{"id":874,"date":"2015-01-30T06:14:19","date_gmt":"2015-01-30T11:14:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/?p=874"},"modified":"2015-01-30T06:14:19","modified_gmt":"2015-01-30T11:14:19","slug":"aether-structure-for-unification-between-gravity-and-electromagnetism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/?p=874","title":{"rendered":"Aether Structure for unification between gravity and electromagnetism"},"content":{"rendered":"

.<\/span><\/p>\n

by<\/em><\/div>\n
Wladimir Guglinski<\/em><\/div>\n
retired, author of the Quantum Ring Theory<\/em><\/div>\n
.<\/span><\/div>\n
\n
Read the whole article<\/a><\/div>\n
Download the ZIP file<\/a><\/div>\n
.<\/span><\/div>\n
Introduction<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
In the book Quantum Ring Theory I had proposed a double-field model for elementary particles (composed by two concentric fields), therefore a field model fundamentally different of the mono-field model considered in the Quantum Electrodynamics \u00a0(QED).<\/div>\n
The inner field, named principal field Sp, gyrates and induces the outer field, named secondary field Sn. \u00a0In the book, published in 2006, it was considered that the outer field Sn gyrates.<\/div>\n
In this model, the outer field Sn is responsible for the electric charge of the particles as the electron, the proton, etc.<\/div>\n
Later in 2010 I changed the \u00a0double-field model, by considering that the outer field Sn does not gyrates. \u00a0However, in 2014, after a long discussion with the reader Mr.Joe in the Comments of the Journal of Nuclear Physics, he drew our attention to two key points:<\/div>\n
\n
    \n
  1. An outer field Sn induced by the rotation of an inner field Sp must have rotation.<\/li>\n
  2. A mono-field model violates the monopolar nature of the electric charge in the even-even nuclei with Z=N, because they have null magnetic moment, but as all the nuclei have rotation then the even-even nuclei with Z=N would have to have non-null magnetic moment (because the rotation of the positive charge of the proton would have to induce a magnetic moment). Therefore QED violates the monopolar nature of the electric charge in the case of the even-even nuclei with Z=N.<\/li>\n
  3. A double-field model in which the outer field Sn gyrates would have to induce a magnetic field in the case of even-even nuclei with Z=N, if we consider the field Sn in the classical sense of Euclidian space. \u00a0But the space considered in Quantum Ring Theory is not Euclidian, in order that the rotation of the field Sn never induces magnetic fields, and this is the reason why the even-even nuclei with Z=N have null magnetic moment.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n
    Here we will analyse these questions in details.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
    .<\/span><\/div>\n
    Read the whole article<\/a><\/div>\n
    Download the ZIP file<\/a><\/div>\n
    .<\/span><\/div>\n
    <\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    .<\/p>\n

    by Wladimir Guglinski retired, author of the Quantum Ring Theory . Read the whole article Download the ZIP file . Introduction In the book Quantum Ring Theory I had proposed a double-field model for elementary particles (composed by two concentric fields), therefore a field model fundamentally different of the mono-field model considered in the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[3],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/874"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=874"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/874\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":875,"href":"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/874\/revisions\/875"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=874"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=874"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=874"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}