{"id":501,"date":"2011-07-11T02:51:24","date_gmt":"2011-07-11T07:51:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/?p=501"},"modified":"2011-10-02T08:28:10","modified_gmt":"2011-10-02T13:28:10","slug":"generalized-theory-of-bose-einstein-condensation-nuclear-fusion-for-hydrogen-metal-system","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/?p=501","title":{"rendered":"Generalized Theory of Bose-Einstein Condensation Nuclear Fusion for Hydrogen-Metal System"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: right;\"><em>by Yeong E. Kim Department of Physics, Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/files\/Generalized Theory of Bose-Einstein Condensation.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"> Direct download<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong> ABSTRACT<br \/>\n<span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">Generalized theory of Bose-Einstein condensation nuclear fusion (BECNF) is used to carry out theoretical analyses of recent experimental results of Rossi et al. for hydrogen-nickel system. \u00a0Based on incomplete experimental information currently available, preliminary theoretical explanations of the experimental results are presented in terms of the generalized BECNF theory. Additional accurate experimental data are needed for obtaining more complete theoretical descriptions and predictions, which can be tested by further experiments.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\"> <strong>I. \u00a0Introduction<br \/>\n<\/strong> Over the last two decades, there have been many publications reporting experimental observations of excess heat generation and anomalous nuclear reactions occurring in metals at ultra-low energies, now known as \u201elow-energy nuclear reactions\u201f (LENR). \u00a0Theoretical explanations of the LENR phenomena have been described based on the theory of Bose-Einstein condensation nuclear fusion (BECNF) in micro\/nano-scale metal particles [1-3]. \u00a0The BECNF theory is based on a single basic assumption capable of explaining the observed LENR phenomena; deuterons in metals undergo Bose-Einstein condensation. \u00a0While the BECNF theory is able to make general qualitative predictions concerning LENR phenomena it is also a quantitative predictive physical theory. \u00a0Some of the theoretical predictions have been confirmed by experiments reported recently. \u00a0The BECNF theory was generalized for the case of two species of Bosons [4].<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><!--more--> Recently, there were two positive demonstrations (January and March, 2011) of a heat generating device called \u201cEnergy Catalyzer\u201d [5]. The Energy Catalyzer is an apparatus built by inventor Andrea Rossi, Italy. The patent application [5] states that the device transforms energy stored in its fuel (hydrogen and nickel) into heat by means of nuclear reaction of the two fuel components, with a consequent observed production of copper [5,6]. According to Rossi\u201fs patent application [5], heating of the sample is accomplished by an electric resistance heater. \u00a0Details of March 2011 demonstration were reported by Essen and Kullander [7]. The report [7] also contains references to January 2011 demonstration. In the following, we describe hydrogen-nickel reactions in section II. Other possible reactions are discussed in section III. \u00a0Conclusions are given in section IV.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>II. \u00a0Hydrogen-Nickel Reactions<br \/>\n<\/strong> The generalized BECNF theory [4] can be applied to the case of hydrogen-nickel fusion reactions observed in Rossi\u201fs device (the energy catalyzer) [5] under the following two conditions: (1) additives used (not disclosed in the patent application) form Ni alloy and\/or Ni metal\/alloy oxide in the surface regions of nickel nano-scale particles, so that Ni atoms\/nuclei become mobile with a sufficiently large diffusion coefficient and (2) local magnetic field is very weak in the surface regions, providing a suitable environment in which two neighboring protons can couple their spins anti-parallel to form spin-zero singlet state (S=0). \u00a0Relatively low Curie temperature (nickel has the Curie temperature of 631 oK (~358 oC)) is expected to help to maintain the weak magnetic field in the surface regions. If Rossi\u201fs device is operated at temperatures greater than the Curie temperature ~358 oC and with hydrogen pressures of up to ~22 bars, the conditions (1) and (2) may have been achieved in Rossi\u201fs device.  The mobility of Ni atoms\/nuclei (condition (1)) is enhanced by the use of an electric resistance heater to maintain higher temperatures. This may provide a suitable environment in which more of both Ni atoms\/nuclei and protons become mobile, thus creating a favorable environment for the case of two species of Bosons (Ni nuclei and composite Bosons of paired two protons). If the velocities of mobile Ni atoms\/nuclei under the condition (1) are sufficiently slow, their de-Broglie wavelengths become sufficiently large and may overlap with neighboring two-proton composite Bosons which are also mobile, thus creating Bose-Einstein condensation of two species of Bosons. The generalized BECNF theory can now be applied to these two-species of Bosons and provides a mechanism for the suppression\/cancellation of the Coulomb barrier, as shown in [4].  Once the Coulomb barrier is overcome in the entrance reaction channel, many possible allowed exit reaction channels may become open such as reactions (i) A<em>Ni<\/em>(2p(S=0), p)\u02c6<em>A+1<\/em> Cu, with even A=58, 60, 62 and 64. These reactions will produce radioactive isotopes 59<em>Cu<\/em> and 61<em>Cu<\/em> with A = 58 and 60, respectively. 59<em>Cu<\/em> has a half-life of 81.5 seconds and decays by the electron capture to the 59<em>Ni<\/em> ground state (58.1%) which has a half-life of 7.6 x 10\u02c6<em>4<\/em> years and to the 59<em>Ni<\/em> excited states (41.9%) which in turn decay to the 59<em>Ni<\/em> ground state by emitting gamma-rays with energies ranging from 310.9 keV to 2682.0 keV [8]. 61<em>Cu<\/em> has a half-life of 3.333 hours and decays by the electron capture to the stable 61<em>Ni<\/em> ground state (67%) and to the 61<em>Ni<\/em> excited states (33%) which in turn decay to the 61<em>Ni<\/em> ground state by emitting gamma-rays with energies ranging from 67.412 keV to 2123.93 keV [8]. Gamma-rays (and neutrons) have not been observed outside the reactor chamber during the experiment [6]. These gamma-rays may have been present inside the reaction chamber. If no radiations are observed, reactions (i) are ruled out.  Focardi and Rossi [6] reported that the experimental results of Rossi et al. indicate the production of \u00a0stable isotopes 63<em>Cu<\/em> and 65<em>Cu<\/em> with an isotopic ratio of 63<em>Cu<\/em> \/65<em>Cu<\/em> ~ 1.6 (natural abundance is 63<em>Cu<\/em>\/ 65<em>Cu<\/em> = 2.24). This production of Cu may be due to reactions (i). The production of 63<em>Cu<\/em> and 65<em>Cu<\/em> with isotopic ratio of 63<em>Cu<\/em> \/65<em>Cu<\/em> different from the natural isotopic ratio is expected and can be explained by estimating the reaction rates for 62<em>Ni<\/em>(2p(S=0), p)63<em>Cu<\/em> and 64<em>Ni<\/em>(2p(S=0), p)65<em>Cu<\/em>. \u00a0Reaction rates estimates based on transmission probability calculated from a barrier tunneling model similar to the alpha-decay theory indicate that the reaction rates for stable Cu productions, 62<em>Ni<\/em>(2p(S=0), p)63<em>Cu<\/em> and 64<em>Ni<\/em>(2p(S=0), p)65<em>Cu<\/em>, are expected to be much larger than the reaction rates for production of radioactive Cu, 58<em>Ni<\/em>(2p(S=0), p)59<em>Cu<\/em> and 60<em>Ni<\/em>(2p(S=0), p)61<em>Cu<\/em>. This leads to the prediction that intensities of the gamma-rays from the decays of 59<em>Cu<\/em> and 61<em>Cu<\/em> are expected to be weak and do not commensurate with the observed heat production, which is mostly from stable Cu production \u00a0reactions 62<em>Ni<\/em>(2p(S=0), p)63<em>Cu<\/em> and 64<em>Ni<\/em>(2p(S=0), p)65<em>Cu<\/em>.  There are other exit reaction channels which are (nearly) radiation-less, such as reactions (ii) A<em>Ni<\/em>(2p(S=0), \u03b1)\u02c6<em>A-2<\/em>Ni, (even A=58, 60, 62, and 64) [9]. For this case, we expect that the natural isotopic ratio of Ni isotopes will be changed in a particular way, which can be checked from the \u00a0sample after each experiment. \u00a0Even though reactions (ii) produce radioactive isotope 56<em>Ni<\/em>, it can be shown using the alpha-decay theory that its reaction rate is much slower (by many order of magnitudes) than those of other reactions.  Other exit reaction channels, A<em>Ni<\/em>(2p(S=0), d)A<em>Cu<\/em>, A<em>Ni<\/em>(2p(S=0), 3<em>He<\/em>)\u02c6<em>A-1<\/em>Ni, and A<em>Ni<\/em>(2p(S=0), t)\u02c6<em>A-1<\/em>Cu (all with even A=58, 60, 62, and 64) are ruled out since these reactions all have negative Q-values. \u00a0There are possibilities of neutron-emission exit reaction channels, such as reactions (iii) A<em>Ni<\/em>(2p(S=0), n)\u02c6<em>A+1<\/em>Zn, (even A= 62, and 64; Q is negative for A = 58 and 60). \u00a0However, reaction rates for reactions (iii) are expected be substantially smaller than those for reaction (i). \u00a0Reactions (iii) involve emission of a tightly bound neutron (62<em>Ni<\/em> -&gt;\u00a061<em>Ni<\/em> + n, Q = -10.597MeV or \u00a064<em>Ni<\/em> -&gt; 63<em>Ni<\/em> + n, Q = -9.657MeV) while reactions (i) involve emission of a loosely bound proton from an excited compound nuclear state consisting of A<em>Ni<\/em> (even A) and 2p(S=0). Therefore, the transmission probability of a neutron tunneling through the centrifugal barrier in reactions (iii) is expected to be substantially smaller than that of a proton tunneling through the centrifugal barrier in reactions (i).  The branching ratios of reactions (i) and (ii) need to be determined by measurements of gamma-ray energies and changes in isotopic ratios from future Ross-type experiments. \u00a0Theoretically, the branching ratios can be estimated by calculating transmission probability of an emitted charged particle tunneling through both Coulomb and centrifugal barriers in the exit reaction channel, as done in the alpha-decay theory.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>III. \u00a0Other Possible Reactions<br \/>\n<\/strong> In addition to the above reactions described in II, there are possibilities of reactions involving additives used (not disclosed so far). For an example, if lithium is added as an additive, reaction (iv) 6<em>Li<\/em>(2p(S=0), p 3<em>He<\/em>)4<em>He<\/em> may be possible. As in cases of reactions (i) and (ii), Ni nano-particles would be still playing an important role of providing two-proton singlet composite Bosons for reaction (iv). Reaction (iv) would not change the isotopic ratios of Ni.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>VI. \u00a0Conclusions<br \/>\n<\/strong> In order to explore validity and to test predictions of the generalized BECNF theory for the hydrogen-metal system, it is very important to carry out Rossi-type experiments independently in order to establish what are exact inputs and outputs of each experiment. \u00a0If the entrance and exit reaction channels are established experimentally, we can investigate selection rules as well as estimates of the reaction rates for different exit reaction channels, based on the generalized\u00a0BECNF theory [1-4]. Once these experimental results are established, further application of the generalized BECNF theory can be made for the purpose of confirming the theoretical mechanism and making theoretical predictions, which can then be tested experimentally.  Basic description of the above theoretical concepts for BECNF in the hydrogen-metal system will be included in an invited talk at a forthcoming nuclear physics conference [10], and will be published in the conference proceedings [10].<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>References <\/strong><\/p>\n<ol style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><strong><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">Y. E. Kim, \u201cTheory of Bose-Einstein Condensation Mechanism for Deuteron-Induced Nuclear Reactions in Micro\/Nano-Scale Metal Grains and Particles\u201d, Naturwissenschaften 96, 803 (2009) and references therein.<\/span><\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">Y. E. Kim, \u201cBose-Einstein Condensate Theory of Deuteron Fusion in Metal\u201d, J. Condensed Matter Nucl. Sci. 4, 188 (2010), Proceedings of Symposium on New Energy Technologies, the 239th National Meeting of American Chemical Society, San Francisco, March 21-26, 2010.<\/span><\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">Y. E. Kim, \u201cTheoretical interpretation of anomalous tritium and neutron productions during \u00a0Pd\/D co-deposition experiments\u201d, Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. \u00a052, 31101 (2010).<\/span><\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">Y. E. Kim and A. L. Zubarev, \u201cMixtures of Charged Bosons Confined in Harmonic Traps and Bose-Einstein Condensation Mechanism for Low Energy Nuclear Reactions and Transmutation Processes in Condensed Matter\u201d, Condensed Matter Nuclear Science, Proceedings of the 11th International conference on Cold Fusion, Marseilles, France, 31 October \u2013 5 November, 2006, World Scientific Publishing Co., pp. 711-717.<\/span><\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">Andrea Rossi, \u201cMETHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CARRYING OUT NICKEL AND HYDROGEN EXOTHERMAL REACTION\u201d, United States Patent Application Publication (Pub. No.: US 2011\/0005506 A1, Pub. Date: Jan. 13, 2011); <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wipo.int\/patentscope\/search\/ja\/WO2009125444\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/www.wipo.int\/patentscope\/search\/ja\/WO2009125444<\/a>.<\/span><\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">S. Focardi and A. Rossi, \u201cA new energy source from nuclear fusion\u201d, March 22, 2010. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nyteknik.se\/incoming\/article3080659.ece\/BINARY\/Rossi-Forcardi_paper.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/www.nyteknik.se\/incoming\/article3080659.ece\/BINARY\/Rossi-Forcardi_paper.pdf<br \/>\n<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/?p=66\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/?p=66<\/a> , \u00a0February 2010<\/span><\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">H. Essen and S. Kullander, \u201cExperimental test of a mini-Rossi device at the Leonardocorp, Bologna, 29 March 2011\u201d, a travel report, April 3, 2011; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nyteknik.se\/nyheter\/energi_miljo\/energi\/article3144827.ece\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/www.nyteknik.se\/nyheter\/energi_miljo\/energi\/article3144827.ece<\/a><\/span><\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nyteknik.se\/nyheter\/energi_miljo\/energi\/article3144827.ece\" target=\"_blank\"><\/a>Table of Isotopes, 8th Edition, Volume I: A = 1-150, edited by R. B. Firestone et al., published by John Wiley and Sons, Inc. (1999), pages 270 and 284.<\/span><\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">Reactions (ii) were suggested by T. \u00a0E. Ward, private communication, May 11, 2011.<\/span><\/strong><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">Y. E. Kim, \u201cDeuteron Fusion in Micro\/Nano-Scale Metal Particles\u201d, an invited talk to be presented at the Fifth Asia Pacific Conference on Few-Body Problems in Physics 2011(APFB2011), August 22-26, 2011, Seoul, Korea. (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.apctp.org\/conferences\/2011\/APFB2011\/\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/www.apctp.org\/conferences\/2011\/APFB2011\/<\/a>)<\/span><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/files\/Generalized Theory of Bose-Einstein Condensation.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Direct download<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: right;\">by Yeong E. Kim Department of Physics, Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"> Direct download<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"> ABSTRACT Generalized theory of Bose-Einstein condensation nuclear fusion (BECNF) is used to carry out theoretical analyses of recent experimental results of Rossi et al. for hydrogen-nickel system. Based [&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[3],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/501"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=501"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/501\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":503,"href":"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/501\/revisions\/503"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=501"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=501"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=501"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}