.
Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent
|
|||||
United States Patent US 9,115,913 B122,438 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1Leave a Reply |
|||||
|
Copyright © 2019 Journal of Nuclear Physics - All Rights Reserved Powered by WordPress & Atahualpa |
|||||
Anonymous:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Are you still optimst about the possibility to make the Ecat able to produce electric energy directly from the plasma ?
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Marcos:
Thank you for your attention to the work of our team,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Brent:
Very useful to limit the expansion of polluting sources.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
What do you think about the popular movement raised by Greta to protect the planet and of the chant “we do not have a second planet”?
Good luck for your Ecat SK Leonardo,
Cheers
Brent
Dr Rossi,
Thank you for the precious information contained in your publication
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
combined with the video
http://www.ecatskdemo.com
You have opened a Pandora crate.
All the best,
Marcos
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Sal Hilley:
I’ll see what I can do.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
the German icebreaker and research vessel Polarstern is leaving the Norwegian port of Tromso with scientists from 19 Countries to study the climate changes in the center of the Arctic. The mission will last one year: will be the Ecat SK Leonardo ready when their results will be published ?
Sam:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello DR Rossi
This a thread from LENR Forum blog
in honour of Norman Cook that
you or others with that kind of
of knowledge might be interested
in joining.
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/6111-the-nuclear-structure-research-group/
Regards
Sam
Yrka:
The R&D on the Ecat has never ceased and coherently never ceased the evolution.
The list you made is correct, albeit the Hot Cat has been developed before the QX.
The best solution is always the next and the evolution will never stop, because every step creates the seed of the next one.
Thank you for your permanent attention to the work of our Team,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello DR Rossi
This is a link to Dr Parkhomov
presentation by Bob Grenyer
at ICCF 22.
https://youtu.be/7p8Y26d5gk0
Regards
Sam
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi.
I had a free evening and I read the main publications about your work again, from the moment the test results were published in Lugano, in 2014. Then I began to read everything I could find about your work. And of course I looked through this blog, which I have been following almost every day since September 2015 (4 years!). I remembered all the main stages.
– An attempt to organize the production of domestic installations at a factory in Sweden.
– The fight for Sigma 5,
– A tough year working with HI and litigation.
– Great presentation in Stockholm and even better in 2019 on the Internet
– and a triumphant article on researchgate.net (which, unfortunately, I did not understand).
– The beginning of sales of heat to customers.
And now fantastic, even against the backdrop of fantastic predecessors, Ecat SK Leonardo.
Everyone is looking forward to your kitties in the market!
Here is the evolution of the names of your Cats. Did I miss anything?
1. E-Cat
2. E-Cat X
3. E-Cat QuarkX (QX)
4. Hot Cat
5. Ecat SK (“The SK would be my masterpiece, a real art ouvre.” Remember?)
6. Ecat SK Leonardo
Thank you, if you can briefly, in 2 – 3 words, comment on each name. In retrospect, you probably have an understanding and attitude towards each model.
Good luck in work and tennis!
Yuri Isaev
Engineer
Tyumen, Russia.
“Jag bara undrar”:
Maybe you are right,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
My personal assessment for several years has been that the happy ending to the story of the cat would be in November, December 2019 or 1/1 2020 for various reasons.
(I’ve asked you this question before about this time span)
Would be fun if I got it right. My next assessment is that you will be in Stockholm in December 2019 or 2020.
Best regards
“Jag bara undrar”
Steven N. Karels:
You are right, but the matter of the fact is that now most of the electric ebergy is made by fossil fuels.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Martn Aubrey:
None of all. Just make electricity to fuel the electric engine, that will be the load where send the electric energy to.
Yes, we are in contact with a primary manufacturer.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi,
You said to Frank Acland that you are “optimist about launching the Ecat SK Leonardo with permanent ssm this year”.
Well done to yourself and your very hard working team.
You also said to Aki that the Ecat SK Leonardo “should eliminate the autonomy issue” for cars.
How do you see the future development for using the Ecat SK Leonardo for powering motor vehicles?
Would the Ecat be best used to:
1. Power a generator to provide electricity to drive an electric motor.
2. Directly heat water to make steam to drive an engine to provide mechanical force, as done in the steam cars of the early 20th Century (e.g. the Stanley Steamer and the Doble steam car).
3. Directly heat air, or another gas, to drive a hot air engine to provide mechanical force.
4. Some other method. Please specify if you are able.
Could you also please tell us if you have had any discussions with anyone in the transport industry about their ideas for using the Ecat to power vehicles?
Thank You if you can answer these questions.
Best Regards, and good luck for your work,
Martyn Aubrey
Dear Andrea Rossi,
You posted ” I am baffled about the fact that electric cars that use batteries charged with fossil fuels generated electricity are considered madia to make us free from fossil fuels.”
When electric power generation is primarily based on wind, solar, nuclear and eCat technology, then electric cars will be “free” of carbon emissions. Consider the efficiency of the automobile engine, the efficiencies on the gasoline production process and compare it to the fossil fuel efficiency of the fossil fuel electric production plants and the electric transmission losses. I do not know which alternative approach produces less of a carbon footprint. If carbon emissions is a worthwhile goal — there is still debate in the scientific community — then eCat technology applied to electric grid power generation and/or eCat powered automobiles is a worthy effort.
Stacey:
Thank you!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Glad I discovered this on google .
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today on other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Aki:
If we will succeed, yes, because it should eliminate the autonomy issue. Besides, I am baffled about the fact that electric cars that use batteries charged with fossil fuels generated electricity are considered madia to make us free from fossil fuels.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Prof:
Yes, it was necessary to be more precise about this link.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I noticed that you have updated your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
with more precise reference to the continuity between your theoretical evolution and the atomic nucleus model of Norman Cook
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
If your direct production of electricity from the plasma will succeed, do you think it will be useful also for cars ?
Buck:
Thank you for your insight.
The answer to all your questions is Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Your exchange with Ruby on 9/12 came as a very pleasant surprise. A surprise arising from your clear statement that “these modifications derived not from experimental phases, but directly from theoretical considerations . . .”. I could only wonder “why?” and “how?”, especially as you are in the middle of a ~7-week R&D testing of the SK Leonardo.
As a starting point, I thought to keep in mind how you focused upon integrating Husserl, with his method for distinguishing the “Natural Attitude” and “Phenomenological Attitude”, into the discipline of physics. This led me to a presumption: you were looking to nurture intuition, a phenomena for leaping beyond “knowing” to “understanding” as Richard Feynman would describe it.
Link>> https://youtu.be/NM-zWTU7X-k
A few weeks before you began this ~7-week R&D testing of the SK-Leonardo, you shared that you had assembled the “best possible Team in this matter in the whole world”. In addition, you and presumably your mysterious global partner are clear on the importance of attaining SSM as described in your exchanges here. As such, a possible way of triggering intuition is by infusing “ignorance”, not “stupidity”, in the guise of experts unfamiliar with the details of the Ecat plasma phenomenon, but experts in the physics at play in the Ecat. Right or wrong, these experts such as Oscar Gullstrom or experts from companies like ABB, would bring challenging questions, followed by clarifying questions. Experts who would be entirely comfortable at “jumping down” to the scale (femto- and picoseconds) of quantum level physics as described in your key paper. These questions would be a powerful driver in a collegial, professional, and friendly environment, pushing you to clarify the ideas presented in your paper “Long Range Particle Interaction”.
If my intuition is pointing me in the right direction about these major modifications and with you holding SSM as the paramount goal of this ~7-week testing, then do these modifications make it
• easier to attain/maintain a 5-6 Sigma SSM?
• easier to increase the rated power of each Ecat SK and SK Leonardo?
• easier to harvest electricity?
• possible to extend the life of the “fuel”?
• possible to see the “fuel” as a 100% efficient catalyst and no longer a “fuel”?
• extend the life of the hardware encasing the plasma phenomenon?
• possible to clarify on potential new fruitful control parameters?
• possible to further refine the existing control parameters?
Further, is it fair to say that, as these modifications “reinforced the theoretical bases”, then the “soup” of energies, forces, and conditions described in your paper are now being “mapped” or “sequenced” into relative priority or importance? Where the “soup” is now closer to being a manageable “framework” that has discrete “handles”?
Finally, I like Einstein’s view on the difference between intuition and rationalization as paraphrased here: “The intuitive mind is a sacred gift. The rational mind is a faithful servant.” It seems entirely appropriate to share this quote given your rapid progress for unfolding this plasma phenomenon within these 7 weeks.
As always, my best to you, your team, and your wife
Sincerely and respectfully,
Buck/Mason Ainsworth
ps. Will you now call your updated paper “Stable Long Range Particle Interactions”? “SLRPI”?
Steven N. Karen’s:
1- yes
2- yes
Warm Regards
A.R.
Frank Acland:
We are doing very well, I still am optimist about launching the Ecat SK Leonardo with permanent ssm this year.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
How is the progress of your testing going these days?
What do you think will be the end result of all the testing you are doing, and do you expect to demonstrate the E-Cat SK Leonardo in 2019?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Regarding the revision to the theoretical understanding, has this:
1. Improved the electrical generation conversion efficiency?
2. Is there any impact on control stability?
Carroll Sachar:
I think it is more probable an integration of all of them.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Rod Walton:
Thank you for the info
Warm Regards
A.R.
US gas production more than match for rising generation demand
Rod Walton
Dr Rossi
Is there a preferential thread in the theoretical sources described in
http://Www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Thanks if you can answer
Carroll