United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

46,156 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Readers of the JoNP:
    Today is the World Day of the Earth; may it inspire all of us to defend this masterpiece of God,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Ambrogio:
    Correct,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    TJKaminski:
    Thank you for the suggestion,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    Yes,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Axil

    @2026-04-21 04:09 Svein

    Regarding:

    “Suggestions for possible improvements will probably also emerge from several in line with how Axil acts, as more “apparatus” are put into use and the understanding of the new and complex physics that must lie behind it becomes widespread.”

    In my opinion the new science in the NGU is localized in the diode. But there is critical engineering to be done in the hardware, software and systems engineering in getting all 10,000 or more diodes to work together to produce electrical power in support a vast range of applications world wide. Unless already existing engineering norms, method, protocols and guardrails are adhered to, disaster will result.

    This is why I burdened the blog with a number of posts that identified these system engineering requirements, I listed the companies that use them, I recommended the best companies that could provide and example of the most compatible to the NGU distributed micro board networked modular system and explained how to select a partner to eliminate the time and money that are required to partner with a company who can support all the technology that a world wide deployment of the NGU would optimize.

    In my opinion, even a genius of unsurpassed intellectual power and energy will fail if that person does not follow the norms, methods, characteristics, protocols, and guardrails that exist for a generalized networked application.

    Take Leonardo da Vinci who is still renowned for his genius failed when he ignore the guardrails of the application.

    The primary reason The Last Supper deteriorated while the Mona Lisa survived in better condition lies in the experimental techniques Leonardo da Vinci used for each.

    Unlike traditional murals of the time, The Last Supper was not a true fresco. Leonardo’s choices and the environment led to its rapid decay.

    Leonardo used tempera and oil on dry plaster rather than the traditional fresco method (pigment on wet plaster). He did this to work slowly and achieve finer details not to mention the work and mess required to paint fresco, but the paint never properly bonded to the wall.

    If Leonardo followed the fresco methods he was taught in his apprenticeship under the renowned Florentine artist Andrea del Verrocchio, his greatest success would have endured down through the ages. Even in its corrupted state, the Last Supper is still a venerated and well studied work of art.

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    Thank you for the confirmation. Am I correct in assuming the that the heat is made with resistors using electricity generated from the plant?

    Best wishes,

    Frank Acland

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>