Dr. Rossi: What is the purpose of your upcoming test/presentation/demonstration? I cannot see any difference between this demonstration and all your previous successful public tests. Do you not agree the only demonstration that will count will be a customer showing economic benefits of your reactors? Thanks for answering our questions.
Dear Andrea Rossi:
I enjoyed a lot today with my family and friends the dialogue between “Galileus” and “Andrea”. Genial.
May God bless your work in this new year,
Warm Regards,
DT
Many Happy New Year Wishes to yourself and your excellent team.
Thank you for continuing to answer as many of our endless questions as you reasonably can.
I hope that this coming year will bring you the success that you deserve for your perseverance and hard work – as you said to Galileo “mainly try and error, lot of work”!
Do you think that in February you will be able to reveal any details of the Quark-x industrial plant?
Rod Stringer:
I have the feeling to know what you mean when you say “I know the feeling”.
Thank you for your sympathy.
God bless you and all our Readers,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
your goal Was to show the Quark-X by February, with the current state of things do you think the date will be respected or you (we) can have a small delay?
Best Regards, Giuseppe
Buck:
We did not yet decide the particulars. Many issues have to be taken in consideration until we are not ready for the commercialization in mass.
Same Wishes to you
A.R.
An interesting dream! Strange things happen at the intersection of wakefulness and sleep.
I wish you (and your team) all the best for the new year. It would be nice to hear more about (from?) your team, at some point. It must be very exciting for them to be part of something of this magnitude, working with new phenomena, seeing such extraordinary things.
I have long wondered why you keep up this website, answering so many questions, some of them impertinent or disrespectful, many of them naive. But I have learned that you usually answer questions truthfully and respectfully, and you generally find a way to say what you mean, despite being limited in what you can say. And you have repeatedly said “Thank you for your sustain.” Which I take to mean that you appreciate the interest and support from your readers, that our support of you is valuable to you. If that is our real contribution, then it is a pleasure to be able to make it.
While most of us are not able to make technical contributions, it is within our grasp to make sure that you are supported and appreciated while you do your work, that you have some grounding in a community of people who want you to succeed. Dr. Victor Frankl once said something along the lines of “I want to be a doctor, but remain a person.” I think you want to be an inventor, and are therefore consumed by your work, but want to remain a person, which means you need to be in touch with other people, that you can’t give away too much information but you still need to talk about what you do. Science is, paradoxically, an area where one spends a lot of time immersed in work, and is at the same time an intensely social activity. It doesn’t work if one doesn’t read and talk about what others are doing, and it won’t work if one doesn’t get the social support one needs.
Anyway, a lot of words to say that when you say “Thank you for your sustain,” I say “I know what you mean!”
Ron Stringer
Vance Neitzke:
This New Year Eve night I didn’t sleep, too many issues to think about, but, during that limbo status between to be awake and to be sleeping, I attended this dialogue by two characters: Galileo (G) and Andrea (A).
G- what the heck are you doing ?
A- testing the QuarkX
G- what is it ?
A- not your business
G- don’t worry, I am not a spy, just curious: what is it for ?
A- make heat
G- not much of an invention
A- make a lot of heat
G- still not much of an invention
A- make a lot of heat with a bit of energy respect the heat produced
G- now, that’s interesting
A- yep
G- for example, how much units of heat with , say, ten of the same units of supply ?
A- more than one hundred
G- that’s crazy: you kidding ?
A- nope
G- how did you invent it ?
A- mainly try and error, lot of work
G- I know the feeling
A- what do you do in the life ?
G- my life in this Earth is long past. At those times I discovered that the Earth was orbiting around the Sun, not viceversa, but most of all I estabilished a new scientific method to make science, based on experiments instead of speculations
A- that’s nice
G- official science tried to roast me for all that
A- I know the feeling
G- what do you dream to do with that gadget ?
A- make billions of them to make energy without pollution and with strong economic advantages: also, to reduce the global warming
G- what the heck is the global warming ?
A- forget it
G- when do you think you will start to produce that gadget, to start the route that will bring to make billions of them?
A- in this very beginning year, this is my very strong dream right now
G- how are going the experiments ?
A- well
G- do you know the theoretical bases the gadget works upon ?
A- working on that, I got good ideas, but I privilege the experimental activity
G- I know the feeling. Fire has been used for thousands of years before its chemical and physical theoretical bases have been discovered
A- yeah, but you know what Dante wrote: ” fatti non foste a viver come bruti, ma per seguir virtute e conoscienza”
G- all right, good luck and beware not to be roasted
A- you bet
A DRAMATICALLY WONDERFUL 2017 TO ALL OUR DEAR READERS !
Andrea Rossi
I look forward to 2017 with the hope fostered by your upcoming demonstration.
Do you think your demonstration will result in main stream media attention and follow through stories on the e-Cat and QuarkX? Are you structuring the demonstration with sufficient information such as COP, $/kw, and $/kwh to point towards how compelling LENR and the QuarkX is to the market?
my best wishes for all on this first day of the new year.
Have you employed a commercial product designer to package your E-Cat QuarkX for your upcoming presentation in February or will your E-Caat QuarkX look more like a laboratory bench top unit versus a commercial product?
Happy New Year 2017 and best of luck with your important work.
JPR:
After the usual sting playing tennis with my wife, I am back on the QuarkX, which is working very well also this first day of the year 2017.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
In your answers to Sustainers and Stephen you have given us much more than dreams, Thank you!
Positive news and hope that finally 2017 will be THE YEAR THE WORLD CHANGED, f8.
The very best to you and your team in the next very important months, also that finally your tennis improves.
Best regards
Luis
Sustainers:
Thank you, the sustain we got from you all has been extremely important and nobody more than me can feel how responsible I am toward you.
This 2017 incoming year will probably make true the dreams of the year 2016.
Something important is probably going to happen, but much work is still to be done.
I hope God bless you all,
A.R.
Stephen:
First and foremost, thank you for your sustain and your wishes, so precious.
Yes, more tests with more series of QuarkX will follow, but if the test on course will end up well, we’ll push on the industrialization.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea I wish all the best to you, your team, your various supportive contacts both for theory and engineering and your all your steady supporters who follow your work a great Christmas Season and a special new year.
I think 2016 has been amazing there have been burdens and difficulties but I get the feeling that deep down in the important real technology huge progress has been made.
I hope 2017 brings more amazing insights.
I have a couple questions if I may. You mentioned that current testing has been with 3 ecat quarkXs. This makes good sense to me in initial development when fine tuning your device and to simplify testing and reduce potential variables.
Do you plan in a later test phase to test performance with many concurrent quarkXs?
Or would testing large numbers of quarks only be required to test certain configurations before manufacture of complete systems and deployment?
I think 2017 has huge potential to be a breakthrough year for so many fields certainly in break through technologies but even in other well established fields of science. I’m looking forward to it.
Jo:
Yes: when the temperature raises above the mass of an elementary particle waves are formed in its field corresponding to that elementary particle.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Terence:
Spinpolarizability is the ability to form instantaneous dipoles.It affects the response to interactions with external fields.
We are studying its effects.
Warm Regards
A.R.
I did my graduate work study at USC under Dr. Hellworth and studied Q-Switch theory and Laser Theory. Very simply, if an optical gain media (properly pumped) is in a low-Q resonator and the resonator can be very rapidly switched to a high-Q resonator, then the stored available energy can be released in a very brief pulse, generating a so-called Q-Switched laser pulse. Such pulses are on the order of 20 nanoseconds depending on the laser material, the resonator design, etc. So, for example, if the optical energy released was 1 Joule over a 20 nanosecond pulse, then the effective optical power will be 50 MW.
Similarly, a 100 W LENR, operating for a year will produce about 30+ MJ of energy. So there is a lot of energy within an LENR material.
Analogously, if a LENR reaction can be controlled by the application of electromagnetic waves (the assumption) then it should be possible to delay the initiation of the LENR reaction, by either not applying the needed electromagnetic radiation or applying electromagnetic radiation at a specified frequency, with the result to drive the LENR media to near where it will yield an excess heat condition and then apply (or remove) the controlling electromagnetic waves at the correct frequency and with a large enough intensity to avalanche the reaction into a thermal “pulse” – that is, an immediate release of the available thermal energy in a short period of time. If a significant percentage of the available energy in the LENR reaction could be efficiently released in a few milliseconds of so, a significant event would occur. If the LENR response time is much faster than the time it takes for the LENR material to fail (e.g. to melt), then such an event might be possible.
I understand that your control mechanisms and software will prevent such an event from occurring. My question comes down to whether the time responses of the Rossi Effect can lend themselves to such an event?
Dr.Rossi and Readers, blood has 4 parts, red cells white cells Platelets and Plasma.
At OneBlood Center I have donated Platelets 4 times.
I received a Gift Card for 40 dollars.
I am going to donate 6 more times, I will receive a 60 dollar Gift Card.
For every 10 dollars I get a free large pizza with 4 toppings.
You can buy other things, with the Gift Card.
There is another center CSL Plasma, where you can donate Plasma only.
The reward for Plasma is much more then Platelets
You can donate Platelets once a week, Plasma twice a week.
Cancer patients have a constant need for Platelets.
At OneBlood, you can be any age over 18. However they are only located in Florida.
At CSL Plasme you must be 18 to 65.
They have 120 Centers all across the US plus 6 Centers in Germany.
If you are interested in more information send me an email, with the name of your US City, or if you live in Germany. BOBBYCURTO@WEBTV.NET
Robert Curto
Ft. Lauderdale Florida
USA
Dr. Rossi: What is the purpose of your upcoming test/presentation/demonstration? I cannot see any difference between this demonstration and all your previous successful public tests. Do you not agree the only demonstration that will count will be a customer showing economic benefits of your reactors? Thanks for answering our questions.
DT:
Thank you for your continuous support.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi:
I enjoyed a lot today with my family and friends the dialogue between “Galileus” and “Andrea”. Genial.
May God bless your work in this new year,
Warm Regards,
DT
Martyn Aubrey:
Thank you for your kind comment.
Answer: I think so.
All the best to you,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi,
Many Happy New Year Wishes to yourself and your excellent team.
Thank you for continuing to answer as many of our endless questions as you reasonably can.
I hope that this coming year will bring you the success that you deserve for your perseverance and hard work – as you said to Galileo “mainly try and error, lot of work”!
Do you think that in February you will be able to reveal any details of the Quark-x industrial plant?
All the best for 2017, and beyond.
Festive Regards,
Martyn Aubrey
Luis Navarro:
I will pass your comment on to Galileo as soon as I meet him again.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Thoroughly enjoyed the dialogue between Galileo and Andrea. Thank you!
Best
Luis
Rod Stringer:
I have the feeling to know what you mean when you say “I know the feeling”.
Thank you for your sympathy.
God bless you and all our Readers,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Giuseppe:
I think we will do this by Feb
Warm Regards
A.R.
Ken:
Thank you for your attention,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Robert Curto:
Thank you for your attention,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Your dream is wonderful.
Awakening should be so also
Here is my first blog issue for 2017:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/01/jan-01-2017-lenr-first-day-of-year.html
Much health, happinessand accomplishment of all wishes to you!
Peter
Dr. Rossi, very clever !
I enjoyed the dialogue between (G) and (A)
Robert Curto
Ft. Lauderdale Florida
USA
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Thank you for the very intelligent dialogue with Galileus: here comes up your Italian heritage.
Dear Andrea,
your goal Was to show the Quark-X by February, with the current state of things do you think the date will be respected or you (we) can have a small delay?
Best Regards, Giuseppe
Daniel G. Zavela:
Surely the design will be an issue.
Many Wishes to you,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Buck:
We did not yet decide the particulars. Many issues have to be taken in consideration until we are not ready for the commercialization in mass.
Same Wishes to you
A.R.
And of course I meant to say “I know the feeling!”
An interesting dream! Strange things happen at the intersection of wakefulness and sleep.
I wish you (and your team) all the best for the new year. It would be nice to hear more about (from?) your team, at some point. It must be very exciting for them to be part of something of this magnitude, working with new phenomena, seeing such extraordinary things.
I have long wondered why you keep up this website, answering so many questions, some of them impertinent or disrespectful, many of them naive. But I have learned that you usually answer questions truthfully and respectfully, and you generally find a way to say what you mean, despite being limited in what you can say. And you have repeatedly said “Thank you for your sustain.” Which I take to mean that you appreciate the interest and support from your readers, that our support of you is valuable to you. If that is our real contribution, then it is a pleasure to be able to make it.
While most of us are not able to make technical contributions, it is within our grasp to make sure that you are supported and appreciated while you do your work, that you have some grounding in a community of people who want you to succeed. Dr. Victor Frankl once said something along the lines of “I want to be a doctor, but remain a person.” I think you want to be an inventor, and are therefore consumed by your work, but want to remain a person, which means you need to be in touch with other people, that you can’t give away too much information but you still need to talk about what you do. Science is, paradoxically, an area where one spends a lot of time immersed in work, and is at the same time an intensely social activity. It doesn’t work if one doesn’t read and talk about what others are doing, and it won’t work if one doesn’t get the social support one needs.
Anyway, a lot of words to say that when you say “Thank you for your sustain,” I say “I know what you mean!”
Ron Stringer
Vance Neitzke:
This New Year Eve night I didn’t sleep, too many issues to think about, but, during that limbo status between to be awake and to be sleeping, I attended this dialogue by two characters: Galileo (G) and Andrea (A).
G- what the heck are you doing ?
A- testing the QuarkX
G- what is it ?
A- not your business
G- don’t worry, I am not a spy, just curious: what is it for ?
A- make heat
G- not much of an invention
A- make a lot of heat
G- still not much of an invention
A- make a lot of heat with a bit of energy respect the heat produced
G- now, that’s interesting
A- yep
G- for example, how much units of heat with , say, ten of the same units of supply ?
A- more than one hundred
G- that’s crazy: you kidding ?
A- nope
G- how did you invent it ?
A- mainly try and error, lot of work
G- I know the feeling
A- what do you do in the life ?
G- my life in this Earth is long past. At those times I discovered that the Earth was orbiting around the Sun, not viceversa, but most of all I estabilished a new scientific method to make science, based on experiments instead of speculations
A- that’s nice
G- official science tried to roast me for all that
A- I know the feeling
G- what do you dream to do with that gadget ?
A- make billions of them to make energy without pollution and with strong economic advantages: also, to reduce the global warming
G- what the heck is the global warming ?
A- forget it
G- when do you think you will start to produce that gadget, to start the route that will bring to make billions of them?
A- in this very beginning year, this is my very strong dream right now
G- how are going the experiments ?
A- well
G- do you know the theoretical bases the gadget works upon ?
A- working on that, I got good ideas, but I privilege the experimental activity
G- I know the feeling. Fire has been used for thousands of years before its chemical and physical theoretical bases have been discovered
A- yeah, but you know what Dante wrote: ” fatti non foste a viver come bruti, ma per seguir virtute e conoscienza”
G- all right, good luck and beware not to be roasted
A- you bet
A DRAMATICALLY WONDERFUL 2017 TO ALL OUR DEAR READERS !
Andrea Rossi
Happy New Year Dr. Rossi
I look forward to 2017 with the hope fostered by your upcoming demonstration.
Do you think your demonstration will result in main stream media attention and follow through stories on the e-Cat and QuarkX? Are you structuring the demonstration with sufficient information such as COP, $/kw, and $/kwh to point towards how compelling LENR and the QuarkX is to the market?
my best wishes for all on this first day of the new year.
Dear Dr. Rossi:
Have you employed a commercial product designer to package your E-Cat QuarkX for your upcoming presentation in February or will your E-Caat QuarkX look more like a laboratory bench top unit versus a commercial product?
Happy New Year 2017 and best of luck with your important work.
Best Regards,
Daniel G. Zavela
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
In 2016 you published here your New year Eve dream: what did you dream during this New Year Eve night?
JPR:
After the usual sting playing tennis with my wife, I am back on the QuarkX, which is working very well also this first day of the year 2017.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Luis Navarro:
A new Dream is coming later, from a long night of the 2017 Eve…
The very best also to you,
A.R.
Hugo:
Thank you and same Wishes to you and again to all our readers for a Great 2017,
Andrea
Happy New Year, Andrea.
I want to wish you good luck with your project in 2017.
Sincerely,
Hugo
Dear Andrea,
In your answers to Sustainers and Stephen you have given us much more than dreams, Thank you!
Positive news and hope that finally 2017 will be THE YEAR THE WORLD CHANGED, f8.
The very best to you and your team in the next very important months, also that finally your tennis improves.
Best regards
Luis
First update of 2017?
Happy New Year!
JPR
Sustainers:
Thank you, the sustain we got from you all has been extremely important and nobody more than me can feel how responsible I am toward you.
This 2017 incoming year will probably make true the dreams of the year 2016.
Something important is probably going to happen, but much work is still to be done.
I hope God bless you all,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Wishing the new year brings tremendous joy and good luck that takes you to
newer heights of success and desired results.
Happy New Year 2017
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link.
Again the strongest Wishes for a Great 2017,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
This is indeed the last EGO OT issue for 2016;
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/12/dec-31-2016-lenr-ego-out-wishes-you.html
Happy New Year to you, yours and all the readers!
Coming a great 2017!
Yours sincerely
peter
Stephen:
First and foremost, thank you for your sustain and your wishes, so precious.
Yes, more tests with more series of QuarkX will follow, but if the test on course will end up well, we’ll push on the industrialization.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea I wish all the best to you, your team, your various supportive contacts both for theory and engineering and your all your steady supporters who follow your work a great Christmas Season and a special new year.
I think 2016 has been amazing there have been burdens and difficulties but I get the feeling that deep down in the important real technology huge progress has been made.
I hope 2017 brings more amazing insights.
I have a couple questions if I may. You mentioned that current testing has been with 3 ecat quarkXs. This makes good sense to me in initial development when fine tuning your device and to simplify testing and reduce potential variables.
Do you plan in a later test phase to test performance with many concurrent quarkXs?
Or would testing large numbers of quarks only be required to test certain configurations before manufacture of complete systems and deployment?
I think 2017 has huge potential to be a breakthrough year for so many fields certainly in break through technologies but even in other well established fields of science. I’m looking forward to it.
All,the best to all of you
Stephen
Jo:
Yes: when the temperature raises above the mass of an elementary particle waves are formed in its field corresponding to that elementary particle.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonymous:
Again one billion of Wishes for a Great 2017 to all our Readres,
Andrea Rossi and all the Team of Leonardo Corporation
JPR:
Last update of the Year 2016: thank God is good,
Happy new Year to all our Readers!
Andrea Rossi
Terence:
Spinpolarizability is the ability to form instantaneous dipoles.It affects the response to interactions with external fields.
We are studying its effects.
Warm Regards
A.R.
H:
Thank you for your sustain,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Robert Curto:
Thank you for the information.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven N. Karels:
Thank you for your insight. We work differently.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I did my graduate work study at USC under Dr. Hellworth and studied Q-Switch theory and Laser Theory. Very simply, if an optical gain media (properly pumped) is in a low-Q resonator and the resonator can be very rapidly switched to a high-Q resonator, then the stored available energy can be released in a very brief pulse, generating a so-called Q-Switched laser pulse. Such pulses are on the order of 20 nanoseconds depending on the laser material, the resonator design, etc. So, for example, if the optical energy released was 1 Joule over a 20 nanosecond pulse, then the effective optical power will be 50 MW.
Similarly, a 100 W LENR, operating for a year will produce about 30+ MJ of energy. So there is a lot of energy within an LENR material.
Analogously, if a LENR reaction can be controlled by the application of electromagnetic waves (the assumption) then it should be possible to delay the initiation of the LENR reaction, by either not applying the needed electromagnetic radiation or applying electromagnetic radiation at a specified frequency, with the result to drive the LENR media to near where it will yield an excess heat condition and then apply (or remove) the controlling electromagnetic waves at the correct frequency and with a large enough intensity to avalanche the reaction into a thermal “pulse” – that is, an immediate release of the available thermal energy in a short period of time. If a significant percentage of the available energy in the LENR reaction could be efficiently released in a few milliseconds of so, a significant event would occur. If the LENR response time is much faster than the time it takes for the LENR material to fail (e.g. to melt), then such an event might be possible.
I understand that your control mechanisms and software will prevent such an event from occurring. My question comes down to whether the time responses of the Rossi Effect can lend themselves to such an event?
Dr.Rossi and Readers, blood has 4 parts, red cells white cells Platelets and Plasma.
At OneBlood Center I have donated Platelets 4 times.
I received a Gift Card for 40 dollars.
I am going to donate 6 more times, I will receive a 60 dollar Gift Card.
For every 10 dollars I get a free large pizza with 4 toppings.
You can buy other things, with the Gift Card.
There is another center CSL Plasma, where you can donate Plasma only.
The reward for Plasma is much more then Platelets
You can donate Platelets once a week, Plasma twice a week.
Cancer patients have a constant need for Platelets.
At OneBlood, you can be any age over 18. However they are only located in Florida.
At CSL Plasme you must be 18 to 65.
They have 120 Centers all across the US plus 6 Centers in Germany.
If you are interested in more information send me an email, with the name of your US City, or if you live in Germany. BOBBYCURTO@WEBTV.NET
Robert Curto
Ft. Lauderdale Florida
USA
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
May the 2017 bring the QuarkX to the world!
Dr Andrea Rossi,
What do you think of spinpolarizability? Do you think it can make any sense to explain your effect?
Cheers,
Terence
Last update of 2016?
Happy New Year!
JPR
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Happy New Year to you and to all the Readers of the JoNP !
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Is there a relation between temperature and elementary particles, apart the nuclear fusion?
Thanks,
Jo