Dr Rossi,
Thank you for suggesting us the book “Maxwell-Dirac Theory and Ocam’s Razor: Unified Field, Elementary Particles, and Nuclear Interactions” of Gorgio Vassallo et Al. (by Amazon).
It is very useful, in particular the chapter 1 “Maxwell’s Equations and Occam’s Razor”.
Very well done also the English translation of Jed Rothwell.
All the best,
Basil
Dear Andrea, Regarding your dialogue between Frank Acland and IObservables. Am I correct in understanding that all you seek is a method to put your E-Cat SK into a self sustain mode as I am confused by your different answers provided to both readers.
Regards, Eric Ashworth
You often direct your readers to go to rossilivecat.oom to see all the posts made at Journal of Nuclear Physics (JoNP) in 1 place. Well, this may be of interest to those who come directly to rossilivecat who want to see the original post at JoNP.
Did you know that on rossilivecat, the date/time stamp that is underlined in the comments is a direct link to the original comment on JoNP no matter what page it is on.
Kevin Evans:
1- yes
2- d3epends on many factors, I want the permanent SSM, eseless to talk of transitory results.
I really hope to give this gift.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Two questions:
1- are the periods of SSM longer than they were a year ago?
2- can you indicate the percentage of SSM time respect the total time?
Thank you for your endeavor to complete this important discovery: I hope we will have a much needed Christmas gift,
Kevin Evans
Alan Folmsbee:
Thank you for sending your paper to the JoNP.
It has been passed on for peer reviewing.
In the meantime the interested readers can email to you to have the PDF.
This comment grants you the date of priority.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Remi Andre’:
Thank you for the link: it is about the Seebeck effect, thank you for the update about this technology, that I know very well. The problem of these alloys is the cost of the directional fusion. They work, but to go above the 5-10% of efficiency with a delta T of 100 Celsius degrees is very expensive and the efficiency does not pay for it. This has been my experience.
I made a patent granted by the US Patent Office on this matter, owned by LTI, in the late nineties, but the following attempt of industrialization has been disappointing.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Dr Rossi,
I wrote a new paper on the nuclear structure of Chromium.
The title is ” Antiferromagnetic Nucleus of Cr “, June 3 2019.
This adds evidence to the theory of the static nucleus and confirms it is correct.
Chromium is the sole element that is antiferromagnetic and his shape gives a plausible geometric reason for the antiferromagnetism.
This paper defines the N and S poles of an atom.
The sphere stacking uses a lattice called “face armored cubic”.
Please publish this on the Journal of Nuclear Physics.
Alan Folmsbee
Frank Acland:
It is impossible to answer, because our problems could be resolved in a week or in months: it is impossible to know. I still hope 2019.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I don’t think it is something that will be required for the e-cat, because it will be able to provide a steady baseline power, but it is very interesting for renewables nonetheless.
Dear Readers of JONP, Camphor C10H16O,
Gaston Naessens 714X one such example of a brilliant independent researcher persecuted for his knowledge and frowned upon for his abilities because of him being a health professional. Used by many people and myself with great success. I do not wish to stray into medicine but the 714X formulae is related to chemical energy. The somatascope is related to wave energy, same as chemical only wave. That’s why I used it. Gaston was a biologist and I am guessing he did not know how the mechanism activated the cure. Carbon and Oxygen are anchors. Hydrogen together with the salts represent the magic to reverse the cellular densifying activity. The activity of 714X is related to the s.s.m. of the E-Cat. Camphor has absolutely nothing to do with it, 714X is cellular medical. The E-Cat is nuclear.
Regards, Eric Ashworth
Sam, The story of Alexander Von Humbolt is an example of a true scientist, brave, curious and unrelenting. Qualities that are sometimes frowned upon in our modern age.
Regards, Eric Ashworth
Eric Ashworth:
The information posted by Drew G. was a mockery. He intended to mock us all.
It passed through the spamming robot because Drew G had been always accepted before. I spammed it when I read the links.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, The information posted by Drew G I found entertaining with no substance. I do not believe it was posted to be malicious towards yourself as I was about to point out some relevant facts regarding the supposed revolutionary battery technology. The subject of free energy, is as you are aware comparable to a hot potato in the energy sector even though it falls within the realms of science and technology and therefore, the article had to be all fluff with no substance except that of asking for money for development.
Regards, Eric Ashworth
Dear Andrea,
Completely off-topic. Someone filmed me yesterday when I played the piano at Tartu Observatory during ESTCube workshop. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vs8rwmKHoc
regards, /pekka
Basil Loken:
I agree. That book is on my working desk.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Thank you for suggesting us the book “Maxwell-Dirac Theory and Ocam’s Razor: Unified Field, Elementary Particles, and Nuclear Interactions” of Gorgio Vassallo et Al. (by Amazon).
It is very useful, in particular the chapter 1 “Maxwell’s Equations and Occam’s Razor”.
Very well done also the English translation of Jed Rothwell.
All the best,
Basil
Dear Andrea
Your publication
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
has mandatorily to be read while watching
http://www.ecatskdemo.com
to understand in full what is written there.
I am not surprised it is among the most read nuclear physics papers published on Researchgate and the one that has received more recommendations from the scientists that read Researchgate and publish their papers on it.
Cheers
Mina
Dear Andrea,
Your last comment is totally wrong.
Either You do not want to tell us which problems You have, or You simply cannot, or there are none.
Maybe You know the game “taboo”…. try it like this.
Dear Andrea, Regarding your dialogue between Frank Acland and IObservables. Am I correct in understanding that all you seek is a method to put your E-Cat SK into a self sustain mode as I am confused by your different answers provided to both readers.
Regards, Eric Ashworth
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ulrich W.A. Kranz:
Welcome back !
The heat will be used by the Customers.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
After your quest to reach the permanent SSM, what will happen to the heat ?
Ulrich W.A. Kranz
Dan C.:
thanks for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonymous:
He he he…
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
You often direct your readers to go to rossilivecat.oom to see all the posts made at Journal of Nuclear Physics (JoNP) in 1 place. Well, this may be of interest to those who come directly to rossilivecat who want to see the original post at JoNP.
Did you know that on rossilivecat, the date/time stamp that is underlined in the comments is a direct link to the original comment on JoNP no matter what page it is on.
Warm regards,
Dan C.
IObservable:
It is not possible to say nothing technical to explain technical issues without saying banalities.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Kevin Evans:
1- yes
2- d3epends on many factors, I want the permanent SSM, eseless to talk of transitory results.
I really hope to give this gift.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Two questions:
1- are the periods of SSM longer than they were a year ago?
2- can you indicate the percentage of SSM time respect the total time?
Thank you for your endeavor to complete this important discovery: I hope we will have a much needed Christmas gift,
Kevin Evans
Dear Andrea,
which restricted knowledge ? I am sure, You can tell us something not too technical, without violating and company-secrets, can’t You ?
Alan Folmsbee:
Thank you for sending your paper to the JoNP.
It has been passed on for peer reviewing.
In the meantime the interested readers can email to you to have the PDF.
This comment grants you the date of priority.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
IObservable:
I cannot give this information, because it would contain restricted knowledge.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Remi Andre’:
Thank you for the link: it is about the Seebeck effect, thank you for the update about this technology, that I know very well. The problem of these alloys is the cost of the directional fusion. They work, but to go above the 5-10% of efficiency with a delta T of 100 Celsius degrees is very expensive and the efficiency does not pay for it. This has been my experience.
I made a patent granted by the US Patent Office on this matter, owned by LTI, in the late nineties, but the following attempt of industrialization has been disappointing.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear M.Rossi
Did you know about this new way of converting heat into electricity ?
https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.138001
Best regards
Rémi André
Dear Andrea…
regarding Your answer to Frank Acland: Which exact problems Do You face ?
Hello Dr Rossi,
I wrote a new paper on the nuclear structure of Chromium.
The title is ” Antiferromagnetic Nucleus of Cr “, June 3 2019.
This adds evidence to the theory of the static nucleus and confirms it is correct.
Chromium is the sole element that is antiferromagnetic and his shape gives a plausible geometric reason for the antiferromagnetism.
This paper defines the N and S poles of an atom.
The sphere stacking uses a lattice called “face armored cubic”.
Please publish this on the Journal of Nuclear Physics.
Alan Folmsbee
Frank Acland:
It is impossible to answer, because our problems could be resolved in a week or in months: it is impossible to know. I still hope 2019.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Realistically, what do you think your % chances are of achieving SSM in 2019?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Enrico:
We are working on it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Xavier Pitz:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Rod Walton:
Thank you for the information.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
On Power Engineering issue of October 29 2019:
ACWA Power building 250 MW Solar PV in Ethiopia
Rod Walton
Dear Andrea,
I’d like to share a link about an interesting energy storage technology :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nu9zLOBi0-E
I don’t think it is something that will be required for the e-cat, because it will be able to provide a steady baseline power, but it is very interesting for renewables nonetheless.
Cryogenic Regards 😉
Xavier
Dear Andrea,
meanwhile looking for stable SSM condition, does your SK give substantial and useful electrical energy level ?
All the best
Enrico
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonymous:
If we succeed to make the SSM, the COP will have zero at the denominator.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Raymend:
I still hope so.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi, still thinking the presentation can be made this year?
@714X
Dear Readers of JONP, Camphor C10H16O,
Gaston Naessens 714X one such example of a brilliant independent researcher persecuted for his knowledge and frowned upon for his abilities because of him being a health professional. Used by many people and myself with great success. I do not wish to stray into medicine but the 714X formulae is related to chemical energy. The somatascope is related to wave energy, same as chemical only wave. That’s why I used it. Gaston was a biologist and I am guessing he did not know how the mechanism activated the cure. Carbon and Oxygen are anchors. Hydrogen together with the salts represent the magic to reverse the cellular densifying activity. The activity of 714X is related to the s.s.m. of the E-Cat. Camphor has absolutely nothing to do with it, 714X is cellular medical. The E-Cat is nuclear.
Regards, Eric Ashworth
Sam, The story of Alexander Von Humbolt is an example of a true scientist, brave, curious and unrelenting. Qualities that are sometimes frowned upon in our modern age.
Regards, Eric Ashworth
Sam:
Yes, this is interesting. E-Frog !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello DR Rossi
This is an interesting article
on the Research Scientist
Alexander von Humboldt.
https://www.insidescience.org/news/bold-and-bewildering-curiosity-alexander-von-humboldt
Regards
Sam
Frank Acland:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Eric Ashworth:
The information posted by Drew G. was a mockery. He intended to mock us all.
It passed through the spamming robot because Drew G had been always accepted before. I spammed it when I read the links.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, The information posted by Drew G I found entertaining with no substance. I do not believe it was posted to be malicious towards yourself as I was about to point out some relevant facts regarding the supposed revolutionary battery technology. The subject of free energy, is as you are aware comparable to a hot potato in the energy sector even though it falls within the realms of science and technology and therefore, the article had to be all fluff with no substance except that of asking for money for development.
Regards, Eric Ashworth
Dear Andrea,
Have you made any significant progress on your quest towards SSM in recent days?
Kind regards,
Frank Acland
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jan W. Wiger:
Good question. We are working very hard on it. Maybe sooner than expected.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Mr Andrea Rossi,
I’m learning about your invention and wondering when it will be available to all of us,
Best Regards,
Jan W. Wiger
Drew G.:
Thank you for the information and for your kind sustain,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Pekka Janhunen:
Bravo !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Completely off-topic. Someone filmed me yesterday when I played the piano at Tartu Observatory during ESTCube workshop. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vs8rwmKHoc
regards, /pekka
Sam:
Interesting, thank you.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jos:
Not completely. We think all the theories explained are integrated.
Thanki you for your attention to our work.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
I watched
http://www.ecatskdemo.com
while studying the paper
http://www.researchnet/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
and I made many discoveries, among which I discovered that the par. 4 is the most close to explain the gain. Do you agree?
Jos