It seems congratulations are in order at this way-point of the 3rd-party testing.
It seems that a great deal of preparation has gone into this testing, especially as it is an extension of the Skype-facilitated remote testing for all those interested during the early part of this year.
This preparation suggests a question you may or may not be able to answer: is the current 3rd-party testing made up of only one potential partner, or is this current testing a coordinated testing by and for several of those who participated in the Skype-facilitated testing and now stand with you as potential partners?
Again congratulations and my best to you, and your great team.
Dear Andrea,
I am somewhat confused as to the time of your presentation. Is it before or after the results of the third party testing or is it after certification of your device? Or is it independent of these dates?
Quizzical regards.
After your journey of discovery with the SKL, how do you now view reports of early attempts to tap into novel energy sources, such as the T.H. Moray Valve circuit?
Best wishes for good health …and a successful outcome for your business partnership and the associated testing
sandy r
Dr Irina and Vitaly Uzikov:
I am delighted to continue to enjoy your kind sustain, coming from important echelons of the Russian nuclear physics school.
Your comment is intelligent, I can answer, though.
The answer is: quite surely yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
For almost 10 years, watching your fantastic successes in the development of E-Cat technology and having the good fortune to personally witness your success at the physical demonstration of the reactor in Bologna (October 2011) and in Stockholm (November 2017), we are certainly confident in the success of testing and certifying your revolutionary energy source. We are also fully aware of the importance of maintaining trade secrets in order to attract the required investments in order to successfully develop the industrial technology and quickly solve the problem of entering the global energy market.
You may find that in the first phase of reactor manufacturing, it will be commercially safer to sell not the E-Cat units themselves, but the electricity they produce. But at some point, E-Cat reactors will openly enter the energy market and be available for use in a variety of industries and transportation.
Can E-Cat reactors be expected to be available on the global market in the next 5 years under favorable conditions?
PS: We understand that a direct answer to this question can cause an undesirable reaction on the part of many participants in the energy market, therefore, based on your strategy, we will fully understand and support you if you consider it premature to answer it and if you do not publish this question.
Stephen:
The test of today, that was very important, has been positive.
The next week we will continue to work.
In this period I am very focused, but I don’t feel happy, proud of nervous: just taking extremely seriously what we are doing, every particular of it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonymous:
The condition that the charges must be in the same light cone can be satisfied if the electron distance is an integer multiple of the Compton wavelength while the rotating charges have the same zitterbewegung phase.
See ref 16 in my paper you cited.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Can you tell us if the important test today goes well?
Will the Third party testing continue at your lab next week?
Or will it move on to a new phase?
It must be inspiring seeing your work going into this testing.
We tend to ask about the testers but. I wonder how your feeling is during this important period? Happy, proud, nervous… even more focused? Having more new ideas?
I understand that the people doing the test must be a combination of scientist and/or engineer. With respect that they have a scientific background, before the test began, I would think that they must have been a bit skeptical that your device would work as well as you had described. During the test have they expressed their surprise that, yes indeed, it does work just as you indicated? Have they ever expressed amazement that someone has been able to construct such a device? People, including myself, are getting very excited with your success so far. Keep up your fantastic work, I have a feeling you will be totally successful.
Dave Haws:
Yes and it is in the chatge, as you can see in my patent published on http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com
Thank you for your kind wishes,
Warm regards,
A.R.
Thank you for keeping us informed of such wonderful progress.
I have been following and enjoining the ecat for many years. I am a novice to science so forgive me if my thoughts are unclear. My questions are: Does the SKL reactor require hydrogen to operate? If yes, is it a one time injection when manufacturing the device or must it be continuously injected during operation?
Thank you in advance for your response and wishing you the best success.
Very encouraging news in your recent posts about the testing.
It’s a huge step already. Yet you say you have an important tests tomorrow. I imagine this test is a very significant one if you mention it in the context of what is already ongoing.
I’m very encouraged by the current testing going on in your lab and wish you continued success with them. A few questions if you can:
1) Do the current 3rd Party tests include the replication of tests they previously viewed remotely via Skype?
2) If so, did the 3rd Party bring their own instruments to perform these tests?
3) If so, have the results of the remote and in-person tests been consistent so far?
4) Do any of these tests involve examination of the reactor core before and after operation (or will it remain sealed)?
I find your model of the electron describing a rotating current loop very interesting. Have you ever thought about whether you could use it to describe other leptons or even quarks? This could then perhaps lead to a new standard model of physics.
Gerard McEk:
1- based on the theoretical lines presented in http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
charges are not “carried: they are integral part of the electromagnetic four potential that characterizes the electron
2- “Non particle currents”: ??? Please read better the par 1 of my paper cited here above
3 ( all of them )- I think so, we’ll see
Thank you for your kind wishes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Your latest reply to Anonymous you speak about a ‘charge distribution rotating at the speed of light that causes a current loop’, which I think is quite fascinating.
Until now I always believed that currents are facilitated by electrons, lack of electrons (holes) or ions, in fact moving particles. Now I believe you are saying that currents can also be caused by a ‘charge distribution’.
Some questions of this electrical engineer:
1. What carries the ‘Charge’ ? Is it just the local EM field strength or maybe a photon?
2. Can these non-particle currents only run at very small (‘attometer’) scales or is it also possible at macro (m) scales?
Then something quite different:
I very much hope that the testing going on will be enormously successful. Your Partner is now doing the test, but you said that the presentation will only be after the certification company has done their testing als well. However, will you give us some idea of how the testing of the partner has gone after they have finished like:
3a. That it was successful,
3b. That excess energy is confirmed
3c. That SSM is confirmed
3d. That e.g. 5 kW of electrical output power is confirmed?
I am sure that you are very much aware of the situation of global warming and I personally believe that people will not be able to reverse that situation. However if there is one apparatus that is able to dramatically reduce the exhaust of CO2, then it is the Ecat in relatively short term. A positive answer to all the number 3 confirmations would give many people hope that the tide can be changed, so I hope that you will be able confirm these before the presentation later this year.
Thanks, kind regards, Gerard
Anonymous:
The electron can be modeled, as described in my paper, by a current loop, generated by a charge distribution that rotates at the speed of light, wherein such current loop is proposed as the origin of the electron’s mass, inertia, angolar momentum, spin, and magnetic momentum.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Svein H. Vormedal:
I spammed the comment of the impostor and my answer to him. Anyway, his comment contained nothing bad, plus I can anyway answer to the question I see in the hypertext of your comment: the NDA topics demand to all parties not to diclose any exchanged information related to what we are doing together and our relationship without the permission of both parties.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea.
Today is my name again abused by someone else!
I would not ask about the same you recently had answered, nor about NDA topics.
Regards: Svein Henrik
E-Cat’s for household / domestic use; what type of product will be the most appropriate / applicable / easily utilised?
A large proportion of UK households are connected to the national grid for electricity supply, usually an underground cable enters a house and connects to a meter then distribution junction boxes all mounted within usually a wall recess / cupboard / cabinet / closet / storeroom / under a staircase, a large proportion of electrical meter installations occupy small confined spaces with cable runs hidden away under floorboards inside walls in foundations and roof spaces. Similarly, a large proportion of households have gas heating, underground connection to the gas grid, piped into a house connected to a boiler, the boiler with its water pipework pumping hot water around a house to heating panels and or other domestic use. Some households have electrical heating panels with thermal mass heat storage all cabled back to separate distribution and metering for lower cost off peak electrical usage. Many household installations around the world are likely of a similar complexity, many of the people living in these households being totally unaware of the complexity and cost of the built-in infrastructure supplying the day to day services.
How do you upgrade a household replacing existing energy supplies with E-Cats; possibly replace the boiler with a combined heater and electrical supply E-Cat unit, cap off the existing gas supply, modify the water pipework, run electrical cables to the electrical distribution board, reconfigure the distribution board and disconnect from the electrical supply and metering.
The upgrading of a household to a built in configuration is likely an expensive undertaking, the E-Cat unit and on-going replacement charges may be cost effective but installation costs will incur the time of trained qualified personnel for gas fitting, electrical installation, water plumbing, occasionally some building work required repositioning installation spaces, woodwork / plasterwork, then redecoration, assuming you can even find sufficient space to install, not forgetting all the paperwork as you apply then wait to be physically disconnected from the gas and electrical grids, final readings then meters removed. To do this over many households in the UK will likely require far more qualified trades people than is currently available, even with a large program of training up more trades people it is likely there will be potential customers waiting years to get an installation.
For built in household / domestic use you may be in a situation where sales of E-Cats will be limited by available installation capacity not your production capacity. The people that have signed up with you for a domestic E-Cat boiler can purchase them and take delivery, but will they be able to find the qualified / trained people to install and reconfigure their households.
The likely way forward for household use will be in parallel with longer term built in installations, the use of portable E-Cat electrical power packs to plug in existing equipment, self-contained E-Cat powered portable heaters or floor / wall mounted heaters to replace heater panels, mass production of one size fits all products designed and targeted at the most common household use, products that allow people to buy off the shelf and install / use directly by themselves.
It may be that centralised electricity distribution and portable power packs are the fastest and lowest cost routes forward for market penetration, you your partner and business advisors are likely involved in on-going discussions and investigations of the economics of many different business models to find a way forward.
Frank Acland:
1. yes
2. yes
3- yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Mason:
Thank you for your attention to our work.
Every test is made with one specific partner or potential partner.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
It seems congratulations are in order at this way-point of the 3rd-party testing.
It seems that a great deal of preparation has gone into this testing, especially as it is an extension of the Skype-facilitated remote testing for all those interested during the early part of this year.
This preparation suggests a question you may or may not be able to answer: is the current 3rd-party testing made up of only one potential partner, or is this current testing a coordinated testing by and for several of those who participated in the Skype-facilitated testing and now stand with you as potential partners?
Again congratulations and my best to you, and your great team.
Sincerely and Respectfully,
Mason Ainsworth
Dear Andrea,
1. So far, are you satisfied with the performance of the E-Cat SKL during the time of the third party testing?
2. Does the testing continue through this weekend?
3. Do you still think you will do the presentation within the year 2020?
Kind regards,
Frank Acland
Eernie1:
It is independent.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Sam:
Thank you !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello DR Rossi
This is a link to a video
about Nikola Tesla school days.
https://youtu.be/rucb_e0RrpY
Regards
Sam
Dear Andrea,
I am somewhat confused as to the time of your presentation. Is it before or after the results of the third party testing or is it after certification of your device? Or is it independent of these dates?
Quizzical regards.
Sandy R:
Sorry, I do not know what the T.H. Moray Valve is.
Thank you for your kind wishes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Greetings Dr Rossi
After your journey of discovery with the SKL, how do you now view reports of early attempts to tap into novel energy sources, such as the T.H. Moray Valve circuit?
Best wishes for good health …and a successful outcome for your business partnership and the associated testing
sandy r
Dr Irina and Vitaly Uzikov:
I am delighted to continue to enjoy your kind sustain, coming from important echelons of the Russian nuclear physics school.
Your comment is intelligent, I can answer, though.
The answer is: quite surely yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea!
For almost 10 years, watching your fantastic successes in the development of E-Cat technology and having the good fortune to personally witness your success at the physical demonstration of the reactor in Bologna (October 2011) and in Stockholm (November 2017), we are certainly confident in the success of testing and certifying your revolutionary energy source. We are also fully aware of the importance of maintaining trade secrets in order to attract the required investments in order to successfully develop the industrial technology and quickly solve the problem of entering the global energy market.
You may find that in the first phase of reactor manufacturing, it will be commercially safer to sell not the E-Cat units themselves, but the electricity they produce. But at some point, E-Cat reactors will openly enter the energy market and be available for use in a variety of industries and transportation.
Can E-Cat reactors be expected to be available on the global market in the next 5 years under favorable conditions?
PS: We understand that a direct answer to this question can cause an undesirable reaction on the part of many participants in the energy market, therefore, based on your strategy, we will fully understand and support you if you consider it premature to answer it and if you do not publish this question.
With the greatest respect
Irina and Vitaly Uzikov
Stephen:
The test of today, that was very important, has been positive.
The next week we will continue to work.
In this period I am very focused, but I don’t feel happy, proud of nervous: just taking extremely seriously what we are doing, every particular of it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Drew G.:
I am not able to give a date now, but I think it will not take long.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonymous:
The condition that the charges must be in the same light cone can be satisfied if the electron distance is an integer multiple of the Compton wavelength while the rotating charges have the same zitterbewegung phase.
See ref 16 in my paper you cited.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
From your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
I understand that the Ecat needs the charges to be in the same light cone. How is it possible ?
Dr. Rossi:
When can we see a photo of of the E-Cat SKL that you earlier said was a possibility?
Dear Andrea
Can you tell us if the important test today goes well?
Will the Third party testing continue at your lab next week?
Or will it move on to a new phase?
It must be inspiring seeing your work going into this testing.
We tend to ask about the testers but. I wonder how your feeling is during this important period? Happy, proud, nervous… even more focused? Having more new ideas?
All the best
Stephen
Robert Dorr:
I’d say yes to your questions, that make sense.
Thanks for the kind sustain,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Salvatore Boi:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi, may be that this link can be interesting for you:
https://www.reccom.org/2020/09/17/proprieta-sorprendenti-delle-catene-di-atomi-di-idrogeno/
Warm “testing on going” regards
Dear Andrea,
I understand that the people doing the test must be a combination of scientist and/or engineer. With respect that they have a scientific background, before the test began, I would think that they must have been a bit skeptical that your device would work as well as you had described. During the test have they expressed their surprise that, yes indeed, it does work just as you indicated? Have they ever expressed amazement that someone has been able to construct such a device? People, including myself, are getting very excited with your success so far. Keep up your fantastic work, I have a feeling you will be totally successful.
Sincerely,
Robert Dorr
Stephen:
Thank you for your kind attention to our work,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dave Haws:
Yes and it is in the chatge, as you can see in my patent published on
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com
Thank you for your kind wishes,
Warm regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Thank you for keeping us informed of such wonderful progress.
I have been following and enjoining the ecat for many years. I am a novice to science so forgive me if my thoughts are unclear. My questions are: Does the SKL reactor require hydrogen to operate? If yes, is it a one time injection when manufacturing the device or must it be continuously injected during operation?
Thank you in advance for your response and wishing you the best success.
Dear Andrea
Very encouraging news in your recent posts about the testing.
It’s a huge step already. Yet you say you have an important tests tomorrow. I imagine this test is a very significant one if you mention it in the context of what is already ongoing.
Good luck to you and all teams involved tomorrow.
Best Regards
Stephen
1- yes
2- yes
3- yes
4- no
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Andrea,
I’m very encouraged by the current testing going on in your lab and wish you continued success with them. A few questions if you can:
1) Do the current 3rd Party tests include the replication of tests they previously viewed remotely via Skype?
2) If so, did the 3rd Party bring their own instruments to perform these tests?
3) If so, have the results of the remote and in-person tests been consistent so far?
4) Do any of these tests involve examination of the reactor core before and after operation (or will it remain sealed)?
Thanks for your indulgence as always,
Bill
CC:
Well. Tomorrow will be made an important test.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Wilfried Babelotzky:
No.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andras,
I find your model of the electron describing a rotating current loop very interesting. Have you ever thought about whether you could use it to describe other leptons or even quarks? This could then perhaps lead to a new standard model of physics.
Best wishes
Wilfried
Dr Rossi,
How are going on the tests today ?
Cheers
CC
Gerard McEk:
1- based on the theoretical lines presented in
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
charges are not “carried: they are integral part of the electromagnetic four potential that characterizes the electron
2- “Non particle currents”: ??? Please read better the par 1 of my paper cited here above
3 ( all of them )- I think so, we’ll see
Thank you for your kind wishes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Nils Fryklund:
1- I am in Europe
2- we work with it every day
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea!
1. Are you in Sweden or in Florida now?
2 Is E-catSK 22KW working more stabil now or is it shut down?
Best regards
Nils Fryklund
Dear Andrea,
Your latest reply to Anonymous you speak about a ‘charge distribution rotating at the speed of light that causes a current loop’, which I think is quite fascinating.
Until now I always believed that currents are facilitated by electrons, lack of electrons (holes) or ions, in fact moving particles. Now I believe you are saying that currents can also be caused by a ‘charge distribution’.
Some questions of this electrical engineer:
1. What carries the ‘Charge’ ? Is it just the local EM field strength or maybe a photon?
2. Can these non-particle currents only run at very small (‘attometer’) scales or is it also possible at macro (m) scales?
Then something quite different:
I very much hope that the testing going on will be enormously successful. Your Partner is now doing the test, but you said that the presentation will only be after the certification company has done their testing als well. However, will you give us some idea of how the testing of the partner has gone after they have finished like:
3a. That it was successful,
3b. That excess energy is confirmed
3c. That SSM is confirmed
3d. That e.g. 5 kW of electrical output power is confirmed?
I am sure that you are very much aware of the situation of global warming and I personally believe that people will not be able to reverse that situation. However if there is one apparatus that is able to dramatically reduce the exhaust of CO2, then it is the Ecat in relatively short term. A positive answer to all the number 3 confirmations would give many people hope that the tide can be changed, so I hope that you will be able confirm these before the presentation later this year.
Thanks, kind regards, Gerard
Anonymous:
The electron can be modeled, as described in my paper, by a current loop, generated by a charge distribution that rotates at the speed of light, wherein such current loop is proposed as the origin of the electron’s mass, inertia, angolar momentum, spin, and magnetic momentum.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
In few words, which is the model of electron you propose on
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
?
Frank Acland:
Positive.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Can you characterize the mood of the SKL testing team that is visiting after some days of testing? (e.g. bored, excited, confused, etc.,)?
Best wishes,
Frank Acland
Svein H. Vormedal:
I spammed the comment of the impostor and my answer to him. Anyway, his comment contained nothing bad, plus I can anyway answer to the question I see in the hypertext of your comment: the NDA topics demand to all parties not to diclose any exchanged information related to what we are doing together and our relationship without the permission of both parties.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea.
Today is my name again abused by someone else!
I would not ask about the same you recently had answered, nor about NDA topics.
Regards: Svein Henrik
Chuck Davis:
Every contribution is useful.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
KeithT:
It depends from specific situations. Thank you for your insight.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
E-Cat’s for household / domestic use; what type of product will be the most appropriate / applicable / easily utilised?
A large proportion of UK households are connected to the national grid for electricity supply, usually an underground cable enters a house and connects to a meter then distribution junction boxes all mounted within usually a wall recess / cupboard / cabinet / closet / storeroom / under a staircase, a large proportion of electrical meter installations occupy small confined spaces with cable runs hidden away under floorboards inside walls in foundations and roof spaces. Similarly, a large proportion of households have gas heating, underground connection to the gas grid, piped into a house connected to a boiler, the boiler with its water pipework pumping hot water around a house to heating panels and or other domestic use. Some households have electrical heating panels with thermal mass heat storage all cabled back to separate distribution and metering for lower cost off peak electrical usage. Many household installations around the world are likely of a similar complexity, many of the people living in these households being totally unaware of the complexity and cost of the built-in infrastructure supplying the day to day services.
How do you upgrade a household replacing existing energy supplies with E-Cats; possibly replace the boiler with a combined heater and electrical supply E-Cat unit, cap off the existing gas supply, modify the water pipework, run electrical cables to the electrical distribution board, reconfigure the distribution board and disconnect from the electrical supply and metering.
The upgrading of a household to a built in configuration is likely an expensive undertaking, the E-Cat unit and on-going replacement charges may be cost effective but installation costs will incur the time of trained qualified personnel for gas fitting, electrical installation, water plumbing, occasionally some building work required repositioning installation spaces, woodwork / plasterwork, then redecoration, assuming you can even find sufficient space to install, not forgetting all the paperwork as you apply then wait to be physically disconnected from the gas and electrical grids, final readings then meters removed. To do this over many households in the UK will likely require far more qualified trades people than is currently available, even with a large program of training up more trades people it is likely there will be potential customers waiting years to get an installation.
For built in household / domestic use you may be in a situation where sales of E-Cats will be limited by available installation capacity not your production capacity. The people that have signed up with you for a domestic E-Cat boiler can purchase them and take delivery, but will they be able to find the qualified / trained people to install and reconfigure their households.
The likely way forward for household use will be in parallel with longer term built in installations, the use of portable E-Cat electrical power packs to plug in existing equipment, self-contained E-Cat powered portable heaters or floor / wall mounted heaters to replace heater panels, mass production of one size fits all products designed and targeted at the most common household use, products that allow people to buy off the shelf and install / use directly by themselves.
It may be that centralised electricity distribution and portable power packs are the fastest and lowest cost routes forward for market penetration, you your partner and business advisors are likely involved in on-going discussions and investigations of the economics of many different business models to find a way forward.
Regards,
Keith Thomson.
I think that Carbon capture is a band aid, ecat is a solution!
Warm regards,
Chuck Davis
Rod Walton:
Thank you for the update,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Horst Ludwig:
it does not depend on me.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Will we get to know which third party entity is doing the test?
On Power Engineering issue of September 15 2020:
Defining the potential future for carbon capture technologies
Rod Walton