Mr Andrea Rossi:
What do you answer to all the sceptics that say the fact that your Ecat is not yet in the market massively, 6 years after its introduction, means it is something not to be taken seriously in consideration?
Thank you for spamming this comment,
Simon
Dr. Rossi, you and your Readers can Google:
POPEYE WAS RIGHT ABOUT SPINACH
Click on:
Popeye was right: There’s energy in that spinach-
Robert Curto
Ft. Lauderdale Florida
USA
Dr Andrea Rossi:
You said you are going to have about 60 patents of the E-Cat and the QuarkX: are you aware of all the taxes you will have to pay every year to maintain the rights on all those patents?
Is it worth? Is it not better to have one only patent with all inside?
Jacques
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Based on your information, what do you think will be the most interesting presentation at the next ICCF?
Thank you if you can answer,
Sam
Dr Andrea Rossi:
We can see that more and more institutional scientific entities are funding R&D in the LENR field, much more than before your work has been known.
I think this can be considered also an achievement of yours.
T.
Antonio:
I had to improve my knowledge of specific Physics getting the help of a specialist from an important concern of California who came here in Miami and lectured me for 16 hours: I learnt very much. Thanks to his lecturing I think I got the key to resolve the problems I had.
I am working right now and we are going well.
Warm Regards
A.R.
James Rovnack:
Thank you for the suggestion, very nice for the future: in this period I can’t, but some Reader of the JoNP surely will take advantage of it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Andrea, a little fun again. Took a few days vacation to Quebec Canada & spent some time in St Ann Dupre Canyon 30 mi east of city watching Slack Liners. Bought one for myself to practice in back yard, suggest you get one also for our celebration of the E-Cat commercialization’s later.
Try this link to see backyard & Canyon. Keep trucking, just wish I could help you speed things up. Always walk carefully as you have in the past. Your long time friend & follower Jim
FB link https://www.facebook.com/james.rovnak/posts/10205457286911484
Also you can see pictures on Amazon.com on my product Rebel 59 foot Slack Line review if you don’t have Face book access:
5.0 out of 5 stars Great exercise! Saw this on Canadian Vacation, now practicing in back…
Very happy with my purchase. Helps me with stability & balance issues.
Published 5 days ago by JAMES ROVNAK
Jim
PS I have been around Our Son about ten more times than you & we both like an active athletic life!
I’m happy to hear that the thermal peak problem is not a reactor fuel issue. If this is just an issue of materials, design and control I have no doubt you and your team can overcome all barriers to success.
Daniel De Caluwe’:
Thank you for your attention to our work.
The QuarkX poses new problems respect before.
It is premature, now, to release the description of the QuarkX.
Warm Regards,
Andrea Rossi
Italo R.:
It depends on the issues to be perfectioned, but I got the core of the argument. Anyway the definition of “nth” best is situational indeed.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
…Robert Watson-Watt, who developed early warning radar in Britain to counter the rapid growth of the Luftwaffe, propounded a “cult of the imperfect”, which he described as, “Give them the third best to go on with; the second best comes too late, the best never comes..
So, it is better having an imperfect Quark-X NOW, instead of having a perfect one NEVER.
I didn’t follow your forum for several months, so I probably missed a lot, but yesterday I’ve read that you have a problem with high temperature spots in the Ecat-X and Quark-X versions of your Ecats.
Because you have many (scientific and technological) secrets, also how you increased temperature in Ecat-X en Quark-X versions, I don’t think I really can help you, but when I read about the problems, I had following thoughts:
Isn’t it so that in the first versions of het E-Cat, that the reaction only occurred within a certain temperature range, so that not only you need a minimum temperature (Tmin) to start (heating up with the resistor), but also that the reaction automatically stops at a higher level of the temperature (Tmax), and therefore your first reactors were intrinsically save, because in the case when cooling fails (falls away), the reaction automatically and completely stops at Tmax. I even thought that sometimes you worked with a negative feedback system, i.e. that sometimes you had to add heat with the resistor to bring the reaction back into the desired temperature range, but I can be wrong.
But in the later versions (E-CatX and QuarkX) you see hot spots that you can’t control down? Does this mean that maybe other reactions occur at these points (dislocations and/or impurities in the Ni-cristal structure and/or fuel), so that your general control mechanism cannot influence these points? Maybe than you have to measure what’s really happening (i.e. also what reactions do occur) at these points (hot spots)?
As I’m sure you know much more than we do, I don’t think this remark could be of any help, but I just posted it.
I further wish you all success in solving this problem.
Kind Regards,
Daniel De Caluwé
Belgium
P.S. Immediately after posting this message, I leave this place for an area where I have no internet connection (and I don’t use smart-phones 😉 for several days, So I cannot react nor read reactions for several days, but I read it later.
Dr Joseph Fine:
I take notice.
Should I say ” give me a better suggestion ” I’d give evidence to have understood nothing: did I understand ?
Warm regards,
A.R.
The phrase is found in Italian as Il meglio è nemico del bene (The better is enemy of the good), attested since the 1603 Proverbi italiani (Italian Proverbs), by Orlando Pescetti.[2]
The phrase was popularized by Voltaire. He first used the saying in Italian in the article “Art Dramatique” in the 1770 edition of the Dictionnaire philosophique.[3] It subsequently appeared in French in his moral poem, “La Bégueule”, in Contes (Tales), 1772, which starts, ascribing it to an unnamed “Italian sage” or “wise Italian”:[4]
Dans ses écrits, un sage Italien
Dit que le mieux est l’ennemi du bien.
(In his writings, a wise Italian
says that the best is the enemy of good.)
…….
Robert Watson-Watt, who developed early warning radar in Britain to counter the rapid growth of the Luftwaffe, propounded a “cult of the imperfect”, which he described as, “Give them the third best to go on with; the second best comes too late, the best never comes.”[
…..
Gorshkov is often associated with the phrase “‘Better’ is the enemy of ‘Good Enough'” (“Лучшее – враг хорошего”) which is reputed to have hung on the wall of his office as a motto.
Bernie Koppenhofer:
What a stupid I am ! I had forgotten, you are right, now I remember perfectly…
Anyway: thank you for reminding, I will try not to fall into the Jacometti Syndrome.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi: Your question about “Jacometti”. I sent this to you in a previous posting, it is my opinion you are doing the same with your reactors. “Dr. Rossi: Your question to me about Giacometti, the story goes, his wife had to take his sculptures away to sell them because he would carve until there was nothing left, striving for perfection.” It seems to me you are trying to incorporate non ending improvements in your reactors trying to reach perfection. It is my fear you will continue to do this and possibly miss the fame and money you deserve when competitors will reach the market with proof of LENR before you.
Simon:
Maybe they are right.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Mr Andrea Rossi:
What do you answer to all the sceptics that say the fact that your Ecat is not yet in the market massively, 6 years after its introduction, means it is something not to be taken seriously in consideration?
Thank you for spamming this comment,
Simon
Dr. Rossi, you and your Readers can Google:
POPEYE WAS RIGHT ABOUT SPINACH
Click on:
Popeye was right: There’s energy in that spinach-
Robert Curto
Ft. Lauderdale Florida
USA
Dear Andrea,
This is the first edition of my Blog this week:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/09/sep-26-2016-lenr-about-motivation-i.html
All the best to you!
Peter
Mr. Rossi,
I thought your might find this interesting;
http://newatlas.com/3d-printing-stronger-ceramics-hrl/41142/?li_source=LI&li_medium=default-widget
1700C not to bad
God Speed
Hurley
Dr Rossi,
News about the QuarkX?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
You said you are going to have about 60 patents of the E-Cat and the QuarkX: are you aware of all the taxes you will have to pay every year to maintain the rights on all those patents?
Is it worth? Is it not better to have one only patent with all inside?
Jacques
Mr Andrea Rossi,
Can you explain which has been the inspiration that made you arrive to the present results?
Cheers,
Rino
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Which can be so far the lowest possible power of a QuarkX module?
T.:
Thank you. It is true.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Zaza:
Also.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
James Fly:
More or less, yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dixie:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Larry Raju:
We are working very well and approaching the sigma 5.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Sam Talbert:
I think the new paper of Prof. Norman Cook is important. His papers are always worth to be studied.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Based on your information, what do you think will be the most interesting presentation at the next ICCF?
Thank you if you can answer,
Sam
Dear Andrea Rossi,
How is behaving the QuarkX now, few days after your “lecture”?
Thank you,
Larry
Mr Andrea Rossi:
Are you measuring the spectrometry of the waves inside the QuarkX?
Godspeed,
Dixie
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Is the COP of the QuarkX comparable to the COP you got by the 1 MW E-Cat during the 1 year test in Doral?
Cheers,
James
Mr Rossi:
Are the issues you got lectures of related also to safety problems?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
We can see that more and more institutional scientific entities are funding R&D in the LENR field, much more than before your work has been known.
I think this can be considered also an achievement of yours.
T.
Koen Vandewalle:
True.
Thank you,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
You seem to have the best kind of help available in the world.
Thank you for sharing, and good luck !
Koen
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
DEear Andrea,,
The Sunday edition of my Blog is here:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/09/sep-25-2016-dear-ethan-lenr-is.html
Wish you a great coming week, success!
peter
Antonio:
I had to improve my knowledge of specific Physics getting the help of a specialist from an important concern of California who came here in Miami and lectured me for 16 hours: I learnt very much. Thanks to his lecturing I think I got the key to resolve the problems I had.
I am working right now and we are going well.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Today’s EGO OUT is about una battaglia con un piccolissimo Big Brother:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/09/sep-24-2016-lenr-orwell-s-style.html
A perfect weekend to you and Readers!
peter
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I understand from your last comments that you resolved the problems you had days ago with the Quarkx: am I right?
James Rovnack:
Thank you for the suggestion, very nice for the future: in this period I can’t, but some Reader of the JoNP surely will take advantage of it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Andrea, a little fun again. Took a few days vacation to Quebec Canada & spent some time in St Ann Dupre Canyon 30 mi east of city watching Slack Liners. Bought one for myself to practice in back yard, suggest you get one also for our celebration of the E-Cat commercialization’s later.
Try this link to see backyard & Canyon. Keep trucking, just wish I could help you speed things up. Always walk carefully as you have in the past. Your long time friend & follower Jim
FB link https://www.facebook.com/james.rovnak/posts/10205457286911484
Also you can see pictures on Amazon.com on my product Rebel 59 foot Slack Line review if you don’t have Face book access:
5.0 out of 5 stars Great exercise! Saw this on Canadian Vacation, now practicing in back…
Very happy with my purchase. Helps me with stability & balance issues.
Published 5 days ago by JAMES ROVNAK
Jim
PS I have been around Our Son about ten more times than you & we both like an active athletic life!
Burt:
I think we are close to sigma five.
But still I must add F8.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Can you explain better the work on the Quarkx that appears from your words to be critical in this period?
33:
We are doing an enormous, enormous amount of work.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
John C. Evans:
Probably.
Thanks for your sustain,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Robert Curto:
Thank you for the suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Link for today’s shorter EGO OUT issue;
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/09/sep-23-206-lenr-stop-to-repetition.html
My best wishes of success
Peter
Dr. Rossi and Readers, Google:
HYDROGEN FUEL OF THE FUTURE RESOURCE MAGAZINE
Click on the first link.
Robert Curto
Ft. Lauderdale Florida
USA
Mr Rossi
I’m happy to hear that the thermal peak problem is not a reactor fuel issue. If this is just an issue of materials, design and control I have no doubt you and your team can overcome all barriers to success.
John Evans
Dr Rossi:
Did you with your team resolve the problems with the temperature of the QuarkX?
Daniel De Caluwe’:
Thank you for your attention to our work.
The QuarkX poses new problems respect before.
It is premature, now, to release the description of the QuarkX.
Warm Regards,
Andrea Rossi
Italo R.:
It depends on the issues to be perfectioned, but I got the core of the argument. Anyway the definition of “nth” best is situational indeed.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi, I read from Wikipedia:
…Robert Watson-Watt, who developed early warning radar in Britain to counter the rapid growth of the Luftwaffe, propounded a “cult of the imperfect”, which he described as, “Give them the third best to go on with; the second best comes too late, the best never comes..
So, it is better having an imperfect Quark-X NOW, instead of having a perfect one NEVER.
Kind Regards,
Italo R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
I didn’t follow your forum for several months, so I probably missed a lot, but yesterday I’ve read that you have a problem with high temperature spots in the Ecat-X and Quark-X versions of your Ecats.
Because you have many (scientific and technological) secrets, also how you increased temperature in Ecat-X en Quark-X versions, I don’t think I really can help you, but when I read about the problems, I had following thoughts:
Isn’t it so that in the first versions of het E-Cat, that the reaction only occurred within a certain temperature range, so that not only you need a minimum temperature (Tmin) to start (heating up with the resistor), but also that the reaction automatically stops at a higher level of the temperature (Tmax), and therefore your first reactors were intrinsically save, because in the case when cooling fails (falls away), the reaction automatically and completely stops at Tmax. I even thought that sometimes you worked with a negative feedback system, i.e. that sometimes you had to add heat with the resistor to bring the reaction back into the desired temperature range, but I can be wrong.
But in the later versions (E-CatX and QuarkX) you see hot spots that you can’t control down? Does this mean that maybe other reactions occur at these points (dislocations and/or impurities in the Ni-cristal structure and/or fuel), so that your general control mechanism cannot influence these points? Maybe than you have to measure what’s really happening (i.e. also what reactions do occur) at these points (hot spots)?
As I’m sure you know much more than we do, I don’t think this remark could be of any help, but I just posted it.
I further wish you all success in solving this problem.
Kind Regards,
Daniel De Caluwé
Belgium
P.S. Immediately after posting this message, I leave this place for an area where I have no internet connection (and I don’t use smart-phones 😉 for several days, So I cannot react nor read reactions for several days, but I read it later.
Dr Joseph Fine:
I take notice.
Should I say ” give me a better suggestion ” I’d give evidence to have understood nothing: did I understand ?
Warm regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi and readers:
The “Giacometti principle” is apparently widespread:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_is_the_enemy_of_good
The phrase is found in Italian as Il meglio è nemico del bene (The better is enemy of the good), attested since the 1603 Proverbi italiani (Italian Proverbs), by Orlando Pescetti.[2]
The phrase was popularized by Voltaire. He first used the saying in Italian in the article “Art Dramatique” in the 1770 edition of the Dictionnaire philosophique.[3] It subsequently appeared in French in his moral poem, “La Bégueule”, in Contes (Tales), 1772, which starts, ascribing it to an unnamed “Italian sage” or “wise Italian”:[4]
Dans ses écrits, un sage Italien
Dit que le mieux est l’ennemi du bien.
(In his writings, a wise Italian
says that the best is the enemy of good.)
…….
Robert Watson-Watt, who developed early warning radar in Britain to counter the rapid growth of the Luftwaffe, propounded a “cult of the imperfect”, which he described as, “Give them the third best to go on with; the second best comes too late, the best never comes.”[
…..
And the Russian version:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergey_Gorshkov
Gorshkov is often associated with the phrase “‘Better’ is the enemy of ‘Good Enough'” (“Лучшее – враг хорошего”) which is reputed to have hung on the wall of his office as a motto.
Better (and Better) Regards,
Joseph Fine
Bernie Koppenhofer:
What a stupid I am ! I had forgotten, you are right, now I remember perfectly…
Anyway: thank you for reminding, I will try not to fall into the Jacometti Syndrome.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi: Your question about “Jacometti”. I sent this to you in a previous posting, it is my opinion you are doing the same with your reactors. “Dr. Rossi: Your question to me about Giacometti, the story goes, his wife had to take his sculptures away to sell them because he would carve until there was nothing left, striving for perfection.” It seems to me you are trying to incorporate non ending improvements in your reactors trying to reach perfection. It is my fear you will continue to do this and possibly miss the fame and money you deserve when competitors will reach the market with proof of LENR before you.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.