United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

41,637 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • Andrea Rossi

    Plasmafan:
    1- Ultra Violet and Extreme Ultra Violet rays are not generated by the Ecat SKLed
    2- all I have to say on this issue is published in
    http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
    3- no
    4- no
    5- no
    6- no
    7- no
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • PlasmaFan

    Dear Andrea,

    1) Does the coherent EUV light produced by the plasma ball in the E-Cat SKLed get converted into visible light by an optically thick atmosphere within the reactor?

    2) The negative resistance regime is produced by the existence of a complex space charge (the plasma ball) that increases the power transfer capability of the plasma. There is a great deal of information commonly available about the formation of such fireballs in DC discharges. Could you explain the how the negative resistance regime (and the formation of the plasma ball) is related to the formations of coherent matter?

    3) Have you performed any experiments to determine the characteristics of the membrane or double layer of your plasma ball? For example, have you attempted to determine if it is superconducting?

    4) Kenneth Radford Shoulders marveled at how well Mercury vapor helped in the formation of small scale self organizing plasmas. Have you performed any tests utilizing this element? Were the results positive?

    5) Have you ever seen any evidence of coherent matter or EVOs traveling into the power supply?

    6) What is your opinion of the interaction of these coherent matter layers and the magnetic vector potential? Do you see evidence of a greater coupling than with ordinary matter?

    7) Do you think self organizing plasmas such as the one in your device could one day be utilized to produce a field that could manipulate mass, gravity, or inertia?

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    On the subject of inductive loads and the eCat-SK, assuming a 20kW electrical output from the eCat-SK, what time constant is required to handle load inductance?

    1. < 1 sec;
    2. 1 – 2 sec;
    3. 2 – 10 sec;
    4. longer than 10 sec?

    Assuming a Tesla Model 3 battery system with a nominal voltage of about 350V, a 20 kW load would need about 60 Amperes of average current. So for about a 2% drop in voltage, the effective battery resistance would need to be about 0.1 Ohm. You might need to parallel several such battery packs (not battery systems) to achieve the effective resistance and duration that you need to accommodate the inductive stress. At some level of battery sizing/operation, no eCat-Sk input is required to temporarily run the inductive load. At that point, the eCat-SK is merely tasked with keeping the batteries charged. Thoughts?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Readers:
    Please go to
    http://www.rossilivecat.com
    to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Jan Srajer:
    Yes,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Jan Srajer

    Is the life time of the Ecat SKLed 100 000 hours independently from the luminous flow ?
    Warm Regards,
    Jan Srajer

  • Andrea Rossi

    Nils Fryklund:
    I do not use hydrogen. The question of George N was if the Ecat SKL can be useful to produce hydrogen, obviously referring to hydrogen manufacturers.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Chelsea

    Dr Rossi:
    I think that the fact that the US Navy has replicated your patent US 9,115,913 B1 helps you, giving to your work strong credibility.
    Chelsea

  • Nils Fryklund

    Dear Andrea!
    Why should you use hydrogen, when you can use one or more E-catSKL directly?
    Best regards
    Nils Fryklund

  • Andrea Rossi

    George N:
    Premature to answer, because there would be a dimensional problem to resolve, to get the necessary speed of conversion.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • George N

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    That is great news. Just to follow up on that last question/answer — coincidentally enough yesterday Volvo and Mercedes announced that they would be cooperating to develop hydrogen cells for 18 wheeler trucks because that transport mode is not optimal for purely electric vehicles.

    An idea that I came across on e-catworld.com was that the skl might be able to convert water to hydrogen all inside the vehicle when plugged into an external AC power source. Transporting and transferring hydrogen is very costly due to the highly reactive nature of hydrogen, but if the production of hydrogen can all be done safely inside the vehicle then this may significantly lower the infrastructure costs of hydrogen fuel cells.

    If you develop the SKL to charge batteries, do you see third parties being able to convert the SKL to produce hydrogen or would that be an application that you would need to be directly involved in developing?

    Best,
    George N

  • Glenda Roberts

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
    Is the negative resistance important in the Ecat SKL ?
    Cheers
    Glenda

  • Andrea Rossi

    George N:
    Yes, we have resolved this part of the problem,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • George N

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    Is the DC current that the SKL produces strong/stable enough to perform electrolysis of water to produce economical amounts of hydrogen?

    Best,
    George N

  • Andrea Rossi

    Toussaint:
    Maybe.
    Warm regards,
    A.R.

  • TOUSSAINT

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    One question please, in the future would it be a good idea using the SKL to hydrolyze water to obtain hydrogen ?

    Kind Regard

    Toussaint François

  • Andrea Rossi

    Ulrik Gustavsson:
    No
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Ulrik Gustavsson

    Dr Rossi:
    Did you make a licence agreement with the US Navy to allow them to use your technology, or did you allow a proxy to make such agreement on your behalf ?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Ulrik Gustavsson:
    Thank you for your attention to the work of our Team,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Ulrik Gustavsson

    Dr Rossi,
    congratulations for the important validation made by the US Navy of your effect as I saw here:
    Patent Application US 2021/0090752 A1
    This production of the US Navy crowns the work of you and your team.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Mike Phalen:
    1- maybe, but the interface with a battery is a solution in most of cases
    2- I do not know
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Italo R.:
    We are not ready.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gerard McEk:
    Thank you for your insight,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Gerard McEk

    Dear Andrea,
    Like in other countries, the energy transition in the Netherlands is gaining momentum. Companies responsible for the electrical infrastructure intensify the pressure on the government and the inhabitants, saying that the capacity needs to be doubled to enable the expected power increase due to electrical driving and room heating (heat-pumps). Enormous investments are expected, at least 1/3 of the streets must be excavated to allow for ten thousands of kilometers additional electrical cables.
    I believe that this will not be necessary when the Ecat SKL comes on the market. I hope you can show in November an, perhaps at that moment not perfect, Ecat SKL, that can give the world hope for a brighter future.
    Kind regards, Gerard

  • Italo R.

    Dear Dr. Rossi,
    So the current Ecat SKLed model is ready to be produced and probably only requires minor modifications.
    We all know how important its rapid release to the market is.
    My question: why wait until the end of this year for the presentation?
    You could introduce it right away. Many governments could change their sustainable development spending programs.
    kind regards,
    Italo R.

  • Mike Phalen

    Hi Dr. Rossi,

    I have two questions:

    1. In regards to driving an inductive load with the E-cat. Is it possible that the E-cat reaction is fundamentally unable to create electricity capable of driving an inductive load or do you think it is an engineering issue and it will eventually be worked out?

    2. Would you say that the IP protection in the E-cat is military grade?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Sam:
    You are right, I have been ambiguous on this point, because in reality both solutions can be adopted. The matter of the fact is that the Ecat SKLed does not need a prog for grounding, but the SKL in high power configurations would require the earthed tripolar cable. Hence the ambiguity of my answers, I did not make the distinction. Sorry for that.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Sam

    Hello DR Rossi
    You say that the SKL has
    a 3 prong plug for grounding.
    But you said NO to Kieth Thomson
    Question when he asked if the light
    fitting requires an Earth Connection.
    Can you Clarify.
    Regards
    Sam

  • Andrea Rossi

    Rick 57:
    Thank you for your suggestion,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Sam:
    yes
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Sam

    Hello DR Rossi
    Does the SKLed have
    a three prong Power
    Cord for grounding?
    Regards
    Sam

  • Rick 57

    Dear Andrea,

    as you are definitely aware of, a significant part(59.33 Billion Euros) of the Recovery Fund will be allocated by the Italian Government to the so-called “Green revolution and Ecological transition”.

    I therefore urge you to make known worldwide, with any means, the potential of the E-CAT SKL technology as soon as possible, before this river of money is wasted by installing fields of solar panels, hills of wind generators, new generation nuclear power plants, hydroelectric power plants, tide-based generators, which instead of solving the problem will contribute to disfigure Nature even more.

    Thanks a lot for your understanding and continuous effort.

    Riccardo

  • Andrea Rossi

    Giusy Mantegazza:
    As I already said many times, I do not think anymore that LENR exist. I am convinced of the rightness of the theoretical threads in
    http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions.
    The key words of what I think are:
    Zitterbewegung
    Zero Point Energy
    Low Entropy
    Long Distance Interactions
    the basics are in references 1, 17, 25, 32 of the paper above cited.
    Obviously, this is only an opinion and, as such, it could be wrong as convincing as it might be to me.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Pekka Janhunen:
    Thank you for your opinion, that I totally respect. Obviously taxes are necessary, the problem in in the measure and in the utilization of them.
    About “have you ever…”: I have not.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Heinz Sause:
    At the presentation,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Raffaele Bongo:
    Premature, I am not ready to answer.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Raffaele Bongo

    Hello Dr. Rossi
    It seems that for transport the SKL coupled to a battery is a good solution. You told us that you have contacts with an automobile manufacturer.
    Can you tell us how he sees the integration of SKL in vehicles? SKL only, SKL + battery, SKL + supercapacitor, other….
    A curiosity: my wife’s electric car has, in addition to the propulsion battery, a traditional 12-volt battery.
    Best regards
    Raffaele bongo

  • Giusy Mantegazza

    Dear Andrea:
    Do you still think that the lamp shown in
    http://www.ecat.com
    has links to the LENR ?

  • Heinz Sause

    Hello and good day, Mr. Rossi!
    My suggestion:
    A video, but at least photos if the e-catSKLed illuminates a place.
    Best wishes and good efficiency to you and your team.
    Heinz Sause

  • Giuseppe, Andrea:
    If one uses cars, one has to maintain roads, and if there is no fuel to tax, one must tax the kilometres. The alternative would be to go to Lilium-type airplanes, they do not consume roads.

    “Have you ever seen a politician retire from politics poorer than he was before digging his hands in the politic jam?”
    Yes, I have.

    regards, /pekka

  • Andrea Rossi

    Giuseppe:
    Should we return to the stone age, be sure governments will tax stones.
    Have you ever seen a politician retire from politics poorer than he was before digging his hands in the politic jam ?
    About the costs of the SKL, it’s a premature question.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Giuseppe

    Dear Andrea,
    it seems that the dream of driving a zero-cost car powered by an ECAT is destined to remain so. Lawmakers are already taking countermeasures by shifting taxes from fuel to mileage. Consider that in Italy about 62% of the total cost of fuel are taxes, so these revenues must necessarily be found somewhere else.
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/transportation/interactive/2021/electric-mileage-tax/
    if I can I would like to ask you a question. With the Ecat-Skled you used an approach with popular prices at $ 25, will you do the same with the 20Kw SKL Home? Have you already thought about an indicative price?
    Best Regards, Giuseppe

  • Andrea Rossi

    Johan:
    Thank you for the suggestion,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Johan

    Dr Rossi,
    I suggest you to make the SKL able to deal with any kind of battery, so you wil eliminate obstacles.
    Johan

  • Andrea Rossi

    Koen Vandewalle:
    Thank you for your suggestions, but it is premature to answer.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gerard McEk:
    Yes,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Gerard McEk

    Dear Andrea,
    Because you are developing the Ecat SKL, I hope you develop it on a power level that will be the most useable for many applications, like for domestic use and for cars, which is around 20 kW electric. By putting them in parallel, considerabel power levels can be reached for more heavy industrial applications.
    Can you confirm that this 20 kWe SKL is at least one of the power levels you are concentrating on in the development of the Ecat?
    Thank you, for answering our continuous stream of questions.
    Kind regards, Gerard

  • Koen Vandewalle

    Hello Andrea,
    are you planning to market the Ecat SKL in different power classes and of course different price ranges? Or are you thinking of a modular, stackable concept?
    An application to produce heat, for example, or to drive a cooling machine will be easier to operate than a photocopy machine or a passenger lift. With the former energy sources, the low price of the energy source will prevail, and with the latter the quality of the electricity supplied.
    Or will the SKL be so cheap again – due to a genius design – that it makes no difference?
    With best regards,
    Koen

  • Andrea Rossi

    Svein H. Vormedal:
    Thank you for your suggestions,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>