Anonymous:
Electrons cannot be considered point-like particles.
Shouls they be so, the associated magnetic fields would be infinite.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
We are very excited that the 3rd Party tests of the SKL have started and kicked off the march toward commercialization of this most important invention. A few questions about the testing if you will:
1) Have you known that the 3rd Party testing would require 6-12 months?
2) I assume the longer (6-12 month) endurance and fuel consumption testing will not commence until the tests move to the alternate location?
3) Do the current tests at your location include instructing the 3rd Party on SKL operation and control?
4) Are the tests currently being performed at your location performance-oriented (e.g. electric and thermal output measurement, etc.)?
5) Have you provided multiple SKLs to the 3rd Party for different types of testing?
6) What will you and your team be doing during the 3rd-party testing?
7) Will the certification testing be run concurrent with the third-party testing?
so far the test seems to be a success. Congratulations.
Some questions to the long term test:
In order to get reliable results conerning durability and reliability it will be necessary to test not only one, but a lot of modules. How many modules will be used in the test?
How many modules can be controlled by one controller?
The whole LENR-like road from Pons & Fleishmann till the SKL is paved with (huge) unreliabilities and low power output. For the first time the SKL is a device that is probably ready for production. What ‘unreliability’ could mean to the SKL is largely unknow to us. I believe that some cases of unreliability will be largely accepted by many users. I think the most important questions are:
– can the SKL recover automatically or does it need a service engineer?
– can a user have some tools/spare parts to repair his/her SKL?
– what is the average down time / duty cycle…
An SKL with small output fluctuations won’t be a problem. But other unreliabilities will be perceived in a different way depending on the purpose: home / charging Tesla home batteries at night / car / truck / plane / power plant / use in remote places / hospitals… And if you have five SKLs it probably doesn’t matter so much if one of them is defect.
In my case I would immediatelly buy an SKL if the reliability is better than 50%, it still has a tremendous value with that power output. I think a poll will be very interesting for Dr. Rossi. We all know that he is a perfectionist and now that he told us that a 3rd party test will take 6 to 12 months, followed by a certification test… And every new iteration of the SKL could add an extra 6 to 12 months delays in starting the production of the SKL. If there is a market for acceptable unreliabilities then Dr. Rossi could be convinced to already start a first production line.
Mark U:
1- so far in the premises we are
2- yes
3- yes
4- no, but this is not a problem for eventual industrialized production.
Thank you for your kind wishes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonymous:
That reaction is a paradigmatic example of long range interactions, independently from the specific systems in which they happen.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
In your paper http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
is written (quote): ” The fact that nuclear reactions of the type Au197 + N14 -> Au198 + N13 take place at energies at which colliding nuclei do not come in contact is an interesting though little-advertised discovery”.
Now, since you say the E-Cat has nothing to do with nuclear reactions, why these reactions are relevant to your effect ?
Your answers of ‘confidential’ to Plasmafan were like mouth watering appetizers for this AR fan. This is because I take them as possible hints that the specific subject matter was indeed of some relative importance to the functioning of the Ecat!
Some questions about the current testing and also the certification:
1) Is the third party on the premises where you are, or are they content to dictate the testing procedure and view the results remotely? Or perhaps it is a mixture of both?
2) I assume that the certification process, which may start next month, is with another E-cat device, not the one under 24/7 testing. Given it is another E-cat device, will it also be an SKL 95-5 version?
3)If so, have you made it already?
4)Have you found out efficiencies to somehow reduce the work required to make what was those 10,000 connections? (I hope so!)
With the new ECAT SKL you made a big progress with the generation of electricity and less heat.
What about the endurance of the ECAT SKL is there also a lot of progress? Refuel only after?
I’m excited to hear about the upcoming testing of the E-Cat SKL 95. The truth is that although I expected you to further develop the technology, I did not expect such a high ratio of electrical output to thermal output. Combined with the extremely high COP (allowing for infinite COP in closed loop mode) this truly makes for a revolutionary technology. However, as always, when I hear of such breakthroughs my mind always drifts towards how it is possible to make such an improvement. There is a plethera of information on plasma formations in the scientific literature and I think certain concepts from them may possibly be involved.
1) Were you able to produce a “dark mode” plasma where the temperature is reduced but the electrical gradients and double layers of the self organizing plasma is still intact? If so, did this help in boosting the electrical efficiency?
2) Since anything that attracts electrons together may also induce phonon resonance and other conditions that can allow for the formation of cooper pairs (such as the positive ions in a complex space charge double layer), could it be that the phenomenon of superconductivity could be helping produce an efficient collection of electrical current? Nikola Tesla and others working with electrical discharges that would transiently produce self organizing structures have detected a type of strange current that flows through conductors without heating them in the same manner as conventional current.
3) Did you add a new additive to the gaseous mixture that allowed for the increase in efficiency?
4) Can you confirm that with the E-Cat SKL 95 that you are still using one cathode and one anode like in the previous plasma based E-Cats? (This is of course not counting any “pick up” electrodes you may be using.)
5) Have you tried to wirelessly collect energy from the E-Cat SK 95? For example, plasma balls are generators of not only traditional EMF but also longitudinal waves. With a tuned antenna you should be able to pick up these signals.
6) Is there any chance that you could build a very crude, inefficient model of a plasma based E-Cat for educational purposes? For example, I could imagine a model that could be used in universities to show students how the Rossi Effect can produce excess heat and electrical output. It would not need to be extremely efficient – only enough to show undeniable excess.
Dear Andrea, In my previous comment I mentioned the “million mile battery” because no one needs the aggravation and expense of replacing a dead battery so it appears to be a preferred addition for a reliable power source. Since the ecat has no moving parts I expect that it will have a long lifetime and it would not be wise to add components that will diminish that feature.
Dear Andrea,
May the force be with you on your third party testing.
I have all the faith in the world with your dream and the dream that will benefit us all.
We need hope in this world of turmoil.
Take care my friend,
Gary
Dear Readers,
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonymous:
Electrons cannot be considered point-like particles.
Shouls they be so, the associated magnetic fields would be infinite.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
In your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
in par. 1 how do you concile the reduced electron Compton wavelength with the fact that the electron is a point-like particle ?
Dear Andrea,
Am I correct in assuming that if the E-Cat SKL was not working, that the testers would have packed up and gone home by now?
Kind regards,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Are the third party tests continuing at the moment in your lab?
Best wishes,
Frank Acland
Chuck Davis:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Salvatore Boi:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
6,28 like 2*π?
Dear Andrea, Here is a dandy little town car that would be great for that weekly trip to the grocery store propelled by a single ecat module. 😁
https://newatlas.com/zev-t3-1-micro-enclosed-3-wheeler/48906/
Warm regards,
Chuck Davis
Anonymous:
The value of the reduced Compton wavelength is the product of the electron wavelength divided by 6.28.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Sam:
Please google
“Ecat sk demonstration Stockholm November 2017”
There you will find the details
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello DR Rossi
Was the business partner who is
doing the third party testing at the
2017 E-Cat test and presentation?
https://www.aftenposten.no/digital/i/QogdXq/unknown-energy-source-with-enormous-potential
Regards
Sam
In your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
the reduced Compton wavelength is repeatedly cited as the crucial distance for to obtaining long range interactions. Can you give us the exact value of it ?
E. Hergen:
1 one
2 hundreds
Warm Regards
A.R.
Bill Conley:
1 I never said the test will endure 6-12 mo
2 yes
3 yes
4 yes
5 no
6 nothing
7 yes
Warm Regards
A.R.
Andrea,
We are very excited that the 3rd Party tests of the SKL have started and kicked off the march toward commercialization of this most important invention. A few questions about the testing if you will:
1) Have you known that the 3rd Party testing would require 6-12 months?
2) I assume the longer (6-12 month) endurance and fuel consumption testing will not commence until the tests move to the alternate location?
3) Do the current tests at your location include instructing the 3rd Party on SKL operation and control?
4) Are the tests currently being performed at your location performance-oriented (e.g. electric and thermal output measurement, etc.)?
5) Have you provided multiple SKLs to the 3rd Party for different types of testing?
6) What will you and your team be doing during the 3rd-party testing?
7) Will the certification testing be run concurrent with the third-party testing?
Thanks,
Bill Conley
Dear Mr. Rossi,
so far the test seems to be a success. Congratulations.
Some questions to the long term test:
In order to get reliable results conerning durability and reliability it will be necessary to test not only one, but a lot of modules. How many modules will be used in the test?
How many modules can be controlled by one controller?
Kind regards,
E. Hergen
Frank Acland:
It will continue somewhere else.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Congratulations on getting your partners to finally test the E-Cat, despite the pandemic!
Do you expect they will stay with you for the long-term 24/7 testing, or will it continue somewhere else?
Kind regards,
Frank Acland
@ Frank Acland:
The whole LENR-like road from Pons & Fleishmann till the SKL is paved with (huge) unreliabilities and low power output. For the first time the SKL is a device that is probably ready for production. What ‘unreliability’ could mean to the SKL is largely unknow to us. I believe that some cases of unreliability will be largely accepted by many users. I think the most important questions are:
– can the SKL recover automatically or does it need a service engineer?
– can a user have some tools/spare parts to repair his/her SKL?
– what is the average down time / duty cycle…
An SKL with small output fluctuations won’t be a problem. But other unreliabilities will be perceived in a different way depending on the purpose: home / charging Tesla home batteries at night / car / truck / plane / power plant / use in remote places / hospitals… And if you have five SKLs it probably doesn’t matter so much if one of them is defect.
In my case I would immediatelly buy an SKL if the reliability is better than 50%, it still has a tremendous value with that power output. I think a poll will be very interesting for Dr. Rossi. We all know that he is a perfectionist and now that he told us that a 3rd party test will take 6 to 12 months, followed by a certification test… And every new iteration of the SKL could add an extra 6 to 12 months delays in starting the production of the SKL. If there is a market for acceptable unreliabilities then Dr. Rossi could be convinced to already start a first production line.
Mark U:
1- so far in the premises we are
2- yes
3- yes
4- no, but this is not a problem for eventual industrialized production.
Thank you for your kind wishes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonymous:
That reaction is a paradigmatic example of long range interactions, independently from the specific systems in which they happen.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
In your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
is written (quote): ” The fact that nuclear reactions of the type Au197 + N14 -> Au198 + N13 take place at energies at which colliding nuclei do not come in contact is an interesting though little-advertised discovery”.
Now, since you say the E-Cat has nothing to do with nuclear reactions, why these reactions are relevant to your effect ?
Dear Andrea,
Your answers of ‘confidential’ to Plasmafan were like mouth watering appetizers for this AR fan. This is because I take them as possible hints that the specific subject matter was indeed of some relative importance to the functioning of the Ecat!
Some questions about the current testing and also the certification:
1) Is the third party on the premises where you are, or are they content to dictate the testing procedure and view the results remotely? Or perhaps it is a mixture of both?
2) I assume that the certification process, which may start next month, is with another E-cat device, not the one under 24/7 testing. Given it is another E-cat device, will it also be an SKL 95-5 version?
3)If so, have you made it already?
4)Have you found out efficiencies to somehow reduce the work required to make what was those 10,000 connections? (I hope so!)
All the best wishes from Canada,
Mark
Chuck Davis:
Thank you for the suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ulrich Kranz:
Thank you for your kind wishes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
TOUSSAINTS:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Plasmafan:
1- no
2- confidential
3- yes
4- confidential
5- confidential
6- not now
Warm regards,
A.R.
Sailmenn:
6/12 mo ( hope )
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Italo R:
Theoretically from 6 months to one year, 24/7. We’ll see.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
How long will the current test last? A few hours, a few days?
Can you tell us, when it’s done, if it’s done?
We don’t want to know the result. We already know it.
Obviously positive!
Good luck!
Italo R.
With the new ECAT SKL you made a big progress with the generation of electricity and less heat.
What about the endurance of the ECAT SKL is there also a lot of progress? Refuel only after?
Dear Andrea,
I’m excited to hear about the upcoming testing of the E-Cat SKL 95. The truth is that although I expected you to further develop the technology, I did not expect such a high ratio of electrical output to thermal output. Combined with the extremely high COP (allowing for infinite COP in closed loop mode) this truly makes for a revolutionary technology. However, as always, when I hear of such breakthroughs my mind always drifts towards how it is possible to make such an improvement. There is a plethera of information on plasma formations in the scientific literature and I think certain concepts from them may possibly be involved.
1) Were you able to produce a “dark mode” plasma where the temperature is reduced but the electrical gradients and double layers of the self organizing plasma is still intact? If so, did this help in boosting the electrical efficiency?
2) Since anything that attracts electrons together may also induce phonon resonance and other conditions that can allow for the formation of cooper pairs (such as the positive ions in a complex space charge double layer), could it be that the phenomenon of superconductivity could be helping produce an efficient collection of electrical current? Nikola Tesla and others working with electrical discharges that would transiently produce self organizing structures have detected a type of strange current that flows through conductors without heating them in the same manner as conventional current.
3) Did you add a new additive to the gaseous mixture that allowed for the increase in efficiency?
4) Can you confirm that with the E-Cat SKL 95 that you are still using one cathode and one anode like in the previous plasma based E-Cats? (This is of course not counting any “pick up” electrodes you may be using.)
5) Have you tried to wirelessly collect energy from the E-Cat SK 95? For example, plasma balls are generators of not only traditional EMF but also longitudinal waves. With a tuned antenna you should be able to pick up these signals.
6) Is there any chance that you could build a very crude, inefficient model of a plasma based E-Cat for educational purposes? For example, I could imagine a model that could be used in universities to show students how the Rossi Effect can produce excess heat and electrical output. It would not need to be extremely efficient – only enough to show undeniable excess.
Thank you.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
My best wishes of success for the third party test.
May I share you this link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfaefl5KpdM&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR1yohD913pNS2bfT54jwng4pEW9sCPHED2UIhWqtcvBfumy-lSMEnipHIQ
Kind Regards
Toussaint françois
Dear Andrea, In my previous comment I mentioned the “million mile battery” because no one needs the aggravation and expense of replacing a dead battery so it appears to be a preferred addition for a reliable power source. Since the ecat has no moving parts I expect that it will have a long lifetime and it would not be wise to add components that will diminish that feature.
Warm regards,
Chuck Davis
Dear Andrea,
I wish that better you will get the novel price!
Have success with the third party testing.
Ulrich
Gary Heatherly:
Thank you for your very kind wishes to our team,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
May the force be with you on your third party testing.
I have all the faith in the world with your dream and the dream that will benefit us all.
We need hope in this world of turmoil.
Take care my friend,
Gary
Sam:
Thank you for this commemoration of Prof Norman Cook, author of the best existing atomic nucleus model, by my humble opinion,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Sam:
Yes
Warm Regards
A.R.
Hello DR Rossi
Is it your partners third
party testing that has started?
Regards
Sam
Hello DR Rossi
I came across this article
An Apprecation of Norman D Cook
by David J Nagel.
https://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/CookMemorial%28Nagel%29.pdf
Regards
Sam
Chuck Davis:
Thank you for the link: it seems to me it is an R&D on course, not a product.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Bill Conley:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Rob:
No: I never said that.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Andy Gosserhand:
Thank you,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Calvin Lipani:
Thank you for your attention to the work of our Team and for your kind wishes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.