each other so as to rotate in sync without propeller strike i.e. a 50% binary overlap. The plasm must accommodate the structure formed within each compartment of each triangle. The plasm thereby has an inner and outer depth to comply with the dimension of the inner compartment to that of the outer compartment. As an example a sixteen inch propeller i.e. two eight inch blades requires each triangle to be four inches depth at the apex, three inches depth at the central position and two inches at the outer base/circle. However because of the need to accommodate an outer static dimension of force, the plasm extends out beyond the outer circle. Thereby 4 – 3 – 2 – 1 – 0 inches depth of entire plasm. 4 – 3 – 2 – being triangle compartments 2 – 1 – 0 being outer chambers to amplify the inner oscillations of the inner flows. At the outer zero position a skirt is dropped down four inches to enclose the outer chamber/chambers. Above the outer chambers and beyond is the fuselage. What this propulsion system represents is a collapsed cube forming a disk with a positive negative flow surrounded by a static boundary layer to form an insulation from environmental objects in close proximity. There are two distinct flows to the mechanism, one inner ‘internal economy flow’ that circumvents from the positive force to the negative force passing by the outer chambers on the inner side. These flows are on oscillating helical trajectories and thereby contain gravity which provides a density of structure and that thereby provide the propellers with an added lift due to a greater density of air drawn towards the apexes of the triangles from the outer bases across the plane of the propellers. What these ‘economy flows’ do is knit the structure together i.e. they unify. The outer flows do the same i.e. knits the structure together but on greater loops. This method of propulsion provides an extremely powerful thrust that is completely silent because its fields are unified. How big could this type of thruster be made?. As big as a building, depends on its purpose. It obviously needs fuel to power the system but fuel that compliments the technology i.e. whether it be an aircraft or an interplanetary vehicle (to be explained) and this is why an advanced form of clean energy is an absolute must in the near future besides being beneficial to our planet as a whole at this present time.
Regards, Eric Ashworth
In the greater scheme of things, the mechanism can be compared to containing ten planets. Each compartment contains a planet comprised of four sets that oscillates as a structure, the pivot upon which the propellers rotate represents an empty space of interacting energy i.e. sun. Consequently eight planets with one always coming in and one always going out, ten in total on a continuous never ending cycle with regards the major unit. N.S.E,W represent four seasons thereby ten.
Sam:
Thank you for the link to the Professor Norman Cook’s talk at ICCF 21 !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello DR Rossi
This is a link to the late
Norman Cook talk at ICCF 21.
https://youtu.be/yYzrBtU_Bis
Regards
Sam
Sam:
Well, thank you ! ( he,he,he…)
Warm Regards,
A.R.
P.S.
This morning: 0-6
Hello DR Rossi
You said the tennis article i sent
did not help your tennis game.
But this line in the article
reminded me of you.
She plays her best when she’s up against it, fearless. Her coach Sylvain Bruneau calls her a warrior and a “street fighter” — Andreescu relishes people doubting her.
Regards
Sam
Dr. Rossi,
1) Are your clients with SK installations aware of each other?
2) Do they communicate directly with each other to collaborate on improving their installations?
A reveal of their use of your wonderful technology would be more powerful if done jointly.
Cheers,
Greg Daigle
Dr Joseph Fine:
Thank you for the information and for the link !
The model of the atomic nucleus of Prof Norman Cook remains the more convincing to me and is fit in the theoretical bases I proposed in my last paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
I strongly suggest the reading of this new book of our great master, Prof Norman Cook.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Colin Watters:
1- we are improving
2- in part
3- it depends on the situations
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Sam:
Thank you for your help, but it didn’t work: still 0-6
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello DR Rossi
This is a link to the historic USA
Woman’s open tennis final.
https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.5274905
Regards
Sam
Dear Andrea, At the beginning of May (four months ago) you mentioned you were having problems with the first wave of reactors and that you consider you were still in the R&D phase, not production.
Q1:Can you tell us if you have resolved these issues?
Q2:Have you been able to start or restart production and shipping of your reactors?
Q3: If you are shipping reactors, what is the current estimated delivery time?
Dear Andrea Rossi and readers of JONP,
The 3rd edition of “Models of the Atomic Nucleus” by Norman D. Cook can be ordered via the link
below.
http://www.infinite-energy.com/resources/norman-cook.html
See also:
https://www.infinite-energy.com/store/index.php?main_page=popup_image&pID=464&zenid=g1e818sbmnc5rtko3j7qod01a3&fbclid=IwAR0EojSxgso60jbUgw6W1rYUU5bnIhd0D9jozjmzqm5v5MRqoHzDF8ADQ7g
I do not have the Table of Contents for this book and, unfortunately, Dr. Norman Cook passed away about 3 months ago. If there are any questions about the books’ contents, contact Infinite-Energy Magazine.
Best regards,
Joseph Fine
Dear Steve_save_the_climate, With what I am saying will be said but you have to have patience so as to understand what I am saying. I appreciate your comment but this is not about me. It is information that I believe people need to be made aware of for consideration. It is important but only to certain individuals able to put together what I am saying so as to understand embodied concepts that are to follow and thereby arrive at a meaningful understanding at the various levels that are required i.e. with regards a persons acumen.
Regards Eric Ashworth
Dear readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today on other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Domenico Canino:
Thank you for the suggestion,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Frank Acland:
Andrea, please be humble:
50.1%
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
you are tryng a difficult balance between electricity and heat production in a single e-cat.
Isn’t better to use a cluster of two or more e-cats, the first tuned to get only elecricity, and with this electricity you can pilot the same e-cat (if it has a good efficiency) and also the second (or more tha two) e-cat to produce heat, or elecricity, depends on what you need?
Dear Andrea,
In percentage terms, at this time what do you think the probability is that you will be able to demonstrate an E-Cat operating with no external source of energy input in 2019?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Gerard McEk:
1- There has been a theoretical evolution that appears evident if you go through the publications of mine, now all published on Researchgate.
2- No
3- Yes
4- N.A.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Stephen:
If you want to correct your insight, please do.
The JoNP does not respond of the insights of the Readers and publish their points of view as they are.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea
Thanks for correcting my error in the post from keV to MeV but unfortunately I suppose the remainder of that paragraph that I wrote about it being less than electron pair production is also not really correct.
Best Regards
Stephen.
Dear Andrea,
With regards to how the reaction in the E-cat work and your recent insight that you believe the generated energy doesn’t come from mass to energy conversion:
1. Do you still believe that the energy generated by the SK plasma is based on the same principles as of the first generation lower temperature ECats?
Some other questions:
2. When you do not succeed to make SSM work for the SK Leonardo, would that stop bringing the E-cat SK to the market as a heat energy source?
3. There is a huge upcoming market for heat distribution to houses in the Netherlands. Would you be willing to supply centralized heating stations in domestic areas for that purpose?
4. If ‘no’ for 3: What is the main reason?
Thank you. Kind regards, Gerard
Stephen,
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jorge:
Thank you for your attention,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Congratulations for your monumental
http://www.researchnet/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Dear Andrea Rossi:
I just found this interesting paper that could be relevant to both your work with Carl Oscar Gulström and to Holmlids work with dense Hydrogen decay. After starting to understand better the interesting concepts in your recent paper I thought it might be useful or relevant:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037026931830580X
I know you don’t discuss others work but there may be convergence in someways here.
I suspect for you the resonances could be interesting and for Holmlid the decay paths which also include decays to neutral Kaon and pion pairs in some cases.
The first two f0 type resonances are quite low energy 500 MeV and 980 MeV which is below typical nucleon resonances and even below those of electron positron pair generation.. I wonder when you talk about particle resonances in the e-cat if these are a candidate?
Another point I’ve been wondering is if there analogies or lessons that can be learnt from the Chiral Bag model of the nucleon?
I sometimes wonder if one was to use Wyttenbach’s (very interesting to me) SO(4) approach if different models and approaches at different scales can be resolved in a very elegant way. I guess time will tell.
Thanks and Best Regards
Stephen
Anonymous:
I am, but I could ve wrong.
Tests and studies are progressing very well.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Buck:
Never mind, correction made,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
there is a typo in yesterday’s exchange between you and I.
The exchange with Pekka was on 9/2, not 9/4.
My apologies for any confusion arising from this typo.
Buck
Jeff:
Of course yes !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
Is still Carl-Oscar Gullstrom part of your theoretical research team ?
Jeff
Matt:
1- yes
2- no, with exception of the replications made of my process. I have experts that do it for us, we do not have time presently. I’d take personally care of items should they be really interesting
3- not so far, but I know only the ones that have been published, I cannot know if there out is some “dark matter”…
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Willie:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Martin Himpe:
Surely it will, but I am not able to give a date so far.
The price should be popular.
Warm Regards,
A.R.