Hypothetically speaking, if there were no more problems with the one megawatt E-Cat plant, and everything was smooth sailing, on what exact date would the E-Cat test end?
Dear AR
I am running the latest Firefox 43.0.4
There is still no picture appearing on the startup page of Ecat.com, and the arrows selecting different media do nothing.
Everything works fine on Chrome.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I have been inspired from the story of your life reported in your website http://www.andrea-rossi.com
You have evidence of all what is described there?
God bless you,
Brendon
Alessandro Coppi:
You have problems of bandwidth: I am sorry, our website is heavy, it takes a good bandwidth to go fast…we had to choose between a complete website , but demanding a good bandwidth, or a lighter one and we have chosen the first option.
I am very sorry, but with a narrow band you need patience.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
LookMoo:
I am devastated, you have discovered one of the foundamentals of our know how here: banging the reactors walls with a rubber hammer to restore their stability; now, what can I do? What can I do ? What can I do ? Who goes to the ownership to tell the news about this confidentiality breach ?
Desperate Regards,
A.R.
Stephen:
I cannot give informations about the exact reason of the issues we had, because they involve confidential know how related to the 1 MW plant.
We have also patents in preparation related to the amendments we utilized.
Thank you for your insight.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I am enjoying the navigation in http://www.leonardocorporation.com
It is an encyclopedia of the LENR, there is so much to learn.
Very rich.
Thank you,
P.B.
Kourtney Houtkooper:
Collecting and filing all the slandering material with the help of my attorney. The bill will be sent when the E-Cats will be diffused in the market. I attack only when I have 90% of probabilities to win.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I noticed that from the day one of the new website http://www.leonardocorporation.com and now many corrections have been made: do all these correction depend from the Readers of this blog?
Thanks,
Samuels
Its good news that you managed to get the devices back to stability. It sounds like you are able to manage the parameters of these devices quite well which is a good sign I think for their robustness and controllability.
Can you say if the change of efficiency is due to the reaction it self or some external factors such as the thermal performance of the overall device?
Are all the units affected or is it still limited to certain modules?
If it is the reaction it self perhaps it is a blessing in disguise: Since you mentioned you are recording the data from the device including maybe the gamma spectra perhaps this change in performance give you very valuable information regarding the reaction and yours and Norman Cook’s Hypothesis regarding Mössbauer nuclei and the Rossi effect and maybe your other theories and ideas. It has been asked elsewhere if the change in performance could be due to fuel exhaustion. Could it be that the changes are rather due to occasional low rate changes in the Catalyst rather than the fuel? Perhaps changes could occur due to occasional transmutations, Proton capture or maybe other more subtle nuclear affects that have an impact on the energy levels? If the Mössbauer nuclei are affected then maybe amount of source the energy is diminished, if the non Mössbauer nuclei responsible for the Rossi affect and low energy Gamma perhaps the conversion of this energy is less efficient. Then retuning allows a new but better balance. Either way I suppose the affect might be visible in any changes in the gamma spectra and may help inform the theory behind the process. Perhaps this data during changes in efficiency is very useful for refining and verifying to some extent your hypothesis and ideas.
Perhaps I am speculating a bit much so please feel free to edit my comment if it covers points you prefer not to discuss at this time.
You have previously underlined the importance of your control-system (the computer) for successfully maintaining a stable and controlled operation of the eCat..
Did you adjust the operational parameters of your control-system to restore the operation back to normal… or was you just banking the reactor walls with a rubber hammer???
Gerard McEk:
The COP has slightly diminished its value, but we stopped the tendency to go lower, now it is stable.
The test will be defined positive or negative when the 350 days of operation will have been completed.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
You wrote that after a long night fight you have assessed the lowering COP problem.
Can you tell us if that means that the COP is back to normal, or were some other issues solved that were bothering you because of the decreasing COP?
Can you define when you consider the test positive?
Thanks and kind regards, Gerard
I have been following your work with great interest since 2011. You have inspired me to conduct 100’s of experiments in pursuit of LENR. I failed to produce any evidence of excess heating with light water and nickel electrolysis. Later, using information from the Lugano report fuel analysis, I had some experiments that seemed promising. The most promising was an experiment conducted in March of 2015, in which a COP of up to 1.5 was apparently achieved. Although I have not been able to reproduce this result, I thought you might find it of interest in terms of what might be achieved by an amateur inspired by your work.
I’m eager to see the results of your 1MW plant operational test and to see how the E-Cat X continues to develop. Thank you to you and your team for advancing the field and inspiring so much interest and research into LENR.
Chris Beall:
Your question is not easy to be answered. I would say this: we must wait the completion of the tests on course; we are very close to an industrial product and we have an enormous potential, put in evidence by a portfolio in the order of billions, but we still must put a disclaimer: the final results could be positive or negative.
Our ship is still a warship, not a cruise ship and who enters our ship must be fully aware that he is going to fight, not to make a cruise, and that the result of a fight could also end up with casualties. All the guys presently in our ship are perfectly aware of this. This having been said, I can slightly modify my motto this way:
” I want not to play foot ball with the bones of persons that are not professional American foot ball players”. By the way: Go Panthers!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
M. Neumayer:
Thank you for your kind encuragement. Let me put the situation in the field of the formal logic: the cases are two, either we will be able to make a product in the market, or not.
In the second case ( we will not be able) all the issue will become not important, the battlefield will become a playgroung for children and I will retire.
In the first case, ( we will be able ) the hurdles will become a substantial problem not for us, but for them who will put (and have put) hurdles along our path.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
First of all, congratulations for your US Patent, which is a very important achievement, considering that you have extemely strong enemies that did everything they could to forbid a patent to you, for many reasons. I read that you are building a big corporation and leading it to make a massive production of your E-Cats, assuming the tests on course will perform positively. I agree with this strategy of yours: I am sure you are the sole guy able to put in the battlefield the necessary determination to go through the hurdles that such an enterprise will encounter.
You soon will meet substantial resistance against your endeavor.
May the Force be with you, Andrea: never give up!
Marino Neumayer
In the past you have strongly discouraged those who indicated a desire to invest your process. For example, on April 10, 2013, “I want not to play foot ball with the bones of the others. We sign contracts only with expert persons and corporations, perfectly aware of the fact that they are joining a warship, not a cruise ship. When we will be at a stage in which investments on us from unexpert persons will be safe, we will go public, respecting all the ethical, deontological and National laws.”
On page http://ecat.com/contact of your new website, there is a Contact form with many possible areas on Interest listed; one of those is ‘Investment’. Do you feel that your process, and Leonardo Corporation’s rights to it, have reached the point where investment by ‘unexpert persons’ is now within the ethical realm?
Daniel G. Zavela
January 16th, 2016 at 12:58 PM
…..Was this due to a change in the cell or fuel or is the E-Cat performing better than the original forecast? …..
Andrea Rossi
January 16th, 2016 at 2:50 PM
Daniel G. Zavela:
I expected that the charges could last more.
Does this mean that, at least for now, smaller E-Cats have the best performance regarding lifespan/power ?
That could mean that the structures in the reaction zones are damaged (or exhausted) progressively by the Rossi Effect, and that you must activate other zones in the reactor to migrate the Rossi Effect to other spots. In that case one option would be to abandon the fixed wafer, and introduce a kind of one-way ribbon-style-structured wafer.
An alternative could be to use arrays, 2D or 3D, of conductive materials to feed or extract electric power to or from active zones in the powder, with whatever waveform that is fit for the condition of the active zone. Having a system to cool every single spot, with an array of partly isolated tubes feeding cold and extracting hot gasses, could be usefull too.
Kind Regards,
Koen
PS: please don’t spam this mailadress, if this comment is not fit.
Jerry Norcross:
Our technology has nothing in common with the F&P experiment.
They have the merit to have sparked the idea to obtain nuclear effects at low temperature, though: in this, we all are indebted with them, honestly.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Greg Leonard:
Thank you for the information. Chrome is the best channel, we know that.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Christopher Calder:
We still do not know.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Mr. Rossi,
Hypothetically speaking, if there were no more problems with the one megawatt E-Cat plant, and everything was smooth sailing, on what exact date would the E-Cat test end?
Sincerely, Christopher Calder
Dear AR
I am running the latest Firefox 43.0.4
There is still no picture appearing on the startup page of Ecat.com, and the arrows selecting different media do nothing.
Everything works fine on Chrome.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I have been inspired from the story of your life reported in your website http://www.andrea-rossi.com
You have evidence of all what is described there?
God bless you,
Brendon
Palmer Barthold:
Thank you for your attention,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Alessandro Coppi:
You have problems of bandwidth: I am sorry, our website is heavy, it takes a good bandwidth to go fast…we had to choose between a complete website , but demanding a good bandwidth, or a lighter one and we have chosen the first option.
I am very sorry, but with a narrow band you need patience.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
The browsing of the web site here in Europe is still difficult, scrolling stuck and it is very discouraging.
Best regards
A. C.
LookMoo:
I am devastated, you have discovered one of the foundamentals of our know how here: banging the reactors walls with a rubber hammer to restore their stability; now, what can I do? What can I do ? What can I do ? Who goes to the ownership to tell the news about this confidentiality breach ?
Desperate Regards,
A.R.
Stephen:
I cannot give informations about the exact reason of the issues we had, because they involve confidential know how related to the 1 MW plant.
We have also patents in preparation related to the amendments we utilized.
Thank you for your insight.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I am enjoying the navigation in http://www.leonardocorporation.com
It is an encyclopedia of the LENR, there is so much to learn.
Very rich.
Thank you,
P.B.
Gwyneth Lovingood:
Thank you for your encouragement,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Samuels:
Yes, all the corrections came from the Readers of the JoNP.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anja Rothe:
Time: 10.00 a.m. of Monday Jan 18th
1MW E-Cat: stable
E-Cat X: in operation, still very promising
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Robert Curto:
It is not clever, it is the truth.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Marcelo Mehring:
Yes, but that seconf half…
Thank you for your kind words,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Homer Matusiak:
Genial, extremely interesting stuff.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Homer Matusiak:
Genial. Extremely interesting.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Katelyn Grignon:
We’ll update the photo galleries enytime we’ll have new photos.
Thank you for your attention,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi, I just seen this article and many of your readers may not have had the chance to read this:
http://fortune.com/2015/09/27/ceo-cherokee-investment-partners-low-energy-nuclear-reaction/
Kourtney Houtkooper:
Collecting and filing all the slandering material with the help of my attorney. The bill will be sent when the E-Cats will be diffused in the market. I attack only when I have 90% of probabilities to win.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
How do you react to the continue libelling going on against you?
Kourtney
Dear Andrea,
Your new websites
http://www.leonardocorporation.com
and
http://www.andrea-rossi.com
contain very beautiful photographies.
Will you update them ?
Regards,
Katelyn
Dr Rossi:
What do you think about the new bulbs that recycle the thermal energy increasing the efficiency of the luninescence?
Thank you,
Homer
Dr Andrea Rossi,
The Panthers won! They are going to win the Super Bowl!
By the way: congratulations for your US Patent.
M.M.
Dr. Rossi, I like you saying you are on a Warship, not a Cruiseship.
Clever thinking, as usual.
Robert Curto
Ft. Lauderdale Florida
USA
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Can we have an update for both the 1 MW plant and the E-Cat X?
Anja
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I noticed that from the day one of the new website http://www.leonardocorporation.com and now many corrections have been made: do all these correction depend from the Readers of this blog?
Thanks,
Samuels
Dr Andrea Rossi:
The more I read your US Patent, the more I understand that it is a masterpiece of intelligence.
Dear Andrea: go,go,fo!
Gwyneth
Its good news that you managed to get the devices back to stability. It sounds like you are able to manage the parameters of these devices quite well which is a good sign I think for their robustness and controllability.
Can you say if the change of efficiency is due to the reaction it self or some external factors such as the thermal performance of the overall device?
Are all the units affected or is it still limited to certain modules?
If it is the reaction it self perhaps it is a blessing in disguise: Since you mentioned you are recording the data from the device including maybe the gamma spectra perhaps this change in performance give you very valuable information regarding the reaction and yours and Norman Cook’s Hypothesis regarding Mössbauer nuclei and the Rossi effect and maybe your other theories and ideas. It has been asked elsewhere if the change in performance could be due to fuel exhaustion. Could it be that the changes are rather due to occasional low rate changes in the Catalyst rather than the fuel? Perhaps changes could occur due to occasional transmutations, Proton capture or maybe other more subtle nuclear affects that have an impact on the energy levels? If the Mössbauer nuclei are affected then maybe amount of source the energy is diminished, if the non Mössbauer nuclei responsible for the Rossi affect and low energy Gamma perhaps the conversion of this energy is less efficient. Then retuning allows a new but better balance. Either way I suppose the affect might be visible in any changes in the gamma spectra and may help inform the theory behind the process. Perhaps this data during changes in efficiency is very useful for refining and verifying to some extent your hypothesis and ideas.
Perhaps I am speculating a bit much so please feel free to edit my comment if it covers points you prefer not to discuss at this time.
Kind regards
Stephen
Dear Rossi,
Regarding the latest COP issues.
You have previously underlined the importance of your control-system (the computer) for successfully maintaining a stable and controlled operation of the eCat..
Did you adjust the operational parameters of your control-system to restore the operation back to normal… or was you just banking the reactor walls with a rubber hammer???
Sebastian:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
If there were no regulations issues, do you personally believe that a domestic e-cat could be run off-the-grid in a safe manner?
Many thanks
Gerard McEk:
The COP has slightly diminished its value, but we stopped the tendency to go lower, now it is stable.
The test will be defined positive or negative when the 350 days of operation will have been completed.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
You wrote that after a long night fight you have assessed the lowering COP problem.
Can you tell us if that means that the COP is back to normal, or were some other issues solved that were bothering you because of the decreasing COP?
Can you define when you consider the test positive?
Thanks and kind regards, Gerard
Jack Cole:
Thank you for the information related to your experiment.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Mr. Rossi,
I have been following your work with great interest since 2011. You have inspired me to conduct 100’s of experiments in pursuit of LENR. I failed to produce any evidence of excess heating with light water and nickel electrolysis. Later, using information from the Lugano report fuel analysis, I had some experiments that seemed promising. The most promising was an experiment conducted in March of 2015, in which a COP of up to 1.5 was apparently achieved. Although I have not been able to reproduce this result, I thought you might find it of interest in terms of what might be achieved by an amateur inspired by your work.
http://www.lenr-coldfusion.com/2015/04/16/experiment-generates-apparent-excess-heat/
I’m eager to see the results of your 1MW plant operational test and to see how the E-Cat X continues to develop. Thank you to you and your team for advancing the field and inspiring so much interest and research into LENR.
Best regards,
Jack
Chris Beall:
Your question is not easy to be answered. I would say this: we must wait the completion of the tests on course; we are very close to an industrial product and we have an enormous potential, put in evidence by a portfolio in the order of billions, but we still must put a disclaimer: the final results could be positive or negative.
Our ship is still a warship, not a cruise ship and who enters our ship must be fully aware that he is going to fight, not to make a cruise, and that the result of a fight could also end up with casualties. All the guys presently in our ship are perfectly aware of this. This having been said, I can slightly modify my motto this way:
” I want not to play foot ball with the bones of persons that are not professional American foot ball players”. By the way: Go Panthers!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
M. Neumayer:
Thank you for your kind encuragement. Let me put the situation in the field of the formal logic: the cases are two, either we will be able to make a product in the market, or not.
In the second case ( we will not be able) all the issue will become not important, the battlefield will become a playgroung for children and I will retire.
In the first case, ( we will be able ) the hurdles will become a substantial problem not for us, but for them who will put (and have put) hurdles along our path.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
First of all, congratulations for your US Patent, which is a very important achievement, considering that you have extemely strong enemies that did everything they could to forbid a patent to you, for many reasons. I read that you are building a big corporation and leading it to make a massive production of your E-Cats, assuming the tests on course will perform positively. I agree with this strategy of yours: I am sure you are the sole guy able to put in the battlefield the necessary determination to go through the hurdles that such an enterprise will encounter.
You soon will meet substantial resistance against your endeavor.
May the Force be with you, Andrea: never give up!
Marino Neumayer
Dr. Rossi,
In the past you have strongly discouraged those who indicated a desire to invest your process. For example, on April 10, 2013, “I want not to play foot ball with the bones of the others. We sign contracts only with expert persons and corporations, perfectly aware of the fact that they are joining a warship, not a cruise ship. When we will be at a stage in which investments on us from unexpert persons will be safe, we will go public, respecting all the ethical, deontological and National laws.”
On page http://ecat.com/contact of your new website, there is a Contact form with many possible areas on Interest listed; one of those is ‘Investment’. Do you feel that your process, and Leonardo Corporation’s rights to it, have reached the point where investment by ‘unexpert persons’ is now within the ethical realm?
Dear Readers:
Please find on http://www.rossilivecat.com the comments published in other posts of this blog today.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
R.Seagate:
Thank you for the information and the link.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dr Rossi, here is Mats Lewan webinar on youtube where
he discusses an intro cold fusion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQ3S3YMH96s&feature=youtu.be
Koen Vandewalle:
Thank you for your insight and suggestions.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea:
according the following Q & A:
Daniel G. Zavela
January 16th, 2016 at 12:58 PM
…..Was this due to a change in the cell or fuel or is the E-Cat performing better than the original forecast? …..
Andrea Rossi
January 16th, 2016 at 2:50 PM
Daniel G. Zavela:
I expected that the charges could last more.
Does this mean that, at least for now, smaller E-Cats have the best performance regarding lifespan/power ?
That could mean that the structures in the reaction zones are damaged (or exhausted) progressively by the Rossi Effect, and that you must activate other zones in the reactor to migrate the Rossi Effect to other spots. In that case one option would be to abandon the fixed wafer, and introduce a kind of one-way ribbon-style-structured wafer.
An alternative could be to use arrays, 2D or 3D, of conductive materials to feed or extract electric power to or from active zones in the powder, with whatever waveform that is fit for the condition of the active zone. Having a system to cool every single spot, with an array of partly isolated tubes feeding cold and extracting hot gasses, could be usefull too.
Kind Regards,
Koen
PS: please don’t spam this mailadress, if this comment is not fit.
Tim Flavin:
Yes, it is possible.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Daniel G. Zavela:
I expected that the charges could last more.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Jerry Norcross:
Our technology has nothing in common with the F&P experiment.
They have the merit to have sparked the idea to obtain nuclear effects at low temperature, though: in this, we all are indebted with them, honestly.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
you said your theoretical research is intensely being studied and
answers will be given when you have a mathematical rigorous model.
based on what you know today could you suggest that Pons and Fleischmann
and Cold Fusion will be vindicated soon?