.
by
Gamal A. Nasser
Faculty of science, Mansoura University, Egypt
E-mail: chem.gamal@hotmail.com
.
.
Abstract
This model is development of solid nuclear models. Like FCC model, this model can account for nuclear properties that have been explained by different models. This model gives more accurate explanation for some nuclear properties which are Asymmetric fission, Nuclear binding energy and the most bound nuclei, Natural radioactivity and Number of neutrons in nuclei depending on the structures of these nuclei. The structures of nuclei in this model have special advantage, as there is separation between lattice positions of similar nucleons giving new concept for nuclear force.
.
.
Wlad’
I also believe a sprinkling of 11Be in the mix would not hurt.
Wlad,
Thank you for your wise comments. Theoretically the loose nucleons should be r=1.2fm.11^1/3 = approx. 2.76fm for 11Be but tests out at7fm. For 7Li this should be 1.2.7^1/3 or approx. 2.3fm. Since there is no data for the neutron of the 7Li nucleus, my best guess would be around 5-7fm., well beyond the 3fm distance that the strong force exhibits a healthy influence. I suggested thermal influence because we know that is provided through the heating cycle
Dear Andrea,
The Rossi-Effect seems to transform the nuclei to stable isotopes. Is there any hope -within the scientists group that cooperate with you- to use the effect to treat radioactive waste with the Rossi Effect ?
Kind Regards,
Koen
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Some clarification please. On The Report, it shows the ash had largely consumed certain nickel and lithium isotopes. But I understand that this is only for the ash particles. So, there still remained fuel particles that had not been changed to ash at the end of the test?
a. Is this correct?
b. Can you disclose the relative amount of lithium compared to the nickel? It would help in the energy analysis.
c. Helium was not mentioned in the report. Do you believe this was generated but either escaped or was not tested for?
d. What do you think the primary energy producing reaction was (lithium)? and the secondary one (nickel)?
Dear Andrea,
Dear Industrial Heat team,
Am I correct that with this version of E-Cat, the long-term self-sustain-mode under heavy load has lost a lot of its importance to COP ? Or are there other tricks in the hat ?
It makes obsolete a lot of other ideas and concepts. Any attempt to compete with your team is pointless.
Congratulations,
Koen
Andrea Rossi:
Congratulations on the latest confirmation of your invention!
I would like to pose the following question regarding the extreme depletion of 58Ni in the latest report. Could this be explained by “hot spots” in the reactor? Some of the fuel particles may have gone into “run away” mode during the reaction, resulting in the nearly total exhaustion of 58Ni, and changing the physical appearance of the particles. The change in physical appearance might have caused an (unintentional) selection bias during the analysis??
Kind regards; HRG.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
In the paper, there is a change of isotopes ratio towards 62Ni increase. But this doesn’t mean that there is synthesis of 62Ni. This can be a result of decay of all other Ni isotopes (the same scheme with 7Li and 6Li, I have mentioned to eernie1 below). Such fission will change the ratio. Only the precise measurement of nickel amount before and after usage will give the answer. If there is synthesis of 62Ni from 58Ni then total amount of nickel isotopes will stay the same. If there is 58Ni decay, after interaction with alpha particles, into low atomic weight elements then total amount of nickel will be decreased.
Best wishes,
Valeriy Tarasov
Andrea,
My family and I thank you for your continued dedication to this miracle.
In reply to my request for a not-lengthy lyric to the labwork by Levi et al in Lugano, with Lithium and lots of labor, Matt Robinson sent the following.
New Fire – by Matt Robinson
The Third Party test in Lugano
was built on a set of Meccano
In the middle a pipe,
The first of its type
Showing the light of a brighter Tomorro’
Our congratulations to you and your team,
Joseph Fine
Dear Dott Rossi,
Yes,of course,anyone working in this project,works for the truth and progress.
Thank you all.
Regards G G
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Congratulations on the test results.
If genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration then in your case I’d add a big something more for perseverance in the face of adversity. This recent good news is very well deserved on your part and your team’s.
I do have a question, if you have time: The report’s analysis seemed to indicate that a large part of the excess energy came from the transmutation of Lithium and Nickel:
– Do you think that’s true, or is the jury still out on that one?
Thanks & congratulations again,
Walt C.
I haven’t yet read the report, but … an idea about COP: if warming heat is supplied by burning fuel, and electricity is used only for EM stimulus, then also a COP<5 or so would allow an efficient electricity generation.
I am sure that this idea has already been assessed …
Again, Andrea, my best congratulations for the results you have obtained so far.
Regards,
CM
Dear Mr. Rossi,
Congratulations on the astounding results of the ITP test!
This being the last test that is conducted and public information about the IH customer possibly a year away, does this mean we’re in for yet another long silence? I want the E-Cat to revolutionize energy production yesterday!!
Best Regards,
~Janne
Tommaso Di Pietro:
We’ll see.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Daniel G. Zavela:
Thank you.
The Cat&Mouse ballet will go commercial.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven N. Karels:
1- I have to work and stay focused on my job
2- I have to pray God to help us
All the rest is not up to me
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Giovanni Guerrini:
Thank you; obviously the results are merit of all our Team.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Nicola Cortesi:
Sure your comment merits an answer from a geophysicist: I am not able to answer, but you are introducing an interesting principle: under our feet we have an immense laboratory that makes for us for free a gigantic amount of experiments, if we are able to read them.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Daniel De Caluwé:
Thank you for your attention; in the report is explained well why the Professors preferred a direct measure of the energy instead of through a heat exchanger.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Marco Serra:
Thank you!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Enrico Ghelardoni:
Thank you!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dan C.:
Thank you for your kind attention. No comment at all.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Pekka Janhunen:
Maybe an idea.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
H-G Branzell:
Good idea!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Bill Nicholson:
Please find my answers in capital letters below your questions in your comment.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dan C.:
Thank you for this important information.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
H-G Branzell:
You are right.
The results of the analysis have been partially surprising also to me. I perfectly expected the depletion of 7Li ( I have a patent pending for this, filed much before the test), I knew that during the operation 62Ni is formed ( we found many times a shift toward 62Ni in our private tests) and its percentage grows, but not in that measure. We are studying this fact to try to understand.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Your new member of the E-Cat family obviously needs a name. It belongs to the subspecies Hot-Cats, but it still needs a name of its own. To me this new name is obvious, welcome the Dogbone Cat, or D-Cat for short.
Martin Aubrey:
Sorry, I cannot give this information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gian:
Translation: ” Our gratitude and a prayer must go also to Prof. Sergio Focardi”.
I totally share your comment.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gian:
Very important indeed, thank you. We are really honoured of this position of Elforsk.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Will Hurley:
Thank you!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Congratulations!!! I am amazed at the progress you have made in short order. You have invented the new light bulb and now many lamps must be invented.
Sergio is smiling.
God Speed
Will
THIS IS AN IMPORTANT DECLARATION FROM SWEDISH: NyTeknik
Omissis …………
The central part of the reactor is narrow and two inches long . In the experiments, the reactor was at a temperature up to about 1400 degrees Celsius. Net developed 1,500 kWh energy as heat. The heat energy released was three to four times the electrical energy input . This with approximately one gram of the fuel consisting of hydrogen charged with nickel additives in powder form.
Elforsk in recent years has followed the development of what has come to be called nuclear reactions at low energy, LENR – Low Energy Nuclear Reactions . Elforsk include published a compilation of knowledge about LENR . Elforsk has also co-funded the current measurements and earlier measurements. While the earlier measurements showed an unexplained excess energy .
If it is possible to safely achieve and control the now indicated nuclear reactions waiting probably eventually a fundamental transformation of our energy system. It can open for decentralized energy supply. Electricity and heat can then be produced with relatively simple components . Climate Efficient energy would be very cheap.
In the current situation we do not know if all this is too fantastic to be true. The measurement results indicate that a new way of extracting nuclear power may have been discovered. A small group of Swedish scientists are deeply involved in trying to understand the underlying physics . Sweden thus has a unique chance to be involved in leading research and development in the LENR area .
Elforsk now taking the initiative to build a comprehensive Swedish research initiative . More knowledge is needed to understand and explain. Let us engage more researchers in searching coat phenomenon and then explain how it works.
Magnus Olofsson , CEO Elforsk
Il nostro riconoscente pensiero ed una
preghiera vadano al Prof. Sergio Focardi.
Dear Readers:
I am delighted to receive your comments. I will answer to all of them as soon as possible.
Warmest regards to all.
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Congratulations for the report. The ash was reported to be 98% pure Ni-62. There seems to be a marker for pure isotopes, see e.g. isotope-amt.com and buyisotope.com. To know the prices, one would have to ask for quotation. Someone at Vortex mailing list had speculated earlier that the price could be more than $100k per 10 grams (www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg79966.html).
Maybe you could sell some surplus Ni-62 from test runs, and in that way generate some extra income for Leonardo Corp. From a 1 MW plant, the amounts produced would no longer be so tiny.
best regards, /pekka
Dear Dr Rossi,
Would it be correct to say that one “cap” is the Cat and the other “cap” is the Mouse?
If so, does each cap contain its own charge of nickel powder fuel?
Kind Regards,
Martyn
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I have read the new third party report, thank you. The isotopic shifts are mindblowing. When the test ends all the Nickel is Ni-62 and in spite of this the Net Power Production shown in Plot 6 is constant and even increasing until the test ends. It is like a miracle! How do you do that? 🙂
Dear Mr. Rossi
You may already be aware that Elforsk is considering LENR Research.
If not-On NyTeknik
http://www.nyteknik.se/asikter/debatt/article3854541.ece
Maybe in relationship with Industrial Heat???
Regards
Dan C.
Dear Andrea,
Congratulations on the very positive release of the report of the e-cat. Can only express the appreciation and thanks for the incredible time and efforts made by you and many others.
Know your incredibly busy…
Three quick questions
1.) Does this report aid in obtaining patent(s); hence strengthen your implementation of a business model (besides you mentioning demonstrating the product and satisfied customers)?
PATENTS ARE DEALT WITH BY OUR ATTORNEYS; BUSINESS MODEL IS BASED MORE ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE 1 MW PLANT IN OPERATION
2.) Will this report aid in partnering with others to obtain greater resources to proceed (financially, technologically, and so on) in concert with question 1 above?
THIS REPORT WILL STRENGTHEN OUR EFFORTS TO CONTINUE IN OUR R&D ENDEAVOURS AND DEVELOPE THE INDUSTRIALIZATION OF OUR PRODUCTS
3.) The report is only a step. Have the report authors provided a roadmap to involve the larger scientifically community and ultimately allowing these and future results secure support for further research and discoveries?
WHILE OUR R&D EFFORTS WILL CONTINUE, COHERENTLY WITH ALL OUR FORMER WORK, WE FROM NOW ON WILL FOCUS OUR ATTENTION ON THE PLANTS IN OPERATION IN THE FACTORIES OF OUR CUSTOMERS. OUR R&D WILL GO AHEAD COHERENTLY WITH OUR INDUSTRIAL NECESSITIES AND WITH THE NECESSITY TO MAINTAIN AS LONG AS NECESSARY OUR IP
Interesting how your new technology configuration has similarities to what asked you to visualize several days ago. Coincidence? I don’t think so. : < )
I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE SAYING: OUR “NEW TECHNOLOGY CONFIGURATION” HAS BEEN BORN ONE YEAR AGO, NOT SEVERAL DAYS AGO
Critical we communicate what heat and temperature are, how they overlap with the incomplete concepts of "gravity" and "charge" in the mediums we define as matter. As we've discussed.
SORRY, I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU WANNA SAY!
More to ponder from an olde and ancient B-52 aviator.
OK
All the best and enjoy the ride!
WITH A PILOT LIKE YOU THE RIDE WILL NOT BE BORING.
WARM REGARDS
A.R.
Kind Regards,
Bill Nichols
Dear Andrea
Congratulations to You & your team on a positive report. I have read it once. it is not as layman friendly as the last report.
As to the COP>3.6, I take notice of the On/Off(SSM) and EM Pulse is not implemented. Both of which would have a greater impact on COP though more complex to control.
The test seems to be a bare-bones basic mode which appears very stable in operation. A practical approach considering it’s intent was to measure excess heat, not necessarily a high COP.
My Intuition is that I may be missing something other then the EM Pulse & On/Off(SSM) not being implemented. If I’m correct, could you point out what I should be looking for before I re-read the report. It’s a Long Read & my eyes are getting old. 🙁
P.S. This looks like a Cat between 2 mouseys. Any comment?
https://html1-f.scribdassets.com/44sjod4la842xrh7/images/2-ee77d95136.jpg
Warmest Regards
Dan C.
And more :), a similar to 7Li decay effect should be detected if Lithium will be replaced by Potassium or Sodium.
Best wishes,
Valeriy Tarasov
The report finally arrived and puts an end to this last stressing period for many of us.
Hope that things will go a little smoother for everybody.
Thanks for your resolution.
Enrico
Dear eernie1,
Just one note. In the case of 7Li decay to alpha particles after its interaction with protons relative amount of 6Li will be increased. Thus, no synthesis of 6Li is needed, and only decay of 7Li is sufficient to change the isotope ratio.
Best wishes,
Valeriy Tarasov
Caro Andrea
non ho mai dubitato della tua scoperta da quando ho visto su youtube il Prof. Focardi che diceva “Per l’umanità questa scoperta è paragonabile a quella del fuoco”. Da allora passato 3 anni annoiando amici e familiari increduli sulla nuova era che, grazie a te, si stava per aprire per l’umanità. Tutte le mattine ho letto i tuoi posts su questo sito aspettando buone notizie. Finalmente il momento è arrivato e la mia gioia è alle stelle. Ti faccio le mie congratulazioni e i migliori auguri per il tuo futuro lavoro.
Grazie a te e grazie a Dio che sicuramente ha guidato il tuo lavoro.
Un abbraccio
Marco
PS. Se hanno dato il Nobel 2014 per la fisica agli inventori del led a luce blu non possono non darlo a te.
Dear dr. Rossi,
I’ve read the Report. Also from Belgium, congratulations with this positive report! Again a big step! As I read them calculating the energy radiation and the convection, having to calculate and fill in all the parameters, I couldn’t supress a smile, because, of course, with this big amount of excess energy, for people with eyes to see and ears to hear, this was already obvious with the simple caloremetric tests that you did yourself. I personally even prefer a simple caloremetric test, with a cooling fluid, measuring the flow and the delta T (Temperature difference) because honestly, that’s less complicated. But ok, the scientifc world now has, back again, a very decent report, measuring and calculating the excess energy in a different way. Kind Regards, and a lot of further success with you work, and with the 1MW plant at the location of the customer.
Dear Readers,
Litium, Nickel, H+… It seems that all the components of the E-cat fuel are also naturally present in some rocks inside the earth, where the high temperatures and pressures could be able to sustain the LENR reactions indefinitely, generating the “missing heat” geophysicians are looking for. Maybe if there is a geologist between the readers, he could try to speculate on this topic further.
Bests,
Nicola
Carissimo Dott Rossi,
EVVIVA! “Eppur si muove!” e correrà sempre più veloce.
Onore alla scienza che,tra le tante cose,ci dona l’incontestabilità di ciò che è vero.
Onore al Prof Levi e colleghi,che dedicano la propria esistenza al perseguimento della verità e del progresso.
Grazie a tutti Voi. Giovanni Guerrini
Dear Andrea Rossi,
The success of eCat technology as demonstrated in the report will awaken the sleeping giants who will want to oppose or control the technology. Most people of technology that I know believe “Cold Fusion” to be a pseudo-science. This report may evoke a major change in their perceptions.
I say the onslaught of critics because the powers that will be negatively affected by eCat will attempt to rally against you. I suspect the “Plan A” – LENR is bad science – is now effectively negated by The Report. “Plan B” will now be to regulate it into non-existence or otherwise force it into a mechanism where the eCat technology can be minimized or forced to be abandoned. This is where the Game becomes interesting.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
The new design of you ECat reactor and the temperatures achieved in the latest test are a testament to your engineering genius. Congratulations!
Do you intend to use the ECat self-sustaining mode in commercial applications or has your team decided that better control is achieved via the use of uninterrupted electrical power input as was done in the latest 32 day test run?
Many have tried to harness “Cold Fusion”, but you have actually succeeded after “only” 25 1/2 years of research and toil under the frowning gaze of the scientific physics establishment. Bravo! Wishing you continued great success.
Best Regards,
Daniel G. Zavela