United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

41,590 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • Andrea Rossi

    Tom Conover:
    1- thank you. We are working on it
    2- is where we are directed
    3- please continue to donate to us your attention and suggestions
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Artefact:
    No.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Samantha:
    Thank you,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
    Another replication: that is good.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Hank Mills:
    Thank you for your insight. We’ll continue our work as decided.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Jacky Mad:
    This is my intention. F9. I am looking at the model of the Microsoft’s software: a universal tool that can be applied anywhere ( mutatis mutandis).
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Jacky Mad

    Dr Rossi:
    Did I understand well: the mini-E-Cat X, dubbed “quark”, can be applied everywhere ?
    Cheers,
    Jacky

  • Hank Mills

    Dear Andrea,

    As you may be aware, Songsheng Jiang has released a document detailing two additional replications of the Rossi Effect. In one of the tests, he is reporting a three hour period of self sustain at higher than 1300C — with no input power whatsoever. To achieve this temperature without the excess heat effect, fourteen hundred watts of external DC power was required. Since he is using approximately 10 grams of nickel powder (one gram of LiAlH4 in one test and two grams in the second with no free lithium used in either test), he is producing over 100 watts of excess heat per gram of fuel during self sustain mode.

    What I found fascinating is that he is achieving these results with no exotic forms of electromagnetic stimulation — only a spiral wound resistance wire wrapped around a large ceramic tube (2cm wall thickness) around the stainless steel reactor chamber (5mm wall thickness). There is a large thermal barrier between the resistor and the inner most fuel chamber, yet when the resistor is powered a sudden massive burst of excess heat from the core is detected.

    The issue that confounds me is that Songsheng Jiang seems to have had a short series of amazingly successful experiments, with very few attempts. However, I know of *many* other replicators who have ran dozens of tests utilizing a wide variety of fuel ratios (Ni, LiAlH4, free Lithium), fuel types (various brands of Ni and LiAlH4), and EM stimulation (DC, AC, “dirty” AC, Square Waves, etc). Despite their repeated efforts at changing parameters, they usually achieve little (maybe 10% max) of excess heat or none at all.

    I’m literally beating my head against the wall at this point.

    I’ll be blunt. If an esteemed scientist like Songsheng Jiang at an official government research institute in China has replicated your effect, then I’d assume that all the “real” competitors (with hefty sums of money to invest) have cracked the basic effect too. They’ll never talk about their replication work, however: because helping prove their Rossi Effect and LENR reactions is not their goal. As you have said, they want to copy the process and slap it into copycat products, infringing on your patent rights.

    To assist the replicators who are trying to prove your effect to the world — wanting to openly publish their results — I wish you could help point out what is making Songsheng Jiang’s tests so consistently successful. I only have a few ideas.

    1) Like Parkhomov’s first round of tests, the fuel is surrounded by a thick metal container. If a significant amount of the low level, soft gamma radiation escapes the micro-caves in the nickel particles where the LENR reactions take place, the mass of the metal may allow for a greater level of thermalization of the x-rays (soft gamma). Some replicators are only using relatively thin alumina (ceramic) tubes for reactors. Will simply adding a greater amount of shielding increase the excess heat effect in their tests?

    2) Maybe using a greater quantity of nickel powder creates some type of nuclear reaction rate enhancement effect? Songsheng Jiang uses 10 grams of nickel verses the 1-2 grams that most replicators I’m aware of have used.

    3) There is a great deal of excess space in the innermost chamber. This may allow for a lower pressure when the LiAlH4 breaks down. Could this lower pressure be critical to hydrogen loading?

    I don’t want you to jeopardize your patent situation. But I wish you could point towards what is making Songsheng’s test so successful. I wonder if it would violate patent pre-disclosure rules if you simply took a copy of his PDF and circled in a red marker the bits that were most critical for success?

    What I want more than anything, while we wait for your products to hit the market, is for a stream of hundreds of successful replications to be reported — forcing the mainstream media and scientific establishment to give the Rossi Effect the same respect and attention as the photo voltaic effect. Right now, even you you are probably unaware of many of them, you have a small army of replicators working to make that happen.

    They could use a tiny nudge in the right direction! Not an additional disclosure, but simply a couple nods and a “look here” and “look at that” to put them on the right course.

    Thank you for any help you can provide.

    Sincerely,
    Hank

  • Ing. Michelangelo De Meo

    Hello Dott . Rossi , it seems that the Chinese have reproduced the Rossi Effect. Another replication !
    Song Jiang, a teacher in 2015 nickel-hydrogen cold fusion experiments summary report
    http://www.lenr.com.cn/index.php?m=content&c=index&a=show&catid=7&id=703

  • Samantha

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    After the replication made today by the Chinese scientists the replications of the Rossi Effect have reached an important number. Congratulations, your US Patent has been very useful to all these replications and this is an honour for you.
    Samantha

  • artefact

    Dear Mr. Rossi,

    have you tried goldplating layers in your waver for getting alpha emotions in the Cat X?

    Thank you,
    artefact

  • Tom Conover

    Dear Dr. Rossi,

    The Quark is PERFECT! At the very least, the Certification of this should be 1000x easier than a 10kW home unit. Even if the 20kW is delayed for another year for certification, the Quark will “light the way” for you with the Certification.

    1) Has there been communication with the certifier regarding the 100w Quark yet, and if so, may I ask what he/she had to say?

    THANK YOU! 500,000 Quarks will allow everyone to spread the news to people more quickly. We can give them as gifts to people that need to see and touch the technology before they buy …

    2) Is the Quark being setup for test runs of a few hundred or a few thousand with the robotic production equipment yet?

    (hmmm 100w = 8A at 12 volts … this is the Battery-X I asked you for!!!)

    3) What can I do to help, anything?

    Tom

  • Lars

    Is the quark producing 100 W direct electricity?

  • Brokeeper

    Dear Andrea,

    Are you finding the E-Cat X’s electric output efficiency is higher for lower powered modules and is one of the reasons why you are now producing 100W units?
    Thank you,
    Brokeeper

  • Bernie Koppenhofer

    Dr. Rossi: I salute you on your openness to agreements with other companies to be able to scale up your E-Cat technology for the benefit of our planet. Thank you!

  • Andrea Rossi

    Raoul:
    English, Italian, French and some sort of Spanish that I’m trying to learn.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Darel:
    Yes, we are making a prototype that we call “quark” because very tiny and fundamental, with a power of 100 W assemblable up to any power.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Hajla:
    The E-Cat, if it will work, will be distributed in all Europe.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Umbi:
    Yes. F9.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Brokeeper:
    Carnot cycle for domestic E-Cats should be impossible.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Brokeeper

    Dear Andrea,

    At this point, although at lower efficiency, is it possible to have a competitive and cost effective all electric E-Cat X for domestic and/or industrial use, or will an added Carnot Cycle device be required to optimize electrical output? Thank you.

    With much respect,
    Brokeeper

  • umbi

    You mean … Domestic E-CAT will be 20kW ?

  • Hajla

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Do you think the E-Cat will arrive also in Poland?
    Regards,
    Hajla

  • darel

    Dr Rossi,
    Will you have a mini-module assemblable to fulfill all the small or large necessities?
    Cheers,
    Darel

  • Raoul

    Dear Andrea Rossi,
    Which languages you speak with the members of your team?
    Raoul

  • Andrea Rossi

    Akihiro Y :
    Thank you for the information,
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Aphra Danvers:
    Thanks for the information,
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Nils Fryklund:
    1- I think 1000, 250 and 20 will be the baseline.
    These data have to be elaborated. F9.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Nils Fryklund

    Dear Andrea Rossi!
    Will E-cat in Sweden be buildt in 1 MW- containers or in 250 kW units or smaller?

    I have read about small X-rays in E-cat. Is that only when you start it?

    Best regards
    Nils Fryklund

  • Akihiro Y

    Dr Rossi,

    Possible Role of the Gailitis Resonance in Low Energy Nuclear Fusion Experiments

    By Chi-Yu Hu – California State University Long Beach, United States

    http://www.journalofscience.org/index.php/GJSFR/article/viewFile/1463/1324

    Akihiro Y

  • Andrea Rossi

    Orsobubu:
    The idea is intelligent.
    Agreements of this kind will be possible and also with our help.
    Obviously also our Licensees will have to be involved in the formulation of any agreement of the kind.
    F9.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Zuri:
    Thank you for the link
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Heather Hunt:
    Thank you for your concern.
    Check up so far without problems.
    I am a rock and I have a fantastic Team to put the E-Cat technology at the service of People. F9.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • orsobubu

    Dear Andrea,

    if F9>0, if the industrialization is a success and if Leonardo Corp. becomes the market leader, would you consider to give your technology free for some experimental application useful to to the survival of all mankind? I refere to existing sperimental machinery developed to:

    – filter out toxic radionuclides from environment
    – suck in CO2 gas from atmosphere and stow it in liquid form underground
    – scientific space probes propulsion and human space colonies

    These are applications almost impossible to realize for economic reasons in a capitalistic society, due to exorbitant energy cost. If your answer is yes, would you consider to give your technology free, or at very cheap conditions, also after the experimental phase, if successful?

  • Heather Hunt

    Dr Rossi:
    How are going your clinic check ups?
    We need you, without your enormous work we could not see the Ecats in the market.
    May God bless you
    Heather

  • Zuri

    good Sunday 5 min video for your readers: Disruptive Innovation Explained

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDrMAzCHFUU

    Best,

    Zuri

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Readers:
    Please find on
    http://www.rossilivecat.com
    comments published in other posts of this blog
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Byron Mc Donald:
    Thank you for your attention.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Oeystein Lande:
    I am not able to answer.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Øystein Lande

    Dear mr. Rossi,

    What are your thoughts on Gailities resonances explaining LENR?

    Ref.
    http://www.journalofscience.org/index.php/GJSFR/article/viewFile/1463/1324

  • Byron McDonald

    Dear Andrea

    Thank you for confirmation regarding IH as the point of contact in the Americas.

    I will continue my efforts to establish contact with JT.

    Regards

    Byron

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Readers:
    Today has been published on the Journal of Nuclear Physics the paper ” Plasma electrolysis as foundation of Russian E-Cat heat generator ” by Yu.N. Bezutov, A.I. Gerasimova, V.P. Koretskij of the IZMIRAN Inst. of Moscow, Russia.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Byron Mc Donald:
    I comfirm that, obviously, Industrial Heat is the exclusive Licensee of Leonardo Corporation also in all the Americas. What I answered to Frank Acland is that Leonardo Corporation is not intentioned, so far, to give a global license to a single entity. Global means in the whole world.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Byron McDonald

    Dear Andrea

    In a recent reply to Frank Acland you indicated licenses may not be exclusive. For clarity can you please confirm if Industrial Heat is the exclusive licensee for all geographic areas and applications in North America?

    Kindest Regards

    Byron McDonald

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gerard McEk:
    1,2,3: I cannot yet give these data
    4- yes
    5- months
    Thank you for your kind wishes,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Fedir Mykhaylov:
    Thank you for the suggestion.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    No. As well known, we have given to Industrial Heat an exclusive licence for a certain Territory, but so far we do not intend to give a global exclusive to any entity.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    I am glad to see you are open to agreements with companies to develop E-Cat powered products. Do you think you would ever make an exclusive deal with a company, effectively shutting out anyone else from using your technology?

    Many thanks,

    Frank Acland

  • fedir mykhaylov

    Hello, Mr. Rossi. I congratulate you on the completion of a year-long trial of labor megawatt pilot plant. Your new high-temperature reactor, e-Cat X allows you to directly produce electricity for a surprising number. In this reactor zone temperature is 1,400 degrees Celsius. In industrial production plants may direct an additional amount of electricity using thermal catalytic decomposition of water vapor, the hydrogen separation membrane and the direct production of electricity in a fuel cell. This allows efficient use of the high initial temperature of the active zone of reactions. Sincerely. Fedor.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>