Remember, the SKLep SSM does not need to work perfectly. It only needs to provide the same or more energy than what the EV battery discharges over the demonstration time period.
Because you are using the EV battery system, you could have errors/events that include:
a. The need to restart the SKLep SSM system many times during the demonstration. So long as the EV Battery system is fully charged at the end of the demonstration.
b. The need to manually turn on and off the SKLep SSM during the demonstration. So long as the EV Battery system is fully charged at the end of the demonstration.
c. Some of the SKLep SSM energy supplying components fail during the demonstration. So long as the EV Battery system is fully charged at the end of the demonstration.
Sam:
Thank you for your link; this is not the battery we are working with; we are working with the regular battery of the E.V. we are applying the Ecat to.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Udo:
For technological issues we will decide on October 10, after the series of tests will be completed and we will reach Sigma 5.
For meteorological issues we will have a reliable forecast seven days before October 20, which means October 13.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
BTW I am temporarily driving a Water
Truck in a Coal Mine in B.C and am around
the Big Heavies when working.
They sure get my attention when
I meet up with them in the Mine.
Obviously, high speed would take less track time. However, you might want to consider having the EVs travel at normal highway speeds. In the US on the interstate highways, that is likely in the 75 to 80 mph range.
A reduced speed would decrease the likelihood of a car part failure (tires, etc.).
As you have posted, you are not trying to set a record, only demonstrate the effect.
Also, cabin temperature control (air conditioning or heating) should be identical in both cars. Windows shut on both. Identical tires. Weight the same. Identical models and options. Different car exterior colors are fine.
Here is a recent update on the MIT designed 1 Megawatt Motor for Electrical Aircraft use. Perhaps, the 1 MW motor could be powered by a a 1+ MWe E-cat.
I posted “How stable is the SKLep SSM system — any times where it failed to operate?” and you responded yes.
I realize that failures are normal in testing during system development. Occurrence of failures are a normal part of development. Are you concerned at all regarding failure during the actual demonstration?
Yuri:
We cannot give the date yet because it is possible that the present date will be delayed for meteorological or technological issues: both these issues will be well known only 7 days before the scheduled date; this is also why we suggested to all the persons that will attend the test not to buy unrefundable flight tickets or hotel reservations,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
As the ECAT will be connected to the car, will it be possible to have a mockup, or a secondary Ecat to view so that the media and live streamers can see the size of the ecat which has been inserted into the EV?
1. have you achieved a successful test wherein you have been able to retain or improve the EV battery system state of charge while driving a moving EV?
2. does the SKLep SSM control system control the charging so the EV battery system is not over-charged (charged beyond 100%)?
3. How stable is the SKLep SSM system — any times where it failed to operate?
Mr.Rossi
The presentation drive is not only about demonstrating the operability, but also about the advertising time, which tends to be long. Therefore, it is a good idea to plan your journey by electric car with these two aspects in mind.
After all, the driving time can be changed operationally, according to the demand of the onlookers.
All the best J.Š.
I notice the elapsed number of days counter on the E-Cat Live website often is not updated? Is this a manual process? I see 180 days run time, but it should be 183 or 184 depending on the time zone.
Steven Nicholes Karels:
Thank you for your suggestions.
The certified measurement of the SOC ( State Of Charge ) will not be made by the indicator onboard the car; it will be made independently from a Third Party expert of the art with specialistic instrumentation that he normally uses in a vast variety of electric vehicles.
Yes, the 2 EV will run at half track of distance from each other.
About the trolls, they will say their usual B.S. whatever we do: too bad.
Good idea to add to the EV without Ecat a mass equal to the Ecat system ( which is very complex ).
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jean Paul Renoir:
Thank you for your suggestion; same suggestion I received from two Professors of the University La Sapienza of Rome that will attend the test.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Good words and thoughts. The implementation lies in the details.
If we assume a modern EV with a full range of 200 – 300 miles, and an average speed of 100 mph, then the EV (without the SKLep SSM unit) will be exhausted in 2 – 3 hours. A slower speed will, obviously, take more time to exhaust the battery system. If the EV, equipped with the SKLep SSM unit, has a battery reading of still 100%, then the trolls would say the battery indicator was faked. So, to negate that objection, the EV with the SKLep SSM unit should be run some additional distance and time — perhaps the double the total distance as compared to the EV without the SKLep SSM unit?
As previously mentioned, the two EVs should be identical in every sense. Their gross weight should be the same. Additional mass should be added to the non-SKLep SSM equipped vehicle. They should be driven on the same track, at the same time, yet separated far enough apart to preclude a claim of “drafting”, and at the same speed.
@Jean Paul Renoir
I too agree with you, but I think that also 5 hours could be acceptable, not more. Anyway, if the battery of the Ecat powered car will be full at the same moment in which the car without Ecat stops because its battery is void , for me it’s enough,
Best
Vivienne
Dr Rossi,
Why are you making a 10 hours demo ?
Nobody will follow a 10 hours demo, either in streaming or in presence, and it is completely useless too.
If we will see two twin E.V., certified to be same model, one powered by the Ecat, the other only by its regular battery, if when the E.V. powered with the regular battery stops after 2 or three hours because its SOC (= residual charge) is = 0% and the regular battery of the E.V. charged by the Ecat has an SOC = 100 %, the issue is over. You will win, period.
A streaming of 2 hours will be view with high attention, like a movie, or a normal cars race.
The result will be clear: with the Ecat the E.V. battery remains charged, without the Ecat it gets void. Period. You won.
I suggest to put multiple cameras that cover all the circuit for all the time, so no hidden spot remains not even for a second, and be sure that the measurement of the SOC, both at the start and at the end of the race, is made by an independent party, because that is the core of all.
Good luck,
JPR
From both the technical and economic characteristics, a 3-phase microinverter would presently be my
first choice for a new installation of a residential E-Cat Power system.
E.g here is one capable of 2kW, (4 inputs of 500W, 26-60V). https://emea.apsystems.com/portfolio-item/apsystems-qt2/
Dear Jon Darrel,
Please check the datasheet and note that 18 pcs of the 10W PowerCell in series is not supplying 1.8 kW but 180 W.
This fact makes things much more manageable.
Dear Readers,
what belongs to ecat ssm for use at home. First is would make the most sense to use the ecat directly for electric heating. Also with washing machine, drier, water kettle and all things who need much power. It would be nice to have a solution for refridgerators because they need 2-5(?) times of power to start the apparatus. Maybe with a little battery? But i am sure the market will deliver solutions sooner or later.
Dr. Rossi should focus to the increase of production, not dissipate his energies in every detail.
Best regards
R.Brand
@Andreas:
Yes, I live in Germany. 🙂
My goal is to supply our house with E-Cat. For this purpose, inverters and batteries are to be installed, just like connecting a photovoltaic system. Instead of the PV modules, I would then like to use E-Cat in an appropriate series and parallel connection. Possibly I would like to design the battery and E-Cats in such a way that I can also charge a car.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Remember, the SKLep SSM does not need to work perfectly. It only needs to provide the same or more energy than what the EV battery discharges over the demonstration time period.
Because you are using the EV battery system, you could have errors/events that include:
a. The need to restart the SKLep SSM system many times during the demonstration. So long as the EV Battery system is fully charged at the end of the demonstration.
b. The need to manually turn on and off the SKLep SSM during the demonstration. So long as the EV Battery system is fully charged at the end of the demonstration.
c. Some of the SKLep SSM energy supplying components fail during the demonstration. So long as the EV Battery system is fully charged at the end of the demonstration.
Sam:
Thank you for your link; this is not the battery we are working with; we are working with the regular battery of the E.V. we are applying the Ecat to.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Sam:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Julian Thomson designer of
Lotus Elise and Nyobolt EV
Concept.
https://youtu.be/nP_Y-DvAk5w?si=nNn_2HMPifyz8sg9
https://youtu.be/8F67foRTKYQ?si=BeCaDtY_qfdqlLme
Another article about
Nyobolt Battery technology.
https://www.autoweek.com/news/green-cars/a44557293/nyobolt-claims-zero-to-fully-charged-ev-in-6-minutes/
Sam:
Thank you for the links,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Interesting interview with
car designer Julian Thomson.
https://youtu.be/DNXgiA3S5TQ?si=cS9zK56PhEw66ZTG
Hello DR Rossi
A Video about Nyobolt fast EV
Battery charging technology.
https://youtu.be/QdztTrPX8A4?si=2CQZYMgszErIKckB
Regards
Sam
Udo:
For technological issues we will decide on October 10, after the series of tests will be completed and we will reach Sigma 5.
For meteorological issues we will have a reliable forecast seven days before October 20, which means October 13.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
When do you think you will be able to announce if you will scratch and delay or not ?
Sam:
I am not an expert of the matter,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Sam:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
It depends on what happens.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
If the test fails in the Morning do
you have another one ready to go
In the afternoon?
Off topic but interesting.
https://www.producer.com/news/forgotten-combine-tuned-up-for-harvest-again/
Hello DR Rossi
Some new EV technology.
https://youtu.be/zUI2kUgt_uQ?si=LCOCPiBMV1DcNNxS
Would your technology recharge mining
Electric Trucks?
https://youtu.be/6TxMeHRq1mk?si=j4jcKfyVfzLV44zp
BTW I am temporarily driving a Water
Truck in a Coal Mine in B.C and am around
the Big Heavies when working.
They sure get my attention when
I meet up with them in the Mine.
Regards
Sam
Steven Nicholes Karels:
Thank you for your suggestions,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Obviously, high speed would take less track time. However, you might want to consider having the EVs travel at normal highway speeds. In the US on the interstate highways, that is likely in the 75 to 80 mph range.
A reduced speed would decrease the likelihood of a car part failure (tires, etc.).
As you have posted, you are not trying to set a record, only demonstrate the effect.
Also, cabin temperature control (air conditioning or heating) should be identical in both cars. Windows shut on both. Identical tires. Weight the same. Identical models and options. Different car exterior colors are fine.
Steven Nicholes Karels:
That’s my nightmare.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Joseph Fine:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Here is a recent update on the MIT designed 1 Megawatt Motor for Electrical Aircraft use. Perhaps, the 1 MW motor could be powered by a a 1+ MWe E-cat.
https://drivesncontrols.com/news/fullstory.php/aid/7387/MIT_92s_megawatt_motor_could_help_to_electrify_aviation.html
Best wishes on the upcoming Electric Car race.
Joseph Fine
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I posted “How stable is the SKLep SSM system — any times where it failed to operate?” and you responded yes.
I realize that failures are normal in testing during system development. Occurrence of failures are a normal part of development. Are you concerned at all regarding failure during the actual demonstration?
Mark Saker:
Thank you for the suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Yuri:
We cannot give the date yet because it is possible that the present date will be delayed for meteorological or technological issues: both these issues will be well known only 7 days before the scheduled date; this is also why we suggested to all the persons that will attend the test not to buy unrefundable flight tickets or hotel reservations,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Why don’t you communicare the date of the EV test ?
Hi Dr Rossi
As the ECAT will be connected to the car, will it be possible to have a mockup, or a secondary Ecat to view so that the media and live streamers can see the size of the ecat which has been inserted into the EV?
This could be just to look at.
thanks
Mark
Steven Nicholes Karels:
1. not yet
2. yes
3. yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
On the EV powered by an SKLep SSM project —
1. have you achieved a successful test wherein you have been able to retain or improve the EV battery system state of charge while driving a moving EV?
2. does the SKLep SSM control system control the charging so the EV battery system is not over-charged (charged beyond 100%)?
3. How stable is the SKLep SSM system — any times where it failed to operate?
Jan Srajer:
Thank you for your suggestion; I agree.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Mr.Rossi
The presentation drive is not only about demonstrating the operability, but also about the advertising time, which tends to be long. Therefore, it is a good idea to plan your journey by electric car with these two aspects in mind.
After all, the driving time can be changed operationally, according to the demand of the onlookers.
All the best J.Š.
Wilfried:
Correct,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Sam:
Thank you for your links,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Daniel G. Zavela:
The counter is manual, we update it every several days, so normally it is several days behind.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@JPR:
I see it differently. The E-Cat powered EV has to drive until it is excluded that the E-Cat could be a battery.
Best Regards
Wilfried
I agree with Jean Paul Renoir,
Best
Rupert
Dear Dr. Rossi,
I notice the elapsed number of days counter on the E-Cat Live website often is not updated? Is this a manual process? I see 180 days run time, but it should be 183 or 184 depending on the time zone.
I’m enjoying your live online E-Cat demo.
Best Regards,
Daniel G. Zavela
More on the Ether.
https://youtu.be/8cYf1eIMVHs?si=2i-74xpXF_r18eXO
Physhics from the
Greeks to Einstein.
https://youtu.be/0LjQt1-D0Pc?si=c76tEV94sZ43xYwA
Hello DR Rossi
A tour of the Physhics Department
University La Sapienza of Rome.
https://youtu.be/KMSnmo-FNX0?si=_4LtHjh81dfVjupu
Regards
Sam
Steven Nicholes Karels:
Thank you for your suggestions.
The certified measurement of the SOC ( State Of Charge ) will not be made by the indicator onboard the car; it will be made independently from a Third Party expert of the art with specialistic instrumentation that he normally uses in a vast variety of electric vehicles.
Yes, the 2 EV will run at half track of distance from each other.
About the trolls, they will say their usual B.S. whatever we do: too bad.
Good idea to add to the EV without Ecat a mass equal to the Ecat system ( which is very complex ).
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jean Paul Renoir:
Thank you for your suggestion; same suggestion I received from two Professors of the University La Sapienza of Rome that will attend the test.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jean Paul Renoir,
Good words and thoughts. The implementation lies in the details.
If we assume a modern EV with a full range of 200 – 300 miles, and an average speed of 100 mph, then the EV (without the SKLep SSM unit) will be exhausted in 2 – 3 hours. A slower speed will, obviously, take more time to exhaust the battery system. If the EV, equipped with the SKLep SSM unit, has a battery reading of still 100%, then the trolls would say the battery indicator was faked. So, to negate that objection, the EV with the SKLep SSM unit should be run some additional distance and time — perhaps the double the total distance as compared to the EV without the SKLep SSM unit?
As previously mentioned, the two EVs should be identical in every sense. Their gross weight should be the same. Additional mass should be added to the non-SKLep SSM equipped vehicle. They should be driven on the same track, at the same time, yet separated far enough apart to preclude a claim of “drafting”, and at the same speed.
@Jean Paul Renoir
I too agree with you, but I think that also 5 hours could be acceptable, not more. Anyway, if the battery of the Ecat powered car will be full at the same moment in which the car without Ecat stops because its battery is void , for me it’s enough,
Best
Vivienne
@JPR I totally agree with every single word you wrote
This suggestion was past due,
Roberto
Dr Rossi,
Why are you making a 10 hours demo ?
Nobody will follow a 10 hours demo, either in streaming or in presence, and it is completely useless too.
If we will see two twin E.V., certified to be same model, one powered by the Ecat, the other only by its regular battery, if when the E.V. powered with the regular battery stops after 2 or three hours because its SOC (= residual charge) is = 0% and the regular battery of the E.V. charged by the Ecat has an SOC = 100 %, the issue is over. You will win, period.
A streaming of 2 hours will be view with high attention, like a movie, or a normal cars race.
The result will be clear: with the Ecat the E.V. battery remains charged, without the Ecat it gets void. Period. You won.
I suggest to put multiple cameras that cover all the circuit for all the time, so no hidden spot remains not even for a second, and be sure that the measurement of the SOC, both at the start and at the end of the race, is made by an independent party, because that is the core of all.
Good luck,
JPR
@Jon
From both the technical and economic characteristics, a 3-phase microinverter would presently be my
first choice for a new installation of a residential E-Cat Power system.
E.g here is one capable of 2kW, (4 inputs of 500W, 26-60V).
https://emea.apsystems.com/portfolio-item/apsystems-qt2/
Best Regards
Klas
Dear Jon Darrel,
Please check the datasheet and note that 18 pcs of the 10W PowerCell in series is not supplying 1.8 kW but 180 W.
This fact makes things much more manageable.
Best Regards
KLas
Dear Readers,
what belongs to ecat ssm for use at home. First is would make the most sense to use the ecat directly for electric heating. Also with washing machine, drier, water kettle and all things who need much power. It would be nice to have a solution for refridgerators because they need 2-5(?) times of power to start the apparatus. Maybe with a little battery? But i am sure the market will deliver solutions sooner or later.
Dr. Rossi should focus to the increase of production, not dissipate his energies in every detail.
Best regards
R.Brand
@Andreas:
Yes, I live in Germany. 🙂
My goal is to supply our house with E-Cat. For this purpose, inverters and batteries are to be installed, just like connecting a photovoltaic system. Instead of the PV modules, I would then like to use E-Cat in an appropriate series and parallel connection. Possibly I would like to design the battery and E-Cats in such a way that I can also charge a car.
Best regards
Wilfried
Steven Nicholes Karels,
Thank you for the suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.