Dear Dr. Rossi,
In your response to Ernst on June 11, you indicate there will be a SKL light without battery and AI.
a. Does this mean it is easy to measure that energy output is greater than energy input?
b. Is there any “fuel” consumed?
c. If the answer to b. is no, do you think the energy comes from scalar magnetic and electric fields (ZPE)?
Thank you for the tremendous work by you and your team.
Calle H
Dear Andrea,
Probably you have missed my yesterdays comment.
Is there nothing we can do to help you solving the stability problems?
Thanks, kind regards, Gerard
I don’t write often but I read all the questions and answers to be informed. I would like to know if you will have ready a model of lamp that is suitable for street illumination. I’ve been spreading the news about the SKLED and I would like to know this to talk also with Technical office in some towns nearby (comuni nell’area senese).
I appreciate your effort and the speed with which you and your team are making progress. Looking forward for the presentation and the first product in the market.
V:)
Thank you for your opinion, that I respect. The statistics, though, show that the pandemic regress is proportional to the vaccines diffusion.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
P.S.: thank you for your kind attention to our work
Have you ever made one serious attempt with a very slow-running brushed DC motor? This can work for several decades without maintenance or degeneration of the device. This seems much more efficient than batteries to me. If it works of course.
Also, the A.I. will not have to consider the hard-to-predict degradation that you have with batteries.
I do absolutely admire your endless work investigating the interesting effects you‘ve found and developing your baby the Ecat SKL and also the many hours you spent creating the theoretical framework you (and your team) build up. Fingers crossed for you to have the success you totally deserve. No doubt about it : )
But please allow me to state a few things here regarding part of your response to Anonymous (2021-06-10 09:08h) where you said that the sole solution to kill the pandemic is to vaccinate. I don‘t have a problem with that you‘re happy being vaccinated with Astra-Zeneca (both) and that you haven‘t had any side effects. I‘m really glad that you don‘t have any side effects so far; knowing that the world really needs you (but medium and long term side effects are still completely unknown e.g. infertility, cancer or autoimmune diseases like several doctors suggest).
But unfortunately others do experience those. Strong side effects and even deaths and it seems that only in the first 4 months in the VAERS data base were more severe side effects reported than in the last 15 years together! Similar in EU. I can‘t really call it a vaccine as on one side it is not approved as a vaccine (only as an emergency treatment, which consists of genetic material which technology was never before tested on humans) and on the other side it doesn‘t provide any imunity!
Apart from that several doctors are saying that there is no real necessity to develop in an absolutely hurry a vaccine as (apart from having really different good treatment options at hand) there is no real high mortality due to it (WHO estimates 0,028% in over all population) and comparing the numbers it turns out that last year we experienced just like a harsh flu (looking at the numbers).
And than there are also these misterious magnetic effects from some of the people who (like you) participated in this experiment (it is an ongoing clinical trial with a complete unknown outcome) and some doctors are now investigating the relationship of it as some people who underwent a MRT scan a few weeks after participating in this human trial/getting the injection, some of them died directly and some have really serious health problems now (magnetic effects due to injection + magnetic resonance tomography)
But you might not have heard about these things as mainstream media does prefer to look away and prefers to spread fear and to promote the “vaccine” agenda instead of focusing early on on solutions like several doctors and scientists already proposed early-mid last year (2020!). Like to enhance the immune system fighting the pandemic with supplements like vitamin D3, vitamin C, zinc, selenium, iodine… or in more severe cases to make good use of hydroxychloroquin, ivermectin and also the `famous’ chlorine dioxide, which had already marvelous pre-results directly in the early months of this epidemic and on basis of this Bolivia passed a law to treat Covid with it. Why this isn‘t properly reported in the news? I know it‘s a rhetorical question you don‘t need to answer but if you‘re curious please do your own research instead of spreading here the very unscientific mainstream media propaganda (also most governments, including parts of the WHO do).
For those who want to see, there is a plethora of information regarding this and e.g. you can start with searching for doctors for truth (exists also in italy) and what they have to say and please use your time wisely and check first what they have to say instead of reading directly „fabricated opinions“ about them (=check the facts, not the opinions about it) or look e.g. for COMUSAV, Andreas Kalcker… or the Great Barrington Declaration (where famous scientists clearly oppose lockdowns and inter alia also state that e.g. for children, Covid-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza, so why risk severe side effects like we are experiencing now like never before in the last 15 years?)
And from my personal observation/experience I can only say that I had last year in Febuary (Feb. 2020) symptoms of a very-very strong flu never experienced before (with fatigue, muscle pain, fever, night shiverings, smell and taste faded away, skin looked greenish-yellowish and with breathing problems like not having enough oxygen in my lungs) and as I knew back then already the benefits of chlorine dioxide (back then in the nineties my inorganic chemistry professor at the university told us in his lecture about it) and knowing how to use it- I cured myself with it in just a couple of days. No big deal, just the taste isn‘t mine (but that‘s just my personal experience).
Dear Andrea,
On your answers to various people, it sounds like the stability of the SKL differs with the type of connected load and that the A.I. must be taught to cope with it. I assume that you have not succeeded in having the SKL driving inductive loads yet, but on the other hand, I would think that a battery is needed anyway when starting from the off situation.
Obviously we get only fragments of what’s going on. If you would tell us a bit more, I’m sure the community may give some usable suggestions.
Anyway we all hope you will succeed quickly.
Kind regards, Gerard
Dear Andrea,
Electricity bills in Spain will go up by 44% this month.
The powers that be are desperate for money and this is an easy way to tax people.
Roll on the SKLED and particulary the SKL with or without batteries.
ESTAMOS CONTIGO!
Best regards
Luis
From your answer to Keith Thompson, it sounds to me like you have settled on a plan for the SKL to use batteries to provide a reliable source of electricity. Am I correct?
Dear Dr Rossi,
Thank you for the information you continue to supply us in this blog, made interesting not only by your answers, but also by the information from the readers.
All the best,
Giorgia
Dear Andrea, If the SKL works reliably while charging a battery that would be the obvious initial configuration to expedite release of the ecat. New battery researchers are making claims like the long life of the million mile battery, others claim to have much higher discharge rates. These features will permit many opportunities for integrating the ecat. Domestic off-grid power generation is an application that could use this configuration and would keep your factory humming along 24/7. And of course the research to make the ecat autonomous would continue.
For the latest modifications and tests of the E-Cat SKL, are you developing a different method / mechanism of converting the energy produced in the core to an electrical output suitable for non-resistive loads, or are the modifications to develop the existing technology further to provide this capability, or are modifications only targeted at improving long term reliability of the existing technology?
Anomymous:
I made both doses of the Astra Zeneca vaccination and I am glad of this. I didn’t have any side effect. I strongly suggest to make the vaccination, obviously under the control of your physician; this is the sole way to kill the pandemic.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
I too think that the references are very important and perfectly chosen in your paper http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
In particular, I think it is extremely important the ref. 17, because it corroborates the fact that the Zitterbewegung is perfectly coherent with the fact that Fermions cannot have the speed c, but still they can have a ZBW at the speed of c
All the best,
Richard
With such a gap, it poses at least one question.
Are astrophysics and quantum physics talking about the same thing?
I don’t have the skills to answer but if it should be yes, then I agree with Dr Rossi. It is necessary to redo the experimental measurements as well as the theoretical calculations.
Best regards
Raffaele
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
I think that your paper http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
has in the references one of its most interesting parts. The references are a gold mine of information about the zero point energy. I noticed that it is not a casual collection of papers someway related to your matter, but they are punctual and straight to the point referred to.
I think this is one of the reasons why it is the most read physics paper on Researchgate.
Cheers
Norma
Just for historical curiosity, I discovered how in 1938 the brightness emitted by the lamps that had to be purchased on behalf of the Government was controlled by The National Bureau of Standards.
Dr Rossi,
here are the last statistics of your publications on researchgate I found in http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Readings 71000 ( of which 65533 only for E-Cat SK and Long Range Particle Interactions, the most read paper of physics )
Total Research Interest index 1338
Reccomendations 4919
Citations 22
And counting…
Congratulations,
Prof
Dear Dr. Rossi,
In your response to Ernst on June 11, you indicate there will be a SKL light without battery and AI.
a. Does this mean it is easy to measure that energy output is greater than energy input?
b. Is there any “fuel” consumed?
c. If the answer to b. is no, do you think the energy comes from scalar magnetic and electric fields (ZPE)?
Thank you for the tremendous work by you and your team.
Calle H
Alfonso David Troisi Lopez
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=605#comment-1511065
Frank Acland:
1- yes
2- heat
3- light and electricity
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Alfonso David Troisi Lopez:
Yes, we can produce a version fit for street illumination,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Your recent reply to Ernst indicates that you will produce an alternative SKL (SKL lite) which will be without A.I. or battery.
1. Is this correct?
2. If so, what would this SKL be used for?
3. What will it not be able to do?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Gerard McEk:
Not so far, but thnk you for your offer.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Probably you have missed my yesterdays comment.
Is there nothing we can do to help you solving the stability problems?
Thanks, kind regards, Gerard
Hello Dr. Rossi and team and readers,
I don’t write often but I read all the questions and answers to be informed. I would like to know if you will have ready a model of lamp that is suitable for street illumination. I’ve been spreading the news about the SKLED and I would like to know this to talk also with Technical office in some towns nearby (comuni nell’area senese).
I appreciate your effort and the speed with which you and your team are making progress. Looking forward for the presentation and the first product in the market.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
V:)
Thank you for your opinion, that I respect. The statistics, though, show that the pandemic regress is proportional to the vaccines diffusion.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
P.S.: thank you for your kind attention to our work
Koen Vandewalle:
Thank you for the suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ernst:
yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Mr. Rossi,
will there be a e-cat SKL light, without battery and AI, just for the use with resistive/ohmic load?
Warm regards,
Ernst
Hi Andrea,
Have you ever made one serious attempt with a very slow-running brushed DC motor? This can work for several decades without maintenance or degeneration of the device. This seems much more efficient than batteries to me. If it works of course.
Also, the A.I. will not have to consider the hard-to-predict degradation that you have with batteries.
With best regards,
Koen
Dear Dr. Rossi,
I do absolutely admire your endless work investigating the interesting effects you‘ve found and developing your baby the Ecat SKL and also the many hours you spent creating the theoretical framework you (and your team) build up. Fingers crossed for you to have the success you totally deserve. No doubt about it : )
But please allow me to state a few things here regarding part of your response to Anonymous (2021-06-10 09:08h) where you said that the sole solution to kill the pandemic is to vaccinate. I don‘t have a problem with that you‘re happy being vaccinated with Astra-Zeneca (both) and that you haven‘t had any side effects. I‘m really glad that you don‘t have any side effects so far; knowing that the world really needs you (but medium and long term side effects are still completely unknown e.g. infertility, cancer or autoimmune diseases like several doctors suggest).
But unfortunately others do experience those. Strong side effects and even deaths and it seems that only in the first 4 months in the VAERS data base were more severe side effects reported than in the last 15 years together! Similar in EU. I can‘t really call it a vaccine as on one side it is not approved as a vaccine (only as an emergency treatment, which consists of genetic material which technology was never before tested on humans) and on the other side it doesn‘t provide any imunity!
Apart from that several doctors are saying that there is no real necessity to develop in an absolutely hurry a vaccine as (apart from having really different good treatment options at hand) there is no real high mortality due to it (WHO estimates 0,028% in over all population) and comparing the numbers it turns out that last year we experienced just like a harsh flu (looking at the numbers).
And than there are also these misterious magnetic effects from some of the people who (like you) participated in this experiment (it is an ongoing clinical trial with a complete unknown outcome) and some doctors are now investigating the relationship of it as some people who underwent a MRT scan a few weeks after participating in this human trial/getting the injection, some of them died directly and some have really serious health problems now (magnetic effects due to injection + magnetic resonance tomography)
But you might not have heard about these things as mainstream media does prefer to look away and prefers to spread fear and to promote the “vaccine” agenda instead of focusing early on on solutions like several doctors and scientists already proposed early-mid last year (2020!). Like to enhance the immune system fighting the pandemic with supplements like vitamin D3, vitamin C, zinc, selenium, iodine… or in more severe cases to make good use of hydroxychloroquin, ivermectin and also the `famous’ chlorine dioxide, which had already marvelous pre-results directly in the early months of this epidemic and on basis of this Bolivia passed a law to treat Covid with it. Why this isn‘t properly reported in the news? I know it‘s a rhetorical question you don‘t need to answer but if you‘re curious please do your own research instead of spreading here the very unscientific mainstream media propaganda (also most governments, including parts of the WHO do).
For those who want to see, there is a plethora of information regarding this and e.g. you can start with searching for doctors for truth (exists also in italy) and what they have to say and please use your time wisely and check first what they have to say instead of reading directly „fabricated opinions“ about them (=check the facts, not the opinions about it) or look e.g. for COMUSAV, Andreas Kalcker… or the Great Barrington Declaration (where famous scientists clearly oppose lockdowns and inter alia also state that e.g. for children, Covid-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza, so why risk severe side effects like we are experiencing now like never before in the last 15 years?)
And from my personal observation/experience I can only say that I had last year in Febuary (Feb. 2020) symptoms of a very-very strong flu never experienced before (with fatigue, muscle pain, fever, night shiverings, smell and taste faded away, skin looked greenish-yellowish and with breathing problems like not having enough oxygen in my lungs) and as I knew back then already the benefits of chlorine dioxide (back then in the nineties my inorganic chemistry professor at the university told us in his lecture about it) and knowing how to use it- I cured myself with it in just a couple of days. No big deal, just the taste isn‘t mine (but that‘s just my personal experience).
here some links you might want to consider:
https://andreaskalcker.com/en/
https://worlddoctorsalliance.com/
https://www.stopworldcontrol.com/
wish you a long life and of course all the time with best health
fingers crossed for us all
v : )
Dear Andrea,
On your answers to various people, it sounds like the stability of the SKL differs with the type of connected load and that the A.I. must be taught to cope with it. I assume that you have not succeeded in having the SKL driving inductive loads yet, but on the other hand, I would think that a battery is needed anyway when starting from the off situation.
Obviously we get only fragments of what’s going on. If you would tell us a bit more, I’m sure the community may give some usable suggestions.
Anyway we all hope you will succeed quickly.
Kind regards, Gerard
Frank Acland:
Yes, an we are working with the A.I. to resolve the regulation problems we have.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Luis Navarro Llabres:
We are working for that,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Electricity bills in Spain will go up by 44% this month.
The powers that be are desperate for money and this is an easy way to tax people.
Roll on the SKLED and particulary the SKL with or without batteries.
ESTAMOS CONTIGO!
Best regards
Luis
Dear Andrea,
From your answer to Keith Thompson, it sounds to me like you have settled on a plan for the SKL to use batteries to provide a reliable source of electricity. Am I correct?
Kind regards,
Frank Acland
Ernst:
Very difficult.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Chuck Davis:
Thank you for your suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Giorgia:
You are right, our Readers too are giving precious information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi,
Thank you for the information you continue to supply us in this blog, made interesting not only by your answers, but also by the information from the readers.
All the best,
Giorgia
Dear Andrea, If the SKL works reliably while charging a battery that would be the obvious initial configuration to expedite release of the ecat. New battery researchers are making claims like the long life of the million mile battery, others claim to have much higher discharge rates. These features will permit many opportunities for integrating the ecat. Domestic off-grid power generation is an application that could use this configuration and would keep your factory humming along 24/7. And of course the research to make the ecat autonomous would continue.
Warm regards,
Chuck Davis
Dear Mr. Rossi,
so we can hope further to see the e-cat SKLed AND the e-cat SKL at the presentation in Nov 2021?
Warm regards
Ernst
KeithT:
I think we will end up charging batteries through A.I.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Richard:
Everything is on schedule and going on well.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Alessandro Coppi:
No, curious, though.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hi Andrea, this behaviour in presence of e.m. packets, have something in common with e-cat mechanism?
https://youtu.be/3yrDDv7djRo
Best regards
Alessandro Coppi
Dear Andrea,
For the latest modifications and tests of the E-Cat SKL, are you developing a different method / mechanism of converting the energy produced in the core to an electrical output suitable for non-resistive loads, or are the modifications to develop the existing technology further to provide this capability, or are modifications only targeted at improving long term reliability of the existing technology?
Regards,
Keith Thomson.
Dr Rossi:
How is going the preparation of the Ecat SKLed presentation on November 25th ?
Still on schedule ?
All the best,
Richard
Anomymous:
I made both doses of the Astra Zeneca vaccination and I am glad of this. I didn’t have any side effect. I strongly suggest to make the vaccination, obviously under the control of your physician; this is the sole way to kill the pandemic.
Experimentalist:
We have worked on this experiment and learnt many things from it, although it is quite expensive.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Kurt:
Just google “Amazon books- An impossible invention- Mats Lewan”
Warm Regards,
A.R.
How can I buy the book “An Impossible Invention” of Mats Lewan ?
Thank you if you can help,
Kurt
Dear Andrea:
About the paragraph 2.1 of
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
do you think the US6465965 CAN WORK ?
Experimentalist
Dear Dr Rossi:
Have you completed the vaccination against Covid 19 ? Do you think it is useful to be vaccinated ?
Richard:
I agree,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
I too think that the references are very important and perfectly chosen in your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
In particular, I think it is extremely important the ref. 17, because it corroborates the fact that the Zitterbewegung is perfectly coherent with the fact that Fermions cannot have the speed c, but still they can have a ZBW at the speed of c
All the best,
Richard
Norma:
Thank you for your attention to the paper,
Warm regards,
A.R.
Italo R
Good find with your
Historical Curiosity
Photo.
Regards
Sam
Hello Frank Steinmeier
With such a gap, it poses at least one question.
Are astrophysics and quantum physics talking about the same thing?
I don’t have the skills to answer but if it should be yes, then I agree with Dr Rossi. It is necessary to redo the experimental measurements as well as the theoretical calculations.
Best regards
Raffaele
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
I think that your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
has in the references one of its most interesting parts. The references are a gold mine of information about the zero point energy. I noticed that it is not a casual collection of papers someway related to your matter, but they are punctual and straight to the point referred to.
I think this is one of the reasons why it is the most read physics paper on Researchgate.
Cheers
Norma
Italo R.:
Interesting,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
Just for historical curiosity, I discovered how in 1938 the brightness emitted by the lamps that had to be purchased on behalf of the Government was controlled by The National Bureau of Standards.
https://www.shorpy.com/node/7960?size=_original#caption
Kind Regards,
Italo R.
Gennady Teplitsky:
Premature. We are working very hard on it, believe me.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
What would your prediction be regarding having a working SKL on the market? One year from now? Two, Three? Just a ball park?
Kind regards,
Gennady
Prof:
Thank you for the update,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
here are the last statistics of your publications on researchgate I found in
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Readings 71000 ( of which 65533 only for E-Cat SK and Long Range Particle Interactions, the most read paper of physics )
Total Research Interest index 1338
Reccomendations 4919
Citations 22
And counting…
Congratulations,
Prof