.
by
Aleksei Savchenko
A.A. Bochvar Institute of Inorganic Materials (VNIINM), Rogova 5A, Moscow, Russia,
sav-alex111@mail.ru +7-977-520-5299
.
Read the whole article
Download the ZIP file
.
Abstract
Analyzed the common views on the origin matter and antimatter.
Proposed and rationalized the hypothesis, stating that the antimatter was not lost in The Big Bang as a result of annihilation but remained in the matter, i.e. matter itself (protons and neutrons) consists of particles and antiparticles.
Rationalized the possibility of electron placed inside a neutron and, as a conclusion, the possibility to influence the nuclear half-life.
Proposed the hypothesis regarding the origin and structure of electron, muon, proton, neutron and neutrino, regarding the nature of nuclear (strong) interaction and regarding the prevalence of stretching pressures in Physical Vacuum.
Proposed the mechanism of the expansion of the Universe by «swelling» of the Physical Vacuum energy structure itself and some conclusions of that model.
Analyzed the possible energy effects, resulting from the sharp change in the density of Physical Vacuum.
Proposed an alternative mechanism for the Relic radiation origin (microwave background radiation).
.
Read the whole article
Download the ZIP file
.
TurnitinChecker:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Fascinating read on the matter-antimatter symmetry question. The idea that antimatter wasn’t simply lost to annihilation but persists within protons and neutrons is the kind of unconventional hypothesis that pushes physics forward, even if it invites skepticism. https://aiturnitinchecker.com What strikes me is how often bold theoretical proposals like this one hinge on rigorous scrutiny before they gain traction. That same principle applies to academic writing: before submitting a paper that challenges established views, it’s worth running it through a reliable AI detection check to make sure the work stands on its own merit. Tools like the one at aiturnitinchecker help authors verify originality and reduce risk before peer review.
Gerard McEk:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Although I am not able to verify everything stated in this paper, I liked the new ideas of how matter is formed. To me it feels like more likely, especially when you know that the existing insights, based on quarks, is found by using extremely powerful accelerators. It could well be that these accelerators blow even the Muons in peaces and that these small relics (quarks) are not really part of what forms matter.
I would have left out any link to biology, but would have added ideas of how to verify the assumed structure of matter and PV.
Sushil Kumar:
Can you explain ?
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hypothesis not always true