{"id":841,"date":"2014-02-22T13:05:42","date_gmt":"2014-02-22T18:05:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/?p=841"},"modified":"2014-02-22T13:07:05","modified_gmt":"2014-02-22T18:07:05","slug":"physics-of-rotating-and-expanding-black-hole-universe","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/?p=841","title":{"rendered":"Physics of rotating and expanding black hole universe"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"_mcePaste\" style=\"text-align: right;\"><em>by<\/em><\/div>\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\" style=\"text-align: right;\"><em>U.V.S.Seshavatharam<\/em><\/div>\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\" style=\"text-align: right;\"><em>Honorary Faculty, Institute of Scientific Research on Vedas(I-SERVE)<\/em><\/div>\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\" style=\"text-align: right;\"><em>Hyderabad-35, India<\/em><\/div>\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\" style=\"text-align: right;\"><em>Email: seshavatharam.uvs@gmail.com<\/em><\/div>\n<div><span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">.<\/span><\/div>\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/files\/Physics of rotating and expanding black hole universe.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Read the whole article<\/a><\/div>\n<div><a href=\"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/files\/Physics of rotating and expanding black hole universe.zip\" target=\"_blank\">Download the ZIP file<\/a><\/div>\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\"><span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">.<\/span><\/div>\n<div><strong>Introduction<\/strong><\/div>\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\" style=\"text-align: justify;\">Now as recently reported at the American Astronomical Society a study using the Very Large Array radio telescope in New Mexico and the French Plateau de Bure Interferometer has enabled astronomers to peer within a billion years of the Big Bang and found evidence that black holes were the first that leads galaxy growth. The implication is that the black holes started growing first. Initially astrophysicists attempted to explain the presence of these black holes by describing the evolution of galaxies as gathering mass until black holes format their center but further observation demanded that the galactic central black hole co-evolved with the galactic bulge plasma dynamics and the galactic arms. This is a fundamental confirmation of N. Haramein\u2019s theory described in his papers as a universe composed of \u201cdifferent scale black holes from universal size to atomic size\u201d.<\/div>\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\" style=\"text-align: justify;\">This clearly suggests that: galaxy constitutes a central black hole; the central black hole grows first; Star and galaxy growth goes parallel or later to the central black holes growth. The fundamental questions are: If \u201cblack hole\u201d is the result of a collapsing star, how and why a stable galaxy contains a black hole at its center? Where does the central black hole comes from? How the galaxy center will grow like a black hole? How its event horizon exists with growing? If these are the observed and believed facts \u2014 not only for the author \u2014 this is a big problem for the whole science community to be understood.<\/div>\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\" style=\"text-align: justify;\">Any how, the important point to be noted here is that \u201cdue to some unknown reason galactic central black holes are growing\u201d! This is the key point for the beginning of the proposed expanding or growing cosmic black hole! See this latest published reference for the \u201cblack hole universe\u201d. In our daily life generally it is observed that any animal or fruit or human beings (from birth to death) grows with closed boundaries (irregular shapes also can have a closed boundary). An apple grows like an apple. An elephant grows like an elephant. A plant grows like a plant. A human grows like a human. Through out their lifetime they won\u2019t change their respective identities. These are observed facts. From these observed facts it can be suggested that \u201cgrowth\u201d or \u201cexpansion\u201d can be possible with a closed boundary. By any reason if the closed boundary is opened it leads to \u201cdestruction\u201d rather than \u201cgrowth or expansion\u201d. Thinking that nature loves symmetry, in a heuristic approach in this paper author assumes that\u201c through out its lifetime universe is a black hole\u201d. Even though it is growing, at any time it is having an event horizon with a closed boundary and thus it retains her identity as a black hole forever. Note that universe is an independent body. It may have its own set of laws. At any time if universe maintains a closed boundary to have its size minimum at that time it must follow \u201cstrong gravity\u201d at that time.<\/div>\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\" style=\"text-align: justify;\">If universe is having no black hole structure any massive body(which is bound to the universe) may not show a black hole structure. That is black hole structure may be a subset of cosmic structure. This idea may be given a chance.<\/div>\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\" style=\"text-align: justify;\">Rotation is a universal phenomenon. We know that black holes are having rotation and are not stationary. Recent observations indicates that black holes are spinning close to speed of light.<\/div>\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\" style=\"text-align: justify;\">In this paper author made an attempt to give an outline of \u201cexpanding and light speed rotating black hole universe\u201d that follows strong gravity from its birth to end of expansion.<\/div>\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\" style=\"text-align: justify;\">Stephen Hawking in his famous book <em>A Brief History of Time<\/em>, in Chapter 3 which is entitled <em>The Expanding Universe<\/em>, says: <em>\u201cFriedmann made two very simple assumptions about the universe: that the universe looks identical in which ever direction we look, and that this would also be true if we were observing the universe from anywhere else. From these two ideas alone, Friedmann showed that we should not expect the universe to be static. In fact, in 1922, several years before Edwin Hubble\u2019s discovery, Friedmann predicted exactly what Hubble found&#8230; We have no scientific evidence for, or against, the Friedmann\u2019s second assumption. <\/em><em>We believe it only on grounds of modesty: it would be most remarkable if the universe looked the same in every direction around us, but not around other points in the universe\u201d<\/em>.<\/div>\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\" style=\"text-align: justify;\">From this statement it is very clear and can be suggested that, the possibility for a \u201cclosed universe\u201d and a \u201cflat universe\u201d is 50\u201350 per cent and one cannot completely avoid the concept of a \u201cclosed universe\u201d.<\/div>\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\" style=\"text-align: justify;\">Clearly speaking, from Hubble\u2019s observations and interpretations in 1929, the possibility of \u201cgalaxy receding\u201d and \u201cgalaxy revolution\u201d is 50\u201350 per cent and one cannot completely avoid the concept of \u201crotating universe\u201d.<\/div>\n<div><span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">.<\/span><\/div>\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/files\/Physics of rotating and expanding black hole universe.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Read the whole article<\/a><\/div>\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/files\/Physics of rotating and expanding black hole universe.zip\" target=\"_blank\">Download the ZIP file<\/a><\/div>\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\"><span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">.<\/span><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>by U.V.S.Seshavatharam Honorary Faculty, Institute of Scientific Research on Vedas(I-SERVE) Hyderabad-35, India Email: seshavatharam.uvs@gmail.com . Read the whole article Download the ZIP file . Introduction Now as recently reported at the American Astronomical Society a study using the Very Large Array radio telescope in New Mexico and the French Plateau de Bure Interferometer has enabled [&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[3],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/841"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=841"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/841\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":843,"href":"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/841\/revisions\/843"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=841"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=841"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=841"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}