# United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

### 40,876 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

• Robert Curto

2\$ in 1960 is worth how much today
Click on:
1960 Calculate the value of \$2 in 1960
Robert Curto
Ft. Lauderdale Florida

• Andrea Rossi

http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published in other posts of this blog.
Warm Regards,
A.R.

• Andrea Rossi

Frank Acland:
Exactly.
Warm Regards,
A.R.

• Andrea Rossi

Orsobubu:
in 1965 a Fiat 500 had a price of 500 000 lire.
Today costs 10 000 Euro (20 000 000 lire).
Yours the maths.
Warm Regards
A.R.

• orsobubu

Ok, I calculated 16\$ because I take into account the dollar as a commodity, as relative to its unskilled labour value, because I’m a marxist, but Andrea Rossi is a capitalist and for him the dollar is wealth with intrinsec economic power, so the value could be also more than 65 dollars today

https://www.measuringworth.com/worthmeasures.php

• orsobubu

Rodney, you said that oil price could decline so much to become competitive with possible future cold fusion energy, perhaps reaching 2\$/barrel. But 2\$ in 1960-1969 equaled to 16-13\$ today. And there are estraction costs to consider, today between 6-10\$ for the cheapest countries. For example, during last fall in gold price, it touched 1060\$/oz, where all-in extraction costs are about 1000-1050\$, it could not go much under that. In oil production, it is also possible environmental costs could be calculated after all, for example in China, as the ecosystem damage is starting to exert an heavy toll on population health. Then, I would be more than happy if oil was used only for special applications like high quality plastics instead of burning it!

Obviously, all this is true at market prices, but we know that markets get rigged and distorted all the time. Look for example at helium prices, they should be twenty-fold the market price, because US government has a strange strategy of discarding and waste the extremely precious noble gas just to get the national strategic reserve exhausted and then re-start with stellar market prices. Mysteries of capitalism! Crazy idea: maybe the E-cat can directly produce helium too, besides heat, electricity, light, chocolate… please Andrea take a look hehe

• Frank Acland

Dear Andrea,

When you say in Europe “there will not be privileged areas” do you mean that Europe will be one single market with E-Cats available to all countries there, regardless of where they are manufactured?

Best wishes,

Frank Acland

• Andrea Rossi

Albert N:
Yes
Warm Regards
A.R.

• Andrea Rossi

Giuseppe:
I am sorry, but I cannot answer yet. But our price will be low enough to prevent the competition.
Warm Regards
A.R.

• Andrea Rossi

Rodney Nicholson:
2\$ in the Sixties had more worth than 40\$ today.
Warm Regards
A.R.

• Andrea Rossi

Jan Farrugia:
In Europe there will not be privileged areas. The distribution will be proportionated.

Warm Regards
A.R.

• Jan Farrugia

The time of being able to purchase an e-Cat is fast approaching. Would it be possible, considering that Italy will be in pole position in regard to e-Cat sales, that we Maltese be able to purchase e-Cats from Italy, which is very close to us geographically?

• “DrD
April 1, 2016 at 7:15 AM

Dear Andrea,
You often say “all the energy sources will have to be integrated”.
Is it possible to elaborate? ”

In addition to other considerations, when demand for crude oil declines so will its price. There is a range of prices at which crude will become competitive with LENR for various petroleum product end uses. At a low enough price crude could also become competitive with LENR purely for its energy content. Andrea has previously pointed out LENR would not be competitive for water desalination. In the 1960s crude traded at \$2 a barrel. When demand for crude becomes decisively less than production capacity perhaps it will trade near that price again? This is ‘The Price Mechanism’ at work preserving resources for more important uses. Each ‘niche’ will determine what works best given the resource prices prevailing at the time.

Rodney.

• Giuseppe

Dear Andrea,
probably you already have an idea for the E-Cat selling price.
What do you think can be an honest cost of a single 100W Quark-X for the final customer,
some thing between:
1) 5-10 \$
2) 10-50 \$
3) 50-100 \$
4) 100-200 \$
5) 200-1000 \$
Regards, Giuseppe

• AlbertN

Dear Dr. Rossi,
You have stated that you are ‘very pleased’ with the ERV report. Hopefully the results will be released soon.
Do you think that the results will be useful for the manufacturing?

Warm regards,
AlbertN

• Andrea Rossi

Mike Henderson:
Warm Regards
A.R.

• Mike Henderson

Dear Mr. Rossi,
Historically, the first uses of improved power sources are often not peaceful ones. Do you have any concerns about unfriendly uses of your invention? Have you discussed opportunities for using your invention for weapons? Ate there ways of detecting LENR reactors at shipping docks, airports, etc.? Both military and corporate interests should be extremely interested.
Congratulations,
Mike

• Andrea Rossi

Svein Henrik:
Thanks: let me say that I am very optimistic even if much work remains to be done and still is F8.
Warm Regards
A.R.

• Svein Henrik

Dear Andrea.
If Cristal balls are requested, You may pick the very one you need: https://www.google.no/search?q=crystal+ball&biw=973&bih=932&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi_p4f24u3LAhVBCiwKHR0ZAhEQsAQIHQ
I rater trust to your best judgement, even if you are uncertain.

Best regards: Svein Henrik.

• Andrea Rossi

DrD:
Thank you for your respectable opinion.
Warm Regards
A.R.

• DrD

Dear, Andrea,
I must dissagree, you are surely not curmudgeon.
BTW, I had to look it.
God Bless and continue to prosper you.
Dave

• Andrea Rossi

Svein Henrik:
1- from June on, all is not impossible
2- cristal ball requested
3- no. Leonardo Corporation is the owner of all the IP related to the E-Cat and we of Leonardo Corporation decide independently our strategy, depending only on the results we achieve with our R&D, that is on course in laboratories independent from all our Licensees. Obviously, we are delighted to listen and hold in due consideration all the suggestion our Licensees give us.
4- possibly
5- maybe
6- yes, when the product will be ready, not in phase of preliminar R&D
Warm Regards,
A.R.

• Andrea Rossi

DrD:
I do not agree. LENR will be integrated with all the other energy sources, to match the expanding needs of multiverse consumes and their sustainability, as curmudgeon as this may seem.
Warm Regards,
A.R.

• DrD

Dear Andrea,
You often say “all the energy sources will have to be integrated”.
Is it possible to elaborate?
I confess to being a little confused as my expectation is that, given a little time
your, LENR alone will, power automobiles, ships etc, (maybe aircraft) and provide all our needs for electric and heating without help from fosils.
Am I too optimistic?

• Svein Henrik

Dear Andrea.
We are earlier informed of a new ECXQ test in Europe and end of R&D period within 2 month.
2. Will details of ECXQ be presented in May, June or later?
3. Are answers the above questions depended of IH’s decisions?
4. Will ECXQs be made available to cooperating OEMs in Europe?
5. Is the 1 year function period of the ECXQ dependent of the intermittens of use?
6. May it be an idea to give samples of single units to be tested by universities?
Thank You for earlier answers and attention.
Regards: Svein Henrik

• Andrea Rossi

Terry:
Surely within 2016.
Warm Regards,
A.R.

• Andrea Rossi

Richie:
We’ll do soon, after all changes have been made.
Warm Regards,
A.R.

• Andrea Rossi

Rafal Krych:
Thank you for the interesting links.
Nonetheless, I repeat that all the energy sources will have to be integrated: they all are precious, each of them distinguished in its specificity.
Warm Regards,
A.R.

• Rafal Krych

I think that something is cooking up here behind a courtains. Maybe the World finally starts to see that end of “Fossil Fuels Era” is coming inevitably. Who knows, maybe news about successful outcome of 1MW reactor is a tipping point here.

Early this year, ARAMCO the most valuable company in the World suddenly announced it is going for IPO:
http://fortune.com/2016/01/13/why-a-saudi-aramco-ipo-makes-absolutely-no-sense-for-saudi-arabia/

Next we heard that Rockefeller foundation is going to divest from fossil fuels including oil:
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/sep/22/rockefeller-heirs-divest-fossil-fuels-climate-change

Last week enormous Unaoil bribery scandal surfaced. Isn’t that due to losing some protection umbrella? Why Unaoil was allowed to operate unnoticied for 15 years?
https://www.rt.com/news/337961-unaoil-corruption-scandal-investigation/

Is this mysterious reason behind all that things just fear of climate change and a sudden urge to become green? I don’t think so. It is just a PR stunt.
Seems that oil companies are finally aware that we are reaching end of “Fossil Fuels Era”. The LENR breakthrough is coming and they know about this:

What we see is just a cleaning operation. It is business closure time and they are desperately trying to squeeze as much money as they can before everything collapses.
Andrea, hope you are going to peacefuly sail through turbulent moments which are ahead of you. Good Luck!

• Richie

Dear Andrea:
Is it possible for you to publish an updated list of all your licensees ?
Congratulations for your US Patent and the results of the 352 days test of the 1 MW E-Cat: you made History.
Regards,
Richie

• Terry

Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
When do you think the E-Cat QuarkX will be in operation in an industrial concern, as it happened with the 1 MW E-Cat ?
Cheers,
Terry

• Andrea Rossi

D.Travchenko:
Dr Parkhomov is surely a scientist I will work with, sooner or later.
Warm Regards,
A.R.

• Andrea Rossi

Italo R.:
Warm Regards,
A.R.

• Andrea Rossi

Orsobbu:
Warm Regards,
A.R.

• orsobubu

Andrea, the phrase on the guinea pig was a great fun to read but moving and emotional, it perfectly and shortly describes the very essence about yourself as a man I think! Thank you also for this little gem!

(I was being completely fooled after the first words, I must say with a slight subtle shiver of scandalized, leftist petty bourgeois discomfort for the poor little sacrificed pet, by you and your brutal distopic team of heartless robots!)

• D. Travchenko

Dr Andrea Rossi:
Are you still in contact with Dr Parkhomov ?
Warm Regards,
DT

• Italo R.

Here is a beautiful article to read:

http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/03/31/the-e-cat-moment-billy-jackson/

Each one of us will say, in the future: “I was there, witness of those days…”

Kind Regards
Italo R.

• Andrea Rossi

Karl- Henrik Malmqvist:
Thank you for the very interesting link
Warm Regards
A.R.

• Andrea Rossi

Fedir Maykhaylov:
Warm Regards
A.R

• Andrea Rossi

Oystein Lande:
F8.
Warm Regards
A.R.

• Oystein Lande

Dear mr Rossi,

Regarding e-cat and mouse configuration:

can you now explain what the mouse actually consist of?

• Hello, Mr. Rossi. When you create an e-Cat reactor quark X you have moved to higher temperatures and smaller size of the reactor. Apparently it requires the use of more expensive refractory materials and high precision heat transducer assembly into electricity. Perhaps it makes sense to transfer to reload cartridges only fuel converters leaving the customer? You are using carbon nanotubes to improve the characteristics of the emitter?
With respect Fedor.

• Karl-Henrik Malmqvist

Dear Andrea,
Here is a video of an ABB robot working as a gift wrapper in Sweden last Christmas.
Best Regards,
Karl-Henrik, Sweden

• Andrea Rossi

Peter Metz:
When you think you won you begin to lose.
A.R.

• Andrea Rossi

Yuriy Isaev:
I am mKing my duty: thank you for your and your wife’s sympathy, typical of the Russian soul.
Warm Regards
A.R.

• Andrea Rossi

Yuriy Isaev:
I do not agree: all the energy sources have to be integrated.
Warm Regards
A.R.

• Andrea Rossi

Gian Luca:
he he he
Warm Regards
A.R.

• Andrea Rossi

Jody:
Thank you
Warm Regards
A.R.

• Andrea Rossi

Tom Conover
Surely I will keep you updated
for ABB. About tennis better let it alone.
Warm Regards
A.R.

• Andrea Rossi

John C Evans: