Barry Mead:
I already explained clearly which are the reasons why we need to collect orders for at least about 1 million units before delivering.
There are not other issues.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Markku Poisti:
Thank you for your pre-order.
Please read on the pre-order form when we will start the deliveries; as you know, the pre-order form here http://www.ecat.com
If you do not agree, you can cancel your pre-order.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi: If you have a problem with controller stability (or something), why not just admit it and ask for help? Doing NOTHING is only allowing your competition to catch up and overtake your lead in the market! Lately I see nothing but excuses delays, denials, and avoidance in your answers to the legitimate questions from your loyal followers. The interest, excitement, and money available to market your product will not last forever! In my humble opinion you have already wasted too much time STUCK on this one issue. Other inventors are developing very interesting and higher energy density direct electricity producing products that will probably be on the market before you reach your arbitrary 1-Million unit sales number. I want you to succeed, but inaction is not your friend here DO SOMETHING NOW!!!
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I read that within this year you will execute either the plan A or the plan B. Thank you, I understand your extremely difficult position and the extremely difficult obstacles you have to overcome, and strongly appreciate your dedication to your task, so important for the collectivity in this historic period.
All the best,
SMG
Dr Rossi, I too am delighted to read the update of Prof: the Research Interest index of the paper http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
is higher that in the 99% of all the 15 millions of publications of Researchgate and most of the readers are Prof, PhD, Engineers and Senior scientists.
I think this is very, very important.
Best,
Roberto
Dr Rossi,
1- Will the Ecat SKLep be made also in mini-modules of several Watts, so that they could cover more situations ?
2- If yes, will it be possible to pile them up to reach higher powers ?
Cheers
Rudy
I know you are having some kind of vetting process for big buyers in place – but can you give an indication if the total number of orders is currently increasing or decreasing?
we opened a Telegram-Q&A Group for making applications – using the Ecat SKLep – transparent and realizable.
The discussions are mostly written in German and English language.
We also working on a monthly international Ecat Talk via Zoom to exchange ideas and find more supporters.
In this group we also organizing a collective order. The actual amount of Ecats is: 1930 Units.
Surely after the summer holidays this will be much more.
Buon giorno Andrea.
In questo momento di estrema crisi energetica nel quale l’SKL potrebbe far “saltare il banco” non potrebbe essere possibile diminuire la soglia dei 1ML ed aumentare un poco il prezzo della singola unità?
Perdona se scrivo in italiano ma non vorrei essere frainteso con il mio scarso inglese.
Ad majora
Gian Luca from Lago Maggiore
English synopsis: can you reduce the target under 1 million ordered units ?
Dr Rossi:
Today I read on the statistics of the paper here http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
that the Research Interest index of this paper is higher that that of the 99% of the 15 millions publications on Researchgate.
This achievement is really stunning, considering that most of the RG’s publications are made and read by the highest scientific echelons.
Best,
Prof
Dear Dr. Rossi,
I have been following your project for several years and have also enthusiastically told many people – customers and friends – about it.
Since the announcement of the Ecat SKL, I have ordered a total of 45 Ecat SKL in several tranches and of course also reserved the finances for it. Now I come to a point where I no longer tell others enthusiastically about it, but rather with “it could be”, “maybe ” or similar. This is also related to the fact that none of the suggestions from this blog seem to lead to any additional marketing efforts on your part. A permanent presentation via livestream would have been a simple medium, inexpensive and quick to implement, especially in relation to $250 million in sales for $1 million SKlep.
From the blog, however, I interpret that this is a marketing action for you that could come as a Plan B next year. I don’t understand that and it fuels doubts if Sklep is going down the same path as other announcements before. Even on e-catworld.com your project is now only a side topic, there is more info on other projects. In spirit, I too am more active with other solutions to this worsening energy crisis and am already using the money reserved for SKLep for other hopefull and safely available solutions. I fear you are just missing an opportunity…….or you are just not ready to enter the market.
Best regards
Dieter Wagner
Damiamo:
The order for the former orders are not automatically turned into an Ecat SKLep order, because the price is different and is necessary your will. Please go to http://www.ecat.com
and place your pre-order for the Ecat SKleps you want.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I did “book” one e-cat lamp, that I assume has been converted into an e-cat 100w what is the process of ordering a second one ?
On a side note, is it possible to know what is the current “status” ? I have ordered, many years ago, one of the 2kW units and have no idea if it is till pending or not
Caro Andrea Rossi, ogni paio di settimane do un’occhiata al sito e ormai da mesi (o anni) cambia poco: nuovi annunci e nuove attese di un milione di ordini ma nessuna decisione che risolva il problema una volta per tutte e immetta finalmente sul mercato un dispositivo che, sempre che funzioni, potrebbe risolvere i problemi energetici del pianeta e, vista la situazione attuale, anche quelli della pace e la stabilità.
Neanche questa volta è diverso.
Si aspetta il magico milione di ordini e intanto il mondo va a rotoli.
Spero di sbagliarmi ma, gradualmente, la mia convinzione sul funzionamento dell’eCat sta cambiando e temo che esistano reali possibilità che l’aggeggio in realtà non funzioni del tutto.
Un dispositivo veramente “magico” come quello sviluppato da Rossi dovrebbe avere un solo destino: essere “open source” e andrebbe messo a disposizione dell’umanità come il fuoco o la ruota immediatamente. In tal modo risolverebbe anche il problema del “reverse engineering”.
Rossi: con la sua invenzione diventerebbe l’abitante del pianeta più famoso degli (almeno) ultimi 2000 anni. Le darebbero una mezza dozzina di Nobel e avrebbe a disposizione soldi, fama e risorse da assicurarle una spero lunga vita serena e senza preoccupazioni.
E invece siamo qui ad attendere il milione di ordini per motivi economici o di altro tipo a me incomprensibili.
Rossi, costruisca finalmente il suo dispositivo in grande serie facendosi aiutare da governi e aziende e salvi, in poche settimane, il pianeta.
“Il resto è fuffa” come si dice nel nostro Paese. La saluto.
Dear Andrea Rossi, every couple of weeks, I take a look at the site and for months (or years) now, little has changed: new announcements and new expectations of a million orders but no decision that solves the problem once and for all and finally puts on the market a device that, assuming it works, could solve the planet’s energy problems and, given the current situation, even those of peace and stability.
This time is no different either. One waits for the magic million orders and meanwhile the world goes to hell.
I hope I am wrong but, gradually, my belief in how the eCat works is changing and I fear that there is a real possibility that the device does not actually work at all.
A truly ‘magic’ device such as the one developed by Rossi should only have one destiny: to be ‘open source’ and should be made available to mankind like fire or the wheel immediately. This would also solve the problem of ‘reverse engineering’.
Rossi: with your invention you would become the most famous inhabitant of the planet in (at least) the last 2000 years. You would be awarded half a dozen Nobel Prizes and have the money, fame and resources at her disposal to ensure a hopefully long, worry-free life.
Instead we are here waiting for the million orders for economic or other reasons incomprehensible to me.
Rossi, finally build your device in large series with the help of governments and companies and save the planet in a few weeks.
“The rest is fuffa” as we say in our country. Saluti!
Dear Dr. Rossi,
I completely understand the need to generate orders for a certain number of units before you can begin production. I think what most of us don’t understand is the necessity for the basically passive approach to getting orders – how is it that demonstrations and advertising would make reverse engineering more likely? Without being able to look into the SKLep, how could reverse engineering happen? And no-one will be able to look inside until delivery.
Is the problem that you won’t be able to get sufficient orders without a precise delivery date? Because that seems to be what you are trying to do right now. It is confusing.
If you could explain the nature of your difficulty one of your readers might be able to help.
Ad majora!
Ron Stringer
Dear Dr. Rossi,
maybe instead of the price of gas at the stock market it is more important to look at the stock market of electricity in europe. https://energy-charts.info/charts/price_average/chart.htm?l=en&c=ALL&chartColumnSorting=default&partsum=0
Average prices in week 34/2022 are up to 654 Euro/MWh (=65,4 ct/kwh) – but just at the stock market. Sometime it will reach the households, but plus taxes+dues, administration costs, consolidated profit. The governments are desperate because their sanctions backfired while Russia has deflation since June, full employment, no scarce articles ASO.
Really, the market is ripe for your product.
Best regards
M.Reinhold
Mr. Rossi
I have such an idea. The 100W E-cat SKLep is ideal for a wide range of uses, associated with financial opportunity. From 1 E-catSKLep, up to 30 pieces, it is possible to construct, together with the output synchronized inverter, the apparatus which can be connected in parallel to the power supply network and which will supplement the additional energy. Either just 100W or even more, depending on the amount of E-cat SKLep. This assembly can be made mobile.
All the best.
Dear Andrea,
How is possible that a gas price of 300 euro for megawatt in Europe is not influencing your market introduction strategy?
Gas high price would be “the” variable of lives of people of all Europe in autumn.
Don’t you think the right moment for you is now?
A Cool Application Idea… How about using one or a few 100W SKLep unit(s) to provide electrical power to heat artic or cold environment clothing? A typical clothing heating panel uses 7 to 14 Watts of electrical power and full body heated clothing might have 5 or more panels. A backpack could house the SKLep unit(s) with a suitable Controller unit to allow the user to maintain comfort. It might also be usable for ocean survival suits with radio location devices…
1. A single SKLep unit can provide an output voltage greater than 12 VDC. What is the maximum output voltage consistent with 100W output power? 14VDC?
2. A single SKLep unit is power limited to 100W?
3. Running a single unit at a voltage of greater than 12VDC will affect its operating lifetime? Decrease it?
In the initial Bologna testing of your SKLep, the testing showed an output voltage of greater than 14VDC and a power output of greater than 150W. I know that you have some external control via a knob to allow the user to set the output voltage.
Questions:
1. In the production version of the SKLep, is the output voltage limited to approximately 12VDC?
2. In the production version of the SKLep, is the output power limited to approximately 100W?
3. If it is possible to run the production SKLep at an output voltage greater than 12VDC and/or an output power of greater than 100W, will that affect the lifetime of the production SKLep?
Dear Dr. Rossi,
about just four month remain in this year..
Are you still confident to reach the one million pre-orders this year and therefore to start the production and delivery this year, too?
Or will be 900,000 pre-orders enough to start and get the rest a few weeks later?
Best regards
M.Reinhold
Silent Majority Guy:
Thank you for your support,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Barry Mead:
I already explained clearly which are the reasons why we need to collect orders for at least about 1 million units before delivering.
There are not other issues.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Vanessa:
yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Markku Poisti:
Thank you for your pre-order.
Please read on the pre-order form when we will start the deliveries; as you know, the pre-order form here
http://www.ecat.com
If you do not agree, you can cancel your pre-order.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
For me to believe this device is working, I need one in my desk that I can test. I ordered one.
Dear Mr. Rossi,
after customers deposit money, and they will be invited to one of your facilities for testing,
will customers be allowed to measure output current (Amperage) of the E-Cat SKLep?
Have A Nice Day
Vanessa
Dear Dr. Rossi: If you have a problem with controller stability (or something), why not just admit it and ask for help? Doing NOTHING is only allowing your competition to catch up and overtake your lead in the market! Lately I see nothing but excuses delays, denials, and avoidance in your answers to the legitimate questions from your loyal followers. The interest, excitement, and money available to market your product will not last forever! In my humble opinion you have already wasted too much time STUCK on this one issue. Other inventors are developing very interesting and higher energy density direct electricity producing products that will probably be on the market before you reach your arbitrary 1-Million unit sales number. I want you to succeed, but inaction is not your friend here DO SOMETHING NOW!!!
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I read that within this year you will execute either the plan A or the plan B. Thank you, I understand your extremely difficult position and the extremely difficult obstacles you have to overcome, and strongly appreciate your dedication to your task, so important for the collectivity in this historic period.
All the best,
SMG
Dr Rossi, I too am delighted to read the update of Prof: the Research Interest index of the paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
is higher that in the 99% of all the 15 millions of publications of Researchgate and most of the readers are Prof, PhD, Engineers and Senior scientists.
I think this is very, very important.
Best,
Roberto
I think plan B anf plan A are B.S. and that none will be made this year or ever
Dr Rossi,
1- Will the Ecat SKLep be made also in mini-modules of several Watts, so that they could cover more situations ?
2- If yes, will it be possible to pile them up to reach higher powers ?
Cheers
Rudy
Dear Dr. Rossi,
I know you are having some kind of vetting process for big buyers in place – but can you give an indication if the total number of orders is currently increasing or decreasing?
all the best to you and your team,
Gerald
Dear Blog-Readers,
we opened a Telegram-Q&A Group for making applications – using the Ecat SKLep – transparent and realizable.
The discussions are mostly written in German and English language.
We also working on a monthly international Ecat Talk via Zoom to exchange ideas and find more supporters.
In this group we also organizing a collective order. The actual amount of Ecats is: 1930 Units.
Surely after the summer holidays this will be much more.
Link: https://t.me/+dMpJkr9WWw84ZDUy
Greatings
Claus
Claus:
Thank you for your support !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Nagel:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Rossi Blog Readers,
just to refresh it.
Here (Link below) Dr. Rossi did tell the background of his 1.000.000 Pre-order Strategy.
https://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=702#comment-1591571
Let us support him and the world in finding private people or industries, who support to reach the 1.000.000 Order Limit.
Warm Regards
Claus
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
So, can we be sure that within this year you will perform either the plan A or the plan B ?
Best
Nagel
Roby:
Thank you for your attention to our work,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gian Luca:
We are working on it,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Prof:
Thank you for the update,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
Congratulations for the important achievement we got information of from Prof. Very important,
Best
Roby
Buon giorno Andrea.
In questo momento di estrema crisi energetica nel quale l’SKL potrebbe far “saltare il banco” non potrebbe essere possibile diminuire la soglia dei 1ML ed aumentare un poco il prezzo della singola unità?
Perdona se scrivo in italiano ma non vorrei essere frainteso con il mio scarso inglese.
Ad majora
Gian Luca from Lago Maggiore
English synopsis: can you reduce the target under 1 million ordered units ?
Dr Rossi:
Today I read on the statistics of the paper here
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
that the Research Interest index of this paper is higher that that of the 99% of the 15 millions publications on Researchgate.
This achievement is really stunning, considering that most of the RG’s publications are made and read by the highest scientific echelons.
Best,
Prof
Dieter Wagner:
Thank you for your opinion.
Either the plan A or the plan B will be put in operation within this year.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
I have been following your project for several years and have also enthusiastically told many people – customers and friends – about it.
Since the announcement of the Ecat SKL, I have ordered a total of 45 Ecat SKL in several tranches and of course also reserved the finances for it. Now I come to a point where I no longer tell others enthusiastically about it, but rather with “it could be”, “maybe ” or similar. This is also related to the fact that none of the suggestions from this blog seem to lead to any additional marketing efforts on your part. A permanent presentation via livestream would have been a simple medium, inexpensive and quick to implement, especially in relation to $250 million in sales for $1 million SKlep.
From the blog, however, I interpret that this is a marketing action for you that could come as a Plan B next year. I don’t understand that and it fuels doubts if Sklep is going down the same path as other announcements before. Even on e-catworld.com your project is now only a side topic, there is more info on other projects. In spirit, I too am more active with other solutions to this worsening energy crisis and am already using the money reserved for SKLep for other hopefull and safely available solutions. I fear you are just missing an opportunity…….or you are just not ready to enter the market.
Best regards
Dieter Wagner
M.Reinhold:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Tom Conover,
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ron Stringer:
Thank you for your insight, I already explained the situation.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Enzo Amato:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Damiamo:
The order for the former orders are not automatically turned into an Ecat SKLep order, because the price is different and is necessary your will. Please go to
http://www.ecat.com
and place your pre-order for the Ecat SKleps you want.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea
I did “book” one e-cat lamp, that I assume has been converted into an e-cat 100w what is the process of ordering a second one ?
On a side note, is it possible to know what is the current “status” ? I have ordered, many years ago, one of the 2kW units and have no idea if it is till pending or not
Thanks
Caro Andrea Rossi, ogni paio di settimane do un’occhiata al sito e ormai da mesi (o anni) cambia poco: nuovi annunci e nuove attese di un milione di ordini ma nessuna decisione che risolva il problema una volta per tutte e immetta finalmente sul mercato un dispositivo che, sempre che funzioni, potrebbe risolvere i problemi energetici del pianeta e, vista la situazione attuale, anche quelli della pace e la stabilità.
Neanche questa volta è diverso.
Si aspetta il magico milione di ordini e intanto il mondo va a rotoli.
Spero di sbagliarmi ma, gradualmente, la mia convinzione sul funzionamento dell’eCat sta cambiando e temo che esistano reali possibilità che l’aggeggio in realtà non funzioni del tutto.
Un dispositivo veramente “magico” come quello sviluppato da Rossi dovrebbe avere un solo destino: essere “open source” e andrebbe messo a disposizione dell’umanità come il fuoco o la ruota immediatamente. In tal modo risolverebbe anche il problema del “reverse engineering”.
Rossi: con la sua invenzione diventerebbe l’abitante del pianeta più famoso degli (almeno) ultimi 2000 anni. Le darebbero una mezza dozzina di Nobel e avrebbe a disposizione soldi, fama e risorse da assicurarle una spero lunga vita serena e senza preoccupazioni.
E invece siamo qui ad attendere il milione di ordini per motivi economici o di altro tipo a me incomprensibili.
Rossi, costruisca finalmente il suo dispositivo in grande serie facendosi aiutare da governi e aziende e salvi, in poche settimane, il pianeta.
“Il resto è fuffa” come si dice nel nostro Paese. La saluto.
Dear Andrea Rossi, every couple of weeks, I take a look at the site and for months (or years) now, little has changed: new announcements and new expectations of a million orders but no decision that solves the problem once and for all and finally puts on the market a device that, assuming it works, could solve the planet’s energy problems and, given the current situation, even those of peace and stability.
This time is no different either. One waits for the magic million orders and meanwhile the world goes to hell.
I hope I am wrong but, gradually, my belief in how the eCat works is changing and I fear that there is a real possibility that the device does not actually work at all.
A truly ‘magic’ device such as the one developed by Rossi should only have one destiny: to be ‘open source’ and should be made available to mankind like fire or the wheel immediately. This would also solve the problem of ‘reverse engineering’.
Rossi: with your invention you would become the most famous inhabitant of the planet in (at least) the last 2000 years. You would be awarded half a dozen Nobel Prizes and have the money, fame and resources at her disposal to ensure a hopefully long, worry-free life.
Instead we are here waiting for the million orders for economic or other reasons incomprehensible to me.
Rossi, finally build your device in large series with the help of governments and companies and save the planet in a few weeks.
“The rest is fuffa” as we say in our country. Saluti!
Dear Dr. Rossi,
I completely understand the need to generate orders for a certain number of units before you can begin production. I think what most of us don’t understand is the necessity for the basically passive approach to getting orders – how is it that demonstrations and advertising would make reverse engineering more likely? Without being able to look into the SKLep, how could reverse engineering happen? And no-one will be able to look inside until delivery.
Is the problem that you won’t be able to get sufficient orders without a precise delivery date? Because that seems to be what you are trying to do right now. It is confusing.
If you could explain the nature of your difficulty one of your readers might be able to help.
Ad majora!
Ron Stringer
Dear Andrea,
Here is an interesting list of 11 alternative energy countries success stories at:
https://www.climatecouncil.org.au/11-countries-leading-the-charge-on-renewable-energy/
Warm Regards
Tom
Dear Dr. Rossi,
maybe instead of the price of gas at the stock market it is more important to look at the stock market of electricity in europe.
https://energy-charts.info/charts/price_average/chart.htm?l=en&c=ALL&chartColumnSorting=default&partsum=0
Average prices in week 34/2022 are up to 654 Euro/MWh (=65,4 ct/kwh) – but just at the stock market. Sometime it will reach the households, but plus taxes+dues, administration costs, consolidated profit. The governments are desperate because their sanctions backfired while Russia has deflation since June, full employment, no scarce articles ASO.
Really, the market is ripe for your product.
Best regards
M.Reinhold
Jan Srajer:
Thank you for the suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Domenico Canino:
You are right,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Mr. Rossi
I have such an idea. The 100W E-cat SKLep is ideal for a wide range of uses, associated with financial opportunity. From 1 E-catSKLep, up to 30 pieces, it is possible to construct, together with the output synchronized inverter, the apparatus which can be connected in parallel to the power supply network and which will supplement the additional energy. Either just 100W or even more, depending on the amount of E-cat SKLep. This assembly can be made mobile.
All the best.
Dear Andrea,
300 euros for megawatt gas price in Europe.
Don’t you yhink the right moment for introducing you revolutionary tech is now?
Dear Andrea,
How is possible that a gas price of 300 euro for megawatt in Europe is not influencing your market introduction strategy?
Gas high price would be “the” variable of lives of people of all Europe in autumn.
Don’t you think the right moment for you is now?
Steven Nicholes Karels:
Thank you for the sugestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
A Cool Application Idea… How about using one or a few 100W SKLep unit(s) to provide electrical power to heat artic or cold environment clothing? A typical clothing heating panel uses 7 to 14 Watts of electrical power and full body heated clothing might have 5 or more panels. A backpack could house the SKLep unit(s) with a suitable Controller unit to allow the user to maintain comfort. It might also be usable for ocean survival suits with radio location devices…
Thoughts?
Steven Nicholes Karels:
1. depends on the situation. Normally is 14 V
2. yes
3. depends on the situation
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Clarifying your previous responses to my posting:
1. A single SKLep unit can provide an output voltage greater than 12 VDC. What is the maximum output voltage consistent with 100W output power? 14VDC?
2. A single SKLep unit is power limited to 100W?
3. Running a single unit at a voltage of greater than 12VDC will affect its operating lifetime? Decrease it?
Steven N. Karels:
1. no
2. for a single unit yes
3. putting unit in series yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
In the initial Bologna testing of your SKLep, the testing showed an output voltage of greater than 14VDC and a power output of greater than 150W. I know that you have some external control via a knob to allow the user to set the output voltage.
Questions:
1. In the production version of the SKLep, is the output voltage limited to approximately 12VDC?
2. In the production version of the SKLep, is the output power limited to approximately 100W?
3. If it is possible to run the production SKLep at an output voltage greater than 12VDC and/or an output power of greater than 100W, will that affect the lifetime of the production SKLep?
Michael:
I am not able to answer so far,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Luca:
Thank you for the link.
Honoured to read it,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Dr Rossi
Did you know this US Navy (NAVSEA) presentation that mentions also your your work ?
https://web.archive.org/web/20160331230140/https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Attachment/386-IEEE-brief-DeChiaro-9-2015-pdf/
Regards
Luca
Dear Dr. Rossi,
about just four month remain in this year..
Are you still confident to reach the one million pre-orders this year and therefore to start the production and delivery this year, too?
Or will be 900,000 pre-orders enough to start and get the rest a few weeks later?
Best regards
M.Reinhold