By selling the units, the licensee will generate sufficient cash to finance a second production line. The timing depends on complex variables—for example, introducing a 1,000-watt model within a year could halve production times—so projections remain uncertain. A rapid market launch risks intensifying competition with incumbents that hold the majority of the energy share; where competition is fierce, the likelihood of conflict increases. Therefore, it is appropriate to adopt a gradual and coordinated rollout, defining phases, performance indicators, and mechanisms for stakeholder dialogue. We must also think beyond our own lifetime horizon: plan for future generations—even on a century-long scale—and put aside egocentricity. What do you think?
The fact that as soon as the 10 and 100 W will be delivered the reverse engineering attempts will proliferate is obvious and the fact that within months after its diffusion will be born a paramount competition is obvious as well, therefore: how can we blame the strategy of the global licensee of Leonardo Corporation, that is investing substantial funds in the development of the Ecat technology ?
J.P.R.
Regarding how long it will take to saturate the market: here are some numbers, assuming — for sake of example — starting with output of one million units:
In 50 years,
Annual rate of increase annual unit production in year 50
———————– ————————————
10% 117 million
20% 9.1 billion
30% 498 billion
40% 20.2 trillion
50% 638 trillion
These are large numbers. But if the product is priced to produce sufficient cash flow to finance such an expansion, there is no good reason why the market cannot be saturated in a sensible timeframe. Although there might be problems accessing the raw materials, if some rare elements are required.
1. Is the licensee producing the units actively looking for more than the one customer?
2. Is the licensee producing the units using them for their production line power?
Steven Nicholes Karels:
Thank you for your insight.
The point 5 is obviously wrong: nobody with good sense could say that the deliveries of the pre-orders will start after the saturation of the industrial market !
The tests with the 500 W NGU are proceeding well,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Assuming the 1 MW electrical Grid project is successful, I offer the following:
1. Apple phone production is about 230 million units per year. Let us assume the production of 100W NGU units can reach the same level of annual production.
2. The World production of electrical energy is roughly 30,000 TerraWatt-hours annually. Roughly, this is about 3 TerraWatts of power.
3. if we assume Apple-style mass production of NGU 100W unit we get 230 million times 100 W = 23,000 MW electrical Grid units per year or 0.023 TerraWatts per year.
4. Very roughly, it would take a century to replace all existing electrical Grid power generators. And this does include demand increases.
5. It appears it may be a long time before I get my own NGU units.
Many assumptions… but producing that many units is a daunting task. I see why going to the 500W NGU is desirable.
@Enterpreneur,
I agree: there are hundreds of thousands of pre-orders that are worth tens of millions at the least, and surely the global licensee will not waste this asset
Greg Leonard:
I am not able to answer so far. I think that sooner or later they will be delivered, but at a substantially highest price/Watt,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea!
Two questions abaout the exciting Mwatt power plant:
1. Does the licensee hand over the 100 watt units to the Electricity Company
which then installs them?
2. So right now the Mwatt power plant is not quite finished?
What is the Kardashev scale
The Kardashev scale is a hypothetical classification system used to measure a civilization’s level of technological advancement based on the total amount of energy it can harness. Proposed in 1964 by Soviet astronomer Nikolai Kardashev, the scale was originally intended as a guide for the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) to help identify the potential radio signatures of advanced societies.
The Three Original Types
Kardashev’s initial scale outlined three types of civilizations based on their energy control:
Type I (Planetary): Capable of using all energy available on their home planet, including the solar radiation reaching its surface.
Type II (Stellar): Able to harness the total energy output of their star, potentially through structures like a Dyson sphere.
Type III (Galactic): Capable of controlling energy on the scale of an entire galaxy, perhaps by utilizing its stars or central black hole.
Humanity’s Position
Humanity is currently considered a Type 0 civilization, as we haven’t yet mastered Earth’s total energy resources.
Astronomer Carl Sagan suggested a decimal representation, placing humanity at roughly 0.73 based on current energy consumption.
Estimates suggest humanity could reach Type I status in 100–200 years and Type III in 100,000 to a million years, assuming continued energy growth.
Variations and Extensions
Other scientists and writers have expanded on the original scale:
Type IV & V: Theoretical types representing civilizations capable of harnessing the energy of the universe or multiple universes.
Common Extensions and Variations
Since its inception, various scientists and futurists have proposed expanding the scale:
Type IV & V: Theoretical civilizations that could harness the energy of the entire universe or even a multiverse.
The Barrow Scale (Micro-scale): Proposed by John Barrow, this “anti-Kardashev scale” measures advancement by a civilization’s ability to manipulate increasingly smaller scales, from genes (Type II-minus) to the structure of spacetime (Type Omega-minus).
Information Mastery: Carl Sagan also suggested classifying civilizations by the total amount of information they have access to.
Type 0: Added to represent civilizations, like ours, that use only a fraction of their planet’s energy.
Micro-Kardashev (Barrow Scale): An alternative scale proposed by John Barrow, which measures advancement by the ability to manipulate matter on increasingly smaller scales.
Dear AR
I am pleased that you are making such good progress in power production with your engineering partner.
I, like others, will have many small 10W devices in our pre-order. It seems the 10W device may only be available some considerable time in the future.
When pre-orders are considered by your partner, will we be offered alternatives for our 10W units?
regards,
Greg Leonard
The E-cat could have been delivered many years ago if it were not for Dr. Rossi’s ambition to produce a retail product that could meet any existing retail user’s appliance application.
For example, the use of the E-cat in electric cars was delayed for a year by an overcharging test of an lithium ion battery that resulted in an explosion and fire during testing. The devil is always in the details.
IMHO in the long view, the science involved in the E-cat will advance science for about at least a century, or maybe more; a benefit that 15 years of work will turn out to be well worth the delays.
Fellow readers, your mundane desires to use the E-cat only to warm your house is selfish, dull, and uninteresting compared to the impact that the E-cat will eventually have on the assent of mankind.
The inventions that most impacted the ascent of mankind are universally acknowledged to be fire, the wheel, the printing press, the steam engine, electricity, and the transistor (computing). These breakthroughs share a single defining characteristic: each one removed a fundamental constraint on human capability—whether it was the constraint of digestion (fire), distance (wheel), ignorance (print), or muscle power (steam).
If a mechanism to extract energy from the quantum vacuum (Zero Point Energy) were possible, it would not merely be another step on this ladder; it would represent a terminal leap in technological evolution to the pinacol of what any civilization can accomplish.
Dear Andrea
A time ago You said that an announcement would soon be made about the volumetric kW production too a aggregate consisting of 100W elements.
When will this announcement come?
Regards Svein
Ecat Enthusiast:
Thank you for your support.
I cannot answer in positive or in negative to any question related to our Global Licensee,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi,
Interesting January update, it sounds like you continue to make progress. Is your global licensee a public company?
Regards, Ecat Enthusiast
Dr Rossi:
About the risks that you and the Global Licensee could run through should a global distribution of cheap Ecats be allowed: another one is that your enemies (and you have many around) could buy some Ecats and make on purpose a bad accident with them: this kind of risk can only be neutralized by facts that corroborate that the Ecats worked properly and without problems in many important facilities; your Global Licensee is doing well also in the perspective to defend the image of the Ecat, and of yourself.
Best
Yuri
Neri Accornero,
Thank you for your opinion, but I do not agree for many reasons, among which:
1- to start with industrial plants managed by professionals allows to resolve issues in full safety
2- as I said, the present policy is provisional, as I said many times
3- the fact that the Global Licensee wants to confront the global reverse engineering, born by cheap modules, only after reaching a solid market priority is obvious
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, the press release of January 20, 2026 makes it clear that the Global Licensee is thinking exclusively of its own interests, and this is partly understandable given what’s at stake. However, keeping secret the news of the invention and it’s production, which will be aimed almost exclusively at the military and large companies, is a crime against humanity. Only by disclosing it to the world could this news change the course of many wars and poverty, saving countless lives. If something can be copied, sooner or later it will be copied, and do you expect not even one of the 10,000 units that make up the 1MW generators will be stolen and sold for millions of dollars to some other pirate? Dear Andrea, you risk getting caught up in this economic game and losing the opportunity for your global recognition. Your invention is unmatched in it’s ability to change the world; not even the invention of fire is comparable.
Neri
Dear Dr. Rossi,
some questions come to me through my blog dedicated to the eCat, in particular in relation to the possible delivery of eCat pre-ordered by private individuals in recent years.
Thank you for the clarifications, if you can provide them, and I apologize if the answers are already been given.
As of today (January 23, 2026)
1. Is there a start date for deliveries to private individuals already scheduled or not?
2. Are the eCats that will be delivered to private individuals, at least in part, already in the production and assembly phase?
3. Will an announcement be made before shipments to individuals begin, or will we begin by contacting recipients directly?
4. Can you confirm that the first models that will be sent to private individuals will be those made up of eCat with 100W power assembled together?
Multiple ECats (thousands of elementary ECats) can operate autonomously. They generate DC output, and their power summation occurs at DC. Therefore, there is no need for mutual synchronization of the ECat controllers.
Power summation from each elementary ECat in the first conversion stage is performed at DC using DC/DC converters.
Next, in the second conversion stage, using DC/AC converters, the power summation occurs at AC (50 Hz). At this stage, mutual synchronization of the controllers is required to achieve in-phase power summation.
Ambrogio:
I think so, but probably they will be the last to be delivered, for many reasons: economical, post-sale organization, and others,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKtbw7vOciA
Physicists Turned Light Into Solid Matter – Now You Can Touch It
I still beleive that the smallest NGU core is 10 watts. This means that a one megawatt NGU unit contains 100,000 10 watt cores. But how are all these cores coordinated? This 1 megawatt plant is formed into a supersolid of light: an exciton polariton condensate.
How does this work? A mouse core gets a command from the controller. The mouse changes its nature to conform with the command from the controller. Al the other 100,000 cat cores reform there actions to act just like the mouse unit. They all are now following the command that was given by the mouse core.
I have seen proof in the LION experiments that such processes are occurring when hexagonal imprints of pico-clusters leave their lattice imprints on the insides of diamond.
see 15:20 of this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqAqhp2uR7k&t=14s
1. Have all known problems with the NGU devices relative to the Grid power unit been resolved?
2. Have all required Power generators for the first Grid power unit been fabricated, delivered?
3. How many Grid power units will be built this year?
Dear Eng. Rossi,
I would like to share a few reflections arising from a technical interest and long-standing attention to energy-related topics, without any intention of questioning the operating principle of your system, which I take as established.
When energy production is based on physical processes not yet fully formalized within standard physics, historical experience shows that the main challenges usually concern not the basic functionality, but rather repeatability, long-term stability, and system behavior as operating power is scaled up.
It is well known that many physical phenomena behave in a linear and well-controlled manner at low power levels, while non-linear, secondary, or difficult-to-model effects may emerge when higher power levels are reached or when the system is operated continuously at maximum output.
From this perspective, I find particularly interesting your reported choice of a low unit power (around 10 W), which appears to ensure stable operation without observable side effects on the surrounding environment or electrical infrastructure.
My question, from the point of view of a potential user rather than a theorist, concerns optimal usage modes when multiple units are combined or when the system is employed at higher overall power levels. By way of example only, I consider three possible usage profiles:
1. Prudent and distributed use
A user operates a system capable of several kW nominal output, but uses it at moderate average loads, avoiding continuous operation at maximum power. The electrical installation is carefully designed, with particular attention to grounding and mass distribution.
2. Aggressive and continuous use
A user attempts to exploit the maximum available power continuously, possibly producing a constant surplus to feed into the grid, with little attention paid to grounding quality or load management. In such a scenario, at least in principle, operational stress or reliability issues could emerge that are difficult to interpret.
3. Hybrid and conservative use
The generator is combined with other energy sources (for example photovoltaic panels) and with energy storage systems, minimizing direct operating time of the device. The entire installation is strongly referenced to ground over a large and well-engineered area.
My question is therefore straightforward:
which of these usage profiles do you consider most consistent with long-term stability and technically correct operation of the system?
More generally, do you believe that load management, grounding, and duty cycle play a significant role in maximizing the reliability of the device?
Thank you for your attention.
Kind regards,
Camillo
Francesco Poscetti,
Thank you for your opinion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
By selling the units, the licensee will generate sufficient cash to finance a second production line. The timing depends on complex variables—for example, introducing a 1,000-watt model within a year could halve production times—so projections remain uncertain. A rapid market launch risks intensifying competition with incumbents that hold the majority of the energy share; where competition is fierce, the likelihood of conflict increases. Therefore, it is appropriate to adopt a gradual and coordinated rollout, defining phases, performance indicators, and mechanisms for stakeholder dialogue. We must also think beyond our own lifetime horizon: plan for future generations—even on a century-long scale—and put aside egocentricity. What do you think?
The fact that as soon as the 10 and 100 W will be delivered the reverse engineering attempts will proliferate is obvious and the fact that within months after its diffusion will be born a paramount competition is obvious as well, therefore: how can we blame the strategy of the global licensee of Leonardo Corporation, that is investing substantial funds in the development of the Ecat technology ?
J.P.R.
Drew Glista:
Actually, the production of heat is the most efficient work of the Ecat,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jeff:
1. yes
2. no
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@Steven Nicholes Karels
Regarding how long it will take to saturate the market: here are some numbers, assuming — for sake of example — starting with output of one million units:
In 50 years,
Annual rate of increase annual unit production in year 50
———————– ————————————
10% 117 million
20% 9.1 billion
30% 498 billion
40% 20.2 trillion
50% 638 trillion
These are large numbers. But if the product is priced to produce sufficient cash flow to finance such an expansion, there is no good reason why the market cannot be saturated in a sensible timeframe. Although there might be problems accessing the raw materials, if some rare elements are required.
Rodney.
Dr. Rossi: Please help this city. They definitely need the ECAT NGU ASAP,
https://youtu.be/-IaGmGc4iZ4
Drew G.
Dr. Rossi
1. Is the licensee producing the units actively looking for more than the one customer?
2. Is the licensee producing the units using them for their production line power?
Best regards,
Jeff
Steven Nicholes Karels:
Thank you for your insight.
The point 5 is obviously wrong: nobody with good sense could say that the deliveries of the pre-orders will start after the saturation of the industrial market !
The tests with the 500 W NGU are proceeding well,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Assuming the 1 MW electrical Grid project is successful, I offer the following:
1. Apple phone production is about 230 million units per year. Let us assume the production of 100W NGU units can reach the same level of annual production.
2. The World production of electrical energy is roughly 30,000 TerraWatt-hours annually. Roughly, this is about 3 TerraWatts of power.
3. if we assume Apple-style mass production of NGU 100W unit we get 230 million times 100 W = 23,000 MW electrical Grid units per year or 0.023 TerraWatts per year.
4. Very roughly, it would take a century to replace all existing electrical Grid power generators. And this does include demand increases.
5. It appears it may be a long time before I get my own NGU units.
Many assumptions… but producing that many units is a daunting task. I see why going to the 500W NGU is desirable.
Any update on the 500W NGU testing?
Svein:
Now I understand: I confirm what I said few weeks ago,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea
Below is the matter I ask about when you will publish:
Andrea Rossi
January 7, 2026 at 4:23 PM
Gavino Mamia:
We will publish soon the Watts per liter of volume of the Ecat,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@Enterpreneur,
I agree: there are hundreds of thousands of pre-orders that are worth tens of millions at the least, and surely the global licensee will not waste this asset
Svein:
Sorry, I do not understand what you mean: can you kindly rephrase your comment ?
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Greg Leonard:
I am not able to answer so far. I think that sooner or later they will be delivered, but at a substantially highest price/Watt,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Axil:
Thank you for the information and the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Nils Fryklund:
It is an oprationn that involves the collaboration of both parties,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea!
Two questions abaout the exciting Mwatt power plant:
1. Does the licensee hand over the 100 watt units to the Electricity Company
which then installs them?
2. So right now the Mwatt power plant is not quite finished?
Best regards
Nils Fryklund
What is the Kardashev scale
The Kardashev scale is a hypothetical classification system used to measure a civilization’s level of technological advancement based on the total amount of energy it can harness. Proposed in 1964 by Soviet astronomer Nikolai Kardashev, the scale was originally intended as a guide for the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) to help identify the potential radio signatures of advanced societies.
The Three Original Types
Kardashev’s initial scale outlined three types of civilizations based on their energy control:
Type I (Planetary): Capable of using all energy available on their home planet, including the solar radiation reaching its surface.
Type II (Stellar): Able to harness the total energy output of their star, potentially through structures like a Dyson sphere.
Type III (Galactic): Capable of controlling energy on the scale of an entire galaxy, perhaps by utilizing its stars or central black hole.
Humanity’s Position
Humanity is currently considered a Type 0 civilization, as we haven’t yet mastered Earth’s total energy resources.
Astronomer Carl Sagan suggested a decimal representation, placing humanity at roughly 0.73 based on current energy consumption.
Estimates suggest humanity could reach Type I status in 100–200 years and Type III in 100,000 to a million years, assuming continued energy growth.
Variations and Extensions
Other scientists and writers have expanded on the original scale:
Type IV & V: Theoretical types representing civilizations capable of harnessing the energy of the universe or multiple universes.
Common Extensions and Variations
Since its inception, various scientists and futurists have proposed expanding the scale:
Type IV & V: Theoretical civilizations that could harness the energy of the entire universe or even a multiverse.
The Barrow Scale (Micro-scale): Proposed by John Barrow, this “anti-Kardashev scale” measures advancement by a civilization’s ability to manipulate increasingly smaller scales, from genes (Type II-minus) to the structure of spacetime (Type Omega-minus).
Information Mastery: Carl Sagan also suggested classifying civilizations by the total amount of information they have access to.
Type 0: Added to represent civilizations, like ours, that use only a fraction of their planet’s energy.
Micro-Kardashev (Barrow Scale): An alternative scale proposed by John Barrow, which measures advancement by the ability to manipulate matter on increasingly smaller scales.
Dear AR
I am pleased that you are making such good progress in power production with your engineering partner.
I, like others, will have many small 10W devices in our pre-order. It seems the 10W device may only be available some considerable time in the future.
When pre-orders are considered by your partner, will we be offered alternatives for our 10W units?
regards,
Greg Leonard
The E-cat could have been delivered many years ago if it were not for Dr. Rossi’s ambition to produce a retail product that could meet any existing retail user’s appliance application.
For example, the use of the E-cat in electric cars was delayed for a year by an overcharging test of an lithium ion battery that resulted in an explosion and fire during testing. The devil is always in the details.
IMHO in the long view, the science involved in the E-cat will advance science for about at least a century, or maybe more; a benefit that 15 years of work will turn out to be well worth the delays.
Fellow readers, your mundane desires to use the E-cat only to warm your house is selfish, dull, and uninteresting compared to the impact that the E-cat will eventually have on the assent of mankind.
The inventions that most impacted the ascent of mankind are universally acknowledged to be fire, the wheel, the printing press, the steam engine, electricity, and the transistor (computing). These breakthroughs share a single defining characteristic: each one removed a fundamental constraint on human capability—whether it was the constraint of digestion (fire), distance (wheel), ignorance (print), or muscle power (steam).
If a mechanism to extract energy from the quantum vacuum (Zero Point Energy) were possible, it would not merely be another step on this ladder; it would represent a terminal leap in technological evolution to the pinacol of what any civilization can accomplish.
While historical inventions solved problems of scarcity and distribution, vacuum energy extraction would theoretically solve the problem of energy itself, granting civilization infinite, ubiquitous power and propelling humanity instantly from a Type 0.7 to a Type II or III civilization on the Kardashev scale.
See the AI’s entire assessment of vacuum energy extraction by clicking on this link
https://www.google.com/search?q=what+are+the+inventions+that+most+impacted+the+assent+of+mankind+and+compare+the+development+of+a+extraction+mechanism+of+energy+from+the+vacuum+to+those+inventions+if+the+extraction+mechanism+of+energy+from+the+vacuum+were+possible&sa=X&sca_esv=d866c615fc56355b&sxsrf=ANbL-n5Z1bWGpJI4uAY14nVtd_1OmhLBGw%3A1769338742992&fbs=ADc_l-aN0CWEZBOHjofHoaMMDiKpaEWjvZ2Py1XXV8d8KvlI3o6iwGk6Iv1tRbZIBNIVs-6YKj3ieLLpE5n_AQ7knvnyHmq2hxoqmS0Tx38rbtTMokatCu4UnrJzhU7BOXw7CjzpgexdCLz33raof4dx1VtbdVj50-BJhfDxGZym1fHYCgShAGAicidn7ujxHXACJbD2tu-xxAiTU9q7UKgqs_jjkAgDfA&aep=1&ntc=1&ved=2ahUKEwjEtY26xKaSAxU5LFkFHW_uPIoQ2J8OegQIEBAE&biw=1265&bih=607&dpr=1.52&aic=0&nem=143&mstk=AUtExfA0KRmw_y3Znhqxt0DQCEj09UeTV4Xonjns8uU0oC-I3-2DLuNROK9Y3xFnDbPobjiwFbOIGrKP1OKoPYNVkK0s5DahuVcRY-IKA5cTaMaSFMmuuxDRLhVoV3UQUJW1gnmjkA7IiVIXUx-emranloJ7OedzMhLlZDBgevEVyPEzF38FTQs5Us7oMZZxuLJ-ZbgXfaNO43U77kJtaeLzJXKEqqFjaP2qh-cyaQzPp4C_MTa1U_U7MlQ27KfYgmPMwjxM0choaNC0Ew_JcgnRgQWRMvgsVAkxxDjyfScrhVVly9jXPKr8AydCzeXULPorrPZHIuxbZdtFqj0&csuir=1
Dear Andrea
A time ago You said that an announcement would soon be made about the volumetric kW production too a aggregate consisting of 100W elements.
When will this announcement come?
Regards Svein
Ecat Enthusiast:
Thank you for your support.
I cannot answer in positive or in negative to any question related to our Global Licensee,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Axil:
Thank you for your insights,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi,
Interesting January update, it sounds like you continue to make progress. Is your global licensee a public company?
Regards, Ecat Enthusiast
I understand that it is in the best interest of the success of the Never Give Up (NGU) if the partner is not distracted by small customer interactions to ramp up production and sales to large customers in order to penetrate the electric power industry market place to optimize penetration in the power industry sector.
Click the link to see how the AI explains the partners’ “Never Give Up” Marketing Strategy
https://www.google.com/search?q=I+understand+that+it+is+in+the+best+interest+of+the+success+of+the+Never+Give+Up+%28NGU%29+if+the+partner+is+not+distracted+by+small+customer+interactions+to+ramp+up+production+and+sales+to+large+customers+in+order+to+penetrate+the+electric+power+industry+market+place+to+optimize+penetration+in+the+power+industry+sector.&sca_esv=d866c615fc56355b&sxsrf=ANbL-n6AetbQidKq47DTuOA4f5r1gogR5A%3A1769303379504&fbs=ADc_l-aN0CWEZBOHjofHoaMMDiKpFZYo9qIX3pM4_jubAu4b8O2J-l05bwPYHG24xCsQH1w8cvTO1NaOffwF4OfCYdQKIZryL8qfJoROYdGVoiJQZbHKg3AuH4y0k5mE_Hp009omsADAxM_ZXdLpxa_Mkq5isqpCBUWu0CEnUgUg_x3OWdjy89ZOlntHetoGAd8sDzRERzXWxOR44ug84rqHgbaeipn9pw&aep=1&ntc=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjltr3bwKWSAxUqEmIAHbD3JAoQ2J8OegQIEBAE&biw=1265&bih=607&dpr=1.52&aic=0&nem=143&mstk=AUtExfARc5PAu0XcOtCjJnrfaGmOusqlWM4hit50NIrulcFsKCM4H8bMBJYHIxqedByQYGlAKnMjWh6_dG0174kUVsw7d1WTsxeOY0DQ8yBU1-a2ZgL159B_TIIDcm7lk2JYrsL1ZmwgaO3Yzt_WKkmaLf1cETMgYwBP8XlGLwbJUXRexuaeNH43LoQttxh01f6ek6fqmhdumBlNYCWqtp-9Pi8kClt8AMMEVEJRhDoF-FFf-NuHQiiNl1_qLF031VE0PgVP5wZWZm6Omi56ITWrwCgQCiBNjbVci5B6mvZjKaa7Yt8Kycbg-az3gBhyRpAvTs2_VO_kONpi2_S0-aWTEtNJagF39jH2fJhHPv-ToxYBk5oqn-rawmggBtywaWBAVqX6hWM0EF6u3t0i6_V6_vO711SY4A57rCg&csuir=1
Selling many tiny subcomponents of a large system is a low margin proposition that is unlikely to happen and in fact may never occur. If fact, the partner will attempt to use efficiencies based on economies of scale to increase profitability of the Never Give Up (NGU) product line by producing ever larger modals that meet the needs of ever larger customers such as data center users, powerplants for large ships, trains, factories, and buildings.
click to see the AI describe the strategy of economies of scale that maximizes margins in the electric power industry
https://www.google.com/search?q=Selling+many+tiny+subcomponents+of+a+large+system+is+a+low+margin+proposition+that+may+never+occur.+If+fact%2C+the+partner+will+attempt+to+use+efficiencies+based+0n+economies+of+scale+to+increase+profitability+of+the+Never+Give+Up+%28NGU%29+product+line+by+producing+ever+larger+modals+that+meet+the+needs+of+ever+larger+customers+such+as+data+center+users%2C+powerplants+for+large+ships%2C+trains%2C+and+buildings.&sca_esv=d866c615fc56355b&sxsrf=ANbL-n5phOPOlmVx9-C_X97GHzlwbFVQMA%3A1769301895185&fbs=ADc_l-aN0CWEZBOHjofHoaMMDiKpaEWjvZ2Py1XXV8d8KvlI3o6iwGk6Iv1tRbZIBNIVs-6YKj3ieLLpE5n_AQ7knvnyKWIvRkiFNvO1lj5rKYMNPc0CAUt7svpMhrfXRn6raOkhr7B6C427tV4RsF-7s2nvByCkV2ZvTfGRsVIbFkdjn5H0ce_4UALIeP3oQqUr08uihPPdpfbwIYR9Jxdt8KN5tVzqLQ&aep=1&ntc=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjV3NmXu6WSAxU-EFkFHWnVHi8Q2J8OegQIEBAE&biw=1265&bih=607&dpr=1.52&aic=0&nem=143&mstk=AUtExfCK-FFQ1lX1bmklF-XIl5hSMbdjpNJK4E65CyZpvCEY4lW5JHPl5oMJUYTMpJLqnwXw04rkTWVZJrEZLnfiQ8FPJFBb9dWxUbo7opZUh1AkW2W4befVHpL4shpI8dYXcLwyXUoNmCNmroq0_uPh1Gnk6106CjIB0IiEyjayFPubZJqwiGIZwIV_Alq_5PCE-NoM-I6Vco21BVX2Go-do4iLEnOytftHkE0q19vkWCRdeMImq1G-mvHXKd_qYAxCiWp8YrpSMPAiKAIU3fJCO8s-kLNj7a6Xm5KQ48X4xB6pt-dtfVUyke0IuupCUHxTmPQGb3Cu0_Xx6T4&csuir=1
The ability for extremely high energy conversion efficiency of 95% is based on the match of light frequencies produced by the base level sized cores of the NGU with the photoelectron conversion properties of the surface of the optical cavity that is the foundation of the reaction.
click on the link below to see the explanation of the science behind this hard to believe level of energy conversion efficiency.
https://www.google.com/search?q=The+ability+for+extremely+high+energy+conversion+efficiency+of+95%25+is+based+on+the+match+of+light+frequency+produced+by+the+base+level+sized+cores+of+the+NGU+with+the+photoelectron+conversion+properties+of+the+surface+of+the+optical+cavity+that+is+the+foundation+of+the+reaction.&sca_esv=d866c615fc56355b&sxsrf=ANbL-n5EovlH4RSSmqeXD4CSKx4bnBPmgQ%3A1769294008464&fbs=ADc_l-aN0CWEZBOHjofHoaMMDiKpaEWjvZ2Py1XXV8d8KvlI3o6iwGk6Iv1tRbZIBNIVs-6YKj3ieLLpE5n_AQ7knvnyAHDm0ffyTDNn04dzUE9bTySJ0mTU0zoqlXuU2WsX9FhYGl7n0r0aTHCKsOaBP_pOEINYpzwJRnHvhP6TTpC4OBV_k4yqKF4jRKrJTtFhErP1mLFz7x_JgQ1WvwV7eBPLAhcE4g&aep=1&ntc=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiBxoLnnaWSAxUvEVkFHbi7GLsQ2J8OegQIEBAE&biw=1265&bih=607&dpr=1.52&aic=0&nem=143&mstk=AUtExfBbrkITQhWGi3MoNlnAmuIDOh3sIiL2UdCU6sCohjzUIi_JgpD0qcgXzWvh1YcjigdiHA-PHKC-dnncCx348oBCc9hXMhAPVGAVWRQZWmCrDfFbM6Q7UFjrY984SSBVbPzaZkXLhxUfgiA4LRdj6GcZga_SibPkHHRF8gfcRtxVYr-Vy0GZvnWyLE5YOAugBbPAMgRDWqSelSnx1PNkWwzqDP5jee8b3w4ZmjHdrR4Ul20yK4WmXz3Bo_e5w-dTJaXWpfi5-SqodMI1vRM4OuXUqj-Gu_ZZmJeJDsJ9W7xR4tUftVKGTDiM-oS2GuduncKDvq8TrkmJkV8&csuir=1#sv=CAQSMyoRaWMtYXhLVFRzZlVFYmN2UE0yDmF4S1RUc2ZVRWJjdlBNOg5sVlVRdVRHMDVYSlFLTRgHINygpKMDMAI
Yuri:
I agree,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
About the risks that you and the Global Licensee could run through should a global distribution of cheap Ecats be allowed: another one is that your enemies (and you have many around) could buy some Ecats and make on purpose a bad accident with them: this kind of risk can only be neutralized by facts that corroborate that the Ecats worked properly and without problems in many important facilities; your Global Licensee is doing well also in the perspective to defend the image of the Ecat, and of yourself.
Best
Yuri
Neri Accornero,
Thank you for your opinion, but I do not agree for many reasons, among which:
1- to start with industrial plants managed by professionals allows to resolve issues in full safety
2- as I said, the present policy is provisional, as I said many times
3- the fact that the Global Licensee wants to confront the global reverse engineering, born by cheap modules, only after reaching a solid market priority is obvious
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Axil:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6c_H69pj26s
The Inconvenient Truth About Small Modular Reactors
Small Modular Reactors make a lot of big promises – but, in my opinion, the hype is doing a lot of heavy lifting and there are some fundamental flaws a lot of people seem to be ignoring.
Details, details, details!
The devil is in the details.
Like the Small Modular Reactors (SNR) the SunCell is constrained by the limitations of the thermodynamics of the Steam Turbine. But the NGU boasts of direct electrical power conversion of 95%. Clearly, the NGU is the only workable solution to energy product so far on the market.
Click on the AI link below to see if this post is reliable.
https://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&aep=1&q=Like+the+Small+Modular+Reactors+%28SNR%29+the+SunCell+is+constrained+by+the+limitations+of+the+thermodynamics+of+the+steam+turban.+But+the+NGU+boosts+of+direct+electrical+power+conversion+of+95%25.+Clearly%2C+the+NGU+is+the+only+workable+solution+to+energy+product+so+far+on+the+market.&nem=143&ntc=1&fbs=&mstk=AUtExfAtXfTIfISoi8ih0W6q2e5JakzbfOZG7qIL8Ure0mgj4h3QagrMnVj9NjwgO9kWl8lAAOZ80x7QwgHIXAqd9VaeEuscXdKcWsFDDQXY3KccIzxDUlIt1EGZssKN0lurzeSq9Mrt6IZQSF8u_BhioxDEH60rV4E0iV7Rg_QV7A0LLHwHh1cedLklmEuTo6Cb1D5LUNa6WK1cBg1VIw3GCXvuDFMJwxpSW1yz-f6qe-dySX_5oFj34crdXgL_7zGaa0DY8n0QYuvOqfM&csuir=1
See the cost comparison between power reactors in this AI prepared comparison.
https://www.google.com/search?q=Like+the+Small+Modular+Reactors+%28SNR%29+the+SunCell+is+constrained+by+the+limitations+of+the+thermodynamics+of+the+steam+turban.+But+the+NGU+boosts+of+direct+electrical+power+conversion+of+95%25.+Clearly%2C+the+NGU+is+the+only+workable+solution+to+energy+product+so+far+on+the+market.+At+a+total+cost+of+%2425+per+10+watts%2C+how+does+the+NGU+compare+in+costs+with+the+SNR%3F&sca_esv=d866c615fc56355b&sxsrf=ANbL-n7jQVJzrbh24jKNCdI2rF9k7ge4yw%3A1769243200742&fbs=ADc_l-aN0CWEZBOHjofHoaMMDiKpaEWjvZ2Py1XXV8d8KvlI3o6iwGk6Iv1tRbZIBNIVs-6YKj3ieLLpE5n_AQ7knvnyHmq2hxoqmS0Tx38rbtTMokFhXJqkP-xp8s0xvogTypU-RwwsG491GWtllNZUGq-RuiUvyNadpmBGK_MvfUtLNmeU1HmgngxYd3S_5Yvs3Jofp8MNzCcBDDi6TEP5Jlge0u8D0w&aep=1&ntc=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi5oYHE4KOSAxXXEGIAHW0EIKcQ2J8OegQIEBAE&biw=1265&bih=607&dpr=1.52&aic=0&nem=143&mstk=AUtExfCD9n0vPKIxdAkCxjnN4wappPEmrUynkY4zprU5mT9tbkibnou1KXzZ2kSK21QKiSH9Q_AKsHlY_T4AbFqY-dQPsMRZLMCe26U5fXbYot6DMFC1GOw1SkiGQeIZXLldedLhLAx47Bmi5MrjYxRtJVWgQH9P5uT4jfnTR-yg35sNlImkfZ60mGqe4Qv59zlTxvcLFbnfMgMVdCjDrV72XqPYaBjA_7rSLT00UG5tpKEtEpFQJf4jQ57x-OR5s8CyyfuXweO2GFQi15wGLLrbq6_SM8Ep84a0GSseSIS5lx-PEyOv8yoxc4XGNp1jf9n-tleyzJ4zj2fokaU&csuir=1
Dear Andrea, the press release of January 20, 2026 makes it clear that the Global Licensee is thinking exclusively of its own interests, and this is partly understandable given what’s at stake. However, keeping secret the news of the invention and it’s production, which will be aimed almost exclusively at the military and large companies, is a crime against humanity. Only by disclosing it to the world could this news change the course of many wars and poverty, saving countless lives. If something can be copied, sooner or later it will be copied, and do you expect not even one of the 10,000 units that make up the 1MW generators will be stolen and sold for millions of dollars to some other pirate? Dear Andrea, you risk getting caught up in this economic game and losing the opportunity for your global recognition. Your invention is unmatched in it’s ability to change the world; not even the invention of fire is comparable.
Neri
Frank Acland:
I think I will be able to answer your question within a month,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Stefano:
This issue does not depend on me,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea
Approximately, when we will know the name of the company building and selling the eCat?
Dear Andrea,
I read the January update on X (https://x.com/LeonardoCorpor3/status/2014718694253838687)
Can you comment on how long it will take to complete the assembly of the first plant?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dott. Alessandro Toninelli:
1. No
2. Yes
3. The recopients will be contacted directly
4. yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
some questions come to me through my blog dedicated to the eCat, in particular in relation to the possible delivery of eCat pre-ordered by private individuals in recent years.
Thank you for the clarifications, if you can provide them, and I apologize if the answers are already been given.
As of today (January 23, 2026)
1. Is there a start date for deliveries to private individuals already scheduled or not?
2. Are the eCats that will be delivered to private individuals, at least in part, already in the production and assembly phase?
3. Will an announcement be made before shipments to individuals begin, or will we begin by contacting recipients directly?
4. Can you confirm that the first models that will be sent to private individuals will be those made up of eCat with 100W power assembled together?
Dear Axil,
Multiple ECats (thousands of elementary ECats) can operate autonomously. They generate DC output, and their power summation occurs at DC. Therefore, there is no need for mutual synchronization of the ECat controllers.
Power summation from each elementary ECat in the first conversion stage is performed at DC using DC/DC converters.
Next, in the second conversion stage, using DC/AC converters, the power summation occurs at AC (50 Hz). At this stage, mutual synchronization of the controllers is required to achieve in-phase power summation.
Camillo:
Thank you for your akalysis.
Answers:
1. all the issues you analyzed have to be taken in consideration
2. yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven Nicholes Karels:
1. yes, so far
2. no
3. I am not able to answer
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ambrogio:
I think so, but probably they will be the last to be delivered, for many reasons: economical, post-sale organization, and others,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Axil:
Thank you for yor insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKtbw7vOciA
Physicists Turned Light Into Solid Matter – Now You Can Touch It
I still beleive that the smallest NGU core is 10 watts. This means that a one megawatt NGU unit contains 100,000 10 watt cores. But how are all these cores coordinated? This 1 megawatt plant is formed into a supersolid of light: an exciton polariton condensate.
How does this work? A mouse core gets a command from the controller. The mouse changes its nature to conform with the command from the controller. Al the other 100,000 cat cores reform there actions to act just like the mouse unit. They all are now following the command that was given by the mouse core.
I have seen proof in the LION experiments that such processes are occurring when hexagonal imprints of pico-clusters leave their lattice imprints on the insides of diamond.
see 15:20 of this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqAqhp2uR7k&t=14s
Click on this link or place it in your command line and execute.
See what the AI think of this posit
https://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&aep=1&q=I+still+beleive+that+the+Smallest+NGU+core+is+10+watts.+This+means+that++a+one+megawatt+NGU+unit+contains+100%2C000+10+watt+cores.+But+how+are+all+these+cores+coordinated%3F+This+1+megawatt+plant+is+formed+into+a+supersolid+of+light%3A+an+exciton+polariton+condensate.++%EF%BB%BF+%EF%BB%BFHow+does+this+work%3F+A+mouse+core+gets+a+command+from+the+controller.+The+mouse+changes+its+nature+to+conform+with+the+command+from+the+controller.+Al+the+other+100%2C000+cat+cores+reform+there+actions+to+act+just+like+the+mouse+unit.+They+all+are+now+following+the+command+that+was+given+by+the+mouse+core.++%EF%BB%BF+%EF%BB%BFI+have+seen+proof+in+the+LION+experiments+that+such+processes+are+occurring+when+hexagonal+imprints+of+pico-clusters+leave+their+lattice+imprints+on+the+insides+of+diamond.+%EF%BB%BF+%EF%BB%BFsee+15%3A20+of+this+video&nem=143&ntc=1&fbs=&mstk=AUtExfCp1ttbbvdvBe-FUrK4ze-bKRGl6sDyiYBym_1bVk8b8mPv8JisszgiePwzA2cQdx63KhDJaDyoCWD7WWVRzoquIXfrf1kK7JBFdtUl6_0aO2mIbUdvJhk4XHtyP1df7-8gHFFwX1kUYaW1cs_of8jV4AaNSx1Y34EWkBBaFhmcu-roUvE3njZXuK_wVo-VdzCG12V5WIHlwwlvZ7hv4_WETbe-2at9_codSW2ujgwGQ11Z1GQB6TUWpSI_NRxEU9U0k0i9jh0XXr43SlK7SDBbFz49a5pdWcrHOhJvDNunc4_Pp5umuqGFMCHSQrstwERDkajr0czZwq0&csuir=1
Dr Rossi,
Do you think that the 10 W Ecat NGU will hit the market ?
Ambrogio
Dear Andrea Rossi,
1. Have all known problems with the NGU devices relative to the Grid power unit been resolved?
2. Have all required Power generators for the first Grid power unit been fabricated, delivered?
3. How many Grid power units will be built this year?
Dear Eng. Rossi,
I would like to share a few reflections arising from a technical interest and long-standing attention to energy-related topics, without any intention of questioning the operating principle of your system, which I take as established.
When energy production is based on physical processes not yet fully formalized within standard physics, historical experience shows that the main challenges usually concern not the basic functionality, but rather repeatability, long-term stability, and system behavior as operating power is scaled up.
It is well known that many physical phenomena behave in a linear and well-controlled manner at low power levels, while non-linear, secondary, or difficult-to-model effects may emerge when higher power levels are reached or when the system is operated continuously at maximum output.
From this perspective, I find particularly interesting your reported choice of a low unit power (around 10 W), which appears to ensure stable operation without observable side effects on the surrounding environment or electrical infrastructure.
My question, from the point of view of a potential user rather than a theorist, concerns optimal usage modes when multiple units are combined or when the system is employed at higher overall power levels. By way of example only, I consider three possible usage profiles:
1. Prudent and distributed use
A user operates a system capable of several kW nominal output, but uses it at moderate average loads, avoiding continuous operation at maximum power. The electrical installation is carefully designed, with particular attention to grounding and mass distribution.
2. Aggressive and continuous use
A user attempts to exploit the maximum available power continuously, possibly producing a constant surplus to feed into the grid, with little attention paid to grounding quality or load management. In such a scenario, at least in principle, operational stress or reliability issues could emerge that are difficult to interpret.
3. Hybrid and conservative use
The generator is combined with other energy sources (for example photovoltaic panels) and with energy storage systems, minimizing direct operating time of the device. The entire installation is strongly referenced to ground over a large and well-engineered area.
My question is therefore straightforward:
which of these usage profiles do you consider most consistent with long-term stability and technically correct operation of the system?
More generally, do you believe that load management, grounding, and duty cycle play a significant role in maximizing the reliability of the device?
Thank you for your attention.
Kind regards,
Camillo
Neri Accornero:
The report will be published soon,
Warm Regards,
A.R.