Dear Andrea,
1) According to an earlier reply the quark has a COP>1 with 100% electric and yet it can only partly power itself, is that correct?
2) If YES, would you explain why it can’t self power?
3) Is it the case that the demestic units which we have submitted pre-orders for will now be configured from quarks?
4) If f9 is it possible we might see these shipping in 2016, (dependant on approval of course)?
Thank you for every thing and God Bless your efforts.
Andrea,
You must have important reasons to make a foundamental E-Cat.
One reason could be to make a device that can deliver flexible power from 100 Watts to, let’s say 10 kiloWatts, in steps of 100 Watts, and where a constant, high temperature at the outlet is required.
Because of the modulation, other things can be done too.
One big module of 10 kiloWatts may not be capable of making power this flexible AND have high COP meanwhile.
The controls of 100 quark E-Cats may be more expensive, so I think you are working on a high-end application.
Adso:
Yes, I know Sterling Allen: he is a blogger and several years ago he interviewed me. He is not a promoter of Leonardo Corporation and we never had any professional link.
I cannot have any opinion of him, because I do not know him personally enough to have an opinion: I met him only for several hours during few interviews.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
It seems like an excellent idea to standardize the small quarks. But with standardization comes that the user or dealer will change the quarks between applications. It is necessary to trace each quark module with a serial number that will identify: date of manufacturing, factory of manufacturing, and in the future, model version, eg long life quark with 50% extended lifetime and so on.
For transducers there is a standard with a small chip (TEDS ”Transducer Electronic Data Sheet” IEEE 1451) in the electrical connector that will store serial number and individual calibration data. It might also be possible to store runtime hours if you read the hours upon activation and then store with the additional hours when shutting down. When in the future you improve the control loops it is also good to connect the proper control to the proper serial number.
Dr. Rossi, Your comparison to Microsoft Software is far superior then a comparison to a Telsa Battery as a Reader suggested.
Robert Curto
Ft. Lauderdale Florida
USA
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Congratulations for your US Patent andfor its application with the fantastic E-Cat X in version quark, aimed to be applied everywhere to make heat , electricity, light. That’s genius at work.
Non mollare!
Pino
Dear Andrea,
If the building block reactors are made very small, doesn’t it become expensive (per output power) to change fuel? Or is the idea that the quark reactors contain enough fuel that one does not have to change it?
regards, /pekka
Mark Saker:
Substantially, you got it. I want an E-Cat that can be inserted anywhere, as well as a Microsoft software can be chatged in any computer of the world.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi
Can you say if the electricial output of the 100w quark is AC or DC and if so can we know the voltage, I just want to know if we will need inverters to go with your quarks
Dear Andrea Rossi:
Your intention with the E-Cat X is to make a very small module that makes heat, electricity and /or light , so small to be fit to be assembled and inserted anywhere: did I understand correctly? That’s genial.
Latina
From your disclosure about the ‘quark’, would I be correct in thinking that you will use the quark in every e-cat reactor. The quark will be multiplied for the 20kw, 250 and 1000kw e-cat. For example 10,000 quarks would make up the 1MW plant. I guess this would also give you economies of scale in production?
It reminds me of the tesla battery pack being made up of individual 18650 batteries 🙂
Dear Andrea,
Is it correct to assume that the “quark” wouldn’t have been made possible without some improvements in shielding technology or engineering?
Warm Regards
DrD:
I am not able to answer all your questions until the preliminarY R&D will have been completed.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
Absolutely not, but I suppose not before the end of March.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Do you have any indication on when you will receive the ERV’s report on the 1MW test?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea,
1) According to an earlier reply the quark has a COP>1 with 100% electric and yet it can only partly power itself, is that correct?
2) If YES, would you explain why it can’t self power?
3) Is it the case that the demestic units which we have submitted pre-orders for will now be configured from quarks?
4) If f9 is it possible we might see these shipping in 2016, (dependant on approval of course)?
Thank you for every thing and God Bless your efforts.
Dan:
1- yes
2- yes, by means of microprocessors
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Koen Vandewalle:
Thank you for your insight.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Andrea,
You must have important reasons to make a foundamental E-Cat.
One reason could be to make a device that can deliver flexible power from 100 Watts to, let’s say 10 kiloWatts, in steps of 100 Watts, and where a constant, high temperature at the outlet is required.
Because of the modulation, other things can be done too.
One big module of 10 kiloWatts may not be capable of making power this flexible AND have high COP meanwhile.
The controls of 100 quark E-Cats may be more expensive, so I think you are working on a high-end application.
Kind Regards,
Koen
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Is an E-Cat-quark already in operation for R&D ?
Did you resolve the problem of the regulation of multiple E-Cat quarks?
Dan
Lars:
Partly.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Can the Quark power itself?
Koen Vandewalle:
No. Is small to be foundamental, like quarks.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Quark, as in “quark that influences some Maxwell equation” ?
Is it small to have better electricity to heat ratio ?
Kind Regards,
Koen
Al:
Our Licensee for China is Industrial Heat.
Please contact
jvaughn@industrialheat.co
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Daisy:
You bet!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Brokeeper:
He,he,he…
Thank you for your attention,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Adso:
Yes, I know Sterling Allen: he is a blogger and several years ago he interviewed me. He is not a promoter of Leonardo Corporation and we never had any professional link.
I cannot have any opinion of him, because I do not know him personally enough to have an opinion: I met him only for several hours during few interviews.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi
The price of the E-Cat will be such that poor people of all the world will be able to take advantage of it?
Daisy
Pino:
Thank you,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Robert Curto:
Thank you,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Lars:
No, she makes all three.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Karl- Henrik Malmqvist:
Thank you very much for your suggestion.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
I have important requests from China.
How can I contact you to explai ?
Regards,
Al
Dear Andrea,
It seems like an excellent idea to standardize the small quarks. But with standardization comes that the user or dealer will change the quarks between applications. It is necessary to trace each quark module with a serial number that will identify: date of manufacturing, factory of manufacturing, and in the future, model version, eg long life quark with 50% extended lifetime and so on.
For transducers there is a standard with a small chip (TEDS ”Transducer Electronic Data Sheet” IEEE 1451) in the electrical connector that will store serial number and individual calibration data. It might also be possible to store runtime hours if you read the hours upon activation and then store with the additional hours when shutting down. When in the future you improve the control loops it is also good to connect the proper control to the proper serial number.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_1451
Best Regards,
Karl-Henrik, Sweden
Is your goal with E-Cat X to only produce electricity and with that being able to produce heat and light?
Dr. Rossi, Your comparison to Microsoft Software is far superior then a comparison to a Telsa Battery as a Reader suggested.
Robert Curto
Ft. Lauderdale Florida
USA
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Congratulations for your US Patent andfor its application with the fantastic E-Cat X in version quark, aimed to be applied everywhere to make heat , electricity, light. That’s genius at work.
Non mollare!
Pino
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Do you know Sterling Allen? Is he a promoter of Leonardo Corporation? What is your opinion of him?
Regards,
Adso
Dear Andrea,
What are you doing?! Your three Cristoforo Colombo vessels are turning into billions of fast long-range jet skis!
Brokeeper
Dear readers:
Please find on
http://www.rossilivecat.com
comments published today on other posts of this blog.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Pekka Janhunen:
We have studied how to change fuel in an easy way.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
If the building block reactors are made very small, doesn’t it become expensive (per output power) to change fuel? Or is the idea that the quark reactors contain enough fuel that one does not have to change it?
regards, /pekka
Mark Saker:
Substantially, you got it. I want an E-Cat that can be inserted anywhere, as well as a Microsoft software can be chatged in any computer of the world.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
Yes.
F9.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
J.:
No, the difficulties of the certification are not proportional to the dimensions, unfortunately.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Latina Lynds:
Thank you for your attention.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Manuel Cilia:
As I said, the data will be given when and if the product will be ready.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Alessandro Toninelli:
Not yet, the data will be given when we will have terminated the preliminary R&D.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Sailmenn:
Not yet, but it is very small.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello A. Rossi
Can you tell something about the size of the quark?
AA or AA battery or bigger?
Kind regards
Dr. Rossi,
about the output power of the e-cat X “quark”.
Could you please tell an approximate output electicity power expected from a single “quark”?
Best Regards.
Dear Dr Rossi
Can you say if the electricial output of the 100w quark is AC or DC and if so can we know the voltage, I just want to know if we will need inverters to go with your quarks
Dear Andrea Rossi:
Your intention with the E-Cat X is to make a very small module that makes heat, electricity and /or light , so small to be fit to be assembled and inserted anywhere: did I understand correctly? That’s genial.
Latina
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Your “quark” E-Cat idea is genial, because it makes less difficult to get the certification: is it true?
Cheers,
J.
Dear Andrea,
Can you make a quark that produces electricity only (no heat), with an efficiency of COP >1?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea,
From your disclosure about the ‘quark’, would I be correct in thinking that you will use the quark in every e-cat reactor. The quark will be multiplied for the 20kw, 250 and 1000kw e-cat. For example 10,000 quarks would make up the 1MW plant. I guess this would also give you economies of scale in production?
It reminds me of the tesla battery pack being made up of individual 18650 batteries 🙂
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published on other posts of this blog.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Bernie Koppenhofer:
Thank you for your attention,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Brokeeper:
No.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Lars:
No, the “quark” is smaller. It is very fundamental. Like quarks. That’s my concept of it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.