a sub kW E-CAT would be very beneficial for hundreds of applications.
One of them would be equipping living spaces with heaters. Infrared heating is particularly suitable for this. Today, infrared heaters can be produced with extremely thin wallpaper, such as those used in the automotive industry for seat heaters.
These infrared heating wallpapers can be glued and painted on the wall.
The wallpapers are available with outputs of 20.40 and 60 watts / sqm. The electricity for this is generated by a sub kW E-CAT. Due to its small size, it can be attached to the corresponding wall together with the infrared heater without additional cables having to be laid. In addition, infrared heating offers many advantages for residents over normal conventional heating.
I wish you a successful launch for the ECAT products.
Dr Rossi:
Did I understand well that the presentation of the Ecat SKL will show it powering a system of lights and some heaters ?
All the best to you and your team,
Curtis
Dr Rossi:
Is it correct that the radial charge displacement described in your answer to Oren Teichmiller can be made by the pinch effect generated by short and intense current pulses ?
Oren Teichmiller:
Our experimental data, reported on http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
suggest that intensive impulsive current with a radial cylindrical symmetry and a critical rise time generates a Scalar field that generates radial forces that, confining the charges, create the conditions for the formation of coherent clusters of electrons.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Here in the Netherlands we have years where we need 1200 to 2000 m3 of natural gas per house to have a pleasantly warm house (and to cool in the summer), which is comparable to 10000 to 16000 kWh.
For normal use such as lighting, etc., approximately 3000 kWh is needed.
An E-cat with 2 kWh provides enough energy to switch to electric only.
Peak loads can also be absorbed with a grid connection or with a battery pack. (2 x 24 x 365 = 17,520 kWh + 3000 = approx 20,000kWh per home)
Dear Andrea, It seems to me that a sub kW ecat would be ideal for residential applications when tied to the grid. My personal usage is approximately 6000 kWh per year so a 0.69 kW ecat would satisfy my needs. And I assume the price of an ecat will be proportional to capacity.
Plasmahugger:
The vector P is the sum of the Poynting vector and a vector equal to the product of the scalar field S and the electric field E.
The scalar field S is generally ignored; the scalar field S and the vector SE are generally ignored, but their importance has been recognized by many authors: see in my paper the references 7, 29, 30, 37, 43, 48.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@Corinne:
To enrich your investigations, please read these links from Sifferkoll: in the first one the avatar F.Z. offers money to a bloggist to disparage Dr Andrea Rossi:
Ruby:
The idea that Vacuum is structured and that can be exploited to localize energy extracted from the environment needs a definition of this structure and its relation with energy and matter.
The first step starts recognizing the electromagnetic potentials as the “Vacuum structure” and consequently as the fundamental entities of the physical reality.
The second one requires an encoding of their relations with both the energy density and the energy flux in the space-time continuum.
See par. 4 on http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Calle H:
Mats Lewan, the author of “An Impossible Invention”, is an independent scientific journalist.
I continue to update him about our progress.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Cher François,
Merci de promouvoir le travail de Andrea Rossi en France et au Canada. Même s’il n’y a pas de réponse à ses réalisations, cela ne signifie pas que les efforts sont vains. La quantité se transforme toujours en qualité. C’est la loi de la nature.
Pour ma part, en tant que membre du comité scientifique OECD-NEA, j’essaie aussi très soigneusement de les former à penser que LENR est possible. N’abandonnez pas vos efforts.
Sincèrement, Aleksei
Corinne,
félicitations pour votre intervention. Je suis moi-même un fervent admirateur du Dr Rossi; je me bat depuis des années en France, avec mes petits moyens pour faire connaitre le réacteur du Dr puisque les revues de vulgarisation scientifique ne le font pas.
De même le CEA a interdit à ses chercheurs tout travail sur les LENR, à part faire de la désinformation sur la fusion froide!
J’écris aussi sur un blog Canadien en m’opposant aux détracteurs du E CAT, par contre je n’y ai pas vu FZ.
Je tiens à féliciter Andréa pour la théorie élaborée sur research gate que je n’oserais pas commenter, étant avant tout chercheur en électronique.
Salutations respectueuses, François.
Many years ago Mats Lewan wrote the book An Impossible Invention which I think has been read by many of us who have followed you throughout the years. There has been very little heard from Mats after his engagement in your Stockholm presentation in 2017. May I ask if Mats is still around?
Kind regards,
Calle H
Reviewing some of the Lunar Colony plans from NASA, they speak of a need for a “nuclear” electricity source in the order of 40 kWe continuous output.
1. Absent testing, do you see any reason why eCat-SKL technology would not work on or within the Moon (lower gravity… assume proper environmental control)?
2. Assuming 3 – 4 20 kWe eCat-SKLs would suffice, what would be the approximate mass of each eCat-SKL?
3. I assume 3 – 4 20 kWe devices to allow for fuel replacement on a scheduled basis. What is your recommended maximum continuous operating time limitation?
4, Any other areas of concern for Lunar operation (i.e., rocket transportation, cosmic rays, no internet control)?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I am following your work ten years since and I think your efforts are among the most important enterprises in the world for the defense of our planet. I am disgusted of the disparaging activity agaist your character that is on course, and in particular of the action of “Mr F.Z.”. His action has been of interest to me, because he is disparaging you many years since and, although he says he is a nuclear engineer, in thousands of comments he sent to many blogs against you he never made a single statement with the dignity of a scientific contribution: he wrote only and exclusively totally groundless insults, aimed exclusively to disparage your character. I counted so many comments of him against you, that, calculating the time necessary to write them, I discovered he works practically full time to disparage you. I am a detective and this behavior raised my curiosity, so I decided to dedicate part of my free time to investigate this person, also using some sophisticated tool.
Here is what I discovered:
Mr F.Z. does not exist. He is an avatar, created by a PR company with the precise task to disparage you. You intelligently have always simply ignored him, and you did well; as a matter of fact, should you answer, he would simply amplify his action, inventing new disparaging issues. He is able, using a refined skill to enter any medium wherein he wants to disparage you. He dedicates his full time to discover whatever contact you have to disseminate bad things about you, bad things that he invents time by time. The PR agency that created him shows that he is a nuclear engineer, but he has never been able to comment in a sustainable scientific way your demonstrations and your publications; he just repeats anytime and everywhere the same insults. The PR agency that has invented this avatar is paid to do this. Now, I put to myself this question: “WHY?”
I have discovered not only the name of the PR agency, but also who is paying it and, consequently, I have investigated the payer. You know them very well, and you would not be too much surprised about the name. I have further investigated about their activity: not the official one, that is a cover, but their real source of income.
I am sending to your email address my real address and some hint of what I got.
If you are interested, please contact me.
“Corinne”
I have a question regarding the “fuel-cartridges”. Are they storable over long times (years?, decades?) or do they loose their inherent energy as batteries do?
Stephen:
1. yes
2. yes
3. no
4. no
5. both
6. sub kW
7. both
8. no
9. yes
10. yes
11. yes
Thank you for your kind wishes to our team,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
May I ask some update type questions? Just to get an idea of the status and how things are progressing.
1. I are you and your partners still producing e-cats for testing?”
2. If so have you now produced much more than 100 modules? Can you say roughly how how many?
3. I recall you were testing assemblies off 100 modules. Have you already started testing larger assemblies maybe with 200 or 500 modules?
4. Has the electrical vs thermal efficiency of the e-cats further improved in recent months?
5. I think you mentioned you are generating different sized ecats. Is this different sized assemblies or is it different sized e-cat modules?
6. I think you mentioned you are also making a minimal sized e-cat SKL. Is this a module containing a single ecat in the 5+ kW range as seen before or a new one at sub kW. Such a small low power device might be optimal for some particular needs (appliance power supply or portable for example)
7. Is your main focus now in getting the production lines on line and up and running or do you still have time for some research and development?
8. I see sometimes when we refer to e-cat SKL some times we are referring to the reactor/module some times to the assembly. Do you have a preferred naming to distinguish these? Also for the reactor module. Do you have a preference to how we refer to that. I.e module or reactor of something else?
9. Can you say how the certification process is going. Is it progressing well and are you happy with if so far.
10. If there are delays due to lockdowns and such do you have a strategy to deal with this. I guess improvements and developments never stop regardless.
11. Has you plan for the presentation evolved due to greater development and maturity of the product and business development?
Sorry a lot of status questions there but from past experience I have the impression things move fast in your work. I understand if you can’t answer all of them.
As always all the best to you and your team. I hope 2021 is your year and a time of positive change for all of us.
Svein H. Vormedal:
Premature,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea
Will the sub kW Ecat be of a size and power that makes it usable in a craftsman’s electric hand tools?
Regards, Svein H. Vormedal
Ulrich Kranz:
Thank you for this information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Prof:
Thank you for the uodate,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Here are the last statistics aboutyour publications I read today on
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Full Readings 65 000 (!)
Recommendations 3886
Citations 22
Total Research Interest index 1101
Congratulations for this record smashing numbers achievement…and counting
Ad majora,
Prof
Dear Andrea,
a sub kW E-CAT would be very beneficial for hundreds of applications.
One of them would be equipping living spaces with heaters. Infrared heating is particularly suitable for this. Today, infrared heaters can be produced with extremely thin wallpaper, such as those used in the automotive industry for seat heaters.
These infrared heating wallpapers can be glued and painted on the wall.
The wallpapers are available with outputs of 20.40 and 60 watts / sqm. The electricity for this is generated by a sub kW E-CAT. Due to its small size, it can be attached to the corresponding wall together with the infrared heater without additional cables having to be laid. In addition, infrared heating offers many advantages for residents over normal conventional heating.
I wish you a successful launch for the ECAT products.
Warm Regards
Ulrich
Curtis:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
Did I understand well that the presentation of the Ecat SKL will show it powering a system of lights and some heaters ?
All the best to you and your team,
Curtis
Brittany Itri:
Yes: see also references 4, 13, 21, 45 on
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Rod Walton:
Thank you for the update,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
On Power Engineering issue of February 2 2021:
Utility-scale wind rushes to 11% of US net generation mix
Rod Walton
Dr Rossi:
Is it correct that the radial charge displacement described in your answer to Oren Teichmiller can be made by the pinch effect generated by short and intense current pulses ?
Frank Acland:
I am satisfied about how things are growing up,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Is the performance of the industrial E-Cat SKL plant that you have been building satisfactory to you yet?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Oren Teichmiller:
Our experimental data, reported on
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
suggest that intensive impulsive current with a radial cylindrical symmetry and a critical rise time generates a Scalar field that generates radial forces that, confining the charges, create the conditions for the formation of coherent clusters of electrons.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Chuck Davis:
Thank you for your suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Prof:
Thank you for the update, I am very happy to read this really surprising achievement,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
What are for the pulses we can see in the video
http://www.ecatskdemo.com
?
@Chuck,
Here in the Netherlands we have years where we need 1200 to 2000 m3 of natural gas per house to have a pleasantly warm house (and to cool in the summer), which is comparable to 10000 to 16000 kWh.
For normal use such as lighting, etc., approximately 3000 kWh is needed.
An E-cat with 2 kWh provides enough energy to switch to electric only.
Peak loads can also be absorbed with a grid connection or with a battery pack. (2 x 24 x 365 = 17,520 kWh + 3000 = approx 20,000kWh per home)
kind regards Jitse
Dr Rossi,
Your paper on Researchgate
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
has reached 60 000 ( sixty thousands ! ) readings right now. And counting…
Strong congratulations, this is an unbelievable achievement,
ad majora,
Prof
Dear Andrea, It seems to me that a sub kW ecat would be ideal for residential applications when tied to the grid. My personal usage is approximately 6000 kWh per year so a 0.69 kW ecat would satisfy my needs. And I assume the price of an ecat will be proportional to capacity.
Warm regards,
Chuck Davis
Dear Readers:
Please find on
http://www.rossilivecat.com
comments that have been published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Plasmahugger:
The vector P is the sum of the Poynting vector and a vector equal to the product of the scalar field S and the electric field E.
The scalar field S is generally ignored; the scalar field S and the vector SE are generally ignored, but their importance has been recognized by many authors: see in my paper the references 7, 29, 30, 37, 43, 48.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@Corinne:
Great comment, Bravo !
Giulia
Dr Rossi,
Can you explain the equation 25 of your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long:range_particle_interactions
Thanks
Plasmahugger
@Corinne and Quinto
Thank you for your comments and the very interesting links: I like them
Gertrud
@Quinto:
I like your comment,
CC
@Quinto:
I like your comment. Very much.
All the best,
Ron
@Quinto:
Great comment ! Very interesting links, mainly the first one !
Cheers,
Roberto
@Corinne:
To enrich your investigations, please read these links from Sifferkoll: in the first one the avatar F.Z. offers money to a bloggist to disparage Dr Andrea Rossi:
http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/excellent-video-about-rossi-and-the-e-cat-the-mother-of-all-black-swans-and-surprise-industrial-heat-watch-dog-fred-zoepfl-making-threats-and-offering-sifferkoll-money-to-stay-away-from-the-rossi/
http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/is-fred-zoepfl-totally-losing-it-in-the-ecn-dungeon-since-revealed-as-an-ih-insider/
http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/meet-fred-zoepfl-the-secret-weapon-of-ihapco-or-a-physisist-malfunctioning/
Allthe best,
Quinto
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Chris:
They are storable without time limits.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Brice:
He,he,he…he is an omonymous,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ruby:
The idea that Vacuum is structured and that can be exploited to localize energy extracted from the environment needs a definition of this structure and its relation with energy and matter.
The first step starts recognizing the electromagnetic potentials as the “Vacuum structure” and consequently as the fundamental entities of the physical reality.
The second one requires an encoding of their relations with both the energy density and the energy flux in the space-time continuum.
See par. 4 on
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven N. Karels:
I am not able to answer questions related to the use of an Ecat on the Moon…let us start on the Earth.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Calle H:
Mats Lewan, the author of “An Impossible Invention”, is an independent scientific journalist.
I continue to update him about our progress.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
Also,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Cher François,
Merci de promouvoir le travail de Andrea Rossi en France et au Canada. Même s’il n’y a pas de réponse à ses réalisations, cela ne signifie pas que les efforts sont vains. La quantité se transforme toujours en qualité. C’est la loi de la nature.
Pour ma part, en tant que membre du comité scientifique OECD-NEA, j’essaie aussi très soigneusement de les former à penser que LENR est possible. N’abandonnez pas vos efforts.
Sincèrement, Aleksei
Dear Andrea,
You mentioned you are working on a sub KW E-Cat SKL model. Will this be designed for home use?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Corinne,
félicitations pour votre intervention. Je suis moi-même un fervent admirateur du Dr Rossi; je me bat depuis des années en France, avec mes petits moyens pour faire connaitre le réacteur du Dr puisque les revues de vulgarisation scientifique ne le font pas.
De même le CEA a interdit à ses chercheurs tout travail sur les LENR, à part faire de la désinformation sur la fusion froide!
J’écris aussi sur un blog Canadien en m’opposant aux détracteurs du E CAT, par contre je n’y ai pas vu FZ.
Je tiens à féliciter Andréa pour la théorie élaborée sur research gate que je n’oserais pas commenter, étant avant tout chercheur en électronique.
Salutations respectueuses, François.
Dear Andrea,
Many years ago Mats Lewan wrote the book An Impossible Invention which I think has been read by many of us who have followed you throughout the years. There has been very little heard from Mats after his engagement in your Stockholm presentation in 2017. May I ask if Mats is still around?
Kind regards,
Calle H
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Reviewing some of the Lunar Colony plans from NASA, they speak of a need for a “nuclear” electricity source in the order of 40 kWe continuous output.
1. Absent testing, do you see any reason why eCat-SKL technology would not work on or within the Moon (lower gravity… assume proper environmental control)?
2. Assuming 3 – 4 20 kWe eCat-SKLs would suffice, what would be the approximate mass of each eCat-SKL?
3. I assume 3 – 4 20 kWe devices to allow for fuel replacement on a scheduled basis. What is your recommended maximum continuous operating time limitation?
4, Any other areas of concern for Lunar operation (i.e., rocket transportation, cosmic rays, no internet control)?
Dr Rossi: how is that vacuum can generate energy ?
Dear Dr. Rossi,
I’m not a detective like Corinne, but it seems that you, your double or your twin is working at CERN! I found that a certain ‘Andrea Rossi’ is working on the upgrade of the ALICE-sensor at CERN: andrea.rossi@cern.ch (I found it here: https://indico.cern.ch/event/868940/book-of-abstracts.pdf).
If Corinne says that the troll Mr. F.Z. is disparaging you, then it is probably about the one from CERN… LOL!
With kind regards,
Brice
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I am following your work ten years since and I think your efforts are among the most important enterprises in the world for the defense of our planet. I am disgusted of the disparaging activity agaist your character that is on course, and in particular of the action of “Mr F.Z.”. His action has been of interest to me, because he is disparaging you many years since and, although he says he is a nuclear engineer, in thousands of comments he sent to many blogs against you he never made a single statement with the dignity of a scientific contribution: he wrote only and exclusively totally groundless insults, aimed exclusively to disparage your character. I counted so many comments of him against you, that, calculating the time necessary to write them, I discovered he works practically full time to disparage you. I am a detective and this behavior raised my curiosity, so I decided to dedicate part of my free time to investigate this person, also using some sophisticated tool.
Here is what I discovered:
Mr F.Z. does not exist. He is an avatar, created by a PR company with the precise task to disparage you. You intelligently have always simply ignored him, and you did well; as a matter of fact, should you answer, he would simply amplify his action, inventing new disparaging issues. He is able, using a refined skill to enter any medium wherein he wants to disparage you. He dedicates his full time to discover whatever contact you have to disseminate bad things about you, bad things that he invents time by time. The PR agency that created him shows that he is a nuclear engineer, but he has never been able to comment in a sustainable scientific way your demonstrations and your publications; he just repeats anytime and everywhere the same insults. The PR agency that has invented this avatar is paid to do this. Now, I put to myself this question: “WHY?”
I have discovered not only the name of the PR agency, but also who is paying it and, consequently, I have investigated the payer. You know them very well, and you would not be too much surprised about the name. I have further investigated about their activity: not the official one, that is a cover, but their real source of income.
I am sending to your email address my real address and some hint of what I got.
If you are interested, please contact me.
“Corinne”
Hi Mr Rossi,
I have a question regarding the “fuel-cartridges”. Are they storable over long times (years?, decades?) or do they loose their inherent energy as batteries do?
Thanks for your answer and best regards,
Chris
Stephen:
1. yes
2. yes
3. no
4. no
5. both
6. sub kW
7. both
8. no
9. yes
10. yes
11. yes
Thank you for your kind wishes to our team,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jan Srajer:
lower
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Mr. Rossi
The production price of E-CAT-SKL will be higher, lower, comparable, compared to the production price of the car?
Warm Regards
Jan Srajer
Dear Andrea
May I ask some update type questions? Just to get an idea of the status and how things are progressing.
1. I are you and your partners still producing e-cats for testing?”
2. If so have you now produced much more than 100 modules? Can you say roughly how how many?
3. I recall you were testing assemblies off 100 modules. Have you already started testing larger assemblies maybe with 200 or 500 modules?
4. Has the electrical vs thermal efficiency of the e-cats further improved in recent months?
5. I think you mentioned you are generating different sized ecats. Is this different sized assemblies or is it different sized e-cat modules?
6. I think you mentioned you are also making a minimal sized e-cat SKL. Is this a module containing a single ecat in the 5+ kW range as seen before or a new one at sub kW. Such a small low power device might be optimal for some particular needs (appliance power supply or portable for example)
7. Is your main focus now in getting the production lines on line and up and running or do you still have time for some research and development?
8. I see sometimes when we refer to e-cat SKL some times we are referring to the reactor/module some times to the assembly. Do you have a preferred naming to distinguish these? Also for the reactor module. Do you have a preference to how we refer to that. I.e module or reactor of something else?
9. Can you say how the certification process is going. Is it progressing well and are you happy with if so far.
10. If there are delays due to lockdowns and such do you have a strategy to deal with this. I guess improvements and developments never stop regardless.
11. Has you plan for the presentation evolved due to greater development and maturity of the product and business development?
Sorry a lot of status questions there but from past experience I have the impression things move fast in your work. I understand if you can’t answer all of them.
As always all the best to you and your team. I hope 2021 is your year and a time of positive change for all of us.
Stephen