I imagine you are very focused on the e-cat SKL these days. But.
The recent issues with the Corona virus makes me wonder if the e-cat or one of its derivatives could help mitigate these kinds of issues in the future.
This might be best targeted at medical use or where people are dense clusters.
Obviously readily available power and thermal heat when and where it is needed is already a plus.
But thinking about the E-cat SK. If I recall right It generates a lot of Intense and localized UV that is then thermalised.
Could we have a e-cat derivative a kind of e-cat SK UV. That generates this intense UV that can then be used to sterilize equipment and the environment.
It would depend I suppose if it was better to have this UV source directly. Or indirectly generated from a UV lamp generated by electricity. The advantage of the e-cat might be greater intensity more localized source that is also broad spectrum rather than at particular wave lengths.
How could it be used:
1. Doctors are in the frontline doing a critical job. That we depend on. Their equipment and clothing could be regularly and easily sterilized with a small local and portable device. Hope fully protecting them and reducing the risk of contamination in a vulnerable environment.
2. It could be incorporated in air conditioning to clean the air which would be important if it’s air born.
3. It could be included in water supply and sanitary piping hopefully reducing the risk of contamination in appartment blocks or other places such as working environments, schools and hospitals where water born contamination through piping could occur.
4. Food could be treated especially where it is centrally processed, in a canteen or th food manufactur.
I guess there are others.
It might have other benefits outside this Health type crisis especially when combined with heat and power for waste management and recycling. Whether that’s food, water, air, or materials such as plastics and metals. Perhaps even Carbon dioxide splitting that might be useful in some cases such as in the Space station or nano carbon production technologies.
I wonder if it worth considering? Or even possible?
Dear Dr. Rossi,
Great news! So after updating the software with the new component, there should be no obstacles to running the test.
1 – Has the test already started?
2 – At the end of the test (presumably by the end of March as said), will a generic statement on the outcome (positive, negative) be issued before the demonstration?
3 – Will the demonstration physically show the SKL?
4 – In this case, will the reactor be shown switched off or in operation?
Dear Andrea,
Congratulations with your progress!
Now you have solved the reliability problem, can you give an estimate when a presentation of the SKL can be expected?
Thanks, kind regards, Gerard
Dear Readers:
Here is what I do to place a comment:
Step 1: Go to JoNP website.
Step 2: Scroll down below picture of the US Patent
Step 3: Click on the 24,xxx Comments link
Step 4: Scroll down to the bottom of the page
Step 5: Type my question in the ‘Leave a Comment’ box
Step 6: Fill in my name and email address
Step 7: Click the ‘leave a comment’ button.
That’s it. I have never had a problem doing this on any computer I have used.
Dear Andrea,
One strange idea came to my mind after a heady weekend that is not directly connected with scientific issues but with your future presentation.
There are two options exists. The first option. You are tired to wait when ECAT SKL will be fully ready for industrial implementation, and you are ready to present the most preliminary positive results just now, and only then, without haste, bring it to mind. This is quite enough for the scientific community. For greater effect and to gather more interested parties, including those who can finance your development, the presentation can be held in some more convenient place – in France or Italy (Switzerland is also suitable), preferably on the coast, in Nice, for example.
After all, the most important thing you have already done by creating the previous version of the ECAT, and the novel one. Thereby you have removed psychological clamps from all of us and now we can potentially create something similar or even better by other methods and in other scientific areas (transmutation of elements, antigravity, generation of anti-entropic flows, novel materials, etc.) And we don’t even need to know all your know-how at that case. We thank you for that.
The second option – everything is ready and independent expert commission conducted successful tests of ECAT SKL and gave a positive conclusion for the start of production and industrial implementation. In this case you do not need to conduct any public presentation in Stockholm to receive additional support – it will be enough presentation on the internet. Especially, if you show your top secret team from afar. In addition you will save a lot of money.
Best regards,
Aleksei
Hi Andrea, I know that you haven’t used the term “F9” for a while, but you coined the term on this blog, and it was shorthand to mean “the results of the test could be positive or negative.”
Anyway the silly short musical film written about the term “F9” will be screened at the Toronto GeekFest Festival on Friday evening, and they were nice enough to invite me to attend. I wanted to extend the invitation to any Toronto-based readers of your blog.
if these informations are not confidentials, can you say us which langage are you using to program the e-catSKL’s controller and how many instructions are necessary to do it or the capacity of the used rom memory.
@Eric Ashworth: My reply is “I think we are in agreement that one successful demonstration is enough for claiming the phenomenon exists. My concern is when the first demonstration results in a failure, the expert or person has to consider how many times further demonstrations result in failure that the expert declare not to wait and claim the demonstration is a failure. My paper says that if the expert starts from not knowing whether the phenomenon exists or not (with a probability of a half), then for 95% confidence level, the expert should wait for at least 5 trials for a successful demonstration. If none of the 5 trials result in any successful demonstration, then the expert is entitled to claim that the demonstration has failed with 95% confidence level and leave. Otherwise, if any one of the 5 trials is a success, then the demonstration is considered as a success. I hope this clarifies the issue. Thank you.”
Thank you Andrea for you great efforts.
I am having trouble understanding how software can be running in your 10x10x10cm cube.
This would require a tiny microcontroller of FPGA module which must be supplied with constant voltage.
That seems at odds with the fact that it runs closed loop, as you say.
Such a device would be revolutionary, even forgetting the energy generation aspects.
You must have the very finest engineers on the planet.
I believe these people must be very proud of your collective work, and would be anxious to make their contributions known.
Will you ask at least one of your team to come public and vouch for the fact that they are working for you?
That would do wonders to help progress your acceptance.
If I was working for you I would be so proud and would do anything to help.
Dear Readers:
I have received from many of you emails that complain that they do not succeed to send comments to this blog.
Here are the instructions how to send a comment to this blog, step by step:
1- go to http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com
2- click on “Recent Posts”
3- Click on “United States Patent…”
4- go to the bottom of it and click “Leave a replay”
5- fill up name and email address ( not obligatory, if you want use a nickname )
6- Go to “post comment”
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Bob Belovich:
I do not understand your questions.
Please rephrase,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Stephen:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Stephen:
He,he,he…
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hi Andrea
Some fun…. can the e-cat SKL do this?
https://www.bbc.com/news/av/technology-51360646/robot-blocks-leap-roll-and-climb-to-work-together
Best Regards
Stephen
Dear Andrea
I imagine you are very focused on the e-cat SKL these days. But.
The recent issues with the Corona virus makes me wonder if the e-cat or one of its derivatives could help mitigate these kinds of issues in the future.
This might be best targeted at medical use or where people are dense clusters.
Obviously readily available power and thermal heat when and where it is needed is already a plus.
But thinking about the E-cat SK. If I recall right It generates a lot of Intense and localized UV that is then thermalised.
Could we have a e-cat derivative a kind of e-cat SK UV. That generates this intense UV that can then be used to sterilize equipment and the environment.
It would depend I suppose if it was better to have this UV source directly. Or indirectly generated from a UV lamp generated by electricity. The advantage of the e-cat might be greater intensity more localized source that is also broad spectrum rather than at particular wave lengths.
How could it be used:
1. Doctors are in the frontline doing a critical job. That we depend on. Their equipment and clothing could be regularly and easily sterilized with a small local and portable device. Hope fully protecting them and reducing the risk of contamination in a vulnerable environment.
2. It could be incorporated in air conditioning to clean the air which would be important if it’s air born.
3. It could be included in water supply and sanitary piping hopefully reducing the risk of contamination in appartment blocks or other places such as working environments, schools and hospitals where water born contamination through piping could occur.
4. Food could be treated especially where it is centrally processed, in a canteen or th food manufactur.
I guess there are others.
It might have other benefits outside this Health type crisis especially when combined with heat and power for waste management and recycling. Whether that’s food, water, air, or materials such as plastics and metals. Perhaps even Carbon dioxide splitting that might be useful in some cases such as in the Space station or nano carbon production technologies.
I wonder if it worth considering? Or even possible?
Best Regards
Stephen
Deaer Andrea Rossi
Congratulations to you and your team on developing the software to make the Ecat SKL operate with adequate reliability.
Can you answer these questions?
1. Has your research tended to a. support
b. oppose
c. have no application
to string theory?
2. Has your research tended to a. support
b. oppose
c. have no application
to the theory of the existence of the axion particle as a constituent of dark matter?
Many thanks to your and your team for developing and explaining an understanding of the physical world.
Bob Belovich
Chuck Davis:
It depends on the situations
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, Do you think that a switch like this
https://www.amazon.com/Generac-RXSW200A3-Smart-Transfer-Switch/dp/B0745H7CHL
would be used to connect the ecat with the grid as backup?
Warm regards,
Chuck Davis
Frank Acland:
This means that we are on the right track.
By the way, we continue to find more evidence of the validity of the theoretical system explained in
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Prof:
Thank you for repeating the instructions!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gerard McEk:
As soon as possible.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Sam:
Great
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Italo R.:
1 We will give information about the test during the presentation
2 I don’t think so
3 yes
4 in operation
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
Great news! So after updating the software with the new component, there should be no obstacles to running the test.
1 – Has the test already started?
2 – At the end of the test (presumably by the end of March as said), will a generic statement on the outcome (positive, negative) be issued before the demonstration?
3 – Will the demonstration physically show the SKL?
4 – In this case, will the reactor be shown switched off or in operation?
Kind Regards,
Italo R.
Hello DR Rossi
Good to hear the ECat SKL Concerto
Software is working properly.
https://youtu.be/OaNBa4HsqOU
Regards
Sam
Dear Andrea,
Congratulations with your progress!
Now you have solved the reliability problem, can you give an estimate when a presentation of the SKL can be expected?
Thanks, kind regards, Gerard
Dear Readers:
Here is what I do to place a comment:
Step 1: Go to JoNP website.
Step 2: Scroll down below picture of the US Patent
Step 3: Click on the 24,xxx Comments link
Step 4: Scroll down to the bottom of the page
Step 5: Type my question in the ‘Leave a Comment’ box
Step 6: Fill in my name and email address
Step 7: Click the ‘leave a comment’ button.
That’s it. I have never had a problem doing this on any computer I have used.
Dear Andrea,
Good news that the component is working! What does this mean for the third party testing and upcoming presentation?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Randy Miller:
This is confidential
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Cool.
Which programming language Did You use for that ?
Best regards
Randy.
Randy Miller:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
We are using it now and it works.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I think maybe Randy Miller is asking ‘for how long has the new software component been in existence?’
Have you been using it yet?
Best regards,
Frank Acland
Mr. Rossi.
You talked about a “totally new component”, which needed to be invented…
Then You answered Aclaknd, that You are resolving all the problems.
From this I infered, that You have already coded that software component.
Is this true ?
Best regards
Randy.
Dear Andrea,
One strange idea came to my mind after a heady weekend that is not directly connected with scientific issues but with your future presentation.
There are two options exists. The first option. You are tired to wait when ECAT SKL will be fully ready for industrial implementation, and you are ready to present the most preliminary positive results just now, and only then, without haste, bring it to mind. This is quite enough for the scientific community. For greater effect and to gather more interested parties, including those who can finance your development, the presentation can be held in some more convenient place – in France or Italy (Switzerland is also suitable), preferably on the coast, in Nice, for example.
After all, the most important thing you have already done by creating the previous version of the ECAT, and the novel one. Thereby you have removed psychological clamps from all of us and now we can potentially create something similar or even better by other methods and in other scientific areas (transmutation of elements, antigravity, generation of anti-entropic flows, novel materials, etc.) And we don’t even need to know all your know-how at that case. We thank you for that.
The second option – everything is ready and independent expert commission conducted successful tests of ECAT SKL and gave a positive conclusion for the start of production and industrial implementation. In this case you do not need to conduct any public presentation in Stockholm to receive additional support – it will be enough presentation on the internet. Especially, if you show your top secret team from afar. In addition you will save a lot of money.
Best regards,
Aleksei
Thomas Florek:
He,he,he…congratulations !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Randy Miller:
What do you mean ?
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Mr. Rossi.
Since when does the “new software component” exist ?
Best regards
Randy.
Hi Andrea, I know that you haven’t used the term “F9” for a while, but you coined the term on this blog, and it was shorthand to mean “the results of the test could be positive or negative.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wqu2D2ae8U
Anyway the silly short musical film written about the term “F9” will be screened at the Toronto GeekFest Festival on Friday evening, and they were nice enough to invite me to attend. I wanted to extend the invitation to any Toronto-based readers of your blog.
Christian Scholl:
1,2,3: no
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I have a few questions about electromagnetism.
1 Is the lighting and control of ball lightning related to microwaves?
2 If yes, are there any external leaks?
3 Does the maintenance and control of the E-cat Sk require an external source of radiation (such as wifi, 3G)?
Regards,
Christian
Bob Clam:
Sorry, this information is confidential,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Frank Acland:
We are resolving all the problems.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
How is the work going on the new component for the E-Cat SKL?
Thank you very much,
Frank Acland
Good morning Mr Rossi,
if these informations are not confidentials, can you say us which langage are you using to program the e-catSKL’s controller and how many instructions are necessary to do it or the capacity of the used rom memory.
Thank you for your kind answer.
Bob Clam, from France.
Rod Walton:
Thanks for the update,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
On the Feb.11 2020 issue of Power Engineering:
2020: Top Power Sector trends to watch for in the next decade
Rod Walton
PlasmaFan:
No.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Science Fan:
Thank you for your insight.
Our collaborators are all under NDA.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@Eric Ashworth: My reply is “I think we are in agreement that one successful demonstration is enough for claiming the phenomenon exists. My concern is when the first demonstration results in a failure, the expert or person has to consider how many times further demonstrations result in failure that the expert declare not to wait and claim the demonstration is a failure. My paper says that if the expert starts from not knowing whether the phenomenon exists or not (with a probability of a half), then for 95% confidence level, the expert should wait for at least 5 trials for a successful demonstration. If none of the 5 trials result in any successful demonstration, then the expert is entitled to claim that the demonstration has failed with 95% confidence level and leave. Otherwise, if any one of the 5 trials is a success, then the demonstration is considered as a success. I hope this clarifies the issue. Thank you.”
Thank you Andrea for you great efforts.
I am having trouble understanding how software can be running in your 10x10x10cm cube.
This would require a tiny microcontroller of FPGA module which must be supplied with constant voltage.
That seems at odds with the fact that it runs closed loop, as you say.
Such a device would be revolutionary, even forgetting the energy generation aspects.
You must have the very finest engineers on the planet.
I believe these people must be very proud of your collective work, and would be anxious to make their contributions known.
Will you ask at least one of your team to come public and vouch for the fact that they are working for you?
That would do wonders to help progress your acceptance.
If I was working for you I would be so proud and would do anything to help.
Dear Andrea,
Is there any chance we could get a very brief interim report from the testing group before the final presentation is made?
Basically, something like..
“We verify that for x amount of time we measured x amount of power going into the E-Cat SKL and x amount going out for a COP of x.”
Dear Readers:
I have received from many of you emails that complain that they do not succeed to send comments to this blog.
Here are the instructions how to send a comment to this blog, step by step:
1- go to http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com
2- click on “Recent Posts”
3- Click on “United States Patent…”
4- go to the bottom of it and click “Leave a replay”
5- fill up name and email address ( not obligatory, if you want use a nickname )
6- Go to “post comment”
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonymous:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
No
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Prof:
Confidential,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea
Can you explain which is the software issue you have to invent the software for?
Dear Andrea,
Was the component failure you experienced with the E-Cat SKL due to materials being damaged after extended use?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Do you think that your theoretical paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
is still valid, afer the last developments of your experiments?
Marco Serra:
Software
Warm Regards,
A.R.