United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

 

uspto_seal_big

 

Sigillo

 

Alloro del brevetto

.

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

 

14,579 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    Again returned to a stable and good standing situation toward Sigma5.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Gian Luca

    Carissimo A.R.
    What will happen in the next year?
    Try to explain the new goals of Andrea & his staff.
    Grazie

  • Ing. Michelangelo De Meo

    Hello dr. Rossi:
    here is a link from Russia, where they talk about your work. You must learn Russian !! хорошая работа и хороший день :) :)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-a0ogH6CPl4

  • Andrea Rossi

    Ronald:
    1- yes
    2- yes
    3- no
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Ronald

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    1- was property of the ERV the flowmeter by means of which have been made the measurements on the 1 MW plant?
    2- did the ERV himself install it?
    3- have ever been installed beside it any other flowmeters by IH or Leonardo?
    Cheers,
    Ron

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gerald Cromwell:
    Thank you!
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Gerald Cromwell

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    look at this: Chile’s government has started a R&D on LENR, Bill Gates has started an R&D on LENR, in Europe in Italy the association of engineers has started a permanent updating course on LENR, and in France Airbus has started an R&D on LENR, in Russia after Dr Parkhomov has been started an R&D on LENR, in China the Atomic Institute has started an R&D on LENR, in Japan Mitsubishi has started an R&D on LENR, in South Korea Hiunday has started an R&D on LENR, etc, etc: all this thanks to your immense work: before your test of January 2011 LENR were ridiculized from the very people that today are financing all these R&Ds. This too is a legacy of yours.
    Please continue your great job,
    Gerald

  • Dear Andrea,

    A smallish Sunday EGO OUT blog issue here:
    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/11/nov-27-2106-lenr-just-three-comments-at.html

    Wish you and Readers a glorious coming week!
    peter

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gerard McEk:
    1- no
    2- the jet engine is still at an early stage
    3- the trial is already on course and it is in its preliminary stage
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Gerard McEk

    Dear Andrea,
    Congratulations with solving the control problem of one of the QuarkX’s. I hope with you that no other problems occur till 5 Sigma is reached.
    Just a few questions if I may:
    1. Does the LENR process causes EMC problems on its control system?
    2. You said that you would not produce electricity, just heat units. Does that mean that you leave the development of a QuarkX-turbine to others?
    3. Is there any sight on when the trial takes place?
    Thanks for answering our questions.
    Kind regards, Gerard

  • Andrea Rossi

    Anonymous:
    Done.
    Thank you for your sustain,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Tom Conover:
    Thank you,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Svein Henrik:
    No, we will not produce electric generation plants, we’ll supply the heat generator.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Roslyn Abrams:
    No comment.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Roslyn Abrams

    Dr Rossi,

    Many still don’t understand Darden/IH’s move in not paying you your 90 million. It just doesn’t make business sense?

    Here is one scenario mentioned:

    “To get the data cheap and then kill off the technology path to public access and hide the technology behind a pay wall. The permanent enslavement of the human race to high-cost energy in a free energy world.”

    What are your thoughts on this?

    Best

    Roslyn

  • Svein Henrik

    Dear Andrea.
    Is it your intension to produce complete units for electrical power production? If so, witch type of machinery will be used to drive the generator?
    1, A steam turbine?
    2, A Rankine machine with other fluid than water?
    3, A Stirling engine?
    4, Other solutions?
    5, Will a larger battery capacity be included?
    Regards Svein Henrik

  • Tom Conover

    Dear Andrea,

    We are all one mind in congratulating you on the uninterrupted continuation of the Sigma 5. Well done!

    Tom

  • Anonymous

    Mr Andrea Rossi:
    I hope you have fixed the Quarkx to continue your immense work.
    Godspeed from the silent majority

  • Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    Yes, we resolved the problem and understood it in full last night. It was a problem in the control system, not in the QuarkX. No delays for it.
    F8.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Toussaint:
    No, it will not delay the scheduling, so far.
    F8.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Ivano Sereno:
    I think that a technology that depends from the good eye of an administration is like a car with square wheels. If a technology is good and increases the profits of the clients it does not need any external help. The market makes the success of a product, as well as the People makes the Presidents. This having been said, I do not think that the Trump administrations will put any obstacle to a lawful enterpreneurial endeavour.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Ivano Sereno

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Do you think the new Trump administration will try to block the development of clean energies to the advantage of fossil fuels?
    Thank you, best wishes for your work
    Ivano Sereno

  • JPR

    Dear Andrea Rossi:
    Have you been able to resolve the problem of the broken QuarkX?
    Will this event delay the presentation of it?
    Thank you for your daily updates and your immense work,
    JPR

  • toussaint

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    I am glad that you think to find the reason for the sudden stop of the QUARKX,
    I hope it wont stop the progression to reaching SIGMA 5.

    Warm regards,

    Toussaint françois

  • Andrea Rossi

    Joaquin Quebedeaux:
    It’s 9 P.M. of Saturday here in the factory and we are working on it. I think we discovered the problem. It is important, to make the correction. I think by tomorrow we will overcome this.
    Warm Regards.
    A.R.

  • Joaquin Quebedeaux

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Did you discover what did not work well in the QuarkX?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Drew G.:
    It is premature for that.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Oreste:
    Not yet.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Dear Andrea,

    The regular EGO OUT publication for this day is this:

    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/11/nov-26-2016-lenr-sparks-and-fire.html

    Warm greetings,
    Peter

  • Oreste

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Did you find the reason of the stop of the QuarkX?

  • Drew G.

    Dr. Rossi:

    I viewed your first demonstration of the E-CAT technology in 2011 at Bologna University and your subsequent demonstration of the one-megawatt plant via the Internet. The mainstream media mainly ignored these two events with little mention in newspapers and/or on broadcast or cable TV channels. I sincerely hope that your planned introduction of the QuarkX technology in February 2017 will receive worldwide attention. What plans do you have to attract the widest possible audience so that this event is not also ignored? Advance notice should be provided to all media outlets so that worldwide publicity is assured. I would appreciate your thoughts on how this might be accomplished.

  • Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    Today one QuarK stopped to work suddenly, we are studying the reason of it.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Paul Krause:
    No, apart the Team and persons involved in the R&D under NDA.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Raf:
    1- to give away the intellectual property is not the best way to make it financed
    2- the point 1 should just block any serious investment
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Raf

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    1- why don’t you publish exactly how the QuarkX works, so that everybody can replicate it ?
    2- don’t you think the point 1 could resolve the problem of the urgency to have your technology applied everywhere?

  • Paul Krause

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi
    Is somebody already visiting the QuarkX in operation?
    Cheers,
    Paul

  • Andrea Rossi

    Roslyn Abrams:
    Woodford visited the plant during the test in February 2015 and in September 2015: when they invested 50 million dollars in IH the sole license and intellectual property that IH had was the one of Leonardo Corporation. The top level officers that Woodford sent to visit the plant during the test had at their disposal the first and the second querterly report made by the ERV. The fourth and last quarterly report, as well as the third, were substantially equal to the first and the second. IH has also paid the invoices related to the first, the second and the third report of the ERV. Eventually, they did not pay the fourth report, because they said it was not correct. But it was equal to the former three, related to the period during which IH collected funds from their investors. At the end of the second visit to the plant of 1 MW during the test, in September 2015, the senior officer of Woodford said to me the following precise words: ” Congratulations, Dr Rossi, we saw great stuff here”.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Roslyn Abrams

    Hello Dr Rossi,

    Interesting post about Neil Woodfords investment into ColdFusion – So if it does not work as
    IH and Thomas Darden claim then what of Woodford Funds investment?

    https://ftalphaville.ft.com/2016/11/25/2180322/so-neil-woodford-invested-in-a-cold-fusion-company/

    Best

    Roslyn

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Daniel:
    Thank you for your insight and your sustain,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Daniel

    Dear Dr. Rossi,

    I also like very much your answer to Dylan Larkin/larking(?) about God. It’s a very scientific answer that I too appreciate. So yes, there must be an ordering principle, that created (or maintains) this universe out of complete disorder (entropy = infinite), the universe that also would disintegrate to endless entropy if this universe was let alone, and maybe it does, but maybe not, because some theosofists believe it is a living entity, that evolves contineously towards perfection.

    As I had an interest in theosofy in my youth (Blavatsky, Bailey, Creme), I want to share this link with you, that gives an explanation (on God) by Koot Humi, one of the masters of wisdom in theosofy and also one of the teachers of Helena Petrovna Blavatsky who asked here to found the theosofical movement in 1875.

    It’s not meant to attack you, but to give another vision or explanation of the invisible force (by invisible matter) that, according to them, steers the cosmos:

    (This is written in 1881-82 as an answer to questions of A.O.Hume)

    http://www.theosophy-nw.org/theosnw/evol/ev-kh.htm

    Then what do we believe in? Well, we believe in matter alone, in matter as visible nature and matter in its invisibility as the invisible omnipresent omnipotent Proteus with its unceasing motion which is its life, and which nature draws from herself since she is the great whole outside of which nothing can exist. For as [d’Holbach] truly asserts “motion is a manner of existence that flows necessarily out of the essence of matter; that matter moves by its own peculiar energies; that its motion is due to the force which is inherent in itself; that the variety of motion and the phenomena that result proceed from the diversity of the properties of the qualities and of the combinations which are originally found in the primitive matter” of which nature is the assemblage and of which your science knows less than one of our Tibetan Yak-drivers of Kant’s metaphysics.

    So, already in 1881-82 he mentioned ‘invisible matter’ as the ‘omnipresent omnipotent Proteus’, that according to them steers the Cosmos. And although the concept of dark matter was not used nor discovered in 1881-82, this looks very much like dark matter, isn’t it? So could ‘dark matter’ be the ‘omnipresent omnipotent Proteus’ (= Prima Materia of the alchemists?), that steers the Cosmos? Of course, this is not a scientific text, while yours is very scientific. But my intention is just to show you another – theosofical, but not scientifically proven – vision on it.

    But, of course, I do not want to disturb your very important work with this, so just take the time to read it when it fits, even when it would take years from now before you have the time for it. I think all readers would agree that your present work is much more important.

    Kind Regards,
    Daniel

  • Andrea Rossi

    Tom Conover:
    Thank you for your comment.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Tom Conover

    Dear Andrea,

    I am not ashamed of the good news, but after checking with my loving wife, we both thought it might be too much all at once for the readers of the JoNP blog to appreciate the information I am now personally sending to you based on the Gods Word in the bible, to affirm your perception the GOD EXISTS and that HIS CREATION demonstrates visible evidence that anybody that is alive can see. Yet still, most people on this earth, which is God’s creation, deny Him and His power and glory and His right to rule the universe.

    I now know personally that God exists, and that he is the ruler of His creation, the universe. But even though all people can see and know God, they do not glorify him as God nor do they thank him, but they are empty-headed in their reasoning and their senseless hearts have became darkened.

    (Romans 1:19-20) What may be known about God is clearly evident among them, for God made it clear to them. 20 For his invisible qualities are clearly seen from the world’s creation onward, because they are perceived by the things made, even his eternal power and Godship, so that they are inexcusable.

    (Romans 1:16-32) 16 I am not ashamed of the good news; it is, in fact, God’s power for salvation to everyone having faith, to the Jew first and also to the Greek. 17 For in it God’s righteousness is being revealed by faith and for faith, just as it is written: “But the righteous one will live by reason of faith.” 18 For God’s wrath is being revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who are suppressing the truth in an unrighteous way, 19 because what may be known about God is clearly evident among them, for God made it clear to them. 20 For his invisible qualities are clearly seen from the world’s creation onward, because they are perceived by the things made, even his eternal power and Godship, so that they are inexcusable. 21 For although they knew God, they did not glorify him as God nor did they thank him, but they became empty-headed in their reasoning and their senseless hearts became darkened. 22 Although claiming they were wise, they became foolish 23 and turned the glory of the incorruptible God into something like the image of corruptible man and birds and four-footed creatures and reptiles. 24 Therefore, God, in keeping with the desires of their hearts, gave them up to uncleanness, so that their bodies might be dishonored among them. 25 They exchanged the truth of God for the lie and venerated and rendered sacred service to the creation rather than the Creator, who is praised forever. Amen. 26 That is why God gave them over to uncontrolled sexual passion, for their females changed the natural use of themselves into one contrary to nature; 27 likewise also the males left the natural use of the female and became violently inflamed in their lust toward one another, males with males, working what is obscene and receiving in themselves the full penalty, which was due for their error.

    In closing, let me say thank you again for publicly recognizing that God exists.

    Agape,

    Tom Conover

  • Andrea Rossi

    Tom Conover:
    Thank you: without the sustain of my Faith, I would have been buried in the nineties. I got from there my force.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Joe Klecko:
    I’d say between 60 and 70%.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>