Frederick Somerville:
Because a permanent SSM made directly from the plasma of the Ecat is universal.
About the Sterling engines: I got many offers, but no one has been convincing for efficiency, reliability and costs.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
You already have a high COP and with a Sterling engine you could close the circle.
Why are you losing more time with the quest for a permanent SSM ?
Frederick Somerville
Dear Andrea, There is no link regarding this issue, if there was I would provide it. As I have informed in previous posts and to that of many private people who have asked similar questions to my information. My reply has always been and
still is, ‘how does information get into a book’? i.e. where does it come from. What I have discovered is, some information is very easy to publish whereas some is impossible without self publishing due to censorship and this is where your blog is of irrefutable value with regards free speech regarding subjects considered highly specialized by the establishment. I too have been on a learning experience in more than one way. One of which being the difficulty encountered by bureaucracy, a necessary establishment to govern human evolution in a controlled environment.
Fortunately there comes a time when the shackles have to be loosened and here I am referring to the internet with its associated problems of information overload i.e. sorting that which is intelligent from that which is pure garbage. As an example we all know that pi = 3.14159. This mathematical constant, I believe, is of Greek origin. Used by masons to work out floor tiles etc. and it works very well but I can inform readers of the JONP that when pi is used to work out energy it equals 4 not 3.14159. and this can be proved mathematically when you apply it to a systemic system. The boomerang travels on a circumference i.e. from alpha to omega with its trinity of energy, being positive, neutral and negative. These potentials are actually time dimensions and this is where the final frontier in physics comes to the forefront. The radius can be represented by a Capital G. The diameter by a capital D. and the circumference by O. Pile them on top of one another and spin the symbol on its axis to create a circle containing a cross or pie containing four pieces. Is this pure garbage or the truth?. Is there such a thing as a secret that has been deliberately withheld for necessary reasons and is it still being covered up?. I do not want to join the conspiracy theory regime, I have no time for such nonsense. A person can speculate all he wants but without sufficient information you cannot make a correct decision. Maybe to put the E-Cat into self sustain mode you do not need to know that pi = 4. because I am aware that we each have our own unique methods of approach to solving any problem but maybe you do.
Regards Eric Ashworth.
@Brett Tharrington,
The statistics of the publication http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
are continuing to get stunning and more stunning.
This publication has reached today 30036 full readings, and counting.
All the publications of Andrea Rossi on Researchgate (there are 6 of them in total) have reached as of today 33264 full readings, 1310 Recommendations, 436.4 index of research interest, 15 citations, and counting all of them.
These numbers are a remarkable evidence of the attention of the scientific world on the work of Andrea Rossi.
Prof
Dear Dr Rossi,
Does the Leonardo Corporation employ a sales staff?
One of the largest “energy hogs” in the USA (and in Dade County, Florida) is the cement manufacturing industry. Cement production is a thermal energy intensive process, which requires heating solid particles up to 1450°C and cooling it down. You would not even be required to venture beyond your own county, to greatly accelerate your sales.
Best regards,
James C Yates
Giuseppe:
We will present a working product.
Similar to the one shown in http://www.ecatskdemo.com
with the difference that it will be able to power itself in permanent ssm.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
once you have reached the SSM what will happen, you will do just a press release or you will do a demonstration or you will present a working product or something else.
Regards, Giuseppe
Gerard McEk:
Thank you for your insight, and for the suggestions, apart the unconsolable situation of my tennis record playing with my wife. There is no remedy to that. About the Ecat SK Leonardo I am more optimist.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I am pleased to read that your quest to SSM is progressing in the right direction.
As with all people, following your struggle, we can just assume where you encounter problems, because NDA prohibits you telling us details. However, being an electrical engineer my thoughts tend to assume electrical issues may trouble you.
Combining these with your theoretical work, where you mention ‘dense electron aggregates’ and having read in Ken Schoulders work that mentions EVO’s (Exotic Vacuum Objects, which may be the same as these dense electron aggregates) and their ability to travel though metals, I think maybe these EVO’s maybe in the cause of the problems that trouble you. So I think EVO’s travel through the wires to your semiconductor electronics and destroy it.
Ken Schoulders also gave a remedy for this: layers of conductors and insulators stop EVO’s.
Translated to your situation: Feed the plasma via capacitors. For that you need to have high frequency AC. Use high frequency, high voltage capacitors and maybe, if these capacitors are destroyed, more than one in series.
Obviously this is a very speculative advice, not really knowing what the problem(s) is(are). I probably could have advised you to play tennis with your wife just as good, which may be as effective (I.e. no remedy to the problem), but many of us just want you to succeed. This advice is free of charge.
Kind regards, Gerard
Dear Andrea!
Regarding my question today 2/11 -19 06:40
I mean that you have placed an E-catSK with a customer, who buys the heat-energy cheaper than the customer earlier have payed. Is this working as you haved planned?
Best regards
Nils Fryklund
Dear Andrea, Also, just a small point as I do not wish to distract from the important subject of nuclear physics but Australian aboriginals sometimes decorate their returning boomerangs with snakes in the shape of a wave, filled with dots like particles. Also crop circles to me look similar to aboriginal art. This I find interesting and I thought maybe yourself and readers of the JONP would also.
Regards Eric Ashworth
Dr Joseph Fine:
He,he,he…of course “cigar” in this case is figurative! As a former marathonete I am not a smoker. As you know, “no cigar” is an expression used in the research environment to mean “no celebration”, since expensive cigars are usually smoked to celebrate something, something like it happens with champagne.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Nils Fryklund,
1- I do not understand what you mean with “outsourcing” in this context: please rephrase to allow a precise answer
2- We are working for that, but I cannot talk of dates yet. Surely the progress during these very days has been substantial.
3- same as in 2
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, I can see that many people are now asking more specific questions regarding this final frontier in physics. I would like to make a statement that maybe both yourself and Prof will get a chuckle out of.
Unlike Prof I did not buy the book “Maxwell – Dirac Theory and Occam’s Razor” Unified Field, Elementary Particles and Nuclear Interactions. You reference Chapter 1. page 19 and see page 15. M = 0 (wey equation) solution a spinnor field etc. etc. ending the velocity of an electron at any time equals the velocity of light. Anyway, to cut a long story short, I was in Australia in 1985 and had very little to do, other than get into my pet subject, being the atom and its composition. Energy as I have previously stated is directly related to geometry and maths. Thereby M = 0 of a spinnor field. I was fortunate enough one day to watch an Australian aboriginal throw his returning boomerang (not at the velocity of light) which I would refer to as a spinnor of a field. I do get a laugh out of this quite often, when thinking back but as you know, you can by using simple geometry and maths work out the technical aspects of the field of a returning boomerang. I think Mr Occam would agree.
The puzzle for me as time progressed was how did the Australian aboriginal ancestors develop such a remarkable piece of equipment. The boomerang does not only demonstrate aerodynamics but a far more important aspect of physics connected to that of the final frontier. At least for me it did. Of course we all have our own peculiar method of approach to solve any problem. I am not being sarcastic but very serious to a serious subject.
Regards, Eric Ashworth
P.S. I look forward with anticipation to your much deserved final victory.
Dear Andrea!
1. Is the outsourcing of E-catSK working as good as you hoped?
2. Here in Sweden I (76 year old) am waiting for the home-E-cat still
one winter. My little house (80 m2) need electricity-heating for
about 2.500 USD/year. Do you think that I can buy one about 6KW E-
cat during 2020?
3. Can´t you persuade any customer just to mention on your blog that
E-catSK works for them, since it still seems unbelievable?
Are the major problems remaining to be solved, before you cross the “finish line” related to:
1. Control of the “Ballerina”?
2. the energy conversion efficiency in directly generating electricity?
3. Energy dissipation issues?
4. component reliability issues?
5. manufacturing issues?
In answer to my somewhat detailed question regarding SSM you answered with a brief “No”.
1. Can you clarify further?
2. If so, when in the permanent SSM mode, is the “ballerina” running without control?
3. When in the permanent SSM mode, does your control unit consume any power?
4. When in the permanent SSM mode, can you actively change the ballerina output energy?
5. Is your immediate goal to produce direct-to-electrical output (no conversion to electricity by light or heat)?
My interpretation of the current situation is that, you, your team, partners, and likely technical / legal / scientific advisers (all under NDA’s), are investigating a new and novel energy production system, based on your development of a new understanding of basic nuclear interactions.
If the SSM (Self Sustaining Mode) technology addition to the E-Cat can be engineered to be robust and reliant to the point of being publicly demonstrated, this will provide proof in addition to the main E-Cat charge technology proof for the new understanding of the underlying nuclear interactions.
If confirmed, this new understanding may lead to all involved being party to multiple patents for new devices and technologies, ground-breaking scientific papers and additional products to develop.
It would be understandable that all the parties involved would like time to confirm the definite existence of the new understanding and have proof that can stand up to scrutiny of what will be a hostile sceptical scientific establishment, to have time to be the first to explore the new territories being opened up, to tie up the benefits, file the patents, to write the papers, to have time to prepare and jointly agree on the logistics of how to move forward.
So understandably you are likely in the middle of a very complex situation, one where possibly not everything is under your control, a situation where you will have to agree with your partners the timing of when and how you go public.
I wish you well on your enterprise going forward, you are likely in the middle of a very complex time consuming stressfull situation, but please take time to look after your health.
I assume this is a continuous state of eCat reaction without an initiation signal.
From your previous public demonstrations, it appears you use three different signal types:
a. A sensor signal (perhaps triangular waveforms, positive and negative going) that sense the condition of the eCat “ballerina”;
b. A continuation signal that corrects or adjusts the ongoing eCat “ballerina”; and
c. A initiation signal that creates the eCat “ballerina”.
Dear Andrea, I agree, the answers you refer to are not contradictory but they are different and from what I understand the difference is the correct answer to both of the posted questions. One being to an unavailable time line and the other being that of confidentiality. This I understand as being due to the nature of the subject being the final frontier in physics, referred to by Prof Oct 31st.
Regards Eric Ashworth.
Prof:
Chapter 1 “Maxwell Equations and Occam’s Razor”, page 19:
“The new formulation of the Maxwell’s equations expressed by 1.3.27 [ see pag. 15 ] is quite similar to the Dirac-Hestenes equation for m = 0 ( Weyl equation ). In all cases the solution is a spinor field. A spinor is a mathematical object that in space-time algebra is simply a multivector of even grade components.
The motion of a massless charge that moves at the speed of light can be described using a composition of a rotation in the Lambda x-Lambda y plane followed by a scaled hyperbolic rotation in the Lambda z-Lambda t plane and can be encoded in the real Clifford 3,1 algebra with a single spinor.
At this point the Authors are encouraged by an interesting sentence of P.A.M. Dirac. In fact, in his Nobel lecture held in 1933, Dirac proposed an electron model in which a charge moves at the speed of light:
” It is found that an electron which seems to us to be moving slowly, must actually have a very high frequency oscillatory motion of small amplitude superposed on the regular motion which appears to us. As a result of this oscillatory motion, the velocity of an electron at any time equals the velocity of light ”
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I too bought the book “Maxwell-Dirac Theory and Occam’s Razor: Unified Field, Elementary Particles, and Nuclear Interactions”: which is the most important page of it related to the Ecat?
Thank you if you can answer,
Prof
Mina Montoya:
I too think that what makes it interesting is the coherence between theoretical considerations and experimental work.
Thank you for your kind attention to our work,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
Yes.
I am very hopeful for the next 2-3 weeks. We are working like dogs.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frederick Somerville:
Because a permanent SSM made directly from the plasma of the Ecat is universal.
About the Sterling engines: I got many offers, but no one has been convincing for efficiency, reliability and costs.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Is your recent success connected with the testing of new apparatus that is working as hoped?
Best wishes,
Frank Acland
Sam:
Thank you for the interesting link.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello DR Rossi
This is a video link to
the inventor of the Photo
Copier Chester Carlson.
https://youtu.be/1Vn1lOeMLI4
Regards
Sam
Dr Rossi,
You already have a high COP and with a Sterling engine you could close the circle.
Why are you losing more time with the quest for a permanent SSM ?
Frederick Somerville
James C Yates:
Thank you for the suggestion.
I agree.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Eric Ashworth,
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, There is no link regarding this issue, if there was I would provide it. As I have informed in previous posts and to that of many private people who have asked similar questions to my information. My reply has always been and
still is, ‘how does information get into a book’? i.e. where does it come from. What I have discovered is, some information is very easy to publish whereas some is impossible without self publishing due to censorship and this is where your blog is of irrefutable value with regards free speech regarding subjects considered highly specialized by the establishment. I too have been on a learning experience in more than one way. One of which being the difficulty encountered by bureaucracy, a necessary establishment to govern human evolution in a controlled environment.
Fortunately there comes a time when the shackles have to be loosened and here I am referring to the internet with its associated problems of information overload i.e. sorting that which is intelligent from that which is pure garbage. As an example we all know that pi = 3.14159. This mathematical constant, I believe, is of Greek origin. Used by masons to work out floor tiles etc. and it works very well but I can inform readers of the JONP that when pi is used to work out energy it equals 4 not 3.14159. and this can be proved mathematically when you apply it to a systemic system. The boomerang travels on a circumference i.e. from alpha to omega with its trinity of energy, being positive, neutral and negative. These potentials are actually time dimensions and this is where the final frontier in physics comes to the forefront. The radius can be represented by a Capital G. The diameter by a capital D. and the circumference by O. Pile them on top of one another and spin the symbol on its axis to create a circle containing a cross or pie containing four pieces. Is this pure garbage or the truth?. Is there such a thing as a secret that has been deliberately withheld for necessary reasons and is it still being covered up?. I do not want to join the conspiracy theory regime, I have no time for such nonsense. A person can speculate all he wants but without sufficient information you cannot make a correct decision. Maybe to put the E-Cat into self sustain mode you do not need to know that pi = 4. because I am aware that we each have our own unique methods of approach to solving any problem but maybe you do.
Regards Eric Ashworth.
@Brett Tharrington,
The statistics of the publication
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
are continuing to get stunning and more stunning.
This publication has reached today 30036 full readings, and counting.
All the publications of Andrea Rossi on Researchgate (there are 6 of them in total) have reached as of today 33264 full readings, 1310 Recommendations, 436.4 index of research interest, 15 citations, and counting all of them.
These numbers are a remarkable evidence of the attention of the scientific world on the work of Andrea Rossi.
Prof
Dear Dr Rossi,
Does the Leonardo Corporation employ a sales staff?
One of the largest “energy hogs” in the USA (and in Dade County, Florida) is the cement manufacturing industry. Cement production is a thermal energy intensive process, which requires heating solid particles up to 1450°C and cooling it down. You would not even be required to venture beyond your own county, to greatly accelerate your sales.
Best regards,
James C Yates
Giuseppe:
We will present a working product.
Similar to the one shown in
http://www.ecatskdemo.com
with the difference that it will be able to power itself in permanent ssm.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
once you have reached the SSM what will happen, you will do just a press release or you will do a demonstration or you will present a working product or something else.
Regards, Giuseppe
Nils Fryklund:
Thank you for the rephrasing.
The answer is: yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gerard McEk:
Thank you for your insight, and for the suggestions, apart the unconsolable situation of my tennis record playing with my wife. There is no remedy to that. About the Ecat SK Leonardo I am more optimist.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I am pleased to read that your quest to SSM is progressing in the right direction.
As with all people, following your struggle, we can just assume where you encounter problems, because NDA prohibits you telling us details. However, being an electrical engineer my thoughts tend to assume electrical issues may trouble you.
Combining these with your theoretical work, where you mention ‘dense electron aggregates’ and having read in Ken Schoulders work that mentions EVO’s (Exotic Vacuum Objects, which may be the same as these dense electron aggregates) and their ability to travel though metals, I think maybe these EVO’s maybe in the cause of the problems that trouble you. So I think EVO’s travel through the wires to your semiconductor electronics and destroy it.
Ken Schoulders also gave a remedy for this: layers of conductors and insulators stop EVO’s.
Translated to your situation: Feed the plasma via capacitors. For that you need to have high frequency AC. Use high frequency, high voltage capacitors and maybe, if these capacitors are destroyed, more than one in series.
Obviously this is a very speculative advice, not really knowing what the problem(s) is(are). I probably could have advised you to play tennis with your wife just as good, which may be as effective (I.e. no remedy to the problem), but many of us just want you to succeed. This advice is free of charge.
Kind regards, Gerard
Dear Andrea!
Regarding my question today 2/11 -19 06:40
I mean that you have placed an E-catSK with a customer, who buys the heat-energy cheaper than the customer earlier have payed. Is this working as you haved planned?
Best regards
Nils Fryklund
Eric Ashworth:
Why don’t you send here some link about this issue ?
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, Also, just a small point as I do not wish to distract from the important subject of nuclear physics but Australian aboriginals sometimes decorate their returning boomerangs with snakes in the shape of a wave, filled with dots like particles. Also crop circles to me look similar to aboriginal art. This I find interesting and I thought maybe yourself and readers of the JONP would also.
Regards Eric Ashworth
Steven N. Karels:
mainly 2 and 4
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Joseph Fine:
He,he,he…of course “cigar” in this case is figurative! As a former marathonete I am not a smoker. As you know, “no cigar” is an expression used in the research environment to mean “no celebration”, since expensive cigars are usually smoked to celebrate something, something like it happens with champagne.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Nils Fryklund,
1- I do not understand what you mean with “outsourcing” in this context: please rephrase to allow a precise answer
2- We are working for that, but I cannot talk of dates yet. Surely the progress during these very days has been substantial.
3- same as in 2
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Eric Ashworth:
Very interesting.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, I can see that many people are now asking more specific questions regarding this final frontier in physics. I would like to make a statement that maybe both yourself and Prof will get a chuckle out of.
Unlike Prof I did not buy the book “Maxwell – Dirac Theory and Occam’s Razor” Unified Field, Elementary Particles and Nuclear Interactions. You reference Chapter 1. page 19 and see page 15. M = 0 (wey equation) solution a spinnor field etc. etc. ending the velocity of an electron at any time equals the velocity of light. Anyway, to cut a long story short, I was in Australia in 1985 and had very little to do, other than get into my pet subject, being the atom and its composition. Energy as I have previously stated is directly related to geometry and maths. Thereby M = 0 of a spinnor field. I was fortunate enough one day to watch an Australian aboriginal throw his returning boomerang (not at the velocity of light) which I would refer to as a spinnor of a field. I do get a laugh out of this quite often, when thinking back but as you know, you can by using simple geometry and maths work out the technical aspects of the field of a returning boomerang. I think Mr Occam would agree.
The puzzle for me as time progressed was how did the Australian aboriginal ancestors develop such a remarkable piece of equipment. The boomerang does not only demonstrate aerodynamics but a far more important aspect of physics connected to that of the final frontier. At least for me it did. Of course we all have our own peculiar method of approach to solve any problem. I am not being sarcastic but very serious to a serious subject.
Regards, Eric Ashworth
P.S. I look forward with anticipation to your much deserved final victory.
Dear Andrea!
1. Is the outsourcing of E-catSK working as good as you hoped?
2. Here in Sweden I (76 year old) am waiting for the home-E-cat still
one winter. My little house (80 m2) need electricity-heating for
about 2.500 USD/year. Do you think that I can buy one about 6KW E-
cat during 2020?
3. Can´t you persuade any customer just to mention on your blog that
E-catSK works for them, since it still seems unbelievable?
Best regards
Nils Fryklund
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Thank you for the update.
As for the Cigar, you don’t actually have to smoke it.
You can show it in a picture.
But, from health considerations, you probably wouldn’t want to smoke it .
We want you to stay in the self sustaining mode.
Healthy regards,
Joseph Fine
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Thank you for your clarifications.
Are the major problems remaining to be solved, before you cross the “finish line” related to:
1. Control of the “Ballerina”?
2. the energy conversion efficiency in directly generating electricity?
3. Energy dissipation issues?
4. component reliability issues?
5. manufacturing issues?
KeithT:
You are right.
Thank you for your empathy.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
I honestly think we are very close to the finish line. maybe a matter of weeks.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven N. Karels:
1- see below
2- no
3- yes, but it is supplied directly drom the Ecat itself
4- yes
5- yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
In answer to my somewhat detailed question regarding SSM you answered with a brief “No”.
1. Can you clarify further?
2. If so, when in the permanent SSM mode, is the “ballerina” running without control?
3. When in the permanent SSM mode, does your control unit consume any power?
4. When in the permanent SSM mode, can you actively change the ballerina output energy?
5. Is your immediate goal to produce direct-to-electrical output (no conversion to electricity by light or heat)?
Dear Andrea,
Has the ‘enormous step forward’ been enough to get you to the finish line, or if not can you at least see the cigar from here?
Thank you,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea,
My interpretation of the current situation is that, you, your team, partners, and likely technical / legal / scientific advisers (all under NDA’s), are investigating a new and novel energy production system, based on your development of a new understanding of basic nuclear interactions.
If the SSM (Self Sustaining Mode) technology addition to the E-Cat can be engineered to be robust and reliant to the point of being publicly demonstrated, this will provide proof in addition to the main E-Cat charge technology proof for the new understanding of the underlying nuclear interactions.
If confirmed, this new understanding may lead to all involved being party to multiple patents for new devices and technologies, ground-breaking scientific papers and additional products to develop.
It would be understandable that all the parties involved would like time to confirm the definite existence of the new understanding and have proof that can stand up to scrutiny of what will be a hostile sceptical scientific establishment, to have time to be the first to explore the new territories being opened up, to tie up the benefits, file the patents, to write the papers, to have time to prepare and jointly agree on the logistics of how to move forward.
So understandably you are likely in the middle of a very complex situation, one where possibly not everything is under your control, a situation where you will have to agree with your partners the timing of when and how you go public.
I wish you well on your enterprise going forward, you are likely in the middle of a very complex time consuming stressfull situation, but please take time to look after your health.
Regards,
Keith Thomson.
Eric Ashworth:
Thank you for your intelligent insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Mitchell Caprio:
Enormous step forward yesterday and today.
We are going on faster now.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Raissa:
Thank you for your attention to our work,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven N. Karels:
No.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
You posted on JONP “I want the permanent SSM”
I assume this is a continuous state of eCat reaction without an initiation signal.
From your previous public demonstrations, it appears you use three different signal types:
a. A sensor signal (perhaps triangular waveforms, positive and negative going) that sense the condition of the eCat “ballerina”;
b. A continuation signal that corrects or adjusts the ongoing eCat “ballerina”; and
c. A initiation signal that creates the eCat “ballerina”.
Is this consistent with your meaning?
Dr Rossi,
Thank you for the video
http://www.ecatskdemo.com
a gold mine of information, together with
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Waiting for the Ecat SK Leonardo!
Raissa
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
How is going on your R&D for the Ecat SK Leonardo to obtain permanent self sustaining mode ? Any news ?
Dear Andrea, I agree, the answers you refer to are not contradictory but they are different and from what I understand the difference is the correct answer to both of the posted questions. One being to an unavailable time line and the other being that of confidentiality. This I understand as being due to the nature of the subject being the final frontier in physics, referred to by Prof Oct 31st.
Regards Eric Ashworth.
Prof:
Chapter 1 “Maxwell Equations and Occam’s Razor”, page 19:
“The new formulation of the Maxwell’s equations expressed by 1.3.27 [ see pag. 15 ] is quite similar to the Dirac-Hestenes equation for m = 0 ( Weyl equation ). In all cases the solution is a spinor field. A spinor is a mathematical object that in space-time algebra is simply a multivector of even grade components.
The motion of a massless charge that moves at the speed of light can be described using a composition of a rotation in the Lambda x-Lambda y plane followed by a scaled hyperbolic rotation in the Lambda z-Lambda t plane and can be encoded in the real Clifford 3,1 algebra with a single spinor.
At this point the Authors are encouraged by an interesting sentence of P.A.M. Dirac. In fact, in his Nobel lecture held in 1933, Dirac proposed an electron model in which a charge moves at the speed of light:
” It is found that an electron which seems to us to be moving slowly, must actually have a very high frequency oscillatory motion of small amplitude superposed on the regular motion which appears to us. As a result of this oscillatory motion, the velocity of an electron at any time equals the velocity of light ”
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I too bought the book “Maxwell-Dirac Theory and Occam’s Razor: Unified Field, Elementary Particles, and Nuclear Interactions”: which is the most important page of it related to the Ecat?
Thank you if you can answer,
Prof
Eric Ashworth.
I think like You.
Ben:
Yes, it helps to save time.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Do you make use of the Clifford algebra for your calculations?
Eric Ashworth:
It seems to me that both answers are not contradictory.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
IObservable:
Thank you for your opinion and for your suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Mina Montoya:
I too think that what makes it interesting is the coherence between theoretical considerations and experimental work.
Thank you for your kind attention to our work,
Warm Regards,
A.R.