1) Your invention to directly produce electricity from an Ecat without heat as an intermediary:
– is that something that could be made to apply more generally with other energy sources, such as plasmas produced by other means?
– or is your invention integral to the operation and function of the Ecat itself?
2) At the risk of sounding hyperbolic, it seems to me that the heat-producing Ecat is a foundational invention– a groundbreaking invention from which a myriad of other inventions will spawn– akin to other major inventions like semiconductors and lasers. It also seems to me that the Ecat-SKL (direct electric conversion) is of that same groundbreaking caliber. There are few ways currently to produce electricity from an energy source without the use of heat as the intermediary (photovoltaics comes to mind). If everything pans out to your satisfaction, I expect that you will have something that few others have ever achieved– two foundational, groundbreaking inventions. (Sorry, I guess that was more opinion than question.)
Sorry for tampering you with questions, but something to me and to other readers in the web is not clear:
when you talk about a 20 kW “assembly” (10-20 kg weight) are you talking about the 10cm cube plus controller only (the 10cm has a power of 20kW) OR an assembly of several 10cm cubes with a much lower output power? I personally think that the second case is the right one… a 10cm cube cannot weight 10-20 kg. Am I right?
Again, my sincere congratulations for your wonderful, hard earned success.
You recently replied to Joseph Fine that you have used a magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) generator for the E-Cat SKL. Since I am not even close to being a technical expert on such devices (other than what I read on Wikipedia) and have not been able to find any such device on Amazon.com, is it reasonable to assume that you have not only created a custom-designed version of this MHD technology as part of your development efforts, but you have managed to incorporate it into either the 10cm x 10cm reactor or it is part of your cigarette pack sized controller? Please excuse me if I am off-track on this issue.
Dear Andrea,
In this music video performed by the Swedish group “Galenskaparna and After Shave” they sing “Now it is time”, “Nu är det dags” in swedish. Just as an inspiration for Thomas Florek and the dolls for the introduction of the new E-Cat SK L. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sb5Rdn0zrsQ
Best Regards,
Karl-Henrik
Dear Andrea,
now when you have E-Cats generating electricity you can just sell electricity and keep all the secrets hidden.
I hope you will sell a product for everybody around the world of course.
Have you thought about this?
Thanks
Dear Andrea,
1. New information leads to new questions, which I hope you will answer:
1. Does the 10cm cube SKL include the control system?
2. Will this new development change the way electricity is being supplied from central to local in the future, do you think?
3. Will you continue the Ecat combination with a jet engine?
4. Will you reveal where the ECat’s energy comes from at the presentation in February, as it is non nuclear, non chemical and ‘unemployed’ till you found the key to extract it?
Thanks, kind regards, Gerard
Have you estimated the Ragone Plot values (Power Density, Energy Density) for the E-Cat SKL?
Assuming power output is 20 kW and charge lifetime is 6 months or ~ 182 days, the energy density in (Wh/kg) is 20,000 W * 24 hrs/day * 182 days/charge * (1 charge/x kg ) = ~ 8.7*10^7 Wh/(X kg).
If the E-Cat SKL has a mass of X = 10 kg, the energy density would be about 8.7*10^6 Wh/kg.
A 1 liter (1000 cubic centimeters) volume of water has a mass of 1 kg. An estimate of 10 or 20 kg for the SKL mass is only a wild guess.
Is this estimate in the ball park?
Of course, the SKL mass actually gets lighter over time, just not by much.
Thermal and Electric Regards,
Joseph Fine
( The E-Cat HT has an energy density of about 5*10^7 Wh/kg. )
Om the eCat SK Leonardo design, can the percentage of electricity and thermal heat generation:
1. Be controlled by the user (excluding the generated electricity converting to heat by a resistive load)?
2. If yes, to what extent?
3. is 70% to 80% the maximum electricity conversion factor for all options?
Dear Andrea, Now that your technology has moved beyond the production of heat and entered the domain of self sustainability it has for me entered the necessary domain of scientific discovery whereby academic science is now able to penetrate and explain the exciting esoteric side of existence whereby all things become possible by being able to explain that which lies behind phenomena. Naturally, this understanding will become gradual and necessary for those interested in science, physics and technology from a different perspective and again Andrea I feel it necessary to repeat myself with regards the value of your JONP whereby all voices can be heard regardless of accredited academic credentials, providing a much needed platform of self discovery both within and without academia.
With regards your new found technology i.e. s.s.m and its geometric connection to the cube. This is my question: Have you associated this connection to the three aspects of energy i.e. Gas – Liquid – Solid and connected these to ‘Sets’ i.e. three sets being twelve of which sometimes referred to as stones but not sixteen for obvious reasons and the necessary gaps to synapses sometimes referred to as pearls?. I ask this question because I know you are an academic and that you recognize the power of the ‘Holy Ghost’ which for me puts you on a specific/peculiar level of understanding i.e. that which is much needed as a ‘bridging mechanism’ in our present environment. Regards Eric Ashworth
Dr Rossi,
I always sustained you, also against the trolls, that will have hard times after the certification of the Ecat SK Leonardo will be made public.
I hope to see an Ecat in my house soon,
Happy Holidays and good finalization of the Ecat
Eric Schlinder
WE DO NOT EVEN KNOW WHO THEY ARE. AGAIN, I RECOMMEND YOU NEVER TO GIVE MONEY TO ANY VENDOR WITHOUT FIRST ASKING ME IF IT IS A FRAUDOLENT ATTEMPT OF FRAUD
WRITE TO MY EMAIL HIS NAME AND YOU WILL RECEIVE MY ANSWER WITHIN 24 HOURS, NOT LATER: EMAIL TO INFO@LEONARDOCORP1996.COM
Dr Andrea Rossi
CEO of Leonardo Corporation
Dear Andrea,
a) so you can choose if the cube shall generate 20 kW
or 1 kW for example?
b) if you choose more power for the cube, will the heat be a problem or is the heat taken care of by the control system?
c) is a cube a complete system or how small can a complete electric generating E Cat SKL be for example to fit in a car?
Thank you and congratulation to you and your team 🙂
DEAR READERS:
PLEASE READ WITH ATTENTION THIS WARNING
THERE IS AROUND A MR LA TERRA WITH EMAIL SALES@ECAT.COM
THAT IS FRAUDOLENTLY OFFERING LICENSES TO SELL OR RESALE OR BUY SERVICES RELATED TO THE ECAT.
HE IS ABUSIVELY USING OUR TRADE MARK ECAT
ATTENTION: DO NOT PAY MONEY TO HIM RELATED TO THE ECAT IN ANY FORM OF SERVICE OR SALE, BECAUSE HE DOES NOT HAVE ANY LICENSE AND YOUR MONEY WOULD BE LOST.
OUR LEGAL FIRM IS ALREADY SEARCHING HIM
I AGAIN REPEAT MY RECOMMENDATION: BEFORE SIGNING ANY CONTRACT OR PAYING ANY SUM TO ANYBODY THAT OFFERS YOU ECAT PLANTS OR PRODUCTS OR SERVICES, PLEASE CONTACT ME TO HAVE CONFIRMATION YOU ARE DEALING WITH AN AUTHORIZED PERSON
MY EMAIL ADDRESS IS INFO@LEONARDOCORP1996.COM
Dear Andrea,
I try to understand the possible setup of the E-cat SKL.
If we call the 10 cm basic cube a ‘Rossi cube’,
is a E Cat SKL build of several Rossi cubes?
So it is already known how much power one Rossi cube generates, but it is still to be decided how many Rossi cubes än E-cat SKL will have?
Here’s a project for your R&D staff to think about in their “spare time”.
The current technology is unsustainable. That’s why a new coalition — led by India’s government and America’s Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI), a nonprofit environmental research organization — has launched the Global Cooling Prize, a $1-million competition to design the next generation of air cooling systems.
Looking forward to you presentation in 2020.
Best of Luck.
Sam:
Very interesting link.
No, I did not.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
WaltC:
1- so far it is integrated in the Ecat
2- maybe you are right,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Mario Marini:
Yes, very interesting,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Christian Scholl:
No.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
In the Ecat SKL does part of the energy come from dissolution-recombination of hydrogen?
Christian Scholl
Did you see the new post on the blog of Vessela Nikolova?
http://www.ecat-ilnuovofuoco.it/blog/un-rivoluzionario-nuovo-modello-dellelettrone
Comment?
Dr Rossi,
1) Your invention to directly produce electricity from an Ecat without heat as an intermediary:
– is that something that could be made to apply more generally with other energy sources, such as plasmas produced by other means?
– or is your invention integral to the operation and function of the Ecat itself?
2) At the risk of sounding hyperbolic, it seems to me that the heat-producing Ecat is a foundational invention– a groundbreaking invention from which a myriad of other inventions will spawn– akin to other major inventions like semiconductors and lasers. It also seems to me that the Ecat-SKL (direct electric conversion) is of that same groundbreaking caliber. There are few ways currently to produce electricity from an energy source without the use of heat as the intermediary (photovoltaics comes to mind). If everything pans out to your satisfaction, I expect that you will have something that few others have ever achieved– two foundational, groundbreaking inventions. (Sorry, I guess that was more opinion than question.)
Keep those patents going.
Best wishes,
WaltC
Hello DR Rossi
Scientists have discovered a Black
Hole they did not think possible.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/science/2019/11/29/scientists-find-monster-black-hole-so-big-they-didnt-think-it-was-possible/
Have you thought about what Scientists
will think of your SKL invention?
Regards
Sam
Dear Andrea
Sorry for tampering you with questions, but something to me and to other readers in the web is not clear:
when you talk about a 20 kW “assembly” (10-20 kg weight) are you talking about the 10cm cube plus controller only (the 10cm has a power of 20kW) OR an assembly of several 10cm cubes with a much lower output power? I personally think that the second case is the right one… a 10cm cube cannot weight 10-20 kg. Am I right?
Thank you for your time
Giovanni
Hello DR Rossi
A new discovery.
https://www.sciencealert.com/physicists-identify-a-metal-that-conducts-electricity-but-not-heat
Regards
Sam
Dear Dr Rossi, how much does the 10x10x10cm cube weight?
best regards
Paul
Dear Andrea,
Again, my sincere congratulations for your wonderful, hard earned success.
You recently replied to Joseph Fine that you have used a magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) generator for the E-Cat SKL. Since I am not even close to being a technical expert on such devices (other than what I read on Wikipedia) and have not been able to find any such device on Amazon.com, is it reasonable to assume that you have not only created a custom-designed version of this MHD technology as part of your development efforts, but you have managed to incorporate it into either the 10cm x 10cm reactor or it is part of your cigarette pack sized controller? Please excuse me if I am off-track on this issue.
Warmest regards,
Harvey
Dear Andrea,
In this music video performed by the Swedish group “Galenskaparna and After Shave” they sing “Now it is time”, “Nu är det dags” in swedish. Just as an inspiration for Thomas Florek and the dolls for the introduction of the new E-Cat SK L.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sb5Rdn0zrsQ
Best Regards,
Karl-Henrik
Dear Andrea,
now when you have E-Cats generating electricity you can just sell electricity and keep all the secrets hidden.
I hope you will sell a product for everybody around the world of course.
Have you thought about this?
Thanks
Dear Andrea Rossi,
One question, please.
When do you think you will be able to mass-produce the SKL?
Warm Regards,
Toussaint François
Gerard McEk:
1- no, the control system is as big as a cigarette pack
2- no cristal ball
3- it is still part of the R&D on course
4- maybe, but it has already been substantially published on
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
1. New information leads to new questions, which I hope you will answer:
1. Does the 10cm cube SKL include the control system?
2. Will this new development change the way electricity is being supplied from central to local in the future, do you think?
3. Will you continue the Ecat combination with a jet engine?
4. Will you reveal where the ECat’s energy comes from at the presentation in February, as it is non nuclear, non chemical and ‘unemployed’ till you found the key to extract it?
Thanks, kind regards, Gerard
Dear Andrea,
Thank you for answering all of our questions.
Can we please ask you for a little Christmas gift? Would you take a photo of yourself with the running Ecat SKL and share it with us?
Best regards,
Patrick
Steven N. Karels:
we are not at a point enough developed to give you these answers.
Warm >Regards,
A.R.
Dr Joseph Fine:
A weight of 10-20 kg for an assembly of 20 kW is reasonable.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Have you estimated the Ragone Plot values (Power Density, Energy Density) for the E-Cat SKL?
Assuming power output is 20 kW and charge lifetime is 6 months or ~ 182 days, the energy density in (Wh/kg) is 20,000 W * 24 hrs/day * 182 days/charge * (1 charge/x kg ) = ~ 8.7*10^7 Wh/(X kg).
If the E-Cat SKL has a mass of X = 10 kg, the energy density would be about 8.7*10^6 Wh/kg.
A 1 liter (1000 cubic centimeters) volume of water has a mass of 1 kg. An estimate of 10 or 20 kg for the SKL mass is only a wild guess.
Is this estimate in the ball park?
Of course, the SKL mass actually gets lighter over time, just not by much.
Thermal and Electric Regards,
Joseph Fine
( The E-Cat HT has an energy density of about 5*10^7 Wh/kg. )
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Om the eCat SK Leonardo design, can the percentage of electricity and thermal heat generation:
1. Be controlled by the user (excluding the generated electricity converting to heat by a resistive load)?
2. If yes, to what extent?
3. is 70% to 80% the maximum electricity conversion factor for all options?
Bernie Morrissey:
Yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Eric Schlinger:
Thank you for your sustain,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Eric Ashworth:
Thank you for yur insight, but:
Can you rephrase your question shortly and clearly ?
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, Now that your technology has moved beyond the production of heat and entered the domain of self sustainability it has for me entered the necessary domain of scientific discovery whereby academic science is now able to penetrate and explain the exciting esoteric side of existence whereby all things become possible by being able to explain that which lies behind phenomena. Naturally, this understanding will become gradual and necessary for those interested in science, physics and technology from a different perspective and again Andrea I feel it necessary to repeat myself with regards the value of your JONP whereby all voices can be heard regardless of accredited academic credentials, providing a much needed platform of self discovery both within and without academia.
With regards your new found technology i.e. s.s.m and its geometric connection to the cube. This is my question: Have you associated this connection to the three aspects of energy i.e. Gas – Liquid – Solid and connected these to ‘Sets’ i.e. three sets being twelve of which sometimes referred to as stones but not sixteen for obvious reasons and the necessary gaps to synapses sometimes referred to as pearls?. I ask this question because I know you are an academic and that you recognize the power of the ‘Holy Ghost’ which for me puts you on a specific/peculiar level of understanding i.e. that which is much needed as a ‘bridging mechanism’ in our present environment. Regards Eric Ashworth
Dr Rossi,
I always sustained you, also against the trolls, that will have hard times after the certification of the Ecat SK Leonardo will be made public.
I hope to see an Ecat in my house soon,
Happy Holidays and good finalization of the Ecat
Eric Schlinder
Dear Andrea Rossi,
If there were two Ecat SKL modules connected could one provide heat and one provide electricity?
Bernie Morrissey
Alessandro Coppi:
Wait for our presentation to have precise data,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Sam:
he,he,he…good idea the colors, though!
By the way: this is more difficult than the Ecat
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello DR Rossi
Can you beat this?
https://youtu.be/AWi-81ZYdH0
Regards
Sam
10 cm per side cube, is fantastic, you know that 20KW average are more than enough to run a car on hiway…
Running regards
Alessandro Coppi
DEAR READERS:
ANOTHER FRAUDSTER THAT IS PROPOSING FOR SALE THE ECAT WITHOUT ANY AUTHORIZATION :
http://SHOP.ENERGYEXPERT.IT/CATEGORIE-PRODOTTI/PRODUCT/VIEW/83/558
WE DO NOT EVEN KNOW WHO THEY ARE. AGAIN, I RECOMMEND YOU NEVER TO GIVE MONEY TO ANY VENDOR WITHOUT FIRST ASKING ME IF IT IS A FRAUDOLENT ATTEMPT OF FRAUD
WRITE TO MY EMAIL HIS NAME AND YOU WILL RECEIVE MY ANSWER WITHIN 24 HOURS, NOT LATER: EMAIL TO
INFO@LEONARDOCORP1996.COM
Dr Andrea Rossi
CEO of Leonardo Corporation
Mario Serioni:
You have already the photo in your head: imagine a blue cube with a side of 10 cm.
That’s it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Andrea please, post some pictures of your SKL.
Lars:
All these particulars will be defined when we will have a product for sale
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
a) so you can choose if the cube shall generate 20 kW
or 1 kW for example?
b) if you choose more power for the cube, will the heat be a problem or is the heat taken care of by the control system?
c) is a cube a complete system or how small can a complete electric generating E Cat SKL be for example to fit in a car?
Thank you and congratulation to you and your team 🙂
Steven N. Karels:
a,b,c: yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Iggy Dalrymple:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Henrik:
He,he,he…
Thanks for the liric,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Richard Pollack:
Thank you for the suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Daniel G.Zavela:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
You indicated that you have built and tested three of the eCat SK Leonardo units. Are all the units performing the same:
a. Output
b. Electrical Conversion Efficiency
c. Start Up Time?
Lars:
The module is the cube.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
DEAR READERS:
PLEASE READ WITH ATTENTION THIS WARNING
THERE IS AROUND A MR LA TERRA WITH EMAIL
SALES@ECAT.COM
THAT IS FRAUDOLENTLY OFFERING LICENSES TO SELL OR RESALE OR BUY SERVICES RELATED TO THE ECAT.
HE IS ABUSIVELY USING OUR TRADE MARK ECAT
ATTENTION: DO NOT PAY MONEY TO HIM RELATED TO THE ECAT IN ANY FORM OF SERVICE OR SALE, BECAUSE HE DOES NOT HAVE ANY LICENSE AND YOUR MONEY WOULD BE LOST.
OUR LEGAL FIRM IS ALREADY SEARCHING HIM
I AGAIN REPEAT MY RECOMMENDATION: BEFORE SIGNING ANY CONTRACT OR PAYING ANY SUM TO ANYBODY THAT OFFERS YOU ECAT PLANTS OR PRODUCTS OR SERVICES, PLEASE CONTACT ME TO HAVE CONFIRMATION YOU ARE DEALING WITH AN AUTHORIZED PERSON
MY EMAIL ADDRESS IS
INFO@LEONARDOCORP1996.COM
Chuck Davis:
When the situation will be mature, we will give due directions.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
How will it be possible to install the Ecat in households?
Warm Regards,
Chuck Davis
Dear Andrea,
I try to understand the possible setup of the E-cat SKL.
If we call the 10 cm basic cube a ‘Rossi cube’,
is a E Cat SKL build of several Rossi cubes?
So it is already known how much power one Rossi cube generates, but it is still to be decided how many Rossi cubes än E-cat SKL will have?
Dear Dr. Rossi,
Here’s a project for your R&D staff to think about in their “spare time”.
The current technology is unsustainable. That’s why a new coalition — led by India’s government and America’s Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI), a nonprofit environmental research organization — has launched the Global Cooling Prize, a $1-million competition to design the next generation of air cooling systems.
Looking forward to you presentation in 2020.
Best of Luck.
Best Regards,
Daniel G. Zavela
Dr Rossi,
Why don’t you illuminate a Christmas tree with your Ecat SKL out of your soon-to-be-famous laboratory?
Richard Pollack