Sandy McKellar:
Our consumption is so small, that market fluctuations are not important. Batteries are moving Li market.
About the coincidence: just a coincidence, as odd as it may seem.
Thank you for your attention,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Andrew:
No, I am sorry, we cannot show it until it is ready. By the way: should we show a photo now, it would be so much disguised, that it could be totally insignificant.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I know there is much work to be done on the E-Cat X before it is possible to determine if it will become a product, but is it possible to glimpse a photo of the E-Cat X in its current or an earlier state?
Apologies if my patience is not what it should be.
Thanks for all your work.
Andrew
Dr Andrea Rossi:
The demand of lithium in the last year is strongly increased: the price of Li carbonate has gone from 5k to 14 k$ in 12 months. Is it the case that you buy a good reserve of Li?
Not related: the primary elements after the Big Bang have been Li, H, He, which arethe main elements acting in the E-Cat: odd coincidence, isn’t it?
Cheers,
Sandy McKellar
first of all, let me congratulate you and your team on the remarkable and long-expected patent acquisition and rapid progress with E-CATs. And here is my question/opinion.
It is evident, that you use semiconductor-based elements (diodes, transistors etc) for such important subsystems of E-Cat as control of reactor heating/cooling/heat transfer, power/voltage/current conversion and possibly others. And it is clear that the significant part of such elements works in a harsh environment (high temperatures, pressures, reactive medium etc). With all this in mind – do you use silicon-based elements only? Do you use solutions, based on a wide-bandgap semiconductors (WBG, such as silicon carbide SiC, aluminium and gallium nitrides AlN and GaN, and others)? WBG-solutions can be much more stable/reliable and effective in such conditions than the conventional silicon electronics. It can ensure more stable and effective work of E-Cat as a whole – and this is only thing that we all are wishing!
Dr Andrea Rossi,
how many probabilities in percentage are there that the E-Cat can produce electric energy directly, without Carnot Cycle, in industrial quantities?
Thank you,
Louis
Fred:
10.40 a.m. of Wednesday Feb 3 2016
1MW E-Cat stable
E-Cat X: operating and still promising. We are making new experiments with the one subject to harder tests.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hergen:
If you want to produce electricity necessarily you produce heat with the E-Cat. We are not thinking to uses of the E-Cat of the kind you cited, so far, so I am not prepared to answer.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
You say you got a real solution,
Well, you know, we’d all love to see the plan.
You tell me that it’s evolution,
Well, you know, we all want to change the world.
there are applications, where you want electricity but no heat, for instance a battery for a laptop. What is the minimum required temperature for the e-catx to produce electricity?
Hank Mills:
I am still not able to answer to questions related to the efficiency of the E-Cat X, but I can say that in these very days we are making substantial progress in the field of direct production of electricity.
This having been said, thank you for your insight, but add F9.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
On the path towards a potential (F9) 50/50 split between electrical and heat output, in these early, preliminary tests does it seem you have made it half way towards that goal?
Since your fuel is so incredibly cheap (probably a penny per gram in bulk), the truth is that a 1MW plant that only operated for 100 days (not even 400) between refuelings would be an enormous success and economically viable. To produce the same quantity of megawatt hours of power would cost a thousand times more using any conventional fuel. Maybe a kilogram of fuel in the 1MW plant, even after only 100 days, would have produced more energy than 1000 kilograms (or more) of oil or coal. Operating a year between replacing charges simply makes maintenance easier.
Silvio Caggia:
nightime is the 50% of daytime, therefore there are 50% of probability that troubles occur during the night. Moreless I would say this statistic is respected.
I am pretty sure neutrinos have nothing to do with the E-Cat.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Is it a wrong impression or most of e-cat’s problems arise during night times?
And if it were true… Do you exclude any connection with solar neutrinos flux?
EK:
E-Cat X: strong progress on course for the direct productin of electric power: very promising.
1 MW E-Cat: troubles during the night, but now stable.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
M Breslin:
Leonardo Corporation’s Intellectual Property value depends on the results of the tests on course. Such results, for many reasons, could be either positive or negative.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Marco:
The destructive tests are made in a safe environment, for obvious reasons.
The outcome of destructive tests is melting, plus other phenomenons that are restricted.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
what is the outcome of the destructive tests of the ECat X? Melting, vaporization, explosion? Is there the release of any dangerous byproduct during the final phases of the destructive tests, namely dangerous chemicals, UVA/B, X-rays, gamma rays, alpha particles, beta particles, protons, neutrons, high temperature plasma/ions steam, stATIC magnetic/electric fields, RF impulses?
Hello, Mr. Rossi. I would like to ask the following question: Was there an updated analysis of the ash of spent fuel? He confirmed the phenomenon of isotopic shift of nickel to 62 ?. Are there any plans to reprocess spent fuel, sales of nickel isotope 62 for use in the battery Nickel betavoltaiks 63.
JC Renoir:
I am working with the help of a US expert f the field that works in a top concern of the USA and is related indirectly to a top aircrafts manufacturer; I am learning.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Marco Serra:
I cannot give this information yet, since we are still in a preliminar tests phase.
We still do not know if this will become a product, let alone how it will be.
This kind of information will be possible only at the eve of the launch of the product, but right now all I can say is:
F9 = the final results could be either positive or negative and for the domestic unit there are still issues related to the certification.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello, Andrea Rossi:
As much as the end of the tests on course in the factory of your customer, the worries of your enemies about a success grow up exponentially. Have you the necessary security ? Beware, Andrea…
Warm Regards,
DT
Xax:
At 08.35 of Monday, February 1st 2016
1 MW E-Cat stable
E-Cat X: 2 in good standing, one destroyed leaving enormous information about the production of electric power.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Robert Curto:
Thanks for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi and Readers, Google:
WORLD’S LARGEST WIND FARM TO BE BUILT OFF YORKSHIRE COAST
Robert Curto
Ft. Lauderdale Florida
USA
Kelly Charles:
USA.
F9.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Sandy McKellar:
Our consumption is so small, that market fluctuations are not important. Batteries are moving Li market.
About the coincidence: just a coincidence, as odd as it may seem.
Thank you for your attention,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Andrew:
No, I am sorry, we cannot show it until it is ready. By the way: should we show a photo now, it would be so much disguised, that it could be totally insignificant.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I know there is much work to be done on the E-Cat X before it is possible to determine if it will become a product, but is it possible to glimpse a photo of the E-Cat X in its current or an earlier state?
Apologies if my patience is not what it should be.
Thanks for all your work.
Andrew
Dr Andrea Rossi:
The demand of lithium in the last year is strongly increased: the price of Li carbonate has gone from 5k to 14 k$ in 12 months. Is it the case that you buy a good reserve of Li?
Not related: the primary elements after the Big Bang have been Li, H, He, which arethe main elements acting in the E-Cat: odd coincidence, isn’t it?
Cheers,
Sandy McKellar
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Which Country will be the first E-Cat network based on your Midnight Eve of the New Year dream, if any (F9) ?
Cheers,
Kelly
Alex:
Thank you for your insight and suggestion.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
first of all, let me congratulate you and your team on the remarkable and long-expected patent acquisition and rapid progress with E-CATs. And here is my question/opinion.
It is evident, that you use semiconductor-based elements (diodes, transistors etc) for such important subsystems of E-Cat as control of reactor heating/cooling/heat transfer, power/voltage/current conversion and possibly others. And it is clear that the significant part of such elements works in a harsh environment (high temperatures, pressures, reactive medium etc). With all this in mind – do you use silicon-based elements only? Do you use solutions, based on a wide-bandgap semiconductors (WBG, such as silicon carbide SiC, aluminium and gallium nitrides AlN and GaN, and others)? WBG-solutions can be much more stable/reliable and effective in such conditions than the conventional silicon electronics. It can ensure more stable and effective work of E-Cat as a whole – and this is only thing that we all are wishing!
Yours Sincerely, Alex
Frank Acland:
I am not able to answer, yet. Much work has to be done before we know.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Umbi:
We’ll see. F9.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
The developments with the E-Cat X sound promising for large-scale electricity production.
Do you think it will a better option for electricity generation than using the older style of Hot Cat coupled with turbines?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
You will do a pre-test on the market for domestic e-cat ?
Louis:
I’d say 70-80%. F9.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
how many probabilities in percentage are there that the E-Cat can produce electric energy directly, without Carnot Cycle, in industrial quantities?
Thank you,
Louis
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to see the comments published today on other posts of this blog.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Fred:
10.40 a.m. of Wednesday Feb 3 2016
1MW E-Cat stable
E-Cat X: operating and still promising. We are making new experiments with the one subject to harder tests.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hergen:
If you want to produce electricity necessarily you produce heat with the E-Cat. We are not thinking to uses of the E-Cat of the kind you cited, so far, so I am not prepared to answer.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Tom Conover:
Thank you!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
November 22, 1968
Dear Andrea,
We all need a solution to change the world. We all love music. This song would fit nicely into your marketing plans for the E-Cat X.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGLGzRXY5Bw
You say you got a real solution,
Well, you know, we’d all love to see the plan.
You tell me that it’s evolution,
Well, you know, we all want to change the world.
( J. Lennon, P. McCartney )
Dear Mr. Rossi,
there are applications, where you want electricity but no heat, for instance a battery for a laptop. What is the minimum required temperature for the e-catx to produce electricity?
Thank you.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Please an update also today!
Thanks,
Fred
Dear Andrea Rossi
Am I wrong or your dream of midnight on the New year’s Eve is getting closer to its realization?
Godspeed,
Gavin
Hank Mills:
I am still not able to answer to questions related to the efficiency of the E-Cat X, but I can say that in these very days we are making substantial progress in the field of direct production of electricity.
This having been said, thank you for your insight, but add F9.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
On the path towards a potential (F9) 50/50 split between electrical and heat output, in these early, preliminary tests does it seem you have made it half way towards that goal?
Since your fuel is so incredibly cheap (probably a penny per gram in bulk), the truth is that a 1MW plant that only operated for 100 days (not even 400) between refuelings would be an enormous success and economically viable. To produce the same quantity of megawatt hours of power would cost a thousand times more using any conventional fuel. Maybe a kilogram of fuel in the 1MW plant, even after only 100 days, would have produced more energy than 1000 kilograms (or more) of oil or coal. Operating a year between replacing charges simply makes maintenance easier.
Sincerely,
Hank
Silvio Caggia:
nightime is the 50% of daytime, therefore there are 50% of probability that troubles occur during the night. Moreless I would say this statistic is respected.
I am pretty sure neutrinos have nothing to do with the E-Cat.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Is it a wrong impression or most of e-cat’s problems arise during night times?
And if it were true… Do you exclude any connection with solar neutrinos flux?
EK:
E-Cat X: strong progress on course for the direct productin of electric power: very promising.
1 MW E-Cat: troubles during the night, but now stable.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
M Breslin:
Leonardo Corporation’s Intellectual Property value depends on the results of the tests on course. Such results, for many reasons, could be either positive or negative.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
here is a new startup funded for almost one 800 million right out of the box
and they only specialize in 3D imagery over real world objects.
LENR will be worth billions.
http://www.magicleap.com/
Breslin
Marco:
The destructive tests are made in a safe environment, for obvious reasons.
The outcome of destructive tests is melting, plus other phenomenons that are restricted.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
An update for today?
Cheers,
EK
Mike Richardson:
Thank you for your attention,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi, We can see that you are associated with some of the top business
professionals in America, you have come a long way sir.
Article titled: How Not Knowing Tom Darden Could Make You a Rookie in Tech
http://richtopia.com/people/tom-darden-lenr
Best,
Mike Richardson
NYC Tech
Dear Andrea,
what is the outcome of the destructive tests of the ECat X? Melting, vaporization, explosion? Is there the release of any dangerous byproduct during the final phases of the destructive tests, namely dangerous chemicals, UVA/B, X-rays, gamma rays, alpha particles, beta particles, protons, neutrons, high temperature plasma/ions steam, stATIC magnetic/electric fields, RF impulses?
Regards,
Marco.
Fedir Mykhaylov:
1- yes
2- yes
3- yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Rodney Nicholson:
This kind of information will be given after the publication of the results.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea:
Is it possible to tell us in which state (or even region of the country) the one megawatt plant undergoing the one year test is located?
Thank you if you feel able to answer.
Rodney Nicholson.
Hello, Mr. Rossi. I would like to ask the following question: Was there an updated analysis of the ash of spent fuel? He confirmed the phenomenon of isotopic shift of nickel to 62 ?. Are there any plans to reprocess spent fuel, sales of nickel isotope 62 for use in the battery Nickel betavoltaiks 63.
D. Travchenko:
I know. Our security has been intensified.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Curiosone:
If we’ll have not surprises from Her, I would say yes, it makes sense.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JC Renoir:
I am working with the help of a US expert f the field that works in a top concern of the USA and is related indirectly to a top aircrafts manufacturer; I am learning.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Marco Serra:
I cannot give this information yet, since we are still in a preliminar tests phase.
We still do not know if this will become a product, let alone how it will be.
This kind of information will be possible only at the eve of the launch of the product, but right now all I can say is:
F9 = the final results could be either positive or negative and for the domestic unit there are still issues related to the certification.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi:
On the E-Cat X are you working alone or with help?
Cheers,
JCR
Dr Andrea Rossi,
I understand that the tests of the 1 MW E-Cat will be co,pleted by the end of March: is this deadline still valid?
Thanks,
W.G.
Hello, Andrea Rossi:
As much as the end of the tests on course in the factory of your customer, the worries of your enemies about a success grow up exponentially. Have you the necessary security ? Beware, Andrea…
Warm Regards,
DT
Mats Heijkenskjold:
No, not yet, we are not yet to a final product level to allow some kind of price analysis.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Xax:
At 08.35 of Monday, February 1st 2016
1 MW E-Cat stable
E-Cat X: 2 in good standing, one destroyed leaving enormous information about the production of electric power.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Any ideas of price difference between home E-cat (heat version) and home E-catX (heat/electrical, without el. converter)?
Kind regards,
Mats H.