Dr Rossi,
I am watching all the videos on Youtube with the 6 hours Latina race of the Renault Twizy powered by the Eat and the following interviews. I always had been sceptic of the Ecat, I must acknowledge this time you made a convincing test.
Congratulations,
Buck Warner
This project is designed to showcase the immense potential of your ECAT technology at scale in Germany, a country with a strong focus on renewable energy and sustainability. The calculations indicate significant profitability, even under conservative assumptions. With proper execution, a 10-MW ECAT installation could set a benchmark for large-scale, zero-emission energy production.
However, a question arises: Why wait for an order of a million 100-Watt ECATs to begin mass production? The demand for clean, affordable energy is immense, and smaller devices would open the door to residential and decentralized applications. A broad rollout could accelerate market acceptance and establish ECAT as a cornerstone of the global energy transition. Let’s bring this vision to life together.
Project Title:
Sustainable Energy Production with a 10-MW ECAT Generator
Project Description:
This proposal focuses on the installation and operation of an innovative 10-MW ECAT generator for sustainable energy production in Germany. The generated electricity will primarily be sold to local businesses and industrial clients who are eager for cost-efficient, environmentally friendly energy. Additionally, the generator’s zero-emission capabilities will allow participation in the CO2 certificate market as a secondary revenue stream.
After Loan Repayment: €9,999,663 – €3,089,000 = €6,910,663/year
Economic Metrics:
Payback Period: Approximately 2.5 years (based on conservative electricity price)
Net Monthly Profit: Approximately €575,889
Net Annual Profit: Approximately €6,910,663
Market Analysis:
Local Customers:
Businesses and industrial facilities in Zwingenberg and the surrounding region demonstrate strong interest in affordable and ecologically produced electricity.
Target audience:
High-demand enterprises
Medium-sized businesses and municipal facilities.
Competitive Advantages:
Electricity price below the market average for commercial customers (€0.10/kWh vs. €0.20-€0.25/kWh typical market price).
Additional revenue from CO2 certificates.
Project Benefits for the Bank:
Stable Business Model:
Conservatively calculated profits.
Long-term revenue streams through electricity contracts and CO2 certificates.
Sustainability:
Contribution to CO2 reduction and the energy transition.
Positive impact on the regional economy.
Risk Minimization:
Solid financial model.
High demand for green electricity in the region.
Required Documentation:
Business plan with detailed revenue and cost projections.
Technical evaluation of ECAT technology and certification of zero-emission operation.
Site analysis (Germany).
List of potential customers (with non-binding letters of intent).
Financing plan and collateral (e.g., CO2 certificates as an additional revenue source).
The drones over New Jersey reportedly have no heat signal. Are they powered by Ecats? If not, that would be a very awesome demonstration, get lots of press.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Thank you very much for your quick reply.
Would a voltage of 30000 volts be possible with a 10 watt ECAT and if so would the weight and dimensions of the ECAT increase significantly?
JORN-ERIK-OMMANG, ENG. :
Your comment is important.
You opened a window that fulfilled of light a dark room.
I think we could walk together, and will contact you directly, because I understand that our Team has to learn from you.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Thank You for the amazing work You have performed during all these years.
You can soon earn 796 524 EURO, above the purchase price in carbon credits, by running the 1MW ECAT ZPE-Generator in EU the expected operational lifespan of the unit.
The total earned EURO in carbon credits over the expected operational lifespan of the 1 MW ECAT ZPE-Generator unit 3 176 399 EURO.
Energy-related greenhouse gas emissions account for the majority of all anthropogenic emissions – about 80% in the USA and the European Union. Therefore it is in the energy sector global warming and global greenhouse gas emissions shall be targeted and not areas like agriculture with BOVAER and 3-NOP.
Your Company introduced the ECAT ZPE-Generators at a public demonstration on September 27th, 2024 at Latina Italy where an ECAT-powered electric vehicle, WITH THE 3 kW ECAT ZPE-Generator, with a normal range of 75 km on a single charge, drove for over 6 hours for a distance of 201 km. During this time the state of charge of the battery increased from 62 per cent to 83 per cent.
The CO2 reductions that will soon be achieved when using the 1 kW, 3 kW and 1 MW pre-assembled ECAT ZPE-Generators in the areas of Norway, EU and USA for the periods of 1 year and 11,4 years (100 000h), the expected operational lifespan of the units and without any fuel cost are shown here:
CO2 REDUCTION FROM ECAT ZPE-Generator USED IN NORWAY:
One 1 kW ECAT ZPE-Generator, weighing only 2 kg, will save this much CO2 when used in Norway (without any fuel cost):
0.015 kgCO2/kWh x 1 kW x 8 760h = 131 kg CO2 in one year and more than
0.015 kgCO2/kWh x 1 kW x 100 000h = 1 500 kg CO2 over 100 000 hours (11,4 years – expected operational lifespan of the unit – without any fuel cost).
One 3 kW ECAT ZPE-Generator, weighing only 4 kg, will save this much CO2 when used in Norway (without any fuel cost):
0.015 kgCO2/kWh x 3 kW x 8 760h = 394 kg CO2 in one year and more than
0.015 kgCO2/kWh x 3 kW x 100 000h = 4 500 kg CO2 over 100 000 hours (11,4 years – expected operational lifespan of the unit – without any fuel cost)
1 MW pre-assembled ECAT ZPE-Generator, the size of a half standard (20 feet) shipping container, will save this much CO2 when used in Norway (without any fuel cost):
0.015 kgCO2/kWh x 1000 kW x 8 760h = 131 400 kg CO2 in one year and more than
0.015 kgCO2/kWh x 1000 kW x 100 000h = 1 500 000 kg CO2 over 100 000 hours (11,4 years – expected operational lifespan of the unit – without any fuel cost)
CO2 REDUCTION FROM ECAT ZPE-Generator USED IN EU:
One 1 kW ECAT ZPE-Generator, weighing 2 kg, will save this much CO2 when used in EU (without any fuel cost):
0.493 kgCO2/kWh x 1 kW x 8 760h = 4 318 kg CO2 in one year and more than
0.493 kgCO2/kWh x 1 kW x 100 000h = 49 300 kg CO2 over 100 000 hours (11,4 years – expected operational lifespan of the unit – without any fuel cost)
One 3 kW ECAT ZPE-Generator, weighing only 4 kg, will save this much CO2 when used in EU (without any fuel cost):
0.493 kgCO2/kWh x 3 kW x 8 760h = 12 956 kg CO2 in one year and more than
0.493 kgCO2/kWh x 3 kW x 100 000h = 147 900 kg CO2 over 100 000 hours (11,4 years – expected operational lifespan of the unit – without any fuel cost)
1 MW pre-assembled ECAT ZPE-Generator, the size of a half standard (20 feet) shipping container, will save this much CO2 when used in EU (without any fuel cost):
0.493 kgCO2/kWh x 1000 kW x 8 760h = 4 318 680 kg CO2 in one year and more than
0.493 kgCO2/kWh x 1000 kW x 100 000h = 49 300 000 kg CO2 over 100 000 hours (11,4 years – expected operational lifespan of the unit – without any fuel cost)
CO2 REDUCTION FROM ECAT ZPE-Generator USED IN USA:
One 1 kW ECAT ZPE-Generator, weighing only 2 kg, will save this much CO2 used in USA (without any fuel cost):
0.367 kgCO2/kWh x 1 kW x 8 760h = 3 215 kg CO2 in one year and more than
0.367 kgCO2/kWh x 1 kW x 100 000h = 36 700 kg CO2 over 100 000 hours (11,4 years – expected operational lifespan of the unit – without any fuel cost)
One 3 kW ECAT ZPE-Generator, weighing only 4 kg, will save this much CO2 used in USA (without any fuel cost):
0.367 kgCO2/kWh x 3 kW x 8 760h = 9 645 kg CO2 in one year and more than
0.367 kgCO2/kWh x 3 kW x 100 000h = 110 100 kg CO2 over 100 000 hours (11,4 years – expected operational lifespan of the unit – without any fuel cost)
1 MW pre-assembled ECAT ZPE-Generator, the size of a half standard (20 feet) shipping container, will save this much CO2 used in USA (without any fuel cost):
0.367 kgCO2/kWh x 1000 kW x 8 760h = 3 214 902 kg CO2 in one year and more than
0.367 kgCO2/kWh x 1000 kW x 100 000h = 36 700 000 kg CO2 over 100 000 hours (11,4 years – expected operational lifespan of the unit – without any fuel cost)
Carbon offsets are sold on the voluntary carbon credit market by organizations, projects, or individuals to fund their green projects. The two types of carbon credits are voluntary emissions reduction (VER) and certified emissions reduction (CER).
In December 2024 the carbon credits cost in the EU was 64.43 EURO/tCO2e and historically, EU Carbon Permits reached an all time high of 105.73 EURO in February of 2023.
A 1 MW pre-assembled ECAT ZPE-Generator will over 100 000 hours (11,4 years – expected operational lifespan of the unit – without any fuel cost) be able to earn 207 078 EURO pr. year in CO2 carbon credits without fuel cost.
The total earned EURO in carbon credits over the expected operational lifespan of the 1 MW ECAT ZPE-Generator unit 3 176 399 EURO.
0.493 kgCO2/kWh x 1000 kW x 100 000h = 49 300 000 kg CO2 x 64.43 EURO/tCO2e =
3 176 399 EURO in CO2 carbon credits.
The cost for the 1 MW ECAT ZPE-Generator is $2.5 million or
2.379.875 Euro
In 11,4 years (100 000h, the expected operational lifespan of the unit) the 1 MW ECAT ZPE-Generator can earn around 3 176 399 EURO in carbon credits which is 133,5 % of the purchase price of the generator.
You can earn 796 524 EURO, above the purchase price in carbon credits, by running the 1MW ECAT ZPE-Generator the expected operational lifespan of the unit.
The thing is that the carbon credit system will be long gone after some years when real climate solution technologies like the ECAT ZPE-Generator are on the marked.
Carbon credits represent reductions in emissions from renewable energy projects. They can be sold on exchanges like the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) or the U.S. Climate Mitigation Initiative (US CMI). The value of a carbon credit depends on where it’s sold and how much is generated as part of that program.
Data:
Norway: In 2023 the average emissions of Norway were 0.015 kgCO2/kWh
EU: 2023 Europeisk residual mixes average CO2 content 0.493 kgCO2/kWh
USA: U.S. net generation resulted in about of 0.367 kgCO2/kWh emissions per kWh.
1 year = 8 760 hours
11,41 years = 100 000 h
Specifications (per 1 MW Electricity output):
Size: One half size (20 ft) shipping container Expected operational lifespan: 100 000 hours Electric generating unit (EGU): 1 MWh (voltage can be configured to suit customer needs)
Yours Sincerely,
Jorn-Erik Ommang, Eng.
Former Director R&D Zero-Point Energy (ZPE) (UK), Project Manager Oil & Gas, Engineer, Examined Lead Assessor Quality Systems (UK).
Claus B.:
I never said that the Voltage is variable or adjustable: as a matter of fact: as a matter of fact, I always said that the Voltage is fixed, with normal tolerances.
Warm Regards
Yet another eCat NGU Application – Professional Illuminated Water Fountains
Continuous LED illuminated water fountains require a moderate amount of power for long periods (e.g. years). Use of NGU power units are ideally suited for this application.
Savings
1. No Grid electrical costs, no increasing electricity rates.
2. No need to run power cables to the fountain.
3. Control could be WiFi or similar RF communication capability.
4. Zero environmental impact.
Dear Andrea, undoubtedly you are too modest to acknowledge your own stature as perhaps the greatest scientist of the past century. In the Christian world Chistmas is fast approaching. The commencement of large scale manufacture of E Cat technology and distribution would be a wonderful gift to tghe entire world.
You have often replied that the output voltage of the E-Cat is variable or can be adjusted:
1) In what range can the output voltage of an E-Cat 100W be adjusted?
2) Can the output voltage be adjusted by the user himself?
3) In what range can the output voltages of the larger E-Cat generators a) 1kW, b)2kW, c)3kW, d) 5kW and e) 10kW be adjusted?
4) Is it possible to connect an E-Cat in parallel to a battery with a BMS? a) When idling, the battery is charged until the BMS switches off at 90-95% charge and b) under load, the E-Cat and the battery work in parallel and c) if the current is too high, the E-Cat switches off and the battery alone supplies the power. Is this correct?
Italo R.:
Very interesting; Perplexity A.I. proposes intelligent suggestions generally valid in all similar situations; some of them are not applicable in our specific situation, most are valid and already complied with.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Massimo:
Thank you for your opinion.
Please note that we cancelled the much longer Italian text of yours, because this blog is in English, to be read globally.
From now on we will publish comments in other languages only if there is a complete English translation, not just a short synopsis.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I believe that the use of only ecats is too expensive for the disconnection from the grid. The problem is the more convenient balance among ecat/inverter/battery. The real expectation is the boiler that will heat the water with ecat.: how much it will cost? It will mean a complete disconnection from electric and methane gas grid!
Paul Dodgshun:
Yes, it is possible, but must be done by a specifically certified contractor, otherwise the operation is dangerous. We can supply him instructions, if he wants.
We can do it, as an optional.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi,
I asked an AI (Perplexity) what could be the optimal strategies to help spread the E-Cat. The following are the proposals of Perplexity.
Are they applicable? Some maybe yes, others maybe are already surpassed by the development of events.
However they can be useful to think or rethink some improvements.
—————————————————-
Dr. Andrea Rossi, inventor of the E-CAT-NGU, has presented an electric power generator that promises to revolutionize the energy sector.
However, his approach and management of his invention are crucial for its success.
Here are some strategies that Rossi might consider to “save both the goat and the cabbage,” meaning to protect his invention while seeking to make a positive impact in the market.
Optimal Behaviors for Andrea Rossi:
1- Collaboration with Independent Scientists:
Rossi should seek to collaborate with independent and respected scientists in the field of physics to conduct rigorous and transparent tests.
This could help validate the effectiveness of his generator and enhance the credibility of his invention in both scientific and commercial realms.
2 – Transparency and Communication:
It is essential for Rossi to adopt a more transparent approach regarding the results of his tests.
Publishing data in peer-reviewed scientific journals would help dispel doubts and gain trust from both the public and investors.
3 – Gradual Commercialization Strategy:
Instead of imposing such a high minimum pre-order limit, Rossi could consider a gradual commercialization strategy, starting with small productions and gradually increasing production capacity.
This approach would reduce financial risk and allow for useful feedback from early users.
4 – Intellectual Property Protection:
To prevent the risk of reverse engineering, Rossi should invest in robust intellectual property protection through strong patents and legal strategies to defend his invention against potential competitors.
5 – Market Education:
Rossi could initiate educational campaigns to inform the public and investors about the benefits of E-CAT-NGU, clarifying its practical applications and potential positive environmental impact. This could help create stronger demand for the product.
6 – Development of Strategic Partnerships:
Establishing alliances with companies in the energy or automotive sectors could facilitate market access and provide necessary resources for the production and distribution of E-CAT-NGU.
———————————————————-
Can the 3kW NGU have its thirty 100W modules connected in series, so as to supply 360V DC across all the 100W modules?
Has this configuration been tested?
My PV inverter documentation lists the following :-
PV input voltage 370V in a range of 125V-500V
MPPT range 150V-425V
Startup voltage 125V
I apologize if this question has been asked and answered before. How can the NGU start-up by just connecting a load to the connecting terminals? when there is no initial power (like a battery or alike) in the NGU. This question becomes apparent if it is so that the NGU consist of a discharge tube as discussed in previous post and as shown in a previous demonstration by you. Thank you if you can answer.
If it now is signed a global agreement for manufacturing and selling the Ecats.
Today may be the the right day to remember that on 14 December 1900 Max Planck presented his theoretical explanation involving quanta of energy at a meeting of the Physikalische Gesellschaft in Berlin.
In doing so he had to reject his belief that the second law of thermodynamics was an absolute law of nature, and accept Boltzmann’s interpretation that it was a statistical law.
Svein
Persistently high energy costs are an entrenched problem for Europe. In 2023, industrial electricity and gas prices in the European Union were 158 percent and 345 percent higher than in the United States, respectively 1.
Among industrialised economies, only the United Kingdom is more expensive than the EU when it comes to final industrial electricity prices.
The electricity price in UK was in 2023/24, 400 Euros/MWh.
The same in EU was 200 Euros in 2023 and a bit lover in 2024.
This show that a concentration to the marked in UK may be the best start-point for you.
Svein
Dr Rossi,
There are around voices that you signed a global agreement for manufacturing and selling the Ecats. Are these fake news or there is scent of true in these voices ?
Dear Andrea
You answer Italo R December 12: surely eventually the price will decrease with a worldwide spread diffusion.
I have the following questions:
Q1: Does this mean that you will allow more manufacturers to compete against each other on a worldwide basis?
Q2: Are you currently in negotiations with several such possible competitors?
Q3: Will production be able to be carried out close to 100% automated so that local production costs become negligible?
Q4: Are the prices that you have set an economic challenge for any producers?
Q5: Is this the reason why the negotiations are taking time?
Q6: Is your patent protection so secure that opportunities for copying do not exist?
Q7: Will a production agreement be in place by 2025?
As a (retired) Engineer, I attempt to see the “problems” with a proposed system.
For an eCat NGU unit(s) inputting power into the normally PV input of a solar inverter, Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) could be a problem.
The solar inverter automatically adjusts the input characteristics presented to a PV source (e.g., a string of PV panels) to try to obtain and operate at the Maximum Power Point.
The eCat NGU, as I understand it, has a maximum power point and can handle up to a 5% over-current condition before automatically shutting off.
Perhaps the software in the solar inverter can turn off the MPPT function?
I am suggesting using one (or more) eCat NGU units in an array that would in series produce a voltage which is above the solar inverter’s turn-on voltage but less than the lowest voltage for MPPT.
For example, if the turn-on voltage was 100VDC and the start of MPPT was at 120VDC, then 9 each 100W NGU units would produce 108VDC @ 8.33 AMPs (900W). An inverter with 2 PV inputs each capable of handling 15Amps and with one such array of each input would combined generate 1.8kW. The energy per day would be about 43kW-hrs. Coupled with a battery, it could accommodate the peak demands.
To Gian Luca:
Thanks for the information and suggestions.
I had estimated a total cost of about 12,000 euros considering 7,500 US$ for the generator plus 22% VAT plus shipping, plus DC/AC inverter plus installation. The real cost would probably be even more than 12,000 euros
sorry but I can’t understand where that – 3Kw=12,000€ comes from. If you buy a 3Kw NGU your expense is 7,500€. Am I wrong?
If you already have a PV system you can use the same inverter (I imagine hybrid) replacing a string with an NGU. If instead you need to buy an inverter for powers of 3-4Kw you spend nowadays around 1500€ to which you need to add a storage (perhaps NaCl and zeolite from Horien) for an expense of 3,000€ to make up for the peaks. This brings you to the figure of 12,000€.
Right?
Real numbers read from my electric bills over 12 months:
Total paid: €1887 (all inclusive, including fixed costs, charges, etc.)
Energy consumed: 6448 kWh
Cost per kWh: 1887 / 6448 = €0.29/kWh
My meter is set to 3.5 kW. If I try to draw more, the circuit breaker trips. Therefore, my peak consumption is around 3 kW for all my household appliances, with an estimated average consumption of around 2 kW throughout the day.
If I were to replace this energy using a 3 kW E-Cat with an estimated total cost of €12,000, I would recoup this investment after 12000 / 1887 = approximately 6.4 years, which is still a number that is too high.
Of course, these are calculations based on current prices and costs.
It is true that in the future the cost of electricity might rise, and the cost of the E-Cat might decrease.
But to analyze today the economic convenience of using an E-Cat, I must use today’s numbers, not future ones (what will they be?).
Naturally, ecological considerations should also be taken into account.
The E-Cat does not pollute, does not use any kind of fuel, and is truly green.
Meanwhile, we know how polluting it is to produce energy with current systems.
However, all these considerations are beyond my hypothesis of using an E-Cat TODAY.
1. Reduce your 3.5 kW grid contract to 2 kW if possible.
2. Order 4 pcs customized NGU generator (48V/400W).
3. Connect the generators to a QT2 microinverter from APSystems.
4. Sell back the excess power production to grid.
Italo R.
Secondo me i tuoi calcoli non sono esatti perché non prendi in considerazione i costi fissi delle bollette in Italia.
Nella bolletta bimestrale (prima casa) vi sono tante voci che sono vere e proprie tasse: trasporto energia, oreri di sistema, canore Rai ecc.
Confrontando il tuo costo col mio deduco che consumi circa 3000 KW all’anno.
L’E-Cat da 3 KW produce 72 KW al giorno, cioè oltre 26.000 KW in un anno, cioè produce in un solo anno quasi il tuo fabbisogno di dieci anni.
Quindi il tuo problema non sono i KW consumati ma il picco dei KW necessari durante la giornata.
Secondo me, le alternative sono due:
1) vendere al gestore i KW in eccesso
2) dotarsi di un sistema di accumulo per gestire i picchi consumo.
TRANSLATE
In my opinion your calculations are not accurate because you do not consider the fixed costs of bills in Italy.
In the bimonthly bill (first home) there are many items that are real taxes: energy transport, system taxes, Rai song, etc.
Comparing your cost with mine I deduce that it consumes about 3000 KW per year.
The 3 KW E-Cat produces 72 KW per day, that is over 26,000 KW in a year, that is it produces in a single year almost your needs for ten years.
So your problem is not the KW consumed but the peak of KW needed during the day.
In my opinion the solutions are:
1) sell the excess KW to the manager
2) equip yourself with a storage system to manage consumption peaks.
@Italo R
Your analysis is shortviewed; the prices of energy are continuing to raise, the Ecat will make free from bills; besides, the bills I am paying per kWh are much higher. Not to mention the ecological issues of this planet.
Best,
Norman Korie
Dr. Rossi,
In Italy, I have a domestic electricity supply contract with a maximum available power of 3.5 kW.
With my consumption, I am paying an average bimonthly bill of about 250 euros, which amounts to approximately 1500 euros per year.
If I were to purchase a 3 kW E-Cat generator to replace the current grid supply, I would need to spend over 12,000 euros in total (that is, $7,500 for the generator, plus taxes, shipping, DC/AC inverter, and installation).
This means that I would only recoup that expense after 12,000/1,500, which is about 8 years. Definitely too long.
Dr. Rossi has previously stated that the selling price would be so low that it would be uneconomical for any competitor to attempt reverse engineering and subsequent competition.
However, I realize that at least at this stage, the actual price must take into account current economies of scale to avoid losses.
I fear that this fact will limit the widespread adoption of this technology in the early stages.
It is likely that in the future prices will decrease due to increasing demand and production. However, widespread diffusion can only occur with prices that are decidedly “popular.”
Dr Rossi,
Here are the stats of your publications I found today on Researchgate:
Total Readings: 166000, of which 152280 only for “Ecat SK and Long Range Particle Interactions”, more than all the millions of publications on Researchgate
Recommendations: 12300, more than all the publications on Researchgate
Research Interest Score: 3144, more than all the publications on Researchgate
Most readings by geographic areas: America, Europe
Most readings by professionality: Electronic Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Theoretical Physics
Most Readings by seniority: Professors, PhD Students, Researchers, Seniors
And counting…
Prof
Peter J.:
Depends on the specific application,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Richard:
Lol !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Wilfried:
Very interesting,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Buck Warner:
Thank you for your attention to the work of our Team,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
I am watching all the videos on Youtube with the 6 hours Latina race of the Renault Twizy powered by the Eat and the following interviews. I always had been sceptic of the Ecat, I must acknowledge this time you made a convincing test.
Congratulations,
Buck Warner
This project is designed to showcase the immense potential of your ECAT technology at scale in Germany, a country with a strong focus on renewable energy and sustainability. The calculations indicate significant profitability, even under conservative assumptions. With proper execution, a 10-MW ECAT installation could set a benchmark for large-scale, zero-emission energy production.
However, a question arises: Why wait for an order of a million 100-Watt ECATs to begin mass production? The demand for clean, affordable energy is immense, and smaller devices would open the door to residential and decentralized applications. A broad rollout could accelerate market acceptance and establish ECAT as a cornerstone of the global energy transition. Let’s bring this vision to life together.
Project Title:
Sustainable Energy Production with a 10-MW ECAT Generator
Project Description:
This proposal focuses on the installation and operation of an innovative 10-MW ECAT generator for sustainable energy production in Germany. The generated electricity will primarily be sold to local businesses and industrial clients who are eager for cost-efficient, environmentally friendly energy. Additionally, the generator’s zero-emission capabilities will allow participation in the CO2 certificate market as a secondary revenue stream.
Project Specifications:
Generator Capacity: 10 MW
Expected Annual Production: 87,600,000 kWh (10 MW × 8,760 hours/year)
Technology: ECAT Generator (Zero-point energy, emission-free, certified by independent testing institutions)
Location: Germany (industrial area with ideal grid access)
Operational Timeframe: 100,000 hours (approximately 11.4 years)
Capital Requirements and Financing:
Investment Costs:
Total Amount: €23,798,750 (including installation and infrastructure costs)
Breakdown:
ECAT Generator (10 MW): €23,798,750
Infrastructure Costs: Already integrated
Loan Request:
Loan Amount: €23,798,750
Loan Term: 11.4 years (matching the generator’s operational life)
Interest Rate: Market rate for 2025 (~5% assumed)
Repayment Plan:
Annual Payment: €3,089,000 (estimated, including interest)
Revenue and Cost Projections:
1. Revenue:
Electricity Sales:
Sale Price: €0.10/kWh (extremely conservative estimate)
Annual Revenue: 87,600,000 kWh × €0.10 = €8,760,000/year
CO2 Certificates:
Estimated Revenue: €2,780,000/year (from emission reductions)
Total Revenue: €8,760,000 + €2,780,000 = €11,540,000/year
2. Operating Costs:
Annual Operating Costs: 5% of investment costs: €1,189,937/year
EEG Levy: €0.004/kWh: 87,600,000 kWh × €0.004 = €350,400/year
Total Costs: €1,189,937 + €350,400 = €1,540,337/year
3. Profit Projections:
Annual Gross Profit: €11,540,000 – €1,540,337 = €9,999,663/year
After Loan Repayment: €9,999,663 – €3,089,000 = €6,910,663/year
Economic Metrics:
Payback Period: Approximately 2.5 years (based on conservative electricity price)
Net Monthly Profit: Approximately €575,889
Net Annual Profit: Approximately €6,910,663
Market Analysis:
Local Customers:
Businesses and industrial facilities in Zwingenberg and the surrounding region demonstrate strong interest in affordable and ecologically produced electricity.
Target audience:
High-demand enterprises
Medium-sized businesses and municipal facilities.
Competitive Advantages:
Electricity price below the market average for commercial customers (€0.10/kWh vs. €0.20-€0.25/kWh typical market price).
Additional revenue from CO2 certificates.
Project Benefits for the Bank:
Stable Business Model:
Conservatively calculated profits.
Long-term revenue streams through electricity contracts and CO2 certificates.
Sustainability:
Contribution to CO2 reduction and the energy transition.
Positive impact on the regional economy.
Risk Minimization:
Solid financial model.
High demand for green electricity in the region.
Required Documentation:
Business plan with detailed revenue and cost projections.
Technical evaluation of ECAT technology and certification of zero-emission operation.
Site analysis (Germany).
List of potential customers (with non-binding letters of intent).
Financing plan and collateral (e.g., CO2 certificates as an additional revenue source).
Compiled by ChatGPT-4o
The drones over New Jersey reportedly have no heat signal. Are they powered by Ecats? If not, that would be a very awesome demonstration, get lots of press.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Thank you very much for your quick reply.
Would a voltage of 30000 volts be possible with a 10 watt ECAT and if so would the weight and dimensions of the ECAT increase significantly?
Greetings from the Rheingau
Hello DR Rossi
Your recent interview.
https://youtu.be/yq69RGvhYME?si=0YvJl9c6sJN0I50v
Regards
Sam
JORN-ERIK-OMMANG, ENG. :
Your comment is important.
You opened a window that fulfilled of light a dark room.
I think we could walk together, and will contact you directly, because I understand that our Team has to learn from you.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter J.:
Theoretically there are not limits, but it also depends on the specific situations,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
In which range can the voltage be set at the factory?
Greetings from the Rheingau
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Thank You for the amazing work You have performed during all these years.
You can soon earn 796 524 EURO, above the purchase price in carbon credits, by running the 1MW ECAT ZPE-Generator in EU the expected operational lifespan of the unit.
The total earned EURO in carbon credits over the expected operational lifespan of the 1 MW ECAT ZPE-Generator unit 3 176 399 EURO.
Energy-related greenhouse gas emissions account for the majority of all anthropogenic emissions – about 80% in the USA and the European Union. Therefore it is in the energy sector global warming and global greenhouse gas emissions shall be targeted and not areas like agriculture with BOVAER and 3-NOP.
Your Company introduced the ECAT ZPE-Generators at a public demonstration on September 27th, 2024 at Latina Italy where an ECAT-powered electric vehicle, WITH THE 3 kW ECAT ZPE-Generator, with a normal range of 75 km on a single charge, drove for over 6 hours for a distance of 201 km. During this time the state of charge of the battery increased from 62 per cent to 83 per cent.
The CO2 reductions that will soon be achieved when using the 1 kW, 3 kW and 1 MW pre-assembled ECAT ZPE-Generators in the areas of Norway, EU and USA for the periods of 1 year and 11,4 years (100 000h), the expected operational lifespan of the units and without any fuel cost are shown here:
CO2 REDUCTION FROM ECAT ZPE-Generator USED IN NORWAY:
One 1 kW ECAT ZPE-Generator, weighing only 2 kg, will save this much CO2 when used in Norway (without any fuel cost):
0.015 kgCO2/kWh x 1 kW x 8 760h = 131 kg CO2 in one year and more than
0.015 kgCO2/kWh x 1 kW x 100 000h = 1 500 kg CO2 over 100 000 hours (11,4 years – expected operational lifespan of the unit – without any fuel cost).
One 3 kW ECAT ZPE-Generator, weighing only 4 kg, will save this much CO2 when used in Norway (without any fuel cost):
0.015 kgCO2/kWh x 3 kW x 8 760h = 394 kg CO2 in one year and more than
0.015 kgCO2/kWh x 3 kW x 100 000h = 4 500 kg CO2 over 100 000 hours (11,4 years – expected operational lifespan of the unit – without any fuel cost)
1 MW pre-assembled ECAT ZPE-Generator, the size of a half standard (20 feet) shipping container, will save this much CO2 when used in Norway (without any fuel cost):
0.015 kgCO2/kWh x 1000 kW x 8 760h = 131 400 kg CO2 in one year and more than
0.015 kgCO2/kWh x 1000 kW x 100 000h = 1 500 000 kg CO2 over 100 000 hours (11,4 years – expected operational lifespan of the unit – without any fuel cost)
CO2 REDUCTION FROM ECAT ZPE-Generator USED IN EU:
One 1 kW ECAT ZPE-Generator, weighing 2 kg, will save this much CO2 when used in EU (without any fuel cost):
0.493 kgCO2/kWh x 1 kW x 8 760h = 4 318 kg CO2 in one year and more than
0.493 kgCO2/kWh x 1 kW x 100 000h = 49 300 kg CO2 over 100 000 hours (11,4 years – expected operational lifespan of the unit – without any fuel cost)
One 3 kW ECAT ZPE-Generator, weighing only 4 kg, will save this much CO2 when used in EU (without any fuel cost):
0.493 kgCO2/kWh x 3 kW x 8 760h = 12 956 kg CO2 in one year and more than
0.493 kgCO2/kWh x 3 kW x 100 000h = 147 900 kg CO2 over 100 000 hours (11,4 years – expected operational lifespan of the unit – without any fuel cost)
1 MW pre-assembled ECAT ZPE-Generator, the size of a half standard (20 feet) shipping container, will save this much CO2 when used in EU (without any fuel cost):
0.493 kgCO2/kWh x 1000 kW x 8 760h = 4 318 680 kg CO2 in one year and more than
0.493 kgCO2/kWh x 1000 kW x 100 000h = 49 300 000 kg CO2 over 100 000 hours (11,4 years – expected operational lifespan of the unit – without any fuel cost)
CO2 REDUCTION FROM ECAT ZPE-Generator USED IN USA:
One 1 kW ECAT ZPE-Generator, weighing only 2 kg, will save this much CO2 used in USA (without any fuel cost):
0.367 kgCO2/kWh x 1 kW x 8 760h = 3 215 kg CO2 in one year and more than
0.367 kgCO2/kWh x 1 kW x 100 000h = 36 700 kg CO2 over 100 000 hours (11,4 years – expected operational lifespan of the unit – without any fuel cost)
One 3 kW ECAT ZPE-Generator, weighing only 4 kg, will save this much CO2 used in USA (without any fuel cost):
0.367 kgCO2/kWh x 3 kW x 8 760h = 9 645 kg CO2 in one year and more than
0.367 kgCO2/kWh x 3 kW x 100 000h = 110 100 kg CO2 over 100 000 hours (11,4 years – expected operational lifespan of the unit – without any fuel cost)
1 MW pre-assembled ECAT ZPE-Generator, the size of a half standard (20 feet) shipping container, will save this much CO2 used in USA (without any fuel cost):
0.367 kgCO2/kWh x 1000 kW x 8 760h = 3 214 902 kg CO2 in one year and more than
0.367 kgCO2/kWh x 1000 kW x 100 000h = 36 700 000 kg CO2 over 100 000 hours (11,4 years – expected operational lifespan of the unit – without any fuel cost)
Carbon offsets are sold on the voluntary carbon credit market by organizations, projects, or individuals to fund their green projects. The two types of carbon credits are voluntary emissions reduction (VER) and certified emissions reduction (CER).
In December 2024 the carbon credits cost in the EU was 64.43 EURO/tCO2e and historically, EU Carbon Permits reached an all time high of 105.73 EURO in February of 2023.
A 1 MW pre-assembled ECAT ZPE-Generator will over 100 000 hours (11,4 years – expected operational lifespan of the unit – without any fuel cost) be able to earn 207 078 EURO pr. year in CO2 carbon credits without fuel cost.
The total earned EURO in carbon credits over the expected operational lifespan of the 1 MW ECAT ZPE-Generator unit 3 176 399 EURO.
0.493 kgCO2/kWh x 1000 kW x 100 000h = 49 300 000 kg CO2 x 64.43 EURO/tCO2e =
3 176 399 EURO in CO2 carbon credits.
The cost for the 1 MW ECAT ZPE-Generator is $2.5 million or
2.379.875 Euro
In 11,4 years (100 000h, the expected operational lifespan of the unit) the 1 MW ECAT ZPE-Generator can earn around 3 176 399 EURO in carbon credits which is 133,5 % of the purchase price of the generator.
You can earn 796 524 EURO, above the purchase price in carbon credits, by running the 1MW ECAT ZPE-Generator the expected operational lifespan of the unit.
The thing is that the carbon credit system will be long gone after some years when real climate solution technologies like the ECAT ZPE-Generator are on the marked.
Carbon credits represent reductions in emissions from renewable energy projects. They can be sold on exchanges like the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) or the U.S. Climate Mitigation Initiative (US CMI). The value of a carbon credit depends on where it’s sold and how much is generated as part of that program.
Data:
Norway: In 2023 the average emissions of Norway were 0.015 kgCO2/kWh
EU: 2023 Europeisk residual mixes average CO2 content 0.493 kgCO2/kWh
USA: U.S. net generation resulted in about of 0.367 kgCO2/kWh emissions per kWh.
1 year = 8 760 hours
11,41 years = 100 000 h
Specifications (per 1 MW Electricity output):
Size: One half size (20 ft) shipping container Expected operational lifespan: 100 000 hours Electric generating unit (EGU): 1 MWh (voltage can be configured to suit customer needs)
Yours Sincerely,
Jorn-Erik Ommang, Eng.
Former Director R&D Zero-Point Energy (ZPE) (UK), Project Manager Oil & Gas, Engineer, Examined Lead Assessor Quality Systems (UK).
Claus B.:
I never said that the Voltage is variable or adjustable: as a matter of fact: as a matter of fact, I always said that the Voltage is fixed, with normal tolerances.
Warm Regards
Daviid-UK:
Thank you for your support, but I must say that the merit is of all our Great Team,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Claus B.:
When we will be ready to deliver we will give due information. So far I prefer not to comment about this issue,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven Nicholes Karels:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Joachim:
It has been a great job that engaged all our Team,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
The 6 hours video of the Latina race in http://www.ecat.com is a masterpiece
Godspeed,
Joachim
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Yet another eCat NGU Application – Professional Illuminated Water Fountains
Continuous LED illuminated water fountains require a moderate amount of power for long periods (e.g. years). Use of NGU power units are ideally suited for this application.
Savings
1. No Grid electrical costs, no increasing electricity rates.
2. No need to run power cables to the fountain.
3. Control could be WiFi or similar RF communication capability.
4. Zero environmental impact.
Thoughts?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
In Germany there are information, that the E-Cat production did start.
Is It True?
Have WE reached the 1 Million Pre-Order mark?
That would by a great start for the new year 2025, wouldn’t it?
Greatings
Claus from Bonn
Dear Andrea, undoubtedly you are too modest to acknowledge your own stature as perhaps the greatest scientist of the past century. In the Christian world Chistmas is fast approaching. The commencement of large scale manufacture of E Cat technology and distribution would be a wonderful gift to tghe entire world.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
You have often replied that the output voltage of the E-Cat is variable or can be adjusted:
1) In what range can the output voltage of an E-Cat 100W be adjusted?
2) Can the output voltage be adjusted by the user himself?
3) In what range can the output voltages of the larger E-Cat generators a) 1kW, b)2kW, c)3kW, d) 5kW and e) 10kW be adjusted?
4) Is it possible to connect an E-Cat in parallel to a battery with a BMS? a) When idling, the battery is charged until the BMS switches off at 90-95% charge and b) under load, the E-Cat and the battery work in parallel and c) if the current is too high, the E-Cat switches off and the battery alone supplies the power. Is this correct?
Greetings and thanks
Claus from Bonn
Italo R.:
Very interesting; Perplexity A.I. proposes intelligent suggestions generally valid in all similar situations; some of them are not applicable in our specific situation, most are valid and already complied with.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Massimo:
Thank you for your opinion.
Please note that we cancelled the much longer Italian text of yours, because this blog is in English, to be read globally.
From now on we will publish comments in other languages only if there is a complete English translation, not just a short synopsis.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I believe that the use of only ecats is too expensive for the disconnection from the grid. The problem is the more convenient balance among ecat/inverter/battery. The real expectation is the boiler that will heat the water with ecat.: how much it will cost? It will mean a complete disconnection from electric and methane gas grid!
Paul Dodgshun:
Yes, it is possible, but must be done by a specifically certified contractor, otherwise the operation is dangerous. We can supply him instructions, if he wants.
We can do it, as an optional.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi,
I asked an AI (Perplexity) what could be the optimal strategies to help spread the E-Cat. The following are the proposals of Perplexity.
Are they applicable? Some maybe yes, others maybe are already surpassed by the development of events.
However they can be useful to think or rethink some improvements.
—————————————————-
Dr. Andrea Rossi, inventor of the E-CAT-NGU, has presented an electric power generator that promises to revolutionize the energy sector.
However, his approach and management of his invention are crucial for its success.
Here are some strategies that Rossi might consider to “save both the goat and the cabbage,” meaning to protect his invention while seeking to make a positive impact in the market.
Optimal Behaviors for Andrea Rossi:
1- Collaboration with Independent Scientists:
Rossi should seek to collaborate with independent and respected scientists in the field of physics to conduct rigorous and transparent tests.
This could help validate the effectiveness of his generator and enhance the credibility of his invention in both scientific and commercial realms.
2 – Transparency and Communication:
It is essential for Rossi to adopt a more transparent approach regarding the results of his tests.
Publishing data in peer-reviewed scientific journals would help dispel doubts and gain trust from both the public and investors.
3 – Gradual Commercialization Strategy:
Instead of imposing such a high minimum pre-order limit, Rossi could consider a gradual commercialization strategy, starting with small productions and gradually increasing production capacity.
This approach would reduce financial risk and allow for useful feedback from early users.
4 – Intellectual Property Protection:
To prevent the risk of reverse engineering, Rossi should invest in robust intellectual property protection through strong patents and legal strategies to defend his invention against potential competitors.
5 – Market Education:
Rossi could initiate educational campaigns to inform the public and investors about the benefits of E-CAT-NGU, clarifying its practical applications and potential positive environmental impact. This could help create stronger demand for the product.
6 – Development of Strategic Partnerships:
Establishing alliances with companies in the energy or automotive sectors could facilitate market access and provide necessary resources for the production and distribution of E-CAT-NGU.
———————————————————-
Kind Regards,
Italo R.
Can the 3kW NGU have its thirty 100W modules connected in series, so as to supply 360V DC across all the 100W modules?
Has this configuration been tested?
My PV inverter documentation lists the following :-
PV input voltage 370V in a range of 125V-500V
MPPT range 150V-425V
Startup voltage 125V
360V sits in the middle of the inverter’s range.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
I apologize if this question has been asked and answered before. How can the NGU start-up by just connecting a load to the connecting terminals? when there is no initial power (like a battery or alike) in the NGU. This question becomes apparent if it is so that the NGU consist of a discharge tube as discussed in previous post and as shown in a previous demonstration by you. Thank you if you can answer.
Kind regards,
Calle H
Svein:
Thank you for your insight and suggestions,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonymous:
I am under NDA, albeit I can say that the Latina test has strongly improved the general situation,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea and all others.
If it now is signed a global agreement for manufacturing and selling the Ecats.
Today may be the the right day to remember that on 14 December 1900 Max Planck presented his theoretical explanation involving quanta of energy at a meeting of the Physikalische Gesellschaft in Berlin.
In doing so he had to reject his belief that the second law of thermodynamics was an absolute law of nature, and accept Boltzmann’s interpretation that it was a statistical law.
Svein
Dear Andrea NGU
Thanks for 7 honest answers. These were as expected. According to:
https://www.bruegel.org/policy-brief/decarbonising-competitiveness-four-ways-reduce-european-energy-prices
Persistently high energy costs are an entrenched problem for Europe. In 2023, industrial electricity and gas prices in the European Union were 158 percent and 345 percent higher than in the United States, respectively 1.
Among industrialised economies, only the United Kingdom is more expensive than the EU when it comes to final industrial electricity prices.
The electricity price in UK was in 2023/24, 400 Euros/MWh.
The same in EU was 200 Euros in 2023 and a bit lover in 2024.
This show that a concentration to the marked in UK may be the best start-point for you.
Svein
Dr Rossi,
There are around voices that you signed a global agreement for manufacturing and selling the Ecats. Are these fake news or there is scent of true in these voices ?
Svein:
Q1,Q2: no
Q3: yes
Q4: no
Q5: n.a.
Q6: nobody can say this of any existing patent
Q7: I hope so
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven Nicholes Karels:
Thank you for your suggestions,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea
You answer Italo R December 12: surely eventually the price will decrease with a worldwide spread diffusion.
I have the following questions:
Q1: Does this mean that you will allow more manufacturers to compete against each other on a worldwide basis?
Q2: Are you currently in negotiations with several such possible competitors?
Q3: Will production be able to be carried out close to 100% automated so that local production costs become negligible?
Q4: Are the prices that you have set an economic challenge for any producers?
Q5: Is this the reason why the negotiations are taking time?
Q6: Is your patent protection so secure that opportunities for copying do not exist?
Q7: Will a production agreement be in place by 2025?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
As a (retired) Engineer, I attempt to see the “problems” with a proposed system.
For an eCat NGU unit(s) inputting power into the normally PV input of a solar inverter, Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) could be a problem.
The solar inverter automatically adjusts the input characteristics presented to a PV source (e.g., a string of PV panels) to try to obtain and operate at the Maximum Power Point.
The eCat NGU, as I understand it, has a maximum power point and can handle up to a 5% over-current condition before automatically shutting off.
Some of the different MPPT implementations are: Perturb and Observe; Incremental Conductance; Current Sweep, Constant Voltage; and Temperature Method. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximum_power_point_tracking.
Perhaps the software in the solar inverter can turn off the MPPT function?
I am suggesting using one (or more) eCat NGU units in an array that would in series produce a voltage which is above the solar inverter’s turn-on voltage but less than the lowest voltage for MPPT.
For example, if the turn-on voltage was 100VDC and the start of MPPT was at 120VDC, then 9 each 100W NGU units would produce 108VDC @ 8.33 AMPs (900W). An inverter with 2 PV inputs each capable of handling 15Amps and with one such array of each input would combined generate 1.8kW. The energy per day would be about 43kW-hrs. Coupled with a battery, it could accommodate the peak demands.
Thoughts?
To Gian Luca:
Thanks for the information and suggestions.
I had estimated a total cost of about 12,000 euros considering 7,500 US$ for the generator plus 22% VAT plus shipping, plus DC/AC inverter plus installation. The real cost would probably be even more than 12,000 euros
Italo R.
To Italo R.
sorry but I can’t understand where that – 3Kw=12,000€ comes from. If you buy a 3Kw NGU your expense is 7,500€. Am I wrong?
If you already have a PV system you can use the same inverter (I imagine hybrid) replacing a string with an NGU. If instead you need to buy an inverter for powers of 3-4Kw you spend nowadays around 1500€ to which you need to add a storage (perhaps NaCl and zeolite from Horien) for an expense of 3,000€ to make up for the peaks. This brings you to the figure of 12,000€.
Right?
@ Gavino Mamia, Norman:
Real numbers read from my electric bills over 12 months:
Total paid: €1887 (all inclusive, including fixed costs, charges, etc.)
Energy consumed: 6448 kWh
Cost per kWh: 1887 / 6448 = €0.29/kWh
My meter is set to 3.5 kW. If I try to draw more, the circuit breaker trips. Therefore, my peak consumption is around 3 kW for all my household appliances, with an estimated average consumption of around 2 kW throughout the day.
If I were to replace this energy using a 3 kW E-Cat with an estimated total cost of €12,000, I would recoup this investment after 12000 / 1887 = approximately 6.4 years, which is still a number that is too high.
Of course, these are calculations based on current prices and costs.
It is true that in the future the cost of electricity might rise, and the cost of the E-Cat might decrease.
But to analyze today the economic convenience of using an E-Cat, I must use today’s numbers, not future ones (what will they be?).
Naturally, ecological considerations should also be taken into account.
The E-Cat does not pollute, does not use any kind of fuel, and is truly green.
Meanwhile, we know how polluting it is to produce energy with current systems.
However, all these considerations are beyond my hypothesis of using an E-Cat TODAY.
Best Regards,
Italo R.
To Italo R:
A more cost-effective system?
1. Reduce your 3.5 kW grid contract to 2 kW if possible.
2. Order 4 pcs customized NGU generator (48V/400W).
3. Connect the generators to a QT2 microinverter from APSystems.
4. Sell back the excess power production to grid.
Regards
Klas
Italo R.
Secondo me i tuoi calcoli non sono esatti perché non prendi in considerazione i costi fissi delle bollette in Italia.
Nella bolletta bimestrale (prima casa) vi sono tante voci che sono vere e proprie tasse: trasporto energia, oreri di sistema, canore Rai ecc.
Confrontando il tuo costo col mio deduco che consumi circa 3000 KW all’anno.
L’E-Cat da 3 KW produce 72 KW al giorno, cioè oltre 26.000 KW in un anno, cioè produce in un solo anno quasi il tuo fabbisogno di dieci anni.
Quindi il tuo problema non sono i KW consumati ma il picco dei KW necessari durante la giornata.
Secondo me, le alternative sono due:
1) vendere al gestore i KW in eccesso
2) dotarsi di un sistema di accumulo per gestire i picchi consumo.
TRANSLATE
In my opinion your calculations are not accurate because you do not consider the fixed costs of bills in Italy.
In the bimonthly bill (first home) there are many items that are real taxes: energy transport, system taxes, Rai song, etc.
Comparing your cost with mine I deduce that it consumes about 3000 KW per year.
The 3 KW E-Cat produces 72 KW per day, that is over 26,000 KW in a year, that is it produces in a single year almost your needs for ten years.
So your problem is not the KW consumed but the peak of KW needed during the day.
In my opinion the solutions are:
1) sell the excess KW to the manager
2) equip yourself with a storage system to manage consumption peaks.
@Italo R
Your analysis is shortviewed; the prices of energy are continuing to raise, the Ecat will make free from bills; besides, the bills I am paying per kWh are much higher. Not to mention the ecological issues of this planet.
Best,
Norman Korie
Italo R.:
I take notice of your insight; surely eventually the price will decrease with a worldwide spread diffusion.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi,
In Italy, I have a domestic electricity supply contract with a maximum available power of 3.5 kW.
With my consumption, I am paying an average bimonthly bill of about 250 euros, which amounts to approximately 1500 euros per year.
If I were to purchase a 3 kW E-Cat generator to replace the current grid supply, I would need to spend over 12,000 euros in total (that is, $7,500 for the generator, plus taxes, shipping, DC/AC inverter, and installation).
This means that I would only recoup that expense after 12,000/1,500, which is about 8 years. Definitely too long.
Dr. Rossi has previously stated that the selling price would be so low that it would be uneconomical for any competitor to attempt reverse engineering and subsequent competition.
However, I realize that at least at this stage, the actual price must take into account current economies of scale to avoid losses.
I fear that this fact will limit the widespread adoption of this technology in the early stages.
It is likely that in the future prices will decrease due to increasing demand and production. However, widespread diffusion can only occur with prices that are decidedly “popular.”
Kind Regards,
Italo R.
Albo:
Not yet,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Here are the stats of your publications I found today on Researchgate:
Total Readings: 166000, of which 152280 only for “Ecat SK and Long Range Particle Interactions”, more than all the millions of publications on Researchgate
Recommendations: 12300, more than all the publications on Researchgate
Research Interest Score: 3144, more than all the publications on Researchgate
Most readings by geographic areas: America, Europe
Most readings by professionality: Electronic Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Theoretical Physics
Most Readings by seniority: Professors, PhD Students, Researchers, Seniors
And counting…
Prof
Steven Nicholes Karels:
1. the maximum current is limited by the power of the Ecat
2. yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.