Steve D:
It will be possible to discuss these options only when the persons that sent the pre-order will be contacted for the delivery and the Clients will be free to decide if to turn the not binding pre-order into a regular order or not,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Now you are talking about a new Ecat configuration, 230 V AC, which is very interesting, something useful for everyone! I can imagine high demand for this kind of cat. When will this be available for order, or preorder?
The US Army is starting Janus Program, a next-generation nuclear power program that will deliver resilient, secure, and assured energy to support national defense installations and critical missions.
The program will build commercial microreactors through a nimble, milestone-based contracting model in partnership with the Defense Innovation Unit (DIU), accelerating delivery of advanced energy solutions to the warfighter.
Will the specifications of the 22kV and 230V units be published and available for (pre)order this year?
Do you expect that many who planned to build their own 230V unit, comprising Ecats, battery, inverter might change their order to your factory built option?
1) Is the idea for home heating with the 230V AC E-Cat to power normal resistive electric heaters?
2) Will the 230V AC E-Cat be able to power other normal household appliances and devices?
Dear Andrea
I thank you for your recent answers to my 5 questions.
My understanding is that the answer to the “core question” 1. tells what your licensees must ensure is taken care of, -before further investments are made.
Otherwise, the answer from AI that Axil presented, shows that your licensees must specialize their efforts in only producing: “10W Ecat Power elements”.
This can be illustrated with another element that provides electrical energy: “1.5V-AAA battery”.
These are included in thousands of different products that are dependent on energy/voltage supply.
Battery manufacturers only supply the aforementioned elements, not the complex electrotechnical products that require one or more power supply batteries.
Our entire business is built on effective specialization.
This also applies to the manufacture of cables for use in large and small electrical networks.
Cable manufacturers only supply elements that connect the entire network.
Generators and transformers are manufactured by specialized suppliers.
Nor do any of these engage in mining to extract the necessary amount of steel, copper, aluminum and other materials that are included in turbines, generators or cables.
Construction companies carry out the assembly, line laying and burying of cables.
The network owner concentrates on the continuous operation of the complex facility.
Dear Andrea
The comprehensive explanations of conditions in electrical networks that Axil has presented will probably mean that more than me see simplifications here must be a goal for both electricity producers and users around the globe.
The use of 22 kV units can be a contribution here.
Home use of Ecat seems, to me, far more efficient.
This both in connection with existing networks and where such do not yet exist.
I would like to ask you the following:
1. Is it now, or during 2025, possible to provide evidence that the availability of ZPE and its energy density enable the production of electricity as presented in https://ecatthenewfire.com/? (Excluding the lifetime assumptions!)
2. Do you consider the current production method for 10W Ecats to be acceptable enough to market 230/240V units in various sizes that are adapted to the residential market?
3. Do the contractual relationships that exist between L.C. and the licensee allow L.C. to purchase 10W Ecats from their production and resell these under its own control?
4. Does L.C. have the opportunity to further develop additional equipment that may be necessary in connection with the successful use of Ecat directly in homes?
5. Can L.C. enter into development contracts with other suppliers for equipment as mentioned in point 4?
Regards: Svein
I don’t beleive it. The partner will initially setup only one production line to build the 22Kv system for the electric utility marketplace. I judge that Dr. Rossi’s response to Frank Acland’s question is just an opinion or a hope for a future situation rather than a solid commitment from management.
I asked the AI this question:
If a manufacturer was to setup production of a new product using many new worldwide production factories, would proper management and marketing procedures require them to concentrate on initially building a single mainline product, or would they gain advantage in supporting many production lines for optional variations of the product,
AI answer
For a manufacturer establishing multiple new worldwide production factories, proper management and marketing procedures overwhelmingly favor concentrating on a single, mainline product initially. Launching many production lines for variations simultaneously would compound risks, costs, and operational complexities at a critical early stage. A concentrated, single-product approach is the industry standard for minimizing startup risk and building a strong foundation for future expansion.
The concentrated single-product approach
Manufacturing and operations management
Achieve economies of scale: Producing a single product in high volumes across multiple facilities is the most efficient way to achieve significant economies of scale. This lowers the average production cost per unit, providing a competitive pricing advantage.
Simplify logistics: Managing a worldwide supply chain for one product is far simpler than for many. Operations teams can streamline the sourcing of materials, coordinate manufacturing processes, and optimize distribution, reducing complexity and potential for error.
Enhance quality control: By focusing on one product, a manufacturer can more effectively standardize production processes across all new factories. This leads to consistent, high-quality output and makes it easier to troubleshoot and correct any defects that arise.
Increase efficiency: A concentrated approach minimizes the costly and time-consuming interruptions required for re-tooling and re-sequencing production lines for different products. This improves overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) and operational efficiency.
Master the process: Focusing resources and expertise on one product allows management and factory staff to master the production process. This leads to higher yields, less waste, and greater productivity.
Marketing and strategy
Build a strong brand: A single “hero” product can be the cornerstone of an entire brand. By dedicating all marketing resources to a unified message, the manufacturer can create a clear brand identity and position the product effectively in the marketplace.
Validate product-market fit: Concentrating efforts on one product is the quickest way to validate market demand. If the core product succeeds, the company can confidently invest in expanding its product line. If it fails, the company has fewer resources at risk.
Focus resources: Launching multiple products at once dilutes a company’s marketing budget, messaging, and creative energy. A single-product strategy allows for focused, high-impact marketing campaigns that are easier to test and refine.
Minimize market risk: Relying on one product carries risk, but relying on a suite of new, unproven products is even riskier for a new factory network. Market changes or new competitors could threaten the entire lineup. A successful single product can be the foundation for diversification later, mitigating long-term risk.
When a multi-product approach could work
While generally not recommended for an initial launch with new factories, a multi-product approach might be considered in specific circumstances where the risks are manageable and a strong operational base already exists:
Economies of scope: If a manufacturer can produce a variety of related products using the same equipment and processes with minimal adjustments, they can achieve economies of scope. The costs of operating the facilities are spread across multiple products, lowering the average total cost of production.
Complementary products: Offering a multi-product line could be a viable strategy if the products are complementary and serve a similar purpose. For example, a hair care brand might launch a shampoo, conditioner, and hair mask at the same time to provide a complete solution.
Established distribution channels: If the manufacturer can leverage existing, robust distribution channels for its product categories, launching multiple product lines might make sense to capture maximum market share immediately.
Risks of launching with multiple product variations
Diluted resources: Spreading finite resources across multiple product lines can weaken the performance of each one. This dilution affects everything from manufacturing efficiency to marketing budget allocation.
Management complexity: Managing multiple, complex production lines and a global supply chain is far more difficult than managing a single product line. This increases the chance of logistical errors and quality control issues.
Market confusion: A fragmented product line with various options can confuse customers, especially a new market, making it harder for the brand to establish a clear identity.
Risk of brand dilution: If a lower-quality variant is produced, it can negatively impact the entire brand, not just that single product. Each additional variation introduces another variable that could fail and damage the brand’s new reputation.
Advantages of a single mainline product
Cost efficiency: A single product streamlines operations across new factories, minimizing setup costs and maximizing economies of scale. A simplified supply chain is easier to manage and less expensive to operate.
Quality control: With a single, uniform production process across multiple new facilities, manufacturers can more easily establish consistent quality standards. This minimizes the risk of product defects that could damage the brand’s reputation early on.
Focused marketing: A single product allows marketing efforts to be highly focused, building strong brand recognition and trust with customers. This concentrated messaging makes the initial market entry more impactful.
Operational learning: The company and its new production teams can focus on perfecting one product. The valuable knowledge gained will streamline the launch of future products and variations.
Risk reduction: Launching multiple new products and factories simultaneously significantly multiplies the risk. If the mainline product fails, the company is at risk. But if any of many variations fail, the entire brand is potentially tarnished.
Hybrid approach for eventual expansion
The manufacturer can pursue a strategy of phased expansion by starting with a core mainline product and, once production and market entry are stable, introducing variations over time. This approach offers a balance between the advantages of focus and the benefits of diversification.
Phase 1: Build the core product: Launch a single, high-quality product to build brand awareness, establish a reliable global manufacturing base, and iron out any initial issues.
Phase 2: Introduce variations: Once the core product is successful, use the established manufacturing infrastructure to introduce variations. This could be done by testing different options in specific regional markets to gauge consumer interest.
Phase 3: Broaden the product line: As factories and teams gain expertise and confidence, and market demand for variations is proven, the company can expand the product line on a larger, more permanent scale.
I’m curious how will those of us on the outside hear about concrete aspects of the E-cat sales from sources independent from yourself? This will be interesting to follow around the end of the year and anything you can do to help our curiosity will be appreciated.
Dear Andrea
It now seems that some 22 kV units will be the first, when it comes to Ecat.
These are clearly intended as additional supply to existing transformers at the same kV level.
The amount of energy that each of these consumes is according to you: 1 MW.
This entails the use of 100,000 pcs. of 10W Ecats in each 22 kV unit.
This is enough to supply about 500 homes with their annual electricity consumption.
If the initial target is to deliver 10 units, this will require the production of 1 million 10W Ecats by 2026.
The energy production from these will have no demonstrable effects on either US or global energy consumption or CO2 emissions, but will reassure interested global buyers that this solution is a true reality.
After a few years of use, it will also be revealed whether the expected lifespan of 10 years is realistic.
The various global markets for the use of Ecat can thus be created.
Thousands of production plants will then come on a global basis.
The company that has now acquired the rights to Ecat must deal with the current contract with L. C.
What this says is a matter between L. C and the licensees.
The 22 kV systems must be carried out in accordance with the current technical requirements and laws.
The energy customers do not seem to be exposed to any risk.
The company can therefore easily take care of its owners’ risk conditions and their ongoing decisions.
The value of the delivered energy can, in terms of price in many areas of the USA, provide a short payback period for the material deliveries.
It is not unusual for a company to choose a solution that gives them maximum control over their investments.
For the rest of us who have also pre-ordered Ecat, we will have to be patient.
This can prevent our units from being burdened with some “childhood diseases”.
For my own part, I am sure that the opportunities that this discovery/invention provides, -will be exploited by humanity as soon as there is understanding and certainty that Ecat meets what has now been presented by L.C.
(TGTBT will probably be a “bottleneck” here.)
@axil
Thank you for your very interesting search on ChatGPT about the connection of the Ecat as a component of the DER system already employed for the massive solar and eolic plants. Good job,
All the best
Weleda
The following is a conceptual design based on the postings on the 22kV, 1 MW NGU system. The System is used primarily at Grid substations, tying directly into Grid Transformer, either a single phase, or three phases transformer.
Likely the DC output will be around 24 kV, generated by approximately 2,000 100W units, tied in series to develop 24 kV at approximately 8 Amps DC. Each assembly, we will call it a “bank”, will generate about 200 kW of DC power. To reach the 1 MW, 5 such banks would be used.
All the banks would feed power into a Grid-Tie Inverter that converts the DC power to Grid-ready AC power, including phase synchronization. The Inverter would connect to an existing single-phase Transformer, or, 3 such Inverters, each on a different Grid phase, would connect to a three-phase Transformer.
Likely each Bank could be turned ON or OFF as needed control the amount of power flowing to the Grid.
Ron:
As the chief scientist I continue the R&D for the evolution of the Ecat,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Ambrogio:
USA, Asia, Europe,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Can you tell us where the Global Licensee will manufacture the Ecats ?
Best,
Ambrogio
Mr Rossi,
can you explain which are exactly your duties in the context of the global licensee ?
Steve D:
It will be possible to discuss these options only when the persons that sent the pre-order will be contacted for the delivery and the Clients will be free to decide if to turn the not binding pre-order into a regular order or not,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Rafal:
The Ecat is not a nuclear reactor,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ecat Enthusiast:
The answer does not depend on me,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi:
Now you are talking about a new Ecat configuration, 230 V AC, which is very interesting, something useful for everyone! I can imagine high demand for this kind of cat. When will this be available for order, or preorder?
Regards, Ecat Enthusiast
Hi Andrea,
The US Army is starting Janus Program, a next-generation nuclear power program that will deliver resilient, secure, and assured energy to support national defense installations and critical missions.
The program will build commercial microreactors through a nimble, milestone-based contracting model in partnership with the Defense Innovation Unit (DIU), accelerating delivery of advanced energy solutions to the warfighter.
Andrea, I think your E-Cats fit these requirements perfectly. Why not to apply to this one?
https://www.army.mil/article/288903/army_announces_janus_program_for_next_generation_nuclear_energy
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Will the specifications of the 22kV and 230V units be published and available for (pre)order this year?
Do you expect that many who planned to build their own 230V unit, comprising Ecats, battery, inverter might change their order to your factory built option?
Mark Hofer:
I still hope so,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ambrogio:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonymous:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Svein:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
1- yes
2- yes
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
1) Is the idea for home heating with the 230V AC E-Cat to power normal resistive electric heaters?
2) Will the 230V AC E-Cat be able to power other normal household appliances and devices?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea
I thank you for your recent answers to my 5 questions.
My understanding is that the answer to the “core question” 1. tells what your licensees must ensure is taken care of, -before further investments are made.
Otherwise, the answer from AI that Axil presented, shows that your licensees must specialize their efforts in only producing: “10W Ecat Power elements”.
This can be illustrated with another element that provides electrical energy: “1.5V-AAA battery”.
These are included in thousands of different products that are dependent on energy/voltage supply.
Battery manufacturers only supply the aforementioned elements, not the complex electrotechnical products that require one or more power supply batteries.
Our entire business is built on effective specialization.
This also applies to the manufacture of cables for use in large and small electrical networks.
Cable manufacturers only supply elements that connect the entire network.
Generators and transformers are manufactured by specialized suppliers.
Nor do any of these engage in mining to extract the necessary amount of steel, copper, aluminum and other materials that are included in turbines, generators or cables.
Construction companies carry out the assembly, line laying and burying of cables.
The network owner concentrates on the continuous operation of the complex facility.
Today is the “1-year anniversary” of a well-written document:
https://ecatthenewfire.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/E-Cat-Power-Whitepaper-October-14-2024.pdf
I recommend everyone to read this thoroughly.
Here are the global market opportunities for “10WEcat”.
Regards: Svein
Dr Rossi,
Do you have the guarantee that the Ecats will be delivered ?
Dr Rossi,
Has been decided the design of the body of the basic Ecat ?
Hi Andrea,
Still sure the deliveries will start in 2025 ?
Mark Hofer
Giuseppe Censorio:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
will the single 10W Ecat unit be the same for both the 22kV modules and the 230V ones?
Regards, Giuseppe
Frank Acland:
Yes,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Svein:
1- I think so
2- yes
3- confidential
4- yes, in collaboration with the Licensee
5- only in collaboration with the Licensee
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Thank you for your reply to my previous question.
So the E-Cats generating 230V AC would be the solution for people who want to heat their homes with E-Cat power?
Best wishes,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea
The comprehensive explanations of conditions in electrical networks that Axil has presented will probably mean that more than me see simplifications here must be a goal for both electricity producers and users around the globe.
The use of 22 kV units can be a contribution here.
Home use of Ecat seems, to me, far more efficient.
This both in connection with existing networks and where such do not yet exist.
I would like to ask you the following:
1. Is it now, or during 2025, possible to provide evidence that the availability of ZPE and its energy density enable the production of electricity as presented in https://ecatthenewfire.com/? (Excluding the lifetime assumptions!)
2. Do you consider the current production method for 10W Ecats to be acceptable enough to market 230/240V units in various sizes that are adapted to the residential market?
3. Do the contractual relationships that exist between L.C. and the licensee allow L.C. to purchase 10W Ecats from their production and resell these under its own control?
4. Does L.C. have the opportunity to further develop additional equipment that may be necessary in connection with the successful use of Ecat directly in homes?
5. Can L.C. enter into development contracts with other suppliers for equipment as mentioned in point 4?
Regards: Svein
I don’t beleive it. The partner will initially setup only one production line to build the 22Kv system for the electric utility marketplace. I judge that Dr. Rossi’s response to Frank Acland’s question is just an opinion or a hope for a future situation rather than a solid commitment from management.
I asked the AI this question:
If a manufacturer was to setup production of a new product using many new worldwide production factories, would proper management and marketing procedures require them to concentrate on initially building a single mainline product, or would they gain advantage in supporting many production lines for optional variations of the product,
AI answer
For a manufacturer establishing multiple new worldwide production factories, proper management and marketing procedures overwhelmingly favor concentrating on a single, mainline product initially. Launching many production lines for variations simultaneously would compound risks, costs, and operational complexities at a critical early stage. A concentrated, single-product approach is the industry standard for minimizing startup risk and building a strong foundation for future expansion.
The concentrated single-product approach
Manufacturing and operations management
Achieve economies of scale: Producing a single product in high volumes across multiple facilities is the most efficient way to achieve significant economies of scale. This lowers the average production cost per unit, providing a competitive pricing advantage.
Simplify logistics: Managing a worldwide supply chain for one product is far simpler than for many. Operations teams can streamline the sourcing of materials, coordinate manufacturing processes, and optimize distribution, reducing complexity and potential for error.
Enhance quality control: By focusing on one product, a manufacturer can more effectively standardize production processes across all new factories. This leads to consistent, high-quality output and makes it easier to troubleshoot and correct any defects that arise.
Increase efficiency: A concentrated approach minimizes the costly and time-consuming interruptions required for re-tooling and re-sequencing production lines for different products. This improves overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) and operational efficiency.
Master the process: Focusing resources and expertise on one product allows management and factory staff to master the production process. This leads to higher yields, less waste, and greater productivity.
Marketing and strategy
Build a strong brand: A single “hero” product can be the cornerstone of an entire brand. By dedicating all marketing resources to a unified message, the manufacturer can create a clear brand identity and position the product effectively in the marketplace.
Validate product-market fit: Concentrating efforts on one product is the quickest way to validate market demand. If the core product succeeds, the company can confidently invest in expanding its product line. If it fails, the company has fewer resources at risk.
Focus resources: Launching multiple products at once dilutes a company’s marketing budget, messaging, and creative energy. A single-product strategy allows for focused, high-impact marketing campaigns that are easier to test and refine.
Minimize market risk: Relying on one product carries risk, but relying on a suite of new, unproven products is even riskier for a new factory network. Market changes or new competitors could threaten the entire lineup. A successful single product can be the foundation for diversification later, mitigating long-term risk.
When a multi-product approach could work
While generally not recommended for an initial launch with new factories, a multi-product approach might be considered in specific circumstances where the risks are manageable and a strong operational base already exists:
Economies of scope: If a manufacturer can produce a variety of related products using the same equipment and processes with minimal adjustments, they can achieve economies of scope. The costs of operating the facilities are spread across multiple products, lowering the average total cost of production.
Complementary products: Offering a multi-product line could be a viable strategy if the products are complementary and serve a similar purpose. For example, a hair care brand might launch a shampoo, conditioner, and hair mask at the same time to provide a complete solution.
Established distribution channels: If the manufacturer can leverage existing, robust distribution channels for its product categories, launching multiple product lines might make sense to capture maximum market share immediately.
Risks of launching with multiple product variations
Diluted resources: Spreading finite resources across multiple product lines can weaken the performance of each one. This dilution affects everything from manufacturing efficiency to marketing budget allocation.
Management complexity: Managing multiple, complex production lines and a global supply chain is far more difficult than managing a single product line. This increases the chance of logistical errors and quality control issues.
Market confusion: A fragmented product line with various options can confuse customers, especially a new market, making it harder for the brand to establish a clear identity.
Risk of brand dilution: If a lower-quality variant is produced, it can negatively impact the entire brand, not just that single product. Each additional variation introduces another variable that could fail and damage the brand’s new reputation.
Advantages of a single mainline product
Cost efficiency: A single product streamlines operations across new factories, minimizing setup costs and maximizing economies of scale. A simplified supply chain is easier to manage and less expensive to operate.
Quality control: With a single, uniform production process across multiple new facilities, manufacturers can more easily establish consistent quality standards. This minimizes the risk of product defects that could damage the brand’s reputation early on.
Focused marketing: A single product allows marketing efforts to be highly focused, building strong brand recognition and trust with customers. This concentrated messaging makes the initial market entry more impactful.
Operational learning: The company and its new production teams can focus on perfecting one product. The valuable knowledge gained will streamline the launch of future products and variations.
Risk reduction: Launching multiple new products and factories simultaneously significantly multiplies the risk. If the mainline product fails, the company is at risk. But if any of many variations fail, the entire brand is potentially tarnished.
Hybrid approach for eventual expansion
The manufacturer can pursue a strategy of phased expansion by starting with a core mainline product and, once production and market entry are stable, introducing variations over time. This approach offers a balance between the advantages of focus and the benefits of diversification.
Phase 1: Build the core product: Launch a single, high-quality product to build brand awareness, establish a reliable global manufacturing base, and iron out any initial issues.
Phase 2: Introduce variations: Once the core product is successful, use the established manufacturing infrastructure to introduce variations. This could be done by testing different options in specific regional markets to gauge consumer interest.
Phase 3: Broaden the product line: As factories and teams gain expertise and confidence, and market demand for variations is proven, the company can expand the product line on a larger, more permanent scale.
Frank Acland:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Will the E-Cats that generate current at 230 V be available for home use?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Yury Evdokimov:
To third party buyers, as far as I am aware of,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. A. Rossi
Will your global licensee manufacture 22 kV substations for its own use or for sale to interested third-party buyers?
With best wishes,
Yury Evdokimov
Steve Albers:
The answer is in your question: how can I answer about things independent from me ?
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Giuseppe Santoni:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Rick:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Do you think that the Ecats will be manufactured by your global Licensee in the USA as well as in Europe and Asia ?
Greetings Andrea,
I’m curious how will those of us on the outside hear about concrete aspects of the E-cat sales from sources independent from yourself? This will be interesting to follow around the end of the year and anything you can do to help our curiosity will be appreciated.
Dr Rossi,
Will the Ecats be manufactured also for heating houses ?
Stephen:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi
This publication I found in the internet maybe of interest to you, your partners or other readers:
https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/high-voltage-substation-market/amp
Best regards
Stephen
Anonymous:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Will the cat be able also to generate current at 230 V AC ?
Svein:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea
It now seems that some 22 kV units will be the first, when it comes to Ecat.
These are clearly intended as additional supply to existing transformers at the same kV level.
The amount of energy that each of these consumes is according to you: 1 MW.
This entails the use of 100,000 pcs. of 10W Ecats in each 22 kV unit.
This is enough to supply about 500 homes with their annual electricity consumption.
If the initial target is to deliver 10 units, this will require the production of 1 million 10W Ecats by 2026.
The energy production from these will have no demonstrable effects on either US or global energy consumption or CO2 emissions, but will reassure interested global buyers that this solution is a true reality.
After a few years of use, it will also be revealed whether the expected lifespan of 10 years is realistic.
The various global markets for the use of Ecat can thus be created.
Thousands of production plants will then come on a global basis.
The company that has now acquired the rights to Ecat must deal with the current contract with L. C.
What this says is a matter between L. C and the licensees.
The 22 kV systems must be carried out in accordance with the current technical requirements and laws.
The energy customers do not seem to be exposed to any risk.
The company can therefore easily take care of its owners’ risk conditions and their ongoing decisions.
The value of the delivered energy can, in terms of price in many areas of the USA, provide a short payback period for the material deliveries.
It is not unusual for a company to choose a solution that gives them maximum control over their investments.
For the rest of us who have also pre-ordered Ecat, we will have to be patient.
This can prevent our units from being burdened with some “childhood diseases”.
For my own part, I am sure that the opportunities that this discovery/invention provides, -will be exploited by humanity as soon as there is understanding and certainty that Ecat meets what has now been presented by L.C.
(TGTBT will probably be a “bottleneck” here.)
Regards: Svein
@axil
Thank you for your very interesting search on ChatGPT about the connection of the Ecat as a component of the DER system already employed for the massive solar and eolic plants. Good job,
All the best
Weleda
Ambrogio:
Not for the time being, as far as I am aware of, although this issue does not depend on me,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Roberto:
Higher, and to understand why please read the last comments of axil,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
axil:
Ithe A.I. considerations are correct,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
axil:
The A.I. answered correctly to your question,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven Nicholes Karels:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
The following is a conceptual design based on the postings on the 22kV, 1 MW NGU system. The System is used primarily at Grid substations, tying directly into Grid Transformer, either a single phase, or three phases transformer.
Likely the DC output will be around 24 kV, generated by approximately 2,000 100W units, tied in series to develop 24 kV at approximately 8 Amps DC. Each assembly, we will call it a “bank”, will generate about 200 kW of DC power. To reach the 1 MW, 5 such banks would be used.
All the banks would feed power into a Grid-Tie Inverter that converts the DC power to Grid-ready AC power, including phase synchronization. The Inverter would connect to an existing single-phase Transformer, or, 3 such Inverters, each on a different Grid phase, would connect to a three-phase Transformer.
Likely each Bank could be turned ON or OFF as needed control the amount of power flowing to the Grid.
Thoughts?