From your proposal presented here on: May 28, 2026 at 11:05, it was difficult to understand how you have thought of this, functionally, placed in relation to the task of converting the variable DC voltage that Ecat delivers, to a stable AC with a frequency of 50 Hz that is also in phase with the normal network the user is connected to.
This is considering that businesses and homes provide both steady and varying short-term loads in connection with frequent starts of various electric motors and other appliances.
I can imagine an Ecat unit consisting of 20 pcs. 100 Watt Ecats with 12 volts that are connected in series to provide 240 volts.
This then provides a basis for supplying 220 to 240V AC with a stable 50 Hz frequency to the local grid.
The alleged unstable DC that is extracted from the ZPE must then be converted if this energy is really available.
The individual user can then acquire the number of 2kW generators he needs.
So far, AR has pointed out that when using 10,000 Ecat units, each of 100 W, the variations will be balanced out since what happens in each unit, in terms of time, does not coincide.
Could a current solution then be that the necessary number of units are placed at the users’ premises and directly supply the grid?
The owner of the relevant Ecats cover his needs only from the grid and is billed for the difference between his consumption and what his own generators deliver to the grid.
In the event of a fault or interruption in the grid, he can then be supplied directly from his Ecats.
Since the electricity produced will always choose the shortest route to the nearest consumer, the local grid will be under-loaded and the losses will be very small.
The need for gigantic central, polluting power plants with extensive, expensive networks with high voltages and corresponding energy losses in these will then disappear.
Our total energy costs will consequently be significantly lower.
Such a total system change will probably take a long time and all parties involved will have the necessary time to adapt.
I do not imagine that a well-designed Ecat unit would need more external service and maintenance than a regular refrigerator. If the energy demand were to be lower than the total supply, the possibility of regulating the supply must be taken into account.
When it comes to Leonardo Corp. and their licensees, attractive visions will be a natural part of the global presentation.
Hello Dr Rossi,
Since (1) the present Ecat produces DC current that will power a resistive load, and (2) a storage battery generally acts like a resistive load, and (3) a storage battery can produce, via an inverter, standard AC power to supply the Ecat’s operating requirements, this would seem to be a solution to the SSM problem. But you and your team must have considered this approach long ago and found it wanting. Are you at liberty to tell us why the storage battery solution does not work? Thanks and best wishes for your success!
Richard
Ecat Enthusiast:
I am sure that the global presentation is 100% probable within one year; 50% within this year. The difference is due to very important developments in our R&D we made in these very days, that could make possible the SSM: if the SSM will demand some more time, we prefer to delay several months, and go SSM, for obvious reasons.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Comparing Dr. Rossi’s design with the other competing system designs out in the wild is how the NGU is an elegant engineering tour de force in the use of the vacuum reaction. This NGU design pushes efficiency to the ultimate limit. Unlike other systems, the NGU captures both electron creation and photon creation from the vacuum in one elegant high efficiency conversion effect where electrons react with optical gases to convert the vacuum energy it harvests into a single optical format where photovoltaic processes convert coherent light into electron current with near perfect efficiency without the production of waste heat.
The self sustain mode is produced with the minimum of wasted power in a closed loop that only extracts the minimum power from the vacuum to sustain a fixed electrical output without the production of waste heat.
This lack of waste heat production makes the NGU an ideal solution for just about every power production application you can think of.
Dear Axil
From your proposal presented here on: May 28, 2026 at 11:05, it was difficult to understand how you have thought of this, functionally, placed in relation to the task of converting the variable DC voltage that Ecat delivers, to a stable AC with a frequency of 50 Hz that is also in phase with the normal network the user is connected to.
This is considering that businesses and homes provide both steady and varying short-term loads in connection with frequent starts of various electric motors and other appliances.
I can imagine an Ecat unit consisting of 20 pcs. 100 Watt Ecats with 12 volts that are connected in series to provide 240 volts.
This then provides a basis for supplying 220 to 240V AC with a stable 50 Hz frequency to the local grid.
The alleged unstable DC that is extracted from the ZPE must then be converted if this energy is really available.
The individual user can then acquire the number of 2kW generators he needs.
So far, AR has pointed out that when using 10,000 Ecat units, each of 100 W, the variations will be balanced out since what happens in each unit, in terms of time, does not coincide.
Could a current solution then be that the necessary number of units are placed at the users’ premises and directly supply the grid?
The owner of the relevant Ecats cover his needs only from the grid and is billed for the difference between his consumption and what his own generators deliver to the grid.
In the event of a fault or interruption in the grid, he can then be supplied directly from his Ecats.
Since the electricity produced will always choose the shortest route to the nearest consumer, the local grid will be under-loaded and the losses will be very small.
The need for gigantic central, polluting power plants with extensive, expensive networks with high voltages and corresponding energy losses in these will then disappear.
Our total energy costs will consequently be significantly lower.
Such a total system change will probably take a long time and all parties involved will have the necessary time to adapt.
I do not imagine that a well-designed Ecat unit would need more external service and maintenance than a regular refrigerator. If the energy demand were to be lower than the total supply, the possibility of regulating the supply must be taken into account.
When it comes to Leonardo Corp. and their licensees, attractive visions will be a natural part of the global presentation.
Regards Svein
Axil:
Thank you,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Richard:
Thank you for your support.
I am sorry, this information is restricted,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Dr Rossi,
Since (1) the present Ecat produces DC current that will power a resistive load, and (2) a storage battery generally acts like a resistive load, and (3) a storage battery can produce, via an inverter, standard AC power to supply the Ecat’s operating requirements, this would seem to be a solution to the SSM problem. But you and your team must have considered this approach long ago and found it wanting. Are you at liberty to tell us why the storage battery solution does not work? Thanks and best wishes for your success!
Richard
Ecat Enthusiast:
I am sure that the global presentation is 100% probable within one year; 50% within this year. The difference is due to very important developments in our R&D we made in these very days, that could make possible the SSM: if the SSM will demand some more time, we prefer to delay several months, and go SSM, for obvious reasons.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Comparing Dr. Rossi’s design with the other competing system designs out in the wild is how the NGU is an elegant engineering tour de force in the use of the vacuum reaction. This NGU design pushes efficiency to the ultimate limit. Unlike other systems, the NGU captures both electron creation and photon creation from the vacuum in one elegant high efficiency conversion effect where electrons react with optical gases to convert the vacuum energy it harvests into a single optical format where photovoltaic processes convert coherent light into electron current with near perfect efficiency without the production of waste heat.
The self sustain mode is produced with the minimum of wasted power in a closed loop that only extracts the minimum power from the vacuum to sustain a fixed electrical output without the production of waste heat.
This lack of waste heat production makes the NGU an ideal solution for just about every power production application you can think of.
Dr. Rossi:
What do you think the probability is of having the global Ecat presentation this year?
Regards, Ecat Enthusiast