.
Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent
|
|||||
United States Patent US 9,115,913 B131,138 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1Leave a Reply |
|||||
|
Copyright © 2021 Journal of Nuclear Physics - All Rights Reserved Powered by WordPress & Atahualpa |
|||||
Dear Andrea,
I think it’s good that you offer the E-CAT SK publicly as a heating service on the Leonardo website. As you have already described, there are many applications in which you can save a lot of money and CO2 with the SK.
Why don’t you sell the SK?
– 1) Because you want to keep the development secrets to yourself.
– 2) Because you believe that you earn more money with the heat than with the sale.
– 3) Because special heat exchangers are prerequisites for operation.
– 4) Because you think that the installation is not that easy for buyers.
– 5) Because you believe that offering heat is more successful than selling it.
For the heating application, there is the option of district heating or direct heating of buildings. For building heating, it would also make sense to offer different outputs from 10 kW. Larger outputs would also make sense for district heating.
6) With what services is the SK offered?)
6.1) Can several SKs be coupled?
7) Does the SK have a higher COP with the new controller for the SKL?
Who implements the turbine drive application?
8) Leonardo?
9) the developers at the end customer?
Who is responsible for the development and manufacture of the special heat exchangers?
10) Leonardo?
11) subcontractor?
12) the customer?
13) Will it be possible for industrial customers to share in the heat gain?
Many greetings
Ulrich
KeithT:
No, but thank you for the suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Kay:
No,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Roosi, Question 3 from Jeff: 3. Have any of your customers suggested any valuable improvements? AR: Yes! My question about this: does this customer produce the associated electronics for the ECAT or ECATLED? Greetings Kay
Dear Andrea,
On your list of potential experiments, if this is feasible, is there a Stern-Gerlach type experiment that will utilise Ecat technology / theoretical knowledge to examine whether the normal Stern-Gerlach type experiment spin outcome can be influenced?
Maybe this has been done, or is in progress, or if not yet, hopefully it is being considered and is on your long (and likely very expensive) list of potential experiments.
Regards,
Keith Thomson.
Anne:
Thank you for your support,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
The Ecat SKL is probably the most important thing in fieri in this world: thank you for your sacrifice to make true this dream.
I wish you and your team all the best,
Anne
Frank Acland:
No, I was referring to the Ecat SKLed.
For the SKL we are still working .
Warmest Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Ernst’s question today was about the E-Cat SKL (electricity generator). Do you mean by your response (“So far I don’t see reason for a delay”) you think will be ready to demonstrate it on Nov 25th?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Ernst:
So far I don’t see reason for a delay.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Mr. Rossi,
if the e-cat SKL is not ready and presentable until 25.11.2021 what would be the next possible date?
sometime in spring or summer 2022? (i need hope..!)
Best regards
Ernst
Prof:
It is also very interesting the reference 17 of the paper you cited.
Warm Regards
A.R.
While your paper
http://www.researcchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
continues to accumulate readings and is the most read paper of Researchgate on Physics of the last 2 years, I noticed that not a single scientific critic has been done, with exception of the fact that electrons, being Fermions, can’t travel at c, to which you responded that c is not the speed of electrons, but of the ZBW oscillations.
Best,
Prof
Frank Acland:
1- yes
2- yes
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
1. Will the commercial version of the Ecat SKLed have a dimmer dial to adjust the brightness of the lamp?
2. If so, will the power consumption of the SKLed be proportional to its brightness setting?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Mason Ainsworth:
I suppose with the acronym ZPE you mean zero point energy.
You can find, as anybody, a good supply of information to the relation between my technology and it on
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E_Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
This is to respond to your request for clarification about my question regarding the time it took for your team of University Professors to adjust to your ZPE technology.
I am under the general impression that most if not all physics professors would be skeptical if not profoundly skeptical to the assertion of a functional ZPE technology. Therefore, it would take time and a number of experiments to overcome this initial skepticism. This is the basis for my question and the presumption that none of these physics professors would immediately say “Andrea, you are right. You don’t need to prove it to me . . . this is a ZPE technology.” Also, please note that there is a bit of humor in asking such a question because, in my lay understanding, most consider ZPE technology as “science fiction”.
If I might ask an additional question. Is it reasonable to presume this group of physics professors has gained sufficient experience in working with you, the SK, SKLed, and SKL that when they return to their respective university labs they would be able to act as “seeded” research facilities for delving deeper into the physics of the SLRPI effect . . . therefore enhancing the development of future Bachelors, Masters, and PhD physics students for this ZPE technology? Would their efforts be perceived with good will by you and your partners? Is it part of your strategy to spread the technology, supporting your goal of broad global deployment, supporting the spread of good will towards this new technology?
Also, thank you for your consideration over my health and those near me . . . Covid-19 D and extreme heat/drought/wild fires have hit this region hard.
Sincerely and Respectfully,
Mason Ainsworth
Mason Ainsworth:
We all are doing well, thanks to God, I hope the same from your side.
Answers:
1- enough
2- 11 years
3- 2 years
4- no
5- I do not understand exactly what you mean: can you rephrase ?
6- one yes
7- USA and Europe
8- both
Thank you for your attention to the work of our Team,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Norma:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Tom Conover:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Is this ECAT SKL from 2020-07-31 (noted below) still in progress?
Warm Regards,
Tom
2020-07-31 12:49 Andrea Rossi
Aleksei Savchenko and All Readres of the JoNP:
Just finished now my job of today, started early this morning at 5.30 A.M.
The work of today has been important, but it is important also this introduction to the information: THE TEST OF TODAY HAS BEEN IMPORTANT, BECAUSE I USED A REVOLUTIONARY CONFIGURATION OF THE ECAT SKL, BUT FIRST OF ALL I WANT TO MAKE THIS DISCLAIMER: THE TEST OF TODAY HAS BEEN MADE BY ME ALONE, NOBODY ELSE WAS PRESENT, NOT EVEN BY SKYPE, THEREFORE THESE DATA MUST BE READ WITH RESERVE ( IN ITALIAN WE SAY ” CON BENEFICIO D’INVENTARIO” ).
In September, Covid 19 permitting, we will have an important third party nominated by a Partner that will control the measurements remaking them.
Therefore for now you are just taking my word, right or wrong as it might be, albeit I think I am right.
The new Ecat SKL is the masterpiece of my life. It works in closed loop and generates the electric energy to fuel itself, plus generates 4 kWh/h of electric energy. I consumed only 130 Wh/h to flow away the thermal energy that is irradiated from the Ecat ( about 1 kWh/h of thermal energy is in total emitted ).
The volume of the Ecat reactor is in total 100 cubic cm, while the whole is contained in a heat dissipator box whose dimensions are cm 20 x 20 x 20, plus we have outside it the control box, which is extremely complex and does not dissipate heat thanks to passive cooling systems that are very efficient.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Among the physicists of your team is there also any woman ?
Good Day Andrea;
I hope this finds you, Team Rossi, and your tennis coach doing well.
Today, you shared with Rupert that Team Rossi includes University Professors of Physics. IMO, you have affirmed what has been a reasonable assumption for several years. Right or wrong, I presume you chose to share this information because of a body of ongoing successes in the R&D of the SK, SKLed, and SKL (inductive & resistive types). It goads me to ask, if you are able to answer, some questions that the curious at ECatWorld likely have.
1. How many are there: < 3, 5, < 10, or enough
2. How long has the longest been with Team Rossi?
3. How long has the newest been with Team Rossi?
4. Are you able to share their respective specializations?
5. How long did it take for them to get over the realization of your ongoing experimental results pointing towards the ECat being a ZPE technology based upon a revolutionary view of plasma physics?
6. Did they act as an "internal peer review" of your initial and revised LRPI paper?
7. What countries represent the universities for these University Professors?
8. Are they all local to your lab and the ongoing R&D efforts, or are they dispersed and available via Skype/Zoom?
Thank you for your openness to questions. As well, my best to you, Team Rossi, and your wife . . . the inspiration you all provide is deeply appreciated.
Sincerely & Respectfully,
Mason Ainsworth
Patricia:
Please go to the reference 36 of the paper you cited
Warm Regards
A.R.
Rupert:
Yes,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Is there in your Team also the presence of university Professors of physics ?
Dear Andrea,
In your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
where can I find a link between your work and the one of Tesla ?
Rod Walton:
Thank you for the update,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
On Power Engineering issue of July 20 2021:
Unique solar-gas microgrid takes charge at Pittsburgh Airport
Rod Walton
@Jeff
Clearly Dr Rossi has an NDA with the customers that forbids him to give information about them.
Best,
Ron
Anonymous:
Yes, it is still not impossible, as difficult as it might be,
Warm regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
Is it still not impossible that on November 25th in Sweden you will make the presentation of the Ecat SKL, that makes electric energy, together with the presentation of the ECAT SKLed lamp ?
Stephen:
Good point.
The certification on course has to control also these issues.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jeff:
1- yes
2- yes
3- yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
1. Are any of your current customers able to provide feedback about your products and services?
2. Have any of your customers provided feedback?
3. Have any of your customers suggested any valuable improvements?
Best regards,
Jeff
Dear Andrea
I recently came across this issue with ordinary LED bulbs .
A family member was having some issue with certain bulbs that were interfering with his Radio that went a way when he got some new bulbs from another manufacturer.
After a bit of digging I found it’s more to do with the ballast and electronics component than the light emission components. Also that the older lamp wasn’t optimized for the European consumer where as the new one was.
https://www.electronicshub.org/radio-interference-by-led-lights/
I don’t know if the SKLed has a similar ballast or not or if there are other RF sources in other components. It’s not the purpose of this post to know that.
However to ensure the SKLed release is perfect though it might be worth checking it has no similar RF issues.
Weleda:
Please see reference 42 in the paper you cited,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Can you suggest me a publication that can better explain the roots of the Casimir forces in the context of the theoretical system published on
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Cheers
Weleda