.
by
Tadej Bajda a.k.a.Tamal Krishna
das Krsko, Slovenia
.
.
Abstract
Description of a fictional device, cylindrical in shape, for starting a low energy nuclear reaction. Using an environment of hydrogen and nickel charecteristics, similiar to one in an E-Cat. Imagining hydrogen molecul as a spring resonant system and simply using frequency and power of electricity as a catalyst.
.
.
Dear Chris Beall:
1- by the experimenters, of course; I was not attending the test
2- the experimenters used their instruments: we only supplied the E-Cat
3- the electrical hook up was very simple and has been described in the report
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Suriani:
Thank you, also from Prof. Sergio Focardi
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
it was about time to have some public praise and recognition for the incredible accomplishments you have reached with the support of Prof. Focardi. It is an exciting feeling for the many of us who had trusted your work since years now.
I wish you all the best.
Andrea Suriani
Mr. Rossi,
Congratulations on a successful independent verification of your E-Cat process!
Concerning the rules of the test, who set up the connections between the E-Cat reactor and the control box? For the December test it is evident that the experimenters did not, as the device was already running when that test began. But for the March test, were these connections established by the experimenters or by you or your associates?
Were the experimenters permitted to break these connections to insert test instruments, such as an ammeter, or to allow static measurements, such as the DC resistance of the heaters?
I know you had no control over the writing of the report, but I find it frustrating that it contains no diagram showing the electrical hookup between the various components, including the test instruments.
Regards,
Chris Beall
Dear Andrea Rossi,
The independent report speaks of the Dec test where the inner cylinder comprosed of SS 310 (melting point 1,454 degC) failed. Since the melting point of Nickel is 1,455 degC, would it not have been better to have used a titanium cylinder? Are there technical reasons why titanium was not used?
Dear Andrea it’s not easy to describe the growing enthusiasm in reading the report. Besides your personal success (and revenge) I think that this is the time for a grateful acknowledgment to Prof. Focardi who sustained a difficult role against the “mainstream science” pundits.
If now, as it shoud be, a good part of ITER funds, will be diverted to LENR applicative research, a really new era could start from your historical endeavour.
Thanks from all your first-time open minded supporters….
Dear Andrea,
It seems that there has been no activity in the list of communications with the European Patent Office since april 15.
Someone should inform them about the excellent report of the professors.
I hope that there is no further delay, eventually because of an appeal, since the examiner seems to have worked for your competitors in the past, and could have learnt there, from experiments and from proven theory, that low temperature nuclear reactions were impossible.
Once opinions and knowledge do resonate in the waves of the brain, they are very difficult to change. This is true for both the good and the bad.
I Hope you and your team are well. After the failure of the snakes and the elimination of controverse, some other hostile reactions and actions may appear.
Very kind regards,
Koen
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I think it’s time to stop call ourselves “believers” and others “skeptics”, it’s time to call ourselves “resistance” (stamina) and others “un-believers”! 😀
Mr.Herb Gillis
As Eng. Rossi said many times. What going on inside E-Cat is confidential.:)
You have to agree that IP is very important.
KD
It seems to me that you have devoted significant efforts during the last several months to continuing the improvement of the e-Cat, so you have achieved 1000+ temperatures (stable at around 350 degrees). Also, you have the new mouse/cat/tiger configuration which improves the stability and COP of the e-Cat. At the same time, deliveries of working plants have been slow, and it appears the ramp-up of production is conservative (to change the energy landscape thousands of plants per month must be manufactured). 1) Do you foresee that research to improve the e-Cat will continue to be your main goal for the rest of this year?. It seems to me that with an investment of around $100 million you could start mass production of the industrial e-Cats; 2) Is the commitment of your US partner of this size?
Dear Andrea Rossi, and (italian or who understand italian language) readers:
http://www.prometeon.it/news.php
The best wishes !
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Again congratulations for this milestone. Nobel price is minimum from this achievement. But as you say we have long way to go, lets keep on pushing further.
After reading full report it crossed my mind that since the reaction has this exponential runaway nature and you are trying to cope with it by working in lower end of possible working range.
Questions:
1) Have you tried to push ‘stable range’ to higher temperatures by pumping coolant through the reactor and adjusting pump power to control the runaway.
2) The report mentions that you are ‘teasing’ the reaction by modulating current to resistors with Triac producing secret waveform/frequency. Have you tried to alter that ‘teasing’ early stage in the brink of runaway to control the phenomenon.
Thank you for collaborating with us,
BR,
Argon
PS if needed more exotic waveforms, small 35€ credit card sized computers consuming few Watts can be used to generate them with ease.
Carissimo Andrea,
ho un sogno: una notte d’inverno, un caminetto (che, diciamocelo, come effetto scenico è ancora meglio di un e-cat) e mio figlio che racconta ai mei nipoti: “pensate che il nonno il 28 ottobre era là, guardate: queste sono le foto, e al minuto 4.30 di questo filmato lo si vede nel capannone… Gli ha stretto la mano e lo ha guardato negli occhi…”.
E i bambini, estasiati di avere avuto un nonno tanto fortunato, si addormentano felici e sognano il futuro che lei, Ingegnere, ha regalato loro…
Che bel sogno. Che bella realtà.
Grazie, Fabrizio.
(l’evento merita il mio inusuale semtimentalismo e il mio pessimo inglese)
Dear Andrea,
I have a dream; a winter night, a fireplace (always more scenographic than an e-cat) and my son who tells to my grandchildren: “October 28 grandpa was there, see, these are the pictures, and in this movie you can see he in the factory… He shook him hands and he looked into his eyes…”.
And the children of a so lucky grandfather fall asleep, and they dream the future you given them…
What a beautiful dream. What a beautiful reality.
Thank you, Fabrizio
Andrea Rossi:
Congratulations on your historic vindication! The third party report was very impressive confirmation.
I am wondering if you could now tell us what transmutations you think are responsible for most of the energy generated by the Ecat?
Regards; HRG.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I along with some thirty friends, to whom I have regularly reported over the past two long years, the developments of the extraordinary adventure of your E-Cat, want to thank you for your hard work and want to share with you our great satisfaction and joy for the publication of the third-party report with the confirmation of all your claims – con buona pace di tutti i soloni accademici (I can’t translate it).
Your exceptional scientific insight and your stubborn determination have made available to the present desperate human community the most unthinkable and providential “wonder of all time”: a clean, unlimited and low cost energy; a tool capable, if properly used, to project our world into a new global renaissance.
Thank you Mr. Rossi for ever.
Best Wishes,
Bruno & Friends
Dear Mr. Rossi, I’m astonished by the results of the report, as the whole world should be.
Not because of lack of trust about your previous results, but because I believe that from now on even the most rigid detractor will need to view under a different light your work.
I wish you the business success you deserve, but I also expect to see a much stronger involvement of the scientific community into LERN research. It’s time to divert a substantial amount of funds (maybe from the useless ITER) to better understand the physical principles beyond your invention.
I’ve been working in the energy field for almost 20 years, I expect to work for the next 20 around the new landscape that you are shaping.
Mr. Rossi
I was wondering if you might be able to talk about some of the specific results in the third party test.
The third party reviewers commented that the second test used your more advanced activation system. This system did not generate as high temperatures and had a lower COP (2.9). Has this been consistent with your experience?
Thank you for taking the time to answer my question
Brian
Dear Patrick Ellul:
No, not at all.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
You designed your reactor so that it is not very easy to access the chamber that houses the secret powders.
So essentially you put a constraint on your reactor design such that it is difficult to tamper with.
Question:
Do you think that if secrecy was not an issue and was not a constraint in the design of your reactor, then the design could be improved and made more effective and efficient, even by a little bit?
Best regards,
Patrick
Hi A.R.
This is on the first page on oilprice.com
http://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Rossi-Vindicated-E-Cat-Tested-by-Third-Party-Investigation.html.
Dear Andrea,
It’s great to see so many positive responses here. You must be very gratified.
Here’s something interesting from the Prometeon website: http://prometeon.it/news.php
Dr. Christos Stremmenos reports that he built his own reactor and brought it to your lab where it was charged with your nickel powder — and similar positive results to your own were measured.
Could you explain to readers more about this interesting development?
Best wishes,
Frank Acland
Dear Gian:
Thanks to you, yes we will do all to make this tech useful for the issues you listed.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Peter Fimmel:
Thank you, but I do not think our energies are such to make the job you said…even if NUclear is so UNclear…
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Manuel Cilia:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Gherardo:
Thank you; about what you say, today an important recognizement came from Forbes:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2013/05/20/finally-indipendent-testing-of-rossis-e-cat-cold-fusion-device-maybe-the-world-will-change-after-all/
Thanks ,
A.R.
Dear Michael Schneider:
Thanks to you.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
GRAZIE. GRAZIE DI TUTTO.
GRAZIE PER L’ITALIA CHE HAI ANCORA ONORATO.
GRAZIE PER I PIU’ POVERI DEL MONDO CHE POTRANNO AVERE UN FUTURO MIGLIORE.
CHE DIO (ECCO UN ALTRO DA RINGRAZIARE) CONTINUI AD AIUTARTI ED AD AIUTARCI
Dear Andrea Rossi,
This is a VERY special day. Thank you for the Upright spririt that guided you, allies againt all odds !! Keep it up that way & all the best,
Michael S
Dott.Rossi,
my best compliments for the confirmations you got on the cats !
You knew it, but when something is widely recognized by the community and honorable persons it has a different taste.
All the best, Gherardo
PS: thanks to you, I’m going to get an overdue pizza from a friend 🙂
Dear Mr Rossi,
Do you think you will able to improve on the results the tester obtained with higher COP with stable temps.
Thank you
Dear Dr. Rossi,
My congratulations to you for such a monumental contribution to nuclear physics, and its safe and practical utility. I regard your achievement as equal to that of heavier than air flight. Perhaps you have captured nuclear supersymmetry with the E-cat. Which, if it is, is perhaps the deepest symmetry in Nature.
Kind regards
Peter Fimmel
Dear Silvio Caggia:
Thank you!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Blanco 69:
I was sure that whatever the result, it surely had to be honest and really indipendent: none of the Professors are competitors, none made patents in competition with ours, all are totally indipendent from us under the economical point of view as well as economically indipendent from any competitor of us; they have no connections with our competitors, as we could certify. Their work has been hard, very conservative, professional and totally indipendent from us as well as our competitors and from big corporations or Government Entities that want to compete with us and made patents trying to copy us. This is why we trusted them to the point that we gave them our device leaving them totally free in a room deserted by us, at their complete disposal, where they did what they wanted without any limitation put by us. The sole limitation we put has been the impossibility to open the reactor and look at the internal structure of the E-Cat.
About the audience: I am receiving many beautiful comments, to each of which I want to answer with my personal thanks. Thank you!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Koen Vandewalle:
thank you for your suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Eric Ashworth,
Thank you,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Renato Estri:
I agree.
Warmest Regards,
A.R.
Dear captain:
OK,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Luca Salvarani:
Thank you, also for reminding Prof. Sergio Focardi: he has been revitalized by the Report.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Antenna:
Now more work: the Report is an encouragement to work more on all the uncomplete issues.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Howard Herrington:
Yes, you are right,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Daniel G. Zavela:
Thank you,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
The high quality of the third party, independent report was worth waiting for.
A very entertaining read as well as a scientifically informative report. Congratulations!
The six-month additional test that is planned for this year is good news, indeed.
I won’t hold my breath for the USA media to report these great test results.
It will probably take a Hot Cat with Siemens steam/electric turbine providing electricity to the entire city of Buffalo, New York for 5 years plus a 3-year DOE scientific study to get the attention of AP, Reuters, and the TV News Broadcasters.
You have made an amazing amount of progress in a very short time, Dr.Rossi.
You should ask your new boss for a bonus payment.
Wishing you continued great success.
Best Regards,
Daniel G. Zavela
Thank you for allowing us to follow your progress these last 2 years! I hope the COP found by the testers was as good as you had hoped. I know you had reservations about doing the test, but I hope the results are to you and your partners satisfaction.
Howard Herrington
Dear Andrea Rossi,
AWESOME! I have trusted your word from the day I first became aware of your work in 2010.
Perhaps now Champagne?
Congratulations!
Antenna
Congratulazioni. Questo report mi ha davvero emozionato cosi come anche le tue splendide parole per Sergio Focardi. Continua cosi.
Hi Andrea, remember … facts will speak for me!
The time has come.
Hot regards.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I would suggest to dedicate officially
this historic date 20th MAY 2013, that
will become a milestone day for the modern science,
in honor to the great Professor Sergio Focardi.
Renato Estri
Dear Andrea Rossi, Just read the independent 3rd party report. Great news, never doubted the performance of the e-cat. You are obviously onto another important level. Keep up the good, all the very best Eric Ashworth.
Dear Professors, Doctors, Engineers, and all the people who contributed to this historical event:
Congratulations on your excellent work !
One order of magnitude of proof ! 1000 %
It may be of some importance to mention that in both cases of the tests, the E-Cat HT and E-cat HT2 were in the state of “idling”, and thereby already performing that impressive.
Andrea,
If these devices get integrated in a sytem that is capable of controlled heat extraction, by means of cooling-fins with measured temperatures, IR reflection screens and flows of different densities, heat capacities and temperatures of coolants, the performance (Power and COP) might increase one order of magnitude again ?
I compare it with the performances of a modern car. When the engine is idling, it consumes infinite litres per 100km. When I drive my car in the first gear, and let the engine idle again, rolling slowly at some 5km/h, the consumption is about 25 litres per 100km. This way, the engine produces about 150 Watts of mechanical energy. But at 90 km/h, and in top gear, the engine consumes no more than 5 litres/100 km, producing some 30 kilowatts. Most engines have an optimal working point with minimum grams of fuel consumed per effective kWh (mech) produced. The performance at idling does not tell a lot of the performance at the optimal point.
So there might be a very good chance that the E-cat HT(2) performs even better when under (regulated) load.
Another analogy with the car engine is that if you push the accelerator when the gears are in neutral, thus wihtout a load, the first thing that happens is that all the power is used to accelerate the engine to the speed where the valves touch the piston and everything breaks.
So without a “load”, the E-cat HT heats too fast and melts. It is not only a matter of reaching a high temperature, but also a matter of extracting enough heat on a controlled way. The tests were in idle-mode, so it was very important not to push the device to temperatures where a forced cooling is needed to avoid a runaway. A forced (emergency) cooling would have spoiled all the measurements. But the numbers of the reports indicate that COP is better at higher temperatures, and that there is some exponential relationship.
So, as an engineer, I am very interested to see what the so called “flange” of the E-cat HT2 fits on. The stove that fits the fire.
Andrea, every opinion can be considered a resonance in the brain.
Kind Regards,
Koen
Congratulations Snr Rossi! I read the report today with joy in my heart. Can I ask you Sir, What were your hopes when you agreed to allow the tests? And who do you see as the audience of the report?