United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

35,180 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • Andrea Rossi

    Thank you for the link,
    Warm Regards,

  • Paul

    Dr. Rossi,
    Please find this interesting article about your ecat:
    Kind regards,

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven Nicholes Karels:
    Thank you for your sugestion,
    Warm Regards,

  • jan Šrajer

    @ Mr. Dan Galburt
    How about Plan C – against reverse engineering. Produce enough initial generators and then enter the stock market to ensure a head start.
    All the best J.Š.

  • Steven Nicholes Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    I think there is merit in some elements of Dan Galburt’s proposed plan.

    1. You obviously are generating pre-production units now for internal testing and product development purposes (please verify my assumption).
    2. Why not select one (or a few) independent test agencies to test the pre-production units for durations and output/input ratios that clearly exclude chemical energy sources.
    3. The independent test organizations would be under a strict NDA where they cannot release information without your approval.
    4. Then a massive news release (more than internet) on the positive results.
    5. I would suggest testing of multiple SKLeps in a system, so that results from each SKLep unit, in the same test environment, can be cross-compared.

    In this manner, the proprietary design data are protected and the units cannot be reverse engineered until your massive production of 1 million units is publicly available.


  • Maico

    @Rupert Murdoch

    Excuse me, just to be sure …
    but the question for an update on SKleps pre-orders, to Andrea Rossi, comes from “this” Rupert Murdoch:


    or just a namesake

    thanks if you can answer 🙂

    thank you


  • Andrea Rossi

    Dan Galburt:
    Thank you for your kind thinking to help us.
    The risk is the recerse engineering while we are nor ready to react.
    Our plan B is different.
    Warm Regards,

  • Dan Galburt

    Dear Dr. Rossi,

    My thoughts on a possible plan B

    Prior to shipment of the ECat SKLep the number of customers placing preorders is limited to people who follow your work on the internet and believe that there is a chance that you will actually manufacture and ship working units as promised. Getting 800000 preorders prior to shipments shows that there is strong interest in the ECat SKLep, but to convert preorders to orders and get additional orders may require more proof.

    After shipments begin, customers will actually get to test the ECat SKLep and everything will change. Short term tests will be conducted by your customers and test results will appear on the internet. The customers doing the testing will defend their results. If the ECat SKLep works it will be obvious, and if it doesn’t work it will be just as obvious. Assuming the initial test results are positive then longer-term tests will begin. About 2 months after the first shipment, testers will verify that the ECat SKLep continues to function for 1000 hours, providing solid proof that more than chemical energy is driving the device. The number of customers interested in ordering ECat SKLep units will increase exponentially and serious work on applying the ECat SKLep to real world applications will begin. Also, serious work on reverse engineering will begin.

    With this in mind, plan B should be to start shipments when you can manufacture at least 1 million ECat SKLeps in one year and have an initial inventory of perhaps 50000 units. The number of preorders is no longer a factor.

    There is no question in my mind that if you get thousands of working ECat SKLep units in the public domain you will generate a level of interest in both your product and the technology behind it that will make you a public figure. You will have accomplished something that no one has done before.

    Question: Do you think this is a viable plan B?

    Warm Regards,
    Dan Galburt

  • Andrea Rossi

    Rupert Murdoch and Robert Maxwell:
    We have numbers that change up and down through the vetting process on the big buyers, so I prefer to hold this information until we have a consolidated number.
    Warm Regards,

  • Hi Bob,

    I’d also like an update for my readers.


  • Robert Maxwell

    HI Dr Rossi
    Can you give us a update on the amount of orders for the SKLep.


  • Andrea Rossi

    Thank you for the update,
    Warm Regards,

  • Prof

    Dear Andrea,
    Here are the stats of your publications on Researchgate I read now on
    Total Readings: 110000 ( of which 101400 only of “Ecat SK and long range particle interactions” )
    Recommendations: 7388
    Citations+Mentions: 51
    Research Interest index: 1921
    and counting…

  • Andrea Rossi

    Jan Srajer:
    Thank you for your topic,
    Warm Regards,

  • Jan Šrajer

    Mr. Rossi
    One more topic.
    Convert voltage to transverse velocity and current to longitudinal velocity. Frequency to velocity rate change transverse and spin electrons to rate change energy electron.
    In short, everything is speed. You will get interesting deductions.
    All the best J.Š.

  • Jan Šrajer

    Ruslan Kulabuchov lives in Lithuania, in town Riga. He built a device where he apparently uses the Aharonov – Bohm effect.
    Impulse nanosecond energie in shorted coax. a cable that is wound like a coil on another solenoid winding. The synergy arises: the seemingly unbound energy of the high-voltage pulse passes into the current solenoid winding. The result is the multiplied of high voltage with the current flowing through the solenoid, achieving more energy than the energy needed to excite both energies, both current and high nanosecond voltage. Maybe it is ZPE.
    As a result, 100W excites about 400W of electricity into light bulbs.Unfortunately, the equipment must have a ground that is degraded over time.
    Ruslan Kulabuchov no longer continues in development.

    All the best J. Š.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Yes, and thank you for your attention to our work,
    Warm Regards,

  • Donna

    Dr Rossi,
    What I have understood reading the paper
    is that the coherence between it and the theoretical rationale of the effect from the Ecat SKLep comes from the dV/dT of the following synopsis:
    1- point zero energy
    2- matterwaves from ZBW and
    3- dV/dt with high dV and increase of ZBW and Aharonov-Bohm effect
    4- electrons phase change
    5- formation of electron clusters in phase
    6- transfer of energy to electrons not in phase
    7- emession of energy gain
    Is it correct ?
    Thank you for your immense efforts due to the difficult situation you are in,
    Best Regards,

  • Andrea Rossi

    I empathyze with your position, but I already made my point.
    Thank you for your suggestion,
    Warm Regards,

  • Walter

    Dear Mr. Rossi,
    now it is nearly June, still no hope for a date of despatch.
    How many years do you want to wait in addition? The need for your product exists more than ever, of course much more than a million ecat sklep.
    Maybe you can sell your science to the peoples republic of china? It is a country with an immense energy demand, but also a country without the might of trusts who do not want your rivalry.
    And of course it is a country which owns currency reserves of 4 billion(EU) or 4 trillion(am.) dollar. Surely they can pay a few hundred million dollar for your invention and the expenses of your investors.
    I am sorry, but after waiting for years i getting older and impatient. And i want to witness this revolution in my lifetime.
    Best regards

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven Nicholes Karels:
    Thank you for the suggestions,
    Warm Regards,

  • Steven Nicholes Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    It would be nice and re-assuring if you could provide:

    1. new test results (and test conditions) on the production SKLep,
    2. mechanical drawings on the SKLep, specifically mounting points/specifications — type, how deep penetration allowed (e.g., M3 x 5mm),
    3. connector types and locations,
    4. input and output specifications (ranges, constraints — if any), and
    5. a sample cabling scheme for running multiple SKLep unit.

  • Donald

    Dear Andrea
    can you explain where is the link between the Casimir force and the ZPE ?

  • Prof

    @Steven Nicholes Karels
    Nice job

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven Nicholes Karels:
    Thank you for sharing,
    Warm Regards,

  • Steven Nicholes Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    Some details on the Prototype system to use SKLep units for an on-grid residential system.

    . The Components are mounted on the back of a copper clad aluminum sheet, approximately 16” wide by 12” high. No machine shop work was done, all were hand-drilled and hand-wired.

    The power comes in through a standard 1-Gang PVC box in which a pilot switch is mounted. The controlled output of the 1-Gang box goes through a NEMA cable to a 3/8” cable restraint and then to a 3 by 2 barrier strip (aka terminal strip). Ground is tied to the copper clad (both sides of the plate). A RED LED is tied to the 120VAC coming into the barrier strip and is in parallel to the AC power going to an 8 x 2 input barrier strip and also to a 120VAC input/12VDC, 10W supply (for later use in powering the SKLeps).

    Currently, I am using the 120VAC power to power the 120VAC to 12VDC power supplies in place of the future SKLep units. When I receive the SKLep units (DC in/DC out), I will replace the 120VAC going to the 8 x 2 barrier strip with the 12VDC power coming from the 10W power supply. The 120VAC/12VDC supplies will be replaced with the SKLep units. One Controller module will be added to connect to the SKLep units. The Controller gets it power from one or more of the SKLep units.

    There are three colored LEDs. They are 12VDC indicators. They show that the 12VDC output is present. There is a different color for each power supply or SKLep unit.

    The three power supplies feed to another 8 x 2 output barrier strip so that their outputs are wired in series. This configuration produces about 36 VDC. The future SKLep units would be wired the same.

    The 36VDC, 300W output goes through a strain relief to an Enphase micro-inverter, Model IQ7A or IQ8A. The Enphase micro-inverter requires the AC Neutral to be wired to its mounting support while the 36VDC connects through some cables with the same connector types as those from a Solar Panel to the micro-inverter DC Input connector. Grid Power (240VAC) is applied to the AC Connector on the micro-inverter.

    The mounting hardware is standard US 6-32 x ½” machine screws with #6 Acorn nuts and internal tooth washers.

    The IQ7A micro-inverters cost a little less than $200 USD each. Other material costs (excluding the SKLep units) are under $100 per system.

    I am using a standard Enphase grid power cable with three micro-inverter connectors, one for each of the three micro-inverters. Connection to the Grid power is through a subpanel cable which includes a 20AMP, 2-phase breaker. Different Enphase cables are available with more or less numbers of connectors that mate to the Enphase micro-controller Grid power connector. The Enphase micro-inverters run in parallel to each other.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Warm regards,

  • Anonymous

    Dr Rossi,
    Can you disclose the schematic of the control system ?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven Nicholes Karels:
    Warm Regards,

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>