In the paper of Andrea Rossi published on Researchgate are proposed different theoretical hypothesis .
Which one is considered more likely to be the right one?
Thank you if you can answer,
Boris
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Did you apply in your experiments magnetic fields interacting with the plasma? If yes, did you observe effects from such interaction?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
I watched on youtube the Ecat SK presentation of January 31st and I saw the blue Ecat SK: why blue? I’d suggest to paint it gold, to put in evidence its preciousness.
Anonymous:
The base is the same, the setup in laboratory is more complex, to allow extra experiments and measurements. You can see a sketch of it in the blog of http://www.ecat-thenewfire.com
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Raffaele Bongo:
Thank you for your kind sustain; you have not to apologize, I understand your curiosity. We will give these data when they will be important.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello A. Rossi
Based on your feedback, the commercial impact of your January 31st presentation is greater than your expectations.
After one month, can you publish the total power you have on order or more traditionally the number of months of activity corresponding to your order book?
I apologize if you consider this information confidential.
All my support for your amazing invention
Best regards
Raffaele
Dear Andrea,
One last statement about global\heating\cooling. It seems to me that the effects of plant absorption of co2 on planet carbon content is glossed over by global heating advocates. Plants make up 75% of global organic material. The amount of co2 they absorb is estimated to be 25 to 40% of atmospheric content. Since all our human food consumption is derived one way or another through the use of their mass, the increase in atmospheric content of co2 directly provides humans with more of their sustenance. Studies have shown that the higher the concentration of co2 the higher the increase of plant growth. Empirical evidence for me that this is correct is my observation that my grass and trees on my property seem to be getting more growth than in previous years without any increase on my part of applied fertilizer or other plant food. I think that perhaps we should encourage co2 production rather than discourage it(tongue in cheek). Our efforts should be in decreasing other atmospheric gas components such as Nitrogen and ozone.
Nourishing regards.
George Dvorak:
I never used MHD generators, because too expensive respect the relatively low efficiency.
As for your glorious name: he,he,he…true, when in Piazza del Duomo ( the central place of Milan where is the Duomo, the most beautiful Gothic cathedral of Europe ) you call “Rossi!” at least several persons turn to you.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi,
Did you ever use a magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) generator to turn into electricity the kinetic and thermal energy?
As for my surname, I am not a relative of the great musicist: you know, Dvorak, among Czechs, is a very common name, as the name of the great inventor Rossi among Italians…
I take no position on the impact of carbon emissions on global warming. That is not my field of expertise. But I do recognize a political trend to suppress carbon footprint emissions. With the talk of banning commercial aircraft because of fossil fuel use and emissions, it seems this could facilitate the conversion of energy generation to eCat technology. As has been pointed out in other posts, the integration of a new energy technology is a long and slow process. If eCat works (a big if), then seizing every advantage to facilitate the conversion should be used. If inexpensive, pollution free energy becomes readily available across our planet, the quality of life can drastically improve. Andrea Rossi appears to be using the economic approach to the integration of eCat technology into our society — it is cheaper than alternative methods. I am merely pointing out an additional benefit.
Dr Andrea,
Rewatching on “youtube Ecat SK Presentation January 31st 2019” I got a question: do you switch the poles? Is this at the origin of that particular oscilloscope track?
Dear Orsobubu, You are absolutely correct what you say in response to Steven and myself, although we are making justifiable statements of how Andrea’s technology can impact a very real problem. From my own perspective, even if GHG emissions are a none issue LENRs have to be recognized as an amazing important technology required to deliver a more advanced form of heat than what is presently available. However, if you read the post by Ivan Idso February 27th I think that both yourself and the readers of the JONP will get a very clear picture of how anything disliked by unfortunately people who are presently in control are able to interfere with anything they deem competitive and use all tactics to preserve their ‘golden goose’. How many tactics?, well, read the article if you have lots of time and nothing better to do or you could read up on Occam’s Razor a 14th Century Franciscan friar who studied logic and who no doubt was well before his time. Regards Eric Ashworth
I found this post interesting and applicable to your endeavor:
A study conducted by a team led by Robert Gross of Imperial College London and published in December 2018, concluded that, on average, the adoption time of the last four major power-generation technologies was 43 years. And by the end of that time, these technologies were well established, but not yet in a dominant position.
Prof wrote, and you agreed, that the installation of 1 million 1MW E-Cat plants in a relatively short period of time would not be impossible if you partnered with a major company in the field.
Of course this would involve huge amounts of organization, money and manpower to accomplish.
My question is, do you think this kind of partnership is a real possibility, or just a faint hope?
Dear Andrea,
About the impact that the Ecat can have on the global worming: it is stunning to think to the numbers of CO2 reduction that could be reached with the application of one million MW made by the Ecat and one million MW is not impossible, even in a relatively short period, if you make a partnership with a major company of the field.
Godspeed,
Prof
are you working at a new patent for the E-Cat QX / SK or do you consider your device full protected by the Patent US 9,115,913 B1?
This patent was got in August 2015 but filed in March 2012 and based on the original E-Cat, a device apparently, and at least in size, very different from E-Cat QX / SK .
Furthermore It is very likely that in the technology behind your latest devices there are completely new elements compared to the cited patent.
Dr Rossi,
A wide diffusion of the Ecats could improve dramatically the quest for a substantial reduction of carbon dioxide: the numbers I read yesterday on this blog are stunning indeed
Huey Dirkson:
Every kWh made by fossil fuels produces moreless 0.28 kg of carbon dioxide.
From this derives that every kWh made by the Ecat saves 0.28 kg of carbon dioxide.
Therefore: every MWh made by an Ecat saves 280 kg of carbon dioxide, which makes 280 x 24 x 350 = 2 352 ( two thousand three hundred fifty two ) tonns per year of carbon dioxide.
The contribution of thousands of 1 MW Ecat SK can be a game changer.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi!
I live in Moscow and I am watching the video E-Cat SK presentation on U-Tube.
Could you answer if you use hydrogen in the charge of the E-Cat SK?
Rod Walton:
Thank you for the information; I want to add that the new generation of reciprocating gas-fired engines have reduced the pollutants thanks to the increase of efficiency. This shows how important is that all the energy sources are integrated.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
see on Power Engineering of February 26 2019:
The Nation’s capacity in natural gas-fired reciprocating internal combustion engines used to power the grid has reached 4,600 MW
Rod Walton
Vincenzo Bonomo:
Thank you for your opinion, so different from what I wrote in “Ecat and long range particle interactions”.
Thank you for your kind attention to our work,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Caro Dr. Rossi in questi anni mi sono sempre più convinto che la reazione da lei scoperta rientri pienamente nella fisica classica. A mio avviso (e come le confidai anni addietro) l’Ecat non è altro che un acceleratore atipico di particelle che sfrutta la superconduttività dell’idrogeno metallico per superare la barriera coulombiana degli elementi utilizzati ed ottenere la fusione. Lo testimonia la resistenza quasi nulla del reattore unitamente all’espulsione di campi magnetici dallo stesso che disturbano i dispositivi di misura nelle immediate vicinanze e l’estrema volatilità della reazione che l’ha fatta tribolare nei primi anni. Poi naturalmente ognuno è libero di chiamarla zuppa o pan bagnato ma la sostanza verosimilmente non cambia.
English synopsis [by A.R.]: I am convinced your effect belongs to the classic physics: I see the E-Cat as an accelerator of particles that exploits the superconductivity of metallic hydrogen to overcome the Coulombian barrier; evidence of this concept is given by the low resistance of the reactor, the emission from it of the magnetic fields disturbing the measurements if the instrumentation is too close, and the volatility of the reactions that resulted in a conundrum during the initial phase of your R&D.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
About your answer to Anonymous earlier today: good POINT !
I had to read three times and carefully http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_ ling_range_particle_interactions before understanding in full how important it is in the LENR scenario.
Godspeed,
James
Dr Rossi:
I understood from your comment of yesterday that the chance to produce electricity directly by the Ecat has improved: am I correct?
CC
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
B:
Yes, I applied in many experiments magnetic fields. The effects are confidential.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Boris:
Paragraphs 3,4.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
In the paper of Andrea Rossi published on Researchgate are proposed different theoretical hypothesis .
Which one is considered more likely to be the right one?
Thank you if you can answer,
Boris
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Did you apply in your experiments magnetic fields interacting with the plasma? If yes, did you observe effects from such interaction?
Eureka:
Thank you for the suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
I watched on youtube the Ecat SK presentation of January 31st and I saw the blue Ecat SK: why blue? I’d suggest to paint it gold, to put in evidence its preciousness.
Anonymous:
The base is the same, the setup in laboratory is more complex, to allow extra experiments and measurements. You can see a sketch of it in the blog of http://www.ecat-thenewfire.com
Warm Regards,
A.R.
CC:
We are seeing some light.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
About the production of electricity directly from the Ecat: did you mean that progresses have been made?
Dear Readers:
Please go to http://www.rossilivecat.com to find other comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Eernie1:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Raffaele Bongo:
Thank you for your kind sustain; you have not to apologize, I understand your curiosity. We will give these data when they will be important.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello A. Rossi
Based on your feedback, the commercial impact of your January 31st presentation is greater than your expectations.
After one month, can you publish the total power you have on order or more traditionally the number of months of activity corresponding to your order book?
I apologize if you consider this information confidential.
All my support for your amazing invention
Best regards
Raffaele
Dear Andrea,
One last statement about global\heating\cooling. It seems to me that the effects of plant absorption of co2 on planet carbon content is glossed over by global heating advocates. Plants make up 75% of global organic material. The amount of co2 they absorb is estimated to be 25 to 40% of atmospheric content. Since all our human food consumption is derived one way or another through the use of their mass, the increase in atmospheric content of co2 directly provides humans with more of their sustenance. Studies have shown that the higher the concentration of co2 the higher the increase of plant growth. Empirical evidence for me that this is correct is my observation that my grass and trees on my property seem to be getting more growth than in previous years without any increase on my part of applied fertilizer or other plant food. I think that perhaps we should encourage co2 production rather than discourage it(tongue in cheek). Our efforts should be in decreasing other atmospheric gas components such as Nitrogen and ozone.
Nourishing regards.
George Dvorak:
I never used MHD generators, because too expensive respect the relatively low efficiency.
As for your glorious name: he,he,he…true, when in Piazza del Duomo ( the central place of Milan where is the Duomo, the most beautiful Gothic cathedral of Europe ) you call “Rossi!” at least several persons turn to you.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers,
Please go to http://www.rossilivecat.com to find comments published today on other posts of this blog.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi,
Did you ever use a magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) generator to turn into electricity the kinetic and thermal energy?
As for my surname, I am not a relative of the great musicist: you know, Dvorak, among Czechs, is a very common name, as the name of the great inventor Rossi among Italians…
Prof:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
CC:
I cannot answer to this question in positive or in negative.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Yrka:
Home installations are in our strategy.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
orsobubu,
I take no position on the impact of carbon emissions on global warming. That is not my field of expertise. But I do recognize a political trend to suppress carbon footprint emissions. With the talk of banning commercial aircraft because of fossil fuel use and emissions, it seems this could facilitate the conversion of energy generation to eCat technology. As has been pointed out in other posts, the integration of a new energy technology is a long and slow process. If eCat works (a big if), then seizing every advantage to facilitate the conversion should be used. If inexpensive, pollution free energy becomes readily available across our planet, the quality of life can drastically improve. Andrea Rossi appears to be using the economic approach to the integration of eCat technology into our society — it is cheaper than alternative methods. I am merely pointing out an additional benefit.
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi
DO YOU WORK OVER HOME INSTALLATIONS OR NOW YOU ARE NOT INTERESTING?
Yury Isaev
Engineer
Tyumen, Russia
Dr Andrea,
Rewatching on “youtube Ecat SK Presentation January 31st 2019” I got a question: do you switch the poles? Is this at the origin of that particular oscilloscope track?
Dear Andrea,
I studied carefully your paper on http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
and verified that:
1- all the math contained is Clifford algebra derived
2- all the references are Clifford algebra derived
Am I correct?
Dear Orsobubu, You are absolutely correct what you say in response to Steven and myself, although we are making justifiable statements of how Andrea’s technology can impact a very real problem. From my own perspective, even if GHG emissions are a none issue LENRs have to be recognized as an amazing important technology required to deliver a more advanced form of heat than what is presently available. However, if you read the post by Ivan Idso February 27th I think that both yourself and the readers of the JONP will get a very clear picture of how anything disliked by unfortunately people who are presently in control are able to interfere with anything they deem competitive and use all tactics to preserve their ‘golden goose’. How many tactics?, well, read the article if you have lots of time and nothing better to do or you could read up on Occam’s Razor a 14th Century Franciscan friar who studied logic and who no doubt was well before his time. Regards Eric Ashworth
Ivan Idso:
Thank you for the interesting link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I found this post interesting and applicable to your endeavor:
A study conducted by a team led by Robert Gross of Imperial College London and published in December 2018, concluded that, on average, the adoption time of the last four major power-generation technologies was 43 years. And by the end of that time, these technologies were well established, but not yet in a dominant position.
https://www.resilience.org/stories/2019-02-27/the-inescapably-slow-deployment-of-energy-technologies/
Regards and best wishes,
Ivan Idso
Frank Acland:
We are working on it,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Prof wrote, and you agreed, that the installation of 1 million 1MW E-Cat plants in a relatively short period of time would not be impossible if you partnered with a major company in the field.
Of course this would involve huge amounts of organization, money and manpower to accomplish.
My question is, do you think this kind of partnership is a real possibility, or just a faint hope?
Kind regards,
Frank Acland
Gerald Mitchell:
With the heat you can make also the cold. It is a well known and consolidated technology,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ginette:
I agree,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Angelo V.:
The core is protected by the patent of 2015.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Prof:
I agree.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
About the impact that the Ecat can have on the global worming: it is stunning to think to the numbers of CO2 reduction that could be reached with the application of one million MW made by the Ecat and one million MW is not impossible, even in a relatively short period, if you make a partnership with a major company of the field.
Godspeed,
Prof
Dear Andrea,
are you working at a new patent for the E-Cat QX / SK or do you consider your device full protected by the Patent US 9,115,913 B1?
This patent was got in August 2015 but filed in March 2012 and based on the original E-Cat, a device apparently, and at least in size, very different from E-Cat QX / SK .
Furthermore It is very likely that in the technology behind your latest devices there are completely new elements compared to the cited patent.
Best regards
Dr Rossi,
A wide diffusion of the Ecats could improve dramatically the quest for a substantial reduction of carbon dioxide: the numbers I read yesterday on this blog are stunning indeed
Dear Andrea,
What do you think about the possibility to use the Rossi effect also to make air conditioned?
Cheers
Gerald
Dear Andrea,
Are you thinking to apply the Artificial Intelligence to the Ecat?
Thanks if you can answer,
Herbert
Huey Dirkson:
Every kWh made by fossil fuels produces moreless 0.28 kg of carbon dioxide.
From this derives that every kWh made by the Ecat saves 0.28 kg of carbon dioxide.
Therefore: every MWh made by an Ecat saves 280 kg of carbon dioxide, which makes 280 x 24 x 350 = 2 352 ( two thousand three hundred fifty two ) tonns per year of carbon dioxide.
The contribution of thousands of 1 MW Ecat SK can be a game changer.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Can you give numbers to show what could be the impact of the Ecat SK on the global warming?
Valeriy Zatelepin:
The charge is described in our Patent US 9,115,913 B1. The answer is yes, hydrogen is contained in the charge.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi!
I live in Moscow and I am watching the video E-Cat SK presentation on U-Tube.
Could you answer if you use hydrogen in the charge of the E-Cat SK?
Rod Walton:
Thank you for the information; I want to add that the new generation of reciprocating gas-fired engines have reduced the pollutants thanks to the increase of efficiency. This shows how important is that all the energy sources are integrated.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
see on Power Engineering of February 26 2019:
The Nation’s capacity in natural gas-fired reciprocating internal combustion engines used to power the grid has reached 4,600 MW
Rod Walton
James Erurn:
Thank you for your attention to our theoretical work,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Vincenzo Bonomo:
Thank you for your opinion, so different from what I wrote in “Ecat and long range particle interactions”.
Thank you for your kind attention to our work,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Caro Dr. Rossi in questi anni mi sono sempre più convinto che la reazione da lei scoperta rientri pienamente nella fisica classica. A mio avviso (e come le confidai anni addietro) l’Ecat non è altro che un acceleratore atipico di particelle che sfrutta la superconduttività dell’idrogeno metallico per superare la barriera coulombiana degli elementi utilizzati ed ottenere la fusione. Lo testimonia la resistenza quasi nulla del reattore unitamente all’espulsione di campi magnetici dallo stesso che disturbano i dispositivi di misura nelle immediate vicinanze e l’estrema volatilità della reazione che l’ha fatta tribolare nei primi anni. Poi naturalmente ognuno è libero di chiamarla zuppa o pan bagnato ma la sostanza verosimilmente non cambia.
English synopsis [by A.R.]: I am convinced your effect belongs to the classic physics: I see the E-Cat as an accelerator of particles that exploits the superconductivity of metallic hydrogen to overcome the Coulombian barrier; evidence of this concept is given by the low resistance of the reactor, the emission from it of the magnetic fields disturbing the measurements if the instrumentation is too close, and the volatility of the reactions that resulted in a conundrum during the initial phase of your R&D.
Cordiali saluti,
Vincenzo Bonomo
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
About your answer to Anonymous earlier today: good POINT !
I had to read three times and carefully http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_ ling_range_particle_interactions before understanding in full how important it is in the LENR scenario.
Godspeed,
James