Calle H:
It is not easy, although not impossible, to go through the way you suggest, as phylosophically correct as it may be. Think to what is happening with the Covid vaccines: would the “Big Pharma” invest and invent to realize its production without an intellectual property ? I am not able to formulate a sure answer, but I suppose not.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
May I ask for your comment if you think it is appropriate to do so. Could it be so that the SKL is too big (important) to allow Leonardo Corporation and your partners to distribute this revolutionary product? Distribution may become a peace and safety issue on a local, national and world scale. Should the SKL be controlled by governments?
Wish you, your team and partners the very best,
Calle H
Dear Andrea
Will the production of SKL necessitate any critical minerals?
What is the CO2 emissions from production offset by each kWh that a SKL can deliver during its operating time?
I look forward to receiving more details on 25 Nov.
Best regards: Svein H. Vormedal
I think many other of the blog readers would like to join Michael and I in encouraging you to announce you will be accepting new orders for ECatSKL … Thank you for working so very hard on this!
The theoretical images that were sent to you for the ECAT Tesla Car power setup were also very encouraging.
Question: Were you able to confirm that you could configure the EcatSKL so it would be compatable with the ECAT-Tesla power theoretical diagrams?
Dr. Rossi,
I realize that the SKL device you are planning to demonstrate in November will be a prototype device and not a production-ready device, but independently are you planning to begin the Certification Process on that device prior to November 25?
@Italo R, Chuck Davis, Frank Acland,
the Ecat SK has already be presentedyears ago: see here http://www.ecatskdemo.com
Now we are looking for the Ecat SKLed and, most of all, the SKL
Italo R:
Ohh, that was a typo ! Very sorry, Ierroneously wrote SK, it was SKL and I corrected the typo now, after your comment… very sorry, my mistake.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, Wow, what a spectacular event the presentation will be if you are to present all three devices! That would be a trifecta in the physics world! We all wish you success in doing so!
Patrick:
1- yes
2- no guests, we’ll be in the facility of a Client, in presence will be only insiders, but everybody will be able to attend the direct streaming
3- we have a specialist dealing with this issue
4- for what concerns my duties, not much is left to do, apart the Ecat SKL, that will be presented too if we will complete its preparation
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Mr. Rossi,
at a price of 300€/KW i would like to preorder two 10KW ECatSKL!
I guess you could produce and sell 100 million units and more per year. Each household at least two, plus more for the industry, cars..
Best regards
Michael
LilyLover:
1. yes
2. no
3. no
4. there is no reason for it not to survive
5. it depends on the student
6. I do not know
7. no
Thank you for your wishes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
1. First an obvious and silly question — capacitative loads do not pose any issues to the SKL, is that correct?
2. While issues regarding inductive loads were resolved, in doing so, did you discover any new insight into / modifications needed to Lenz’s law?
3. Does your work warrant any changes or adjustments to the Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle?
4. Does the concept of absolute zero degree Kelvin survive your discovery / remain valid in the light of new knowledge?
5. One day, to be able to teach your findings in the universities, will the students at, say Caltech, Stanford, or Cambridge need to study very very hard or once explained, this will be slightly higher than an 800-level course in the level of difficulty?
6. Based on so many reads of ‘the paper’, have the ivory towered Physics professors begun to ask you serious questions? (Or, are they still in denial?)
7. Did the solution to inductive loads help in any way to improve the SKLED?
Thank you. & Best wishes and prayers for November presentation.
Frank Acland:
1- Our A.I. has chips
2- I am not able to answer for the future: so far we should not have problems, although we’d have higher prices, but the competitivity of the Ecat in itself and its environmental impact should make a compensation.
We’ll see.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gavino Mamia:
This is a new trove in the field of the Seebeck Effect: I made a big experience in this field in the late nineties in the USA with the DOE and the DOD; the big issue is that when you go to massive production the efficiency of conversion ( figure of merit ) becomes very, very low.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Track lighting is a method of lighting where light fixtures are attached anywhere on a continuous track device which contains electrical conductors.[1] This is in contrast to directly routing electrical wiring to individual light positions. Tracks can either be mounted to ceilings or walls, lengthwise down beams, or crosswise across rafters or joists. They can also be hung with rods from especially high places like vaulted ceilings.
Bob Belovich:
1- can you explain exactly what you mean with “lighting tracks” ?
2- no, the presentation will be a commercial event, not a scientific symposium. This blog can be the right place to discuss theoretical issues anytime you want, whatever the issue related to our theoretical system explained in http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Warm Regards,
A.R.
1. Can you offer the ecatskled with a base to install in common track lighting tracks ? I will gladly increase my order if this type of base can be offered.
2. Your paper has revealed much about the electron. I hope you will discuss the electron in greater detail at your presentation.
L. Nelson. Method and system for energy conversion using a screened-free-electron source. US Patent US6465965. 2002. [Not listed in the references]
M. J. Arman and C. Chase. [Charles is first name] System and methods for generating coherent matterwave beams. US Patent US9502202. 2016.
P. N. Correa and A. N. Correa. Direct current energized pulse generator utilizing autogenous cyclical pulsed abnormal glow discharges. US Patent US5502354. 1996. [Not 1986]
E. V. Gray. Efficient power supply suitable for inductive loads. US Patent US4595975. 1986.
[Patent US4595975 is referenced [21] but there is nothing referring to this within the contents of your paper]
B. Haisch and G. Moddel. Quantum vacuum energy extraction. US Patent US7379286. 2008.
L. M. Hively. Systems, apparatuses, and methods for generating and/or utilizing scalar-longitudinal waves. US Patent US9306527. 2016.
J. Papp. Method and means of converting atomic energy into utilizable kinetic energy. US Patent US3670494. 1972.
Within one of the reference papers there is also an interesting patent that you have not referred to or listed.
All of these patents have interesting electron flow related subjects, descriptions and claims of; electron flow between electrodes with resulting physical effects, production of electrostatic / impulse energy, electron flow leading to zero point energy / vacuum energy / scalar longitudinal energy transmission between transmitter and receiver, or converting scalar potential energy to electricity.
The science described within these patents may or may not be correct and is likely subject to reinterpretation by others, there may be poorly understood science or new science that requires further investigation, replication is the next step in understanding. Some of the effects described in these patents are likely closely related to the science underlying the E-Cat technology. Also any repeatable replication that proved the existence of scalar longitudinal waves would be encouraging for an alternative electron model.
It is very good news that you have replicated some of these patents, whether in full or in part, to see for yourself the real world physical effects, and to accumulate documentary evidence to support the theoretical frameworks of your ResearchGate paper.
Dear Andrea, I think that you might be interested in this new airplane design. It has been one of my dreams since becoming aware of the Ecat. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uoPvEIgRaZA
Renè:
I agree: it also explains how it is possible for the ZBW happen at the speed of light while the electron, being a Fermion, travels at a lower speed,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Renè:
I read all of them, some only in the parts referred to the paper ( as you can see from the numbers of the references ), some studied in full because particularly important. Some of the patents cited in the references have been replicated.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Calle H:
We stop it every 24 hours to collect a series of data that cannot be taken with the apparatus in operation. Such operations are confidential,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
Your reply to Gerard McEk that the SKL has run in SSM mode for 24 hours may be disappointing if the background is untold. What happened after 24 hours?
Kind regards,
Calle H
Dear Andrea,
It is good to hear that the SKL is still working well.
Some questions to keep us informed, if I may:
1. Is the SKL continuously operating in SSM, so not connected to any external power source?
2. What is the longest duration that it is in SSM until now?
3. You have said that even while it is vacation time, you continue working on the SKL. Can you give us an impression what is still needed to do before the presentation on 11/25?
I wish you great progress and success in the preparation.
Kind regards, Gerard
Calle H:
It is not easy, although not impossible, to go through the way you suggest, as phylosophically correct as it may be. Think to what is happening with the Covid vaccines: would the “Big Pharma” invest and invent to realize its production without an intellectual property ? I am not able to formulate a sure answer, but I suppose not.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
May I ask for your comment if you think it is appropriate to do so. Could it be so that the SKL is too big (important) to allow Leonardo Corporation and your partners to distribute this revolutionary product? Distribution may become a peace and safety issue on a local, national and world scale. Should the SKL be controlled by governments?
Wish you, your team and partners the very best,
Calle H
Dear Andrea
Will the production of SKL necessitate any critical minerals?
What is the CO2 emissions from production offset by each kWh that a SKL can deliver during its operating time?
I look forward to receiving more details on 25 Nov.
Best regards: Svein H. Vormedal
Dear Andrea,
I think many other of the blog readers would like to join Michael and I in encouraging you to announce you will be accepting new orders for ECatSKL … Thank you for working so very hard on this!
The theoretical images that were sent to you for the ECAT Tesla Car power setup were also very encouraging.
Question: Were you able to confirm that you could configure the EcatSKL so it would be compatable with the ECAT-Tesla power theoretical diagrams?
Warm regards,
Tom
(Just for fun … It’s clobbering time …)
https://www.stripersonline.com/surftalk/uploads/monthly_2018_09/5b959a810492e_ClobberinTime2.PNG.2f145083f6696094a713ccc542f182ba.PNG
Dr. Rossi,
I realize that the SKL device you are planning to demonstrate in November will be a prototype device and not a production-ready device, but independently are you planning to begin the Certification Process on that device prior to November 25?
Three months, 2 days and counting!
Best Wishes,
WaltC
Duh:
Thank you for your insight and for your kind wishes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
While I cannot personally say yea or nay to the claims made by Genesis Systems about obtaining water out of the air,
the article at https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/bigger-than-the-moon-walk-new-system-pulls-water-from-thin-air does talk about their marketing plan which reminds me of yours — do not provide a lot of publicity
in the early days of the product. Also reminiscent of the Wright brothers from 1903 to 1908.
Good luck to you and your team, especially over the next 100 days.
@Italo R, Chuck Davis, Frank Acland,
the Ecat SK has already be presentedyears ago: see here
http://www.ecatskdemo.com
Now we are looking for the Ecat SKLed and, most of all, the SKL
Italo R:
Ohh, that was a typo ! Very sorry, Ierroneously wrote SK, it was SKL and I corrected the typo now, after your comment… very sorry, my mistake.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
No, we will present the SKLed and the SKL,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Chuck Davis:
We will present the SHLed and the SKL: it makes two, not three,
Warm regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, Wow, what a spectacular event the presentation will be if you are to present all three devices! That would be a trifecta in the physics world! We all wish you success in doing so!
Good luck!
Chuck Davis
Dear Andrea,
Do I understand correctly that you are now thinking of presenting the E-Cat SK heater, in addition to the SKL and SKLed?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
So you will also present Ecat SK as you have written?
Italo R.
Patrick:
1- yes
2- no guests, we’ll be in the facility of a Client, in presence will be only insiders, but everybody will be able to attend the direct streaming
3- we have a specialist dealing with this issue
4- for what concerns my duties, not much is left to do, apart the Ecat SKL, that will be presented too if we will complete its preparation
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Michael:
You gave me an idea…
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Mr. Rossi,
at a price of 300€/KW i would like to preorder two 10KW ECatSKL!
I guess you could produce and sell 100 million units and more per year. Each household at least two, plus more for the industry, cars..
Best regards
Michael
Dear Andrea,
It’s now less than 100 days until your presentation. The countdown has started.
Is the venue locked in?
Is the guest list ready?
Is the live video streaming platform selected?
What is left for you to prepare for the presentation?
We’re all waiting with anticipation.
Regards
Patrick
Ralf:
USA and Europe,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I am stunned by the number of readings of the paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
I am curious to know the geographic areas where are mostly made the readings
Cheers
Ralf
Ivan Samec:
It will depend on the scale. For a production of million of units, the answer would be yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
I understand that it is difficult to estimate prices if serial production is not yet running, nevertheless I will ask:
By a very rough estimate, do You hope that the sales price for E-Cat SKL will be below 350 USD/kW?
Best Regards, Ivan Samec
LilyLover:
1. yes
2. no
3. no
4. there is no reason for it not to survive
5. it depends on the student
6. I do not know
7. no
Thank you for your wishes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
1. First an obvious and silly question — capacitative loads do not pose any issues to the SKL, is that correct?
2. While issues regarding inductive loads were resolved, in doing so, did you discover any new insight into / modifications needed to Lenz’s law?
3. Does your work warrant any changes or adjustments to the Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle?
4. Does the concept of absolute zero degree Kelvin survive your discovery / remain valid in the light of new knowledge?
5. One day, to be able to teach your findings in the universities, will the students at, say Caltech, Stanford, or Cambridge need to study very very hard or once explained, this will be slightly higher than an 800-level course in the level of difficulty?
6. Based on so many reads of ‘the paper’, have the ivory towered Physics professors begun to ask you serious questions? (Or, are they still in denial?)
7. Did the solution to inductive loads help in any way to improve the SKLED?
Thank you. & Best wishes and prayers for November presentation.
Sincerely,
`LilyLover
Frank Acland:
1- Our A.I. has chips
2- I am not able to answer for the future: so far we should not have problems, although we’d have higher prices, but the competitivity of the Ecat in itself and its environmental impact should make a compensation.
We’ll see.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
There is a big concern on the shortage of semiconductor chips these days which is affecting many industries.
1. Will e-cat products use these kinds of chips?
2. Will this shortage affect your ability to meet the demand you expect for your products?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Gavino Mamia:
This is a new trove in the field of the Seebeck Effect: I made a big experience in this field in the late nineties in the USA with the DOE and the DOD; the big issue is that when you go to massive production the efficiency of conversion ( figure of merit ) becomes very, very low.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ho letto questo articolo interessante:
I read this interesting paper:
https://www.element14.com/community/groups/power-management/blog/2021/08/10/scientists-create-new-material-to-convert-heat-waste-into-electricity
Buon lavoro a tutto a lei a tutto il team
Bob Belovich:
Yes, the Ecat SKLed is fit for track lighting in that sense.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi
From Wikipedia:
Track lighting is a method of lighting where light fixtures are attached anywhere on a continuous track device which contains electrical conductors.[1] This is in contrast to directly routing electrical wiring to individual light positions. Tracks can either be mounted to ceilings or walls, lengthwise down beams, or crosswise across rafters or joists. They can also be hung with rods from especially high places like vaulted ceilings.
Bob Belovich
Chuck Davis:
Nice thing, but, so far, I prefer to fly down.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jeff:
Premature,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
KeithT:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Bob Belovich:
1- can you explain exactly what you mean with “lighting tracks” ?
2- no, the presentation will be a commercial event, not a scientific symposium. This blog can be the right place to discuss theoretical issues anytime you want, whatever the issue related to our theoretical system explained in
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi
1. Can you offer the ecatskled with a base to install in common track lighting tracks ? I will gladly increase my order if this type of base can be offered.
2. Your paper has revealed much about the electron. I hope you will discuss the electron in greater detail at your presentation.
Warm regards and best wishes
Bob Belovich
Dear Andrea,
Within your ResearchGate paper;
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
You cite the following patents;
L. Nelson. Method and system for energy conversion using a screened-free-electron source. US Patent US6465965. 2002. [Not listed in the references]
M. J. Arman and C. Chase. [Charles is first name] System and methods for generating coherent matterwave beams. US Patent US9502202. 2016.
P. N. Correa and A. N. Correa. Direct current energized pulse generator utilizing autogenous cyclical pulsed abnormal glow discharges. US Patent US5502354. 1996. [Not 1986]
E. V. Gray. Efficient power supply suitable for inductive loads. US Patent US4595975. 1986.
[Patent US4595975 is referenced [21] but there is nothing referring to this within the contents of your paper]
B. Haisch and G. Moddel. Quantum vacuum energy extraction. US Patent US7379286. 2008.
L. M. Hively. Systems, apparatuses, and methods for generating and/or utilizing scalar-longitudinal waves. US Patent US9306527. 2016.
J. Papp. Method and means of converting atomic energy into utilizable kinetic energy. US Patent US3670494. 1972.
Within one of the reference papers there is also an interesting patent that you have not referred to or listed.
All of these patents have interesting electron flow related subjects, descriptions and claims of; electron flow between electrodes with resulting physical effects, production of electrostatic / impulse energy, electron flow leading to zero point energy / vacuum energy / scalar longitudinal energy transmission between transmitter and receiver, or converting scalar potential energy to electricity.
The science described within these patents may or may not be correct and is likely subject to reinterpretation by others, there may be poorly understood science or new science that requires further investigation, replication is the next step in understanding. Some of the effects described in these patents are likely closely related to the science underlying the E-Cat technology. Also any repeatable replication that proved the existence of scalar longitudinal waves would be encouraging for an alternative electron model.
It is very good news that you have replicated some of these patents, whether in full or in part, to see for yourself the real world physical effects, and to accumulate documentary evidence to support the theoretical frameworks of your ResearchGate paper.
Regards,
Keith Thomson.
Dear A.R.
Could you post some pictures for us of your masterpiece or maybe something your masterpiece is powering? keep us entertained until November 25th 🙂
Best regards,
Jeff
Dear Andrea, I think that you might be interested in this new airplane design. It has been one of my dreams since becoming aware of the Ecat. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uoPvEIgRaZA
Warm regards,
Chuck Davis
Steven N. Karels:
I confirm your order has been received.
Premature to answer your question,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I recently pre-ordered the Ecat SKLed. Can you tell us how many have now been ordered?
If not now, will the number of pre-orders be revealed at the November demonstration?
Renè:
I agree: it also explains how it is possible for the ZBW happen at the speed of light while the electron, being a Fermion, travels at a lower speed,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@Renè
Ithink that one of the most important references of
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
is the number 17, because it is the base to understand the ZBW of electrons
Renè:
I read all of them, some only in the parts referred to the paper ( as you can see from the numbers of the references ), some studied in full because particularly important. Some of the patents cited in the references have been replicated.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Did you read all the references cited in
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
If not, which ones did you ?
Renè
Calle H:
We stop it every 24 hours to collect a series of data that cannot be taken with the apparatus in operation. Such operations are confidential,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
Your reply to Gerard McEk that the SKL has run in SSM mode for 24 hours may be disappointing if the background is untold. What happened after 24 hours?
Kind regards,
Calle H
Gian Luca:
Thank you for your support.
Approved,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gentile A.R.
I wanted to point out, to all JONP attendees, this initiative that I think Dr. Rossi will certainly share.
https://www.change.org/p/mr-frans-timmermans-the-future-of-energy-0a0928eb-dc9d-4d6b-bac6-f0f00f03538d
Gerard McEk:
1- yes
2- 24 hours
3- many things, long and confidential list
Thank you for your sustain,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
It is good to hear that the SKL is still working well.
Some questions to keep us informed, if I may:
1. Is the SKL continuously operating in SSM, so not connected to any external power source?
2. What is the longest duration that it is in SSM until now?
3. You have said that even while it is vacation time, you continue working on the SKL. Can you give us an impression what is still needed to do before the presentation on 11/25?
I wish you great progress and success in the preparation.
Kind regards, Gerard