United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

 

uspto_seal_big

 

Sigillo

 

Alloro del brevetto

.

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

 

12,404 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • Andrea Rossi

    Mario:
    I didn’t see a complete report, yet.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    M:
    Thank you for your opinion.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Boris:
    Thank you,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    We are working well also today.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Mario

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    What do you think of the replication of your effect made in India?

  • M.

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    I am convinced we will never see any Ecat or Quarkx whatsoever.
    Thank you for spamming this comment,
    Have a nice day

  • Boris

    Dear Andrea:
    QuarkX: I can already tell that’s gonna be super helpful.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Anonymous:
    I agree,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    S. Algarotti:
    Thank you for the link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • S. Algarotti

    Dr Rossi,

    New book by Dr. Francis F. Pitard titled >

    Links Between the Theory of Vacuoles and Low Energy Nuclear Reactions

    https://www.vacuoles-lenr.com/

  • Anonymous

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    I read “An Impossible Invention” of Mats Lewan (for sale by Amazon): very good book, it explains exhaustively the work you did, with intelligence and solid technical documentation.
    Godspeed,
    Anonymous

  • Andrea Rossi

    Miguel Mudra:
    Spin of an elementary particle directed toward the observer: if clockwise is negative, conterclockwise positive, equatorial neutral.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Johnny:
    Yes, when I make professional training for our Team.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    On our way toward Sigma 5.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Osten:
    Thank you for the link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    I am optimistic.
    Wrm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Dear Andrea,

    Sending this short Sunday – simple edition f the Blog:
    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-2-2017-lenr-sunday-info-lectures.html

    Wish you a victorious great coming week!

    More than perfect,
    peter

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    After over a year of R&D with the QuarkX, do you consider it mature and stable enough to be able to be used in a commercial product already?

    Best wishes,

    Frank Acland

  • Osten

    Dr Rossi,

    LENR is the Future – heres-how-life-in-1917-compares-to-today

    https://futurism.com/videos/heres-how-life-in-1917-compares-to-today/?src=featured

  • Johnny

    Dr Andrea Rossi
    Do you now and again use the blackboard in your factory?
    Cheers,
    Johnny

  • Miguel Mudra

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    With your nutshell and simple style can you define what is “helicity” in Physics?
    Thanks,
    Miguel

  • Andrea Rossi

    Tom Conover:
    Surely after the end of the litigation. Before I cannot reduce the focus on this war and start another extremely important front. To win a war it is necessary to have maximum focus in the due site at the due time. But do not worry: we are preparing the demo and we will put on it our maximum focus in the due site at the due time: it will be very important. About your comments: I think we all appreciated your links and citations, you have nothing to apology about.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Tom Conover

    Dear Andrea,

    I was trying to ask again when the demo might be, even though you have clearly said that after Sigma 5 production will begin. I misunderstood your humorous invitation for me to change the range. My apology to the group.

    Sincerely,

    Tom

  • Andrea Rossi

    Hank Mills:
    I do not know.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Hank Mills

    Dear Andrea,

    Of the 20 watts of total output from the basic Quark X, how many watts do you think could be directly collected as electricity — both now and after you perfect the graphene assisted collection process?

  • Dear Andrea,

    Despite not exactly in the spirit of this Day, here is my edition of EGO OUT for today:

    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-01-2017-lenr-about-smell-and-info.html

    Cheers
    peter

  • Andrea Rossi

    Hergen:
    Tha basic brick will be 20 W.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Hergen

    Dear Mr Rossi,
    In former posts you told us the energy output of one quark x module would be 20 watts. In the last test of your quark x module the energy output was more than 240 watts. What will be the planned energy output of your commercial quark x modules?

    Thank you in advance for your answers.

    E.H.

  • Tom Conover

    Dear Andrea,

    Regarding your kind reply to me:
    http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=222#comment-1273306

    At your invitation, I will now provide another data-set for you to identify the answer to my last puzzle question. I propose to change the range as follows for you to select from: Acts 5; 2 Corinthians 6; Daniel 7; John 8; 2 Corinthians 9; Acts 10; Revelation 11, and Romans 12. The new range to select from is therefore: (5,6,7,8,9,10,11 or 12), since you already ruled out (4).

    Please respect with me the fact that Exodus 20:7 warns me that I “must not take up the name of Jehovah your God in a worthless way, for Jehovah will not leave unpunished the one who takes up His name in a worthless way. That being said, please help me to make sure that my inquiry is informative and inquisitive.

    I also hope that you understand, that this is submitted to you after prayer, and moved to share this with you in this spirit: “This is what you are to say to the sons of Israel, ‘I SHALL PROVE TO BE has sent me to YOU.’”

    So then, source and credits properly issued, please enjoy the detailed information shared below as references provided for you to read and benefit from today.

    But don’t forget to answer the puzzle question …

    Thank you,

    Tom

    —- References —-
    Tom Conover:
    The numbers of Corinthians 4:16-18, intrinsically out of range if you want to change the range.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.
    ———————

    Acts 5:
    27 So they brought them and stood them before the San’he·drin. Then the high priest questioned them 28 and said: “We strictly ordered you not to keep teaching on the basis of this name, and yet look! you have filled Jerusalem with your teaching, and you are determined to bring the blood of this man upon us.” 29 In answer Peter and the other apostles said: “We must obey God as ruler rather than men. 30 The God of our forefathers raised up Jesus, whom you killed, hanging him on a stake. 31 God exalted this one as Chief Agent and Savior to his right hand, to give repentance to Israel and forgiveness of sins. 32 And we are witnesses of these matters, and so is the holy spirit, which God has given to those obeying him as ruler.”

    2 Corinthians 6:
    9 So let us not give up in doing what is fine, for in due time we will reap if we do not tire out. 10 So, then, as long as we have the opportunity, let us work what is good toward all, but especially toward those related to us in the faith.

    Daniel 7:
    51 “Obstinate men and uncircumcised in hearts and ears, you are always resisting the holy spirit; as your forefathers did, so you do. 52 Which one of the prophets did your forefathers not persecute? Yes, they killed those who announced in advance the coming of the righteous one, whose betrayers and murderers you have now become, 53 you who received the Law as transmitted by angels but have not kept it.”
    54 Well, at hearing these things, they were infuriated in their hearts and began to grind their teeth at him. 55 But he, being full of holy spirit, gazed into heaven and caught sight of God’s glory and of Jesus standing at God’s right hand, 56 and he said: “Look! I see the heavens opened up and the Son of man standing at God’s right hand.”

    John 8:
    42 Jesus said to them: “If God were your Father, you would love me, for I came from God and I am here. I have not come of my own initiative, but that One sent me. 43 Why do you not understand what I am saying? Because you cannot listen to my word. 44 You are from your father the Devil, and you wish to do the desires of your father. That one was a murderer when he began, and he did not stand fast in the truth, because truth is not in him. When he speaks the lie, he speaks according to his own disposition, because he is a liar and the father of the lie. 45 Because I, on the other hand, tell you the truth, you do not believe me. 46 Who of you convicts me of sin? If I speak truth, why is it that you do not believe me? 47 The one who is from God listens to the sayings of God. This is why you do not listen, because you are not from God.”

    2 Corinthians 9:
    6 But as to this, whoever sows sparingly will also reap sparingly, and whoever sows bountifully will also reap bountifully. 7 Let each one do just as he has resolved in his heart, not grudgingly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver.
    8 Moreover, God is able to cause all his undeserved kindness to abound toward you so that you are always completely self-sufficient in everything, as well as having plenty for every good work. 9 (Just as it is written: “He has distributed widely; he has given to the poor. His righteousness continues forever.” 10 Now the One who abundantly supplies seed to the sower and bread for eating will supply and multiply the seed for you to sow and will increase the harvest of your righteousness.) 11 In everything you are being enriched for every sort of generosity, which produces through us an expression of thanks to God; 12 because the ministry of this public service is not only to provide well for the needs of the holy ones but also to be rich in many expressions of thanks to God. 13 Through the proof that this relief ministry gives, they glorify God because you are submissive to the good news about the Christ, as you publicly declared, and because you are generous in your contribution to them and to all. 14 And with supplication for you, they express affection for you because of the surpassing undeserved kindness of God upon you.
    15 Thanks be to God for his indescribable free gift.

    Acts 10:
    34 At this Peter began to speak, and he said: “Now I truly understand that God is not partial, 35 but in every nation the man who fears him and does what is right is acceptable to him. 36 He sent out the word to the sons of Israel to declare to them the good news of peace through Jesus Christ—this one is Lord of all.

    Revelation 11:
    15 The seventh angel blew his trumpet. And there were loud voices in heaven, saying: “The kingdom of the world has become the Kingdom of our Lord and of his Christ, and he will rule as king forever and ever.”

    Romans 12:
    12 Therefore, I appeal to you by the compassions of God, brothers, to present your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God, a sacred service with your power of reason. 2 And stop being molded by this system of things, but be transformed by making your mind over, so that you may prove to yourselves the good and acceptable and perfect will of God.

    AMEN!

  • Andrea Rossi

    DT:
    With standard calorimetry heating a fluid.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Jewel:
    Yes,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    Sarurday, April 1st, 11.15 A.M.: still working well ( better specify today that it’s not a joke! )
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Umbi:
    Still under certification process.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • umbi

    Domestic E-Cat ? NEWS ?

  • Jewel

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    The same control system of one QuarkX can control many of them?

  • DT

    Dear Andrea
    The presentation of the QuarkX will be made measuring the efficiency with the Boltzmann and Wien equations, or with standard calorimetry heating a fluid?
    Warm Regards,
    D.T.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Hank Mills:
    Thank you for your insight,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Hank Mills:
    1- confidential
    2- confidential
    3- exclude
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Hank Mills

    Dear Andrea,

    The recent paper you published that discusses a theory about the nature of the Rossi Effect — in addition to some data from the Quark X — is thought provoking. Here are some questions that come to mind after reading the paper more than twice. (I’ll try to stick to basic questions that you may be able to answer.)

    1) Is the lattice of the nickel cathode — which is being bombarded by protons — the primary location in the reactor where nuclear reactions take place?

    2) Maybe I missed it in the report, but what was the internal free volume of the tube in which hydrogen gas (plasma or otherwise) could exist?

    3) Did the figure for power input include or exclude any power consumed by control electronics?

  • Hank Mills

    Dear Andrea,

    I’ve performed extensive reading about NAD+ pre-cursors. NMN, the compound mentioned in that study, must converted into NR (nicotinamide riboside) before passing through the cell membrane and then being used to form NAD+. NR supplements already exist and are available over the counter. The primary trade name is “Niagen.” By boosting levels of NAD+ the expression of an entire series of anti-aging genes are enhanced (primarily SIRT 1-7). These genes then go on to activate others. The results, at least in animal testing, can be dramatic health improvements throughout the body. Interestingly, the number one source of NR in food is from milk. But to obtain enough to make a significant difference someone would have to drink tens of gallons a day. A months supply of NR purchased on Amazon costs about thirty to forty dollars.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Dear Andrea,

    With the present EGO OUT edition, we open the weekend- it will be here tomorrow, very probably;

    http://egooutpeters.blogs
    pot.ro/2017/03/mar-31-2107-lenr-kiss-from-eratoand-info.html

    All the best for you and readers!
    Peter

  • Andrea Rossi

    Tom Conover:
    The numbers of Corinthians 4:16-18, intrinsecally out of range if you want to change the range.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Osten:
    Interesting, mainly egarding the radiations.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Eugene Atthove:
    As a matter of fact, neutrinos and antineutrinos in the nuclear physics equations are “tricks”, assumed to be real to obtain the respect of the leptons conservation law.
    For example: the neutron decay, of which we talked yesterday, gives one proton, one electron and one antineutrino: why? Because at the left of the neutron decay equation you do not have leptons, at the right you have one lepton and this would be against the leptons number conservation law: therefore you have to assume the emission of an antineutrino, so you have one plus lepton ( the electron ), one minus lepton ( the antineutrino ) = zero leptons also at the right of the equation, so that the law is respected. You could say that this sounds a little bit tricky, like an artifact, but…it is, albeit without this trick the Standard Model would brutally crack down: realistically, between a crack and a trick is better the trick.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>