.
by
Aleksandr Nikitin
E-mail: nikitinaleksandrp@gmail.com
.
Read the whole article
Download the ZIP file
.
Abstract
The modern scientific paradigm has exhausted itself.
The motion of matter, including low-energy nuclear reactions LENR and gravity, the description of which is the task of science, can be further cognized solely on the basis of a new scientific paradigm:
- Postulating the primacy of the movement of our World as a way of its existence, as its absolute attribute, which is confirmed by all our experience.
- Our World – Cosmos – is the only entity that unites absolutely everything: material bodies, physical fields and ether, object and subject, current and conductor, “moving body” and “perpetual motion machine” with power N=h/tP
(absolute invariant) in one person and singular. - The materiality of Cosmos lies in its motion, which is the process of transformation of baryonic matter (BM) through neutrinos (as a “displacement current”) into “dark matter” (DM) and back, i.e. material-energy induction.
- Cosmos motion is a non-mechanical periodic process of spherical runoff-source (convergence-divergence) according to the Hubble-Planck factor (H-h), which is the cause of formation, existence and motion of material bodies. This
material current creates on the equipotential surfaces the tension-acceleration (difference of energy potentials), which causes any movement of matter. - ….
.
Dr. Rossi,
I just saw your posting on X showing the current form inside the reactor of the E-Cat. One question… the date in the lower right corner of the scope’s display is Sept. 09, 2018 00:19.
Is that the date of the reading being taken? The manual for the scope says you can use the Set Date and Time menu to set the clock date and time. The oscilloscope displays this information…
Was this image taken in 2018?
Warm regards,
Greg
Gregory Daigle:
Although the Grand Unified and the Superstring theories have proposed the hypothesis of the existence of monopoles, I am not familiar with it; surely it has nothing to do with the concepts expressed in the paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi,
On E-Cat World there is a discussion about the nature of dense cluster charges (EVOs or EVs) and their relationship to monopoles. Your paper on long-range particle interactions discusses cluster charges, but there is no mention of monopoles. K. Shoulders also discussed EVs but only briefly mentions monopoles.
What is your personal option about the role of monopoles in charge aggregates?
Warm regards,
Greg