The E-Cat SK design is now over a year old, you likely have a number of them with customers, these likely have some form of certification, even if you did want to upgrade, it may depend on what the certification body would allow.
There may be recent upgraded versions of the E-Cat SK now tested or undergoing tests, but the designs are now frozen and it is too late to fit further improvements without a new cycle of design and testing.
Sometimes with certification you can have a minor upgrade with supplementary documentation, sometimes the upgrade is regarded by a notified body as a major change and requires complete new certification and testing, so you end up with designs that become frozen at a certain stage.
In the last two months of research and testing it is likely that there is a clearer understanding of the underlying physics and the ability to control, this has likely been incorporated into the E-Cat SKL controller, you may now want to incorporate a complete new improved controller into the E-Cat SK or maybe just minor software upgrades, but may be limited by time for testing or existing certification, all improvements then have to pass onto the next generation of E-Cat design and testing.
So any upgrades for the current generation or do we have to wait for the next generation.
You say your robotic factory is ready to start production — congratulations!! What is required for the starter to fire the gun, and get the production rolling?
With the development of the small control unit for the E-Cat SKL, does this mean that the control unit for the current E-Cat SK may also in part or whole be improved, or will any improvement be reserved for a future design replacement of the E-Cat SK.
I second the request of Nils Fryklund! It would be very interesting to all people interested in you work if you could provide data from the 22 kW E-Cat SK about heat output, energy consumption, etc. Maybe your customer could comment!
Randy Miller:
Your text has been edited by me because it was very ineducated. Maybe you cannot understand it, but your terms were very offensive, so I rephrased your comment using educated words and saving the core meaning of it.
Anyway, I take advice of your complaint and I kindly invite you, from now on, to turn your attention to other blogs: plenty of them share your standards.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
1. Have you had to redesign the E-Cat SKL since you introduced the new component recently?
2. What is your satisfaction level with the performance of the SKL since you incorporated the new component?
Dear Andrea!
Is it really so difficult to get any customer to, with a few words, tell us big fans if E-catSK 22KW is giving excess heat energy?
My skeptic friends want bonus soon on our betting.
Several bottles of champagne and french cheese are in the pot.😃
Even my sister and my grandchildren has become very skeptic!
Best regards
Nils Fryklund
Reading for the umpth time your hit paper http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
I discovered another important information: the energy gain is given by the increase of entropy generated by the passage of the energy from the electrons in phase from the ZBW and the Aharonov-Bohm effect to the electrons not in phase. Your paper is a gold mine, the more one reads it, the more understands the importance of the theoretical system incorporated in it.
Cheers
CC
Hot News:
Chinese Central Bank PBOC demands currency deposited at banks must be disinfected with ultraviolet light and then held for a week or longer before being released back into the wilds of the economy. The Chinese central bank will provide new bills worth 600 billion yuan to banks.
“Why does the cash have to be quarantined for 14 days after it’s been disinfected?… Do they fear that it will have a fever?”
Such mystery about need for 14 days quarantine after being disinfected provoke some hypothesis:
For example that todays usual 20 Watt UV lamps used for disinfection are too weak.
In this context there is one question for Dr. Rossi:
Is your 22kW E-Cat SK producing a lot of UV photons hypothetically capable for using as disinfection device?
I recently executed a few (very wild) economical calculations and results are:
It will be far more profitable for Leonardo Corp. as if they not sold E-Cat SKL. Because if they sell E-Cat SKL, they may have profit around 133,825,800% per year. Assuming 80% higher production every 14 days with nice profit margin.
As alternative: Not selling their SKL, there may be even higher profitability wit such business model:
Hey prospective industrial customer, if you pay to us EX ANTE 2 or 3 months price of your usually consummed electricity, we will install a few thousands SKLs at your factory within cca 3 weeks and we will sell to your factory electricity for 30-50% discount.
With such business model Leonardo Corp. don’t need operating credit from bank, don’t need investors, Venture Capital, etc.
Because profitability percentage with such model is approaching infinity.
After 2-3 years of operation launch IPO with P/E = Amazon (i.e. 92) which translated will a few Trillions dollars.
And one extra premium: Intellectual Property secured all the time.
Note: At rare cases where prospective customer refuses pay EX ANTE, there will only 400 to 500% annual profit for Leonardo Corp. (from such rare deal).
And now I have 2 queries for Dr. Rossi:
1) Are my calculations too much wild or close to future possibilities?
2) One control module size of cigarette pack may control more E-Cat SKLs or only one SKL?
One can be an Optimist in development activities. One believes in the ultimate success of his/her development. But setbacks do occur and when there is no immediate, obvious solution, it is human to become pessimistic for a period of time. There is where faith comes to play. Not necessarily religious faith but faith in the underlying theory of the process and faith in your team to solve the problem. Once the problem appears to be solved or has a definite solution, then optimism returns. It is not a matter of lying or deceit.
Robert Luk, Reply to your February 11th posting. Yes I agree with your reasoning. There are many various types of experiments. Chemical such as Andreas can be more temperamental due to combinations and set-ups so obviously you need to sometimes make many adjustments but once you have established the method, the experiment should be repeatable if conducted properly to the instructions provided to any qualified person. It’s really the presentation of the technology that has to be perfect and repeatable but I agree with your considerations i.e. it has to perform with consistent reliability and preferably be backed up with good solid theory to help explain the phenomena.
Regards, Eric Ashworth
Dear Andrea,
I am a bit confused. You told us many times that you are an optimist. Now suddenly you said to Frank Ackland that you ‘returned optimist’. We’re you lying or had things become so difficult, that even your always optimistic mood was fainting in the past month?
Anyway, you must be a lot more happy and so we are!
Can’t wait for the demo.
Kind regards, Gerard
1 – The Ecat SKL will be shown powered by the grid.
2 – The Ecat SKL will be shown not powered by the grid.
3 – Measuring instruments for voltages and currents will be inserted and shown.
4 – All the above information will only be provided during the presentation.
Shane:
Sorry, I will remove nothing from http://www.ecatskdemo.com
If you do not like irony and self irony, just disregard it. I love the irony of my friend Thomas Florek.
If you still cannot take seriously our work for that reason, well, that’s too bad.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
KeithT:
The energy of the pico-metric electron-proton aggregates should be very stable, if we consider only the binding energy, but the very low entropy of these hypothetical structures, with phase-locked electrons, is however a possible source of instability.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I have been following the progress of the E-cat technology for several years and I believe it is very promising. Recently, I have been thinking about sharing it with my employer as a possible replacement for their energy needs. However, after reviewing the E-cat site to be sure of what I would be endorsing I came across a couple of videos with hand puppets in them promoting the technology. This is very unprofessional and even embarrassing. If you want your invention to be taken seriously you cannot be presenting it to potential clients with hand puppets. Please remove and avoid such things so that people can have confidence that this technology is worthy of their attention and money.
Ciao Andrea, il “bill of materials” a cui si riferisce la domanda di Bob Belovich è quella che noi chiamiamo la “distinta-base” dei materiali. Chiedeva appunto se l’elenco dettagliato di tutte le singole parti necessarie (distinta-base) per la produzione industriale dell’ SKL è già stata definita.
Saluti
Do you believe the pico-metric neutral aggregate structures created are potentially stable over a long time period until further acted on to force a change in state, i.e. after initial formation do not subsequently change state spontaneously?
Dear Andrea,
The E-Cat SK design is now over a year old, you likely have a number of them with customers, these likely have some form of certification, even if you did want to upgrade, it may depend on what the certification body would allow.
There may be recent upgraded versions of the E-Cat SK now tested or undergoing tests, but the designs are now frozen and it is too late to fit further improvements without a new cycle of design and testing.
Sometimes with certification you can have a minor upgrade with supplementary documentation, sometimes the upgrade is regarded by a notified body as a major change and requires complete new certification and testing, so you end up with designs that become frozen at a certain stage.
In the last two months of research and testing it is likely that there is a clearer understanding of the underlying physics and the ability to control, this has likely been incorporated into the E-Cat SKL controller, you may now want to incorporate a complete new improved controller into the E-Cat SK or maybe just minor software upgrades, but may be limited by time for testing or existing certification, all improvements then have to pass onto the next generation of E-Cat design and testing.
So any upgrades for the current generation or do we have to wait for the next generation.
Regards,
Keith Thomson.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
have you heard this news?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/jeff-bezos-commits-10-billion-to-fight-climate-change/2020/02/17/e103ae7c-51b7-11ea-b119-4faabac6674f_story.html
What do you think about?
Best Regards,
Italo R.
Dear Andrea,
You say your robotic factory is ready to start production — congratulations!! What is required for the starter to fire the gun, and get the production rolling?
Kind regards,
Frank Acland
Chuck Davis:
it is.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
The availability og our Customer does not depend on us.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
KeithT:
Can you kindly rephrase your question more precisely ?
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
With the development of the small control unit for the E-Cat SKL, does this mean that the control unit for the current E-Cat SK may also in part or whole be improved, or will any improvement be reserved for a future design replacement of the E-Cat SK.
Regards,
Keith Thomson.
Dear Andrea,
I second the request of Nils Fryklund! It would be very interesting to all people interested in you work if you could provide data from the 22 kW E-Cat SK about heat output, energy consumption, etc. Maybe your customer could comment!
Thank you very much,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea, Is the robotic factory ready to start production, if not what is your estimate?
Warm regards,
Chuck Davis
Nils Fryklund:
He,he,he…I see what I can do, asap !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Randy Miller:
Your text has been edited by me because it was very ineducated. Maybe you cannot understand it, but your terms were very offensive, so I rephrased your comment using educated words and saving the core meaning of it.
Anyway, I take advice of your complaint and I kindly invite you, from now on, to turn your attention to other blogs: plenty of them share your standards.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@ FORUM-ADMINS ?
Who is changing my original posts in here and why ?
Frank Acland:
1- partially
2- high
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
1. Have you had to redesign the E-Cat SKL since you introduced the new component recently?
2. What is your satisfaction level with the performance of the SKL since you incorporated the new component?
Best regards,
Frank Acland
@ Lotr Mileikowsky
Obviously the Ecat cannot be used as a sterilyzer: it is not designed for this task and does not have the specific certifications.
Dear Andrea!
Is it really so difficult to get any customer to, with a few words, tell us big fans if E-catSK 22KW is giving excess heat energy?
My skeptic friends want bonus soon on our betting.
Several bottles of champagne and french cheese are in the pot.😃
Even my sister and my grandchildren has become very skeptic!
Best regards
Nils Fryklund
CC:
Thank you for your attention to our work,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Lotr Mileikowsky:
No.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Reading for the umpth time your hit paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
I discovered another important information: the energy gain is given by the increase of entropy generated by the passage of the energy from the electrons in phase from the ZBW and the Aharonov-Bohm effect to the electrons not in phase. Your paper is a gold mine, the more one reads it, the more understands the importance of the theoretical system incorporated in it.
Cheers
CC
Hot News:
Chinese Central Bank PBOC demands currency deposited at banks must be disinfected with ultraviolet light and then held for a week or longer before being released back into the wilds of the economy. The Chinese central bank will provide new bills worth 600 billion yuan to banks.
“Why does the cash have to be quarantined for 14 days after it’s been disinfected?… Do they fear that it will have a fever?”
Such mystery about need for 14 days quarantine after being disinfected provoke some hypothesis:
For example that todays usual 20 Watt UV lamps used for disinfection are too weak.
In this context there is one question for Dr. Rossi:
Is your 22kW E-Cat SK producing a lot of UV photons hypothetically capable for using as disinfection device?
Best Regards
Tracy:
1 yes
2 well, so far.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Bill:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Are still made in the USA and in Europe all the experiments and R&D with the Ecat SKL ?
Bill
Dear Andrea,
Are you working with the Ecat SKL today?
If yes, how is it working?
Thanks if you can answer,
Tracy
Hermes:
The energy made by the Ecat SKL would be useful for any use the other energy generators could be used for.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Is it possible to use E-Cat SKL to split water in an on-board water reactor to use hydrogen as fuel?
Can the heat from E-Cat SKL be used to heat the water tank and water pipes so that the water does not freeze in winter?
Good Luck with improvments of the E-Cat SKL
Lotr Mileikowsky:
We’ll see which will be the best solution to put this technology at the service of mankind.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi, Dear Readers,
I recently executed a few (very wild) economical calculations and results are:
It will be far more profitable for Leonardo Corp. as if they not sold E-Cat SKL. Because if they sell E-Cat SKL, they may have profit around 133,825,800% per year. Assuming 80% higher production every 14 days with nice profit margin.
As alternative: Not selling their SKL, there may be even higher profitability wit such business model:
Hey prospective industrial customer, if you pay to us EX ANTE 2 or 3 months price of your usually consummed electricity, we will install a few thousands SKLs at your factory within cca 3 weeks and we will sell to your factory electricity for 30-50% discount.
With such business model Leonardo Corp. don’t need operating credit from bank, don’t need investors, Venture Capital, etc.
Because profitability percentage with such model is approaching infinity.
After 2-3 years of operation launch IPO with P/E = Amazon (i.e. 92) which translated will a few Trillions dollars.
And one extra premium: Intellectual Property secured all the time.
Note: At rare cases where prospective customer refuses pay EX ANTE, there will only 400 to 500% annual profit for Leonardo Corp. (from such rare deal).
And now I have 2 queries for Dr. Rossi:
1) Are my calculations too much wild or close to future possibilities?
2) One control module size of cigarette pack may control more E-Cat SKLs or only one SKL?
Best Regards
Gerard McEk,
One can be an Optimist in development activities. One believes in the ultimate success of his/her development. But setbacks do occur and when there is no immediate, obvious solution, it is human to become pessimistic for a period of time. There is where faith comes to play. Not necessarily religious faith but faith in the underlying theory of the process and faith in your team to solve the problem. Once the problem appears to be solved or has a definite solution, then optimism returns. It is not a matter of lying or deceit.
Frank Acland:
Yes, but nevertheless working hard to return optimistic.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gerard McEk:
I cannot give daily report of my psychological attitudes. Some “transitory” phase can be missed here.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Robert Luk, Reply to your February 11th posting. Yes I agree with your reasoning. There are many various types of experiments. Chemical such as Andreas can be more temperamental due to combinations and set-ups so obviously you need to sometimes make many adjustments but once you have established the method, the experiment should be repeatable if conducted properly to the instructions provided to any qualified person. It’s really the presentation of the technology that has to be perfect and repeatable but I agree with your considerations i.e. it has to perform with consistent reliability and preferably be backed up with good solid theory to help explain the phenomena.
Regards, Eric Ashworth
Dear Andrea,
I am a bit confused. You told us many times that you are an optimist. Now suddenly you said to Frank Ackland that you ‘returned optimist’. We’re you lying or had things become so difficult, that even your always optimistic mood was fainting in the past month?
Anyway, you must be a lot more happy and so we are!
Can’t wait for the demo.
Kind regards, Gerard
Dear Andrea,
Nice that you have returned to being optimistic. Was there a time when you were not optimistic?
Thank you and best wishes,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
We are working with it. I returned optimist.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Italo R.:
4
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
May I ask you if during the presentation:
1 – The Ecat SKL will be shown powered by the grid.
2 – The Ecat SKL will be shown not powered by the grid.
3 – Measuring instruments for voltages and currents will be inserted and shown.
4 – All the above information will only be provided during the presentation.
Best Regards,
Italo R.
Dear Andrea,
With the new component in place (and you report it is working) what is the focus of your work with the SKL now?
Kind regards,
Frank Acland
Shane:
Sorry, I will remove nothing from
http://www.ecatskdemo.com
If you do not like irony and self irony, just disregard it. I love the irony of my friend Thomas Florek.
If you still cannot take seriously our work for that reason, well, that’s too bad.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
KeithT:
The energy of the pico-metric electron-proton aggregates should be very stable, if we consider only the binding energy, but the very low entropy of these hypothetical structures, with phase-locked electrons, is however a possible source of instability.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Claud:
I answered to Bob Belovich.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Mr. Rossi,
I have been following the progress of the E-cat technology for several years and I believe it is very promising. Recently, I have been thinking about sharing it with my employer as a possible replacement for their energy needs. However, after reviewing the E-cat site to be sure of what I would be endorsing I came across a couple of videos with hand puppets in them promoting the technology. This is very unprofessional and even embarrassing. If you want your invention to be taken seriously you cannot be presenting it to potential clients with hand puppets. Please remove and avoid such things so that people can have confidence that this technology is worthy of their attention and money.
Thank you for your time,
– Shane
Ciao Andrea, il “bill of materials” a cui si riferisce la domanda di Bob Belovich è quella che noi chiamiamo la “distinta-base” dei materiali. Chiedeva appunto se l’elenco dettagliato di tutte le singole parti necessarie (distinta-base) per la produzione industriale dell’ SKL è già stata definita.
Saluti
Dear Andrea,
Within your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
you mention creation of neutral proton-electron structures. And later you refer to pico-metric neutral aggregates when referring to the Vassallo paper “Electron Structure, Ultra-Dense Hydrogen and Low Energy Nuclear Reactions” in JCMNS Vol 29.
Do you believe the pico-metric neutral aggregate structures created are potentially stable over a long time period until further acted on to force a change in state, i.e. after initial formation do not subsequently change state spontaneously?
Regards,
Keith Thomson.
@ Bob Belovich,
How in heaven’s name can You draw a line to string theory in here ?
Best regards
Randy.
Roberto Ridolfi:
Thank you for the update,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
Here are the stats of today related to your publications on Researchgate:
Total Readings: 44081
Research Interest Index: 610.6
Recommendations: 1919
Citations: 15
Data accessible from
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Fantastic!
All the best,
Roberto Ridolfi
Bob Belovich:
Now I have understood your questions.
Here are the answers:
1 c
2 c
Warm Regards,
A.R.