United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

 

uspto_seal_big

 

Sigillo

 

Alloro del brevetto

.

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

 

31,896 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warn Regards
    A.R.

  • Dear Andrea,

    Wishing Merry Christmas to you and Readers I am sending my newest blog issue:

    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/12/dec-23-2016-other-lenr.html

    Really warm regards!

    Peter

  • Andrea Rossi

    M.Sc. Enrico Billi:
    I’d not offer today my patents and IP to other enterpreneurs.
    Lavolale, Lavolale, no Vendele!
    Buon Natale e Buon Anno a te, amico mio,
    A.R.

  • Hello Andrea,
    i write to you to wish you Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.
    I also ask you what do you think about the new platforms set up by NASA (Technology Gateway and Spinoff Magazine) where they offer LENR patents to entrepreneurs.
    http://coldfusionnow.org/nasa-technology-gateway-spinoff-lenr-cold-fusion/

    Hope to read your reply soon, and do not forget
    “Lavolale lavolale”

    Enrico Billi

  • Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    Also today is a good day, thanks God.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Nibbius:
    confidential.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Samec:
    Thank you for the suggestion,
    Happy Christmas to you,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Nils Fryklund:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    DT:
    Degrees Of Freedom
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • DT

    Dear Andrea Rossi:
    I have been asked to give a definition of “spin” in max three words: can you help me?
    DT

  • Nils Fryklund

    Dear Andrea!
    Am I right when I think that at least one E-cat quark X has produced its approximate 20 W effect in 10 months on its originally fuel?
    Merry Christmas and a Happy new nuclearyear
    Nils Fryklund

  • Samec

    Dear E-Cat/LENR fans,
    President elect Donald J. Trump Wants To Know What We Want Done To Make America Great again.
    His office established special website here: http://tinyurl.com/zduae7b
    so You may write to Mr. Trump about next big thing: E-Cat & LENR generally. Launching functional tech will some shock for numbers of analysts, portfolio managers and CEOs, so it is important to not underestimate such situation.

    Happy Christmas for Dr. Rossi, his family, team members and all E-Cat fans.

  • Nibbius

    Dear Andrea Rossi,
    Which data are you monitoring to extablish the sigma value?
    Best Regards

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Dear Andrea,

    Today’s issue a bit slower and smaller than usual

    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/12/dec-22-2016-lenr-just-info.html

    All the best

    peter

  • Andrea Rossi

    Daniel G. Zavela:
    Thank you for the information,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Dear Dr. Rossi,

    Here’s a research report that you may find to be interesting.

    “ZT as high as 7.4 in hybrid MoS2/MoSe2 nanoribbons at 800K, creating a new record for ZT.”

    http://www.nextbigfuture.com/2016/12/new-thermoelectrics-with-zt-over-7.html#more

    Best Regards and Merry Christmas,

    Daniel G. Zavela

  • Andrea Rossi

    DT:
    My Attorneys do not want me to talk on the blogs about issues to be disclosed in Court.
    Merry Christmas to you and all my Russian friends,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Olen:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Olen

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Are further tests on course for the evolution of the low temperature E-Cats?
    Olen

  • DT

    Dear Andrea:
    Are the last documents deposited by IH in the Pacemaker positive or negative for you?
    From Russia, with love, Merry Christmas!
    DT

  • Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    We are working well, the Team is up also during these holidays.
    Merry Christmas and a Great 2017 to all our dear Readers !
    Andrea Rossi

  • Andrea Rossi

    Yrka:
    1- no
    2- no
    3- the COP will be disclosed when it will be presented.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Giuliano Bettini:
    Is a calculation based on the repetitivity of a series of data.
    Happy New Year to you,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Janne:
    I do not know.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Angelo V.:
    Not yet.
    Merry Christmas & Happy New Year to you,
    A.R.

  • Dear Ing. Rossi

    According with a previous comment of Hurley, approved from you:

    <>

    But your QuarkX is not only a scientific discovery but an industrial product almost ready to be used as a low cost source of heat.

    Referring to this page of Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Sigma) can you give us an estimation of expected DMPO (Defects per million opportunities) giving also a definition of what is an opportunities in the specific case of QuarkX? (e.g “operating hours” rather than “produced units”)

    Marry Christmas & Happy New Year

  • Janne

    Dear Andrea,

    If it took you 10 months to reach the current 3.5 Sigma, is it possible for you to reach 5 Sigma by February? In other words, is the presentation still on track to be held then?

    Best Regards,

    Janne

  • Giuliano Bettini

    Dear Andrea,
    quote:
    Pekka Janhunen
    December 21, 2016 at 2:48 AM
    Dear Andrea,
    The term sigma5 in this context is unclear to me. Which one of the following does it refer to:
    1/ Out of 3.5million time units (e.g., seconds) that it runs, it fails for one time unit?
    2/ Out of 3.5million units produced, one of them is faulty?
    3/ Something else?
    regards, /pekka

    Andrea Rossi
    December 21, 2016 at 1:02 PM
    Pekka Janhunen:
    No, it is a totally different issue, related to the repetition of the data from the units under R&D.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.
    I suppose that it’s possible to exactly define the term sigma5, just to avoid “the interactions between something and nothing”. 🙂
    “.. it is a totally different issue…” but, what is it?
    Kind regards, a happy new year,
    Giuliano Bettini.

  • Yrka

    Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi.
    1. Your desire to achieve 5 sigma is related to the theoretical basis originating in the quark-X nuclear reactions?
    2. This affects the design of the quark-X and pre-production?
    3. What today thermal effitsiency quark-X?
    Thank you for taking the time to answer.
    Merry Christmas, your wife and your team!
    Yury Isaev
    engineer
    Tyumen, Russia

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Dear Andrea,

    Here comes the Solstice day edition of EGO OUT:

    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/12/dec-21-2106-lenr-and-top-word-of-2016.html

    Sory for the typos- solstice is the fault.

    I like when the days are longer..

    All the best to you and Readers!

    Peter

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dr Joseph Fine:
    Thanks, interesting.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Pekka Janhunen:
    No, it is a totally different issue, related to the repetition of the data from the units under R&D.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Italo R.:
    We have our strategy. What you observe is not wrong, though.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    Also today a good job with the QuarkX.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Ing.Michelangelo De Meo:
    Thank you for the link.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Ing. Michelangelo De Meo

    Hello Dr. Rossi: here is an interesting document of the American DIA 2009.
    Defense Intelligence Agency
    Defense Analysis Report
    http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BarnhartBtechnology.pdf
    DIA-08-0911-003 13 November 2009
    Technology Forecast: Worldwide Research on Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions
    Increasing and Gaining Acceptance
    Scientists worldwide have been quietly investigating low-energy nuclear reactions
    (LENR) for the past 20 years. Researchers in this controversial field are now claiming
    paradigm-shifting results, including generation of large amounts of excess heat,
    nuclear activity and transmutation of ekments. Although no current theory exists
    to explain all the reported phenomena, some scientists now believe quantum-level
    nuclear reactions may be occurring. DIA assesses with high con fidence that if LENR
    can produce nuclear-origin energy at room temperatures, this disruptive technology
    could revolutionize energy production and storage, since nuclear reactions release
    millions of times more energy per unit mass than do any known chemical fuel.”

  • Italo R.

    Dear Dr. Rossi,
    reading various blogs, someone suggests, about the next test on QuankX, that the expert you choose will be important enough to attract investors, but not important enough to scare the economic and scientific world.

    In fact, if the test will appear absolutely confirmatory, there would be a race to massive funding towards your competitors.

    And soon they may overtake your research and could destroy what you’ve done, that till today requires more R&D.

    What do you think?

    Kind Regards,
    Italo R.

  • Dear Andrea,
    The term sigma5 in this context is unclear to me. Which one of the following does it refer to:
    1/ Out of 3.5million time units (e.g., seconds) that it runs, it fails for one time unit?
    2/ Out of 3.5million units produced, one of them is faulty?
    3/ Something else?
    regards, /pekka

  • Joseph Fine

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    In earlier messages, I sent information on various forms of Carbon.

    Apparently, a lot of improvements can result from adding a bit of Sodium.

    http://phys.org/news/2016-12-scientists-method-material-theory-real.html

    It’s amazing what you can do with carbon and sodium.

    Continuing regards,

    Joseph Fine

  • Andrea Rossi

    Koen Vandewalle:
    I am pretty sure there is no link between the QuarkX and the abnormal mass of the galaxies. About the interactions between something and nothing, I must confess to you I am not able to answer. About the basics of electrical and magnetic attraction, photons and gravitons all I know is what is explained in the Physics manuals.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dr Joseph Fine:
    10 months.
    Merry Christmas and a Great 2017 to you,
    A.R.

  • Joseph Fine

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    For the present test program, how much time did it take to reach the 3.5 sigma level?

    a) One week
    b) One month
    c) Six months
    d) One year
    e) Confidential

    Best wishes for a Merry Christmas and a Happy and Healthy New Year.

    Joseph Fine

  • Koen Vandewalle

    Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi,

    Do you think there is a link between the energy in the QuarkX and seemingly abnormal mass of galaxies?

    Especially since you write that QuarkX never ran out of fuel, which continues to intrigue.

    It seems appropriate that a common solution exists for all those phenomena that are difficult to explain. Especially now “infallible” is written: Simplicity in all the Complexity would be really Divine.

    You’re also very quiet about the propelling force that had occurred in some cases. It links both phenomena.

    We must take into account that those who have optimized the current models, were mainly concerned with explanations for other phenomena.

    I’d really like to know how you understand a basic electrical attraction, magnetic attraction, a photon and gravitation. Preferably expressed in two substances that interact: something and nothing.

    If you have time, of course.

    Kind Regards,
    Koen

  • Andrea Rossi

    Adam Yates:
    5Sigma is an R&D issue. The time of an R&D is difficult to foresee.
    Quality control of an industrial production is a different issue.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>