United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

 

uspto_seal_big

 

Sigillo

 

Alloro del brevetto

.

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

 

32,081 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • Andrea Rossi

    CC:
    Thank you for your answer,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven N, Karels:
    a- yes
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Svein Henrik:
    Yes to all.
    The dimensions of the 80 W Ecat QX are the same of the Ecat of the demo at the IVA of Stockholm.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Jean Gluck:
    On the contrary, the fact that ENI and MIT are copying , or trying to copy, the Ecat QX gives evidence of the importance of our enormous work: both of them until few years ago used to say that LENR do not exist, today they are allied to compete against us. The stronger the competitors, the highest the honour.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Svein Henrik

    Dear Andrea.
    My understanding is now that you can produce individual modules with any effect between 20 W and 100 kW. Is this correct? Can you also produce modules designed for longer continuous use than 1 year? May the modules have other shapes than cylindrical? What is the size of the 80 W module?
    Regards Svein Henrik.

  • CC

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    I found the link to the 6 minutes summary of the demonstration you made on November 24th at the IVA of Stockholm in the site http://www.ecat.com

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    Compared to the 20W eCat modules, are the 80W eCat modules approximately:

    a. The same size?
    b. Doubled in linear dimension?
    c. Tripled in linear dimension?
    d. Some other multiplier (if so, can you tell us the size of the 80W module_/

  • Andrea Rossi

    CC:
    Thanks to you for your attention to our work. Curiosity: did you find it randomly on Google, or clicking the link published on http://www.ecat.com ?
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Birba:
    Thank you for your opinion.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    Individual 80 W modules.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Brokeeper:
    He,he,he…very nice, thank you.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Jean Gluck

    Dear Andrea
    ENI and MIT made an allegiance to copy your technology by means of a spin off of MIT. Are you afraid of their competion?
    Jean Gluck

  • Brokeeper

    Dear Andrea,

    Little did we know your world is a cat:
    https://laughingsquid.com/the-world-is-a-cat-playing-with-australia/
    Brokeeper

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    When you speak of the first plants being made up of “80 W Modules” is that an individual E-Cat QX of 80 W, or a combination of smaller QXs?

    Best wishes,

    Frank Acland

  • Birba

    Mr Rossi,
    Time is running out and you made nothing so far: do confess that you will have no product within 2018!

  • CC

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Thank you for the procious 6 minutes summary of the event of Stockholm,
    CC

  • Andrea Rossi

    Sean Lear:
    Thank you for your recognition of the work of our Team,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Koen Vandewalle:
    Thank you for your kind words related, obviously, to the work of the entire Team of us. Yes, your sustain is important too.
    We will not deliver information or images until the presentation of the industrialized product, but the artist representation you can find on ecat.com are not distant from what the reality will be.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Addrian Ashfield:
    We did not yet decide on this important issue. In this moment we are focused on the fluid heater industrialization. The issue is open.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Addrian Ashfield

    Dr. Rossi,
    I understand you have too much on your plate already with planning the production of the QX and developing new larger capacity E-Cats. I was wondering if anyone was still looking at a QX turbine, or whether you could farm that out to a turbine manufacturer.
    Regards,
    Adrian Ashfield

  • Koen Vandewalle

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,

    I do not write much anymore, because your level of expertise has increased with orders of magnitude, and we as a public can no longer contribute.

    Except for a little moral support. I fear that you can still continue to use it.

    A small suggestion: have a 3D scan made of yourself. This will come in handy later for the statues. Perhaps the heat of the early industrial commercial E-Cats can be used to melt bronze.

    Would you like to distribute a photo of a test setup of the E-Cat Enigma? I mean the version that can not be reverse-engineered. I always find your test setups much more fun and tangible than the pictures of the shiny devices of the competitors.

    Kind Regards,
    K.V.

  • Sean Lear

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    I spent 4 hours to watch the full videos with the demonstration of the Ecat QX made on November 24th at the IVA of Stockholm and I did not even realize how long has been the time, so much I was involved in it. Fantastic presentation and stunning results, under the eyes of the highest echelons of the related science.
    You made an unbelievable progress.
    I sent you to info@leonardocorp1996 my pre-order for a 100 kW industrial Ecat.
    Godspeed,
    Sean Lear

  • Andrea Rossi

    Tamal:
    Please forward your request to info@leonardocorp1996.com to register your pre-order.
    Attention: a pre-order is not binding for both parties, we are not able to make an offer yet. When you will receive our offer, you will be free to accept it or refuse it without refunds.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Tamal

    Dear Mr Andrea Rossi,

    would I be able to purchase an E-Cat QX (let’s say 2x10kW) on my company’s name, to produce heat for manufactoring purposes and heat my office with it as well?

    Kind regards and good luck,
    Tamal

  • Andrea Rossi

    Raffaele Bongo:
    You got the right spirit, I agree.
    Thank you for your kind attention to the work of our Team,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Chuck Davis:
    That is a possibility, but first we have to resolve the safety certification issue for the domestic apparatuses.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Sean Gougouniani:
    1- well
    2- we hope within this year
    Thank you,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Pietro Beltrame:
    Maybe, but we now are producing heat and I suspect the Telcos have difficulties to menage Carnot cycle dependant generators. Honestly, I do not know.
    Maybe in future or indirectly.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Pietro Beltrame

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    Do you think that the telephonic companies can be among your clients? I work in this field and I know these companies have issues in the areas where the grid is insufficient.
    Regards,
    Pietro Beltrame

  • Sean Gougouniani

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
    How is progressing your work?
    When the QX will be industrialized?
    NASA has confirmed, among others, that your work is positive.
    God bless you,
    Sean Gougouniani

  • Chuck Davis

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    Would you reccommend to couple a domestic Ecat with a genset?
    Thanks,
    Chuck Davis

  • Raffaele Bongo

    Hello A. Rossi

    You have made significant progress in R & D in a few months. Your technology is very young and will evolve further as the theoretical and experimental understanding of the LENR process increases.
    The Quart X tomorrow will certainly perform much better than the image of the first aircraft that has never managed to leave the ground, then it flew a few tens of meters, today thousands of kilometers.

    All my support to all your collaborators for the work done.

    Raffaele

  • Andrea Rossi

    Svein Henrik:
    You must make a distinction between what I am sure of, what is possible and what I am not sure of.
    While the 80 W QXs are a reality that works and we are industrializing, the big reactors ( 10 kW and 100 kW ) are prototypes far from being ready for industrialization NOW. Therefore I answered to you on the base of future possibilities, while to Frank Acland based upon the situation related to the year 2018.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    Very intelligent.
    You are right!
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    I own and operate a Chevy Volt — an electric car with gasoline backup. The capacity of the battery is a function of the average battery temperature. Living in the Northeast (of America) means the car is subject to cold temperatures, especially during the winter months. The cold decreases the battery capacity. Many times, the car will activate the gasoline motor to heat the battery unit. The goal is to use a minimum, or no gasoline.

    Why not a distributed eCat reactor system whose sole function is to heat the battery pack to keep its capacity high during charging and while driving? As an example, my range is about 29 miles in the winter but 40 miles in the summer. While a simple application, there are a lot of electric cars being produced and the numbers will likely increase. As long as the effective COP was very high (an efficient controller), it might make energy and economic sense. Thoughts?

  • Svein Henrik

    Dear Andrea.
    I am a bit confused. Referring to the answers March 8, at 1.53 to me, and 1.54 to Frank, it seems that the answer to me is that the first plants will be based on 80 W QX reactors?
    I do understand that any Big-Cat is not actual in this phase.
    Regards, Svein Henrik.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels,
    Thank you for your insight.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    I do not bet — not even on sure things. I have been viewing JONP for about 8 years. It looks to me that you are proceeding in a careful and thoughtful manner. ASSUMING the technology is real…. you should do well. I say assuming because I have not personally seen the technology work in my presence. On the other hand, I have not personally seen the detonation of a nuclear device (Thank God). LOL. I foresee at least two major hurtles for your technology, as I understand it.

    One – increasing the thermal output level of a single reactor while maintaining reliable control at all times of the reactor. Needed to decrease the system level complexity and to assure system level reliability/maintainability. It is better to have 1,000 reactors all working then 1,000,000 reactors from a system viewpoint.
    Two – improve the Controller — size reduction, consumed power (also known as parasitic power) reduction, environmental range to at least industrial range, and cost reduction to a “throw-away” price range. My two cents! That is the limit of my gambling!

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gunnar:
    Thank you for your attention to the work of our Team,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Svein Henrik:
    No, the decision has not yet been made, because we have much more R&D to make on the tigerized Ecats.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    You can bet all you have on this !
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    Congrats on the reactor progress. May we assume significant developments are occurring on the Controller design?

  • Svein Henrik

    Dear Andera.
    It seems there have been a tremendous evolution concerning power of the single units since the Stockholm meeting.
    For the first robotized industrial production planned at the end of 2018, is the decision of output of the single reactors already made? If so, what is this to be? If not, witch alternatives are actual?
    Regards Svein Henrik.

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    So will the first industrial E-Cat plants be built with combinations of 80 W E-Cat QX reactors?

    Thank you,

    Frank Acland

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    We have now 80 W modules, that can be assembled in series and parallels. We are testing prototypes of 10 kW and 100 kW single reactors.
    I cannot give information about the control systems.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Bud:
    Just made all the medical checks, it’s all right.
    Thank you for your concern,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Gunnar

    Mr Andrea Rossi,
    I read today about your calvary on http://www.ingandrearossi.com
    What you became seems to be a miracle.
    Now I understand where you found the guts to do what you did in the LENR field.
    Godspeed,
    Gunnar

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    Perhaps I did not make myself clear… The question was not of a production of power but of mechanical packaging. Instead of producing 20W eCat reactors and externally tying them in series, all controlled by a single Controller, have you considered a single enclosure containing 100 compartments. Between the compartments would be a conducting electrode. Each compartment would contain the fuel.

    The alternative would be to remain with your current 20W design and electrically connect them in series and then to enclose them in an overall container. You probably don’t want to exchange eCat reactors at 20W reactor sizes.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Italo R.:
    Thank you for the suggestion. Yes, you are right.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>