Mr.Rossi
I think that the production of E-catSKLep NGU should start in two places at the same time. In the US and China. It is in line with the bipolar view of the world and would bring you a balanced profit and a smooth ramp-up of production without the worry of reverse engineering.
All the best J.Š
Dear Dr. Rossi,
please consider also to produce the ecat for the Eu in an Eu-country.
There are always advantages to produce local. The same is valid for UNASUR, Mercosur, SCO/BRICS, Arabia, ASEAN, Africa..
Best regards
Rainer
Coder Seeker:
We are close to resolve the problems emerged in October: within this month we will restart the live streaming and within the first quarter of 2024 we will make the next presentation of the Ecat SKLep NGU. The pre-order policy is continuing, to reach the target allowing the start of the industrial production.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Also. When is this technology going to become mainstream? I am really curious. People are still talking about solar, wind, geothermal, hydro, hot fusion as the possible solutions . When is E-CAT technology going to be included in that list?
Paul:
Thank you for your support.
Carl-Oscar Gullstroem has been a consultant of Leonardo Corporation several years ago, and he gave us important theoretical information, as a theoretical physicist as he is. He also participated with me at the presentation of the Ecat SKL we made in 2017 at the IVA of Stockholm: you can reach the video among the links published on http://www.ecat.com
Recently I read an interesting new publication of him on Researchgate ( http://www.researchgate.net ): maybe you can contact him through Researchgate, going on his site there and sending him a message.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi.
Thank you for your relentless work on the E-cat technology.
I have recently become worried about the well being of your past collaborator, Carl-Oscar Gullström. Are you still working with him? If not, do you know if he is still alive healthy, etc. I can’t find any online presence for him for several years.
Steven Nicholes Karels:
1. they are the same thing: the NGU is just an evolution of the same product
2. yes, but after we reach the well known target ( see http://www.ecatorders.com )
3. yes, to be defined
Warm Regards,
A.R.
1. Is the NGU now the standard technology that you will be developing, OR, are you still pursuing the SKLep SSM technology, OR have they become the same, OR, another approach?
2. Can you mass produce the NGU or the SKLep SSM devices in the millions quickly (say, during a few months of time)?
3. Are you still planning to do the EV demonstration? If so, when?
Could it be that the ECAT SKLEP NGU, through resonance within the molecular structures of the solar panels, produces a similar effect as if sunlight were shining on the panels? Instead of concentrating the energy locally in the SKLEP, does dispersion help avoid certain amplitudes?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
If the Ecat NGU will generate electricity, as a consequence of this fact it will be also fit to recharge electric vehicles through the columns: correct ?
R.C.
Steve Albers posed the question “As a clarifying question, will the total energy produced by solar + Ecat be greater when connected together compared with having each running separately? If so, by how much?” To which you said “Yes”.
So, the question is: Is F(solar + eCat) > f(solar) + f(eCat)?
1. If F is a linear function, then the two arguments on each side of the equal sign must be the same.
2. Generally, A higher input tends to have a lower conversion efficiency then a similar lower input (as in limiting).
For example, if the combined input of the solar and the eCat are greater than what the inverter can handle, the combined inputs will convert to less power than the total power of the sum of each of the inputs converted separately.
Can you clarify your answer? At first glance, it appears to be incorrect.
As a clarifying question, will the total energy produced by solar + Ecat be greater when connected together compared with having each running separately? If so, by how much?
Thank you for your opinion. However, I respectfully disagree. Ask the resident of Texas when a winter storm froze all of the Wind Power units. Solar does not work at night and during storms its energy output drops. Wind units, obviously, require the presence of wind. As I drive around, I see countless Wind units still, while those around them are working – mechanical or economic reasons for their non-use.
Energy storage usually consists of thermal or electrical storage. Thermal is very inefficient and electrical storage usually requires lithium-based batteries. There are insufficient lithium processing facilities to process the amount of lithium needed for worldwide energy storage, let alone conversion to electric vehicles, cars, trucks, railroad units, airplanes.
Nuclear (fission) is dead as the plants are old, politically undesirable, and there are proliferation concerns (uranium and thorium byproducts include plutonium).
Hydroelectric requires unique land conditions and has its own environmental issues.
Coal-based and fossil-fuel based electrical generation is not politically acceptable. Natural gas is likely the best alternative but does not address the carbon issue.
Fusion is still a pipe dream and is always 30-years in the future.
If eCat technology works, it holds the promise of clean, unlimited energy with a minimum requirement for scarce minerals.
The term baseload is outdated in the field of energy. Storage and load management is increasingly replacing the historical need for baseload sources.
Electricity storage is becoming cheaper and cheaper and new controllable loads such as Bitcoin mining are being added. Wind and solar are ample primary sources.
Nothing against the E-Cat, as a replacement for storage and as a sustainable source with a low ecological rucksack and the potential to be extremely cheap, it has great significance for the energy of the future.
As I understand your SKLep technology, your units are excellent at providing constant level DC electrical power but they may have difficulties with reactive and/or rapidly changing electrical loads.
Have you considered coupling your technology with LiPo batteries? In this concept, the SKLep unit would provide the average power needed while the battery would handle electrical loads that might otherwise prove to be difficult.
The ideal voltage level of a LiPo battery cell is 3.8 Volts – this is the storage voltage. The active range is between 3.2 Volts and 4.2 Volts. A voltage condition below 3.2 Volts leads to battery cell damage. Above 4.2 Volts can result in fires, etc.
LiPo batteries are described in terms of the number of series and the number of parallel connections. For example, a 6s2p would be 6 LiPo cells in series with the two groups in parallel. Modern LiPo batteries have an output cable and a balance plug. The balance plug is used by battery chargers to balance the charge in each set of series battery cells so that all batteries are of the same voltage. Usually, the series number ranges between 1 and 6.
If you modified the SKLep units to output a number of isolated voltages of around 3.8 Volts, you could provide the average power to the battery so that each cell was operating at its storage voltage. The battery could accommodate the changes in the electrical load.
By keeping the cells at the nominal storage voltage, the life of the LiPo battery would be extended. Thus, you would have a means of handling those difficult loads that currently are eluding you.
Have you been able to:
1. Make a limited quantity production run for the NGU units?
2. Have you tested the NGU units to verify that they will not suffer the same problem(s) as the SKLep SSM units?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Can you share where you are at in terms of SKLep confirmed sales orders – how close to the 1 Million orders?
Jan Srajer:
Thank you for your suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Max:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/president-biden-just-pledged-to-shut-down-60-of-america-s-electric-power/ar-AA1likUL?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=06be47f7bc074ef0a7203e7e50ff9af5&ei=31#comments
the US could really use your products about NOW!
Mr.Rossi
I think that the production of E-catSKLep NGU should start in two places at the same time. In the US and China. It is in line with the bipolar view of the world and would bring you a balanced profit and a smooth ramp-up of production without the worry of reverse engineering.
All the best J.Š
Rainer:
Thank you for your suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
please consider also to produce the ecat for the Eu in an Eu-country.
There are always advantages to produce local. The same is valid for UNASUR, Mercosur, SCO/BRICS, Arabia, ASEAN, Africa..
Best regards
Rainer
Jean Paul Renoir:
Mostly in the USA,
Warm regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Where will be made the massive manufacturing of the Ecats ?
Best
JPR
Rupert:
In paragraph 5,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
After your answer to Anonymous yesterday, where can I find exactly the part related to the electrons density in the paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions ?
Anonymous:
Yes, as it is explained here:
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Is electron density a critical issue for the Ecat technology ?
Thank you if you can answer
Coder Seeker:
We are close to resolve the problems emerged in October: within this month we will restart the live streaming and within the first quarter of 2024 we will make the next presentation of the Ecat SKLep NGU. The pre-order policy is continuing, to reach the target allowing the start of the industrial production.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Also. When is this technology going to become mainstream? I am really curious. People are still talking about solar, wind, geothermal, hydro, hot fusion as the possible solutions . When is E-CAT technology going to be included in that list?
Hi Roberta,
Thanks for the clarification))
Harry R.
Klas:
Thank you for your instructions,
Warm regards,
A.R.
@Paul
It seems you have not yet tried https://www.hitta.se/, the most used Swedish online phonebook.
Regards
Klas
Paul:
Thank you for your support.
Carl-Oscar Gullstroem has been a consultant of Leonardo Corporation several years ago, and he gave us important theoretical information, as a theoretical physicist as he is. He also participated with me at the presentation of the Ecat SKL we made in 2017 at the IVA of Stockholm: you can reach the video among the links published on http://www.ecat.com
Recently I read an interesting new publication of him on Researchgate ( http://www.researchgate.net ): maybe you can contact him through Researchgate, going on his site there and sending him a message.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hi Harry,
I mean the EV recharging columns, as we call them in Italy: “colonnine”
All the best
Roberta
Dr. Rossi.
Thank you for your relentless work on the E-cat technology.
I have recently become worried about the well being of your past collaborator, Carl-Oscar Gullström. Are you still working with him? If not, do you know if he is still alive healthy, etc. I can’t find any online presence for him for several years.
Hi Roberta,
I’m not quite sure what you mean by ‘columns’, could you clarify ?
Thank you,
Harry R
Jan Srajer:
I agree,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Mr.Rossi
I think the E-catSKLep electric car demonstration plan is still very exciting for your readers.
Warm Regards J.Š.
Steven Nicholes Karels:
1. they are the same thing: the NGU is just an evolution of the same product
2. yes, but after we reach the well known target ( see http://www.ecatorders.com )
3. yes, to be defined
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Questions:
1. Is the NGU now the standard technology that you will be developing, OR, are you still pursuing the SKLep SSM technology, OR have they become the same, OR, another approach?
2. Can you mass produce the NGU or the SKLep SSM devices in the millions quickly (say, during a few months of time)?
3. Are you still planning to do the EV demonstration? If so, when?
Koen Vandewalle:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Roberta:
Correct,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonymous:
Yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
When the streaming will restarted, will the setup be the same ?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Could it be that the ECAT SKLEP NGU, through resonance within the molecular structures of the solar panels, produces a similar effect as if sunlight were shining on the panels? Instead of concentrating the energy locally in the SKLEP, does dispersion help avoid certain amplitudes?
With curious regards,
Koen
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
If the Ecat NGU will generate electricity, as a consequence of this fact it will be also fit to recharge electric vehicles through the columns: correct ?
R.C.
CC:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi
Can you confirm that the live streaming will be restarted by this month ?
Sam:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello DR Rossi
The History of Solar Power.
https://youtu.be/KXDTSCQsM5U?si=cmVc8iXwssFG4QmF
Regards
Sam
Steven Nicholes Karels:
It does not work that way. My answer was correct. With the demo will give evidence of it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Steve Albers posed the question “As a clarifying question, will the total energy produced by solar + Ecat be greater when connected together compared with having each running separately? If so, by how much?” To which you said “Yes”.
So, the question is: Is F(solar + eCat) > f(solar) + f(eCat)?
1. If F is a linear function, then the two arguments on each side of the equal sign must be the same.
2. Generally, A higher input tends to have a lower conversion efficiency then a similar lower input (as in limiting).
For example, if the combined input of the solar and the eCat are greater than what the inverter can handle, the combined inputs will convert to less power than the total power of the sum of each of the inputs converted separately.
Can you clarify your answer? At first glance, it appears to be incorrect.
Steve Albers:
1- yes
2- will show in the demo
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Greetings Andrea,
As a clarifying question, will the total energy produced by solar + Ecat be greater when connected together compared with having each running separately? If so, by how much?
Roberto:
Yes, it is correct.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
As a matter of fact the solar application of the Ecat NGU will be by far the most powerful solar system of the world, correct ?
Roberto
Wilfried,
Thank you for your opinion. However, I respectfully disagree. Ask the resident of Texas when a winter storm froze all of the Wind Power units. Solar does not work at night and during storms its energy output drops. Wind units, obviously, require the presence of wind. As I drive around, I see countless Wind units still, while those around them are working – mechanical or economic reasons for their non-use.
Energy storage usually consists of thermal or electrical storage. Thermal is very inefficient and electrical storage usually requires lithium-based batteries. There are insufficient lithium processing facilities to process the amount of lithium needed for worldwide energy storage, let alone conversion to electric vehicles, cars, trucks, railroad units, airplanes.
Nuclear (fission) is dead as the plants are old, politically undesirable, and there are proliferation concerns (uranium and thorium byproducts include plutonium).
Hydroelectric requires unique land conditions and has its own environmental issues.
Coal-based and fossil-fuel based electrical generation is not politically acceptable. Natural gas is likely the best alternative but does not address the carbon issue.
Fusion is still a pipe dream and is always 30-years in the future.
If eCat technology works, it holds the promise of clean, unlimited energy with a minimum requirement for scarce minerals.
My thoughts for you to consider.
Steven Nicholes Karels:
1,2- This all is part of the complex work we have in progress,
Warm regards,
A.R.
Steven Nicholes Karels,
Thank you for your suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@Steven N. Karels
The term baseload is outdated in the field of energy. Storage and load management is increasingly replacing the historical need for baseload sources.
Electricity storage is becoming cheaper and cheaper and new controllable loads such as Bitcoin mining are being added. Wind and solar are ample primary sources.
Nothing against the E-Cat, as a replacement for storage and as a sustainable source with a low ecological rucksack and the potential to be extremely cheap, it has great significance for the energy of the future.
Best Regards
Wilfried
Dear Andrea Rossi,
As I understand your SKLep technology, your units are excellent at providing constant level DC electrical power but they may have difficulties with reactive and/or rapidly changing electrical loads.
Have you considered coupling your technology with LiPo batteries? In this concept, the SKLep unit would provide the average power needed while the battery would handle electrical loads that might otherwise prove to be difficult.
The ideal voltage level of a LiPo battery cell is 3.8 Volts – this is the storage voltage. The active range is between 3.2 Volts and 4.2 Volts. A voltage condition below 3.2 Volts leads to battery cell damage. Above 4.2 Volts can result in fires, etc.
LiPo batteries are described in terms of the number of series and the number of parallel connections. For example, a 6s2p would be 6 LiPo cells in series with the two groups in parallel. Modern LiPo batteries have an output cable and a balance plug. The balance plug is used by battery chargers to balance the charge in each set of series battery cells so that all batteries are of the same voltage. Usually, the series number ranges between 1 and 6.
If you modified the SKLep units to output a number of isolated voltages of around 3.8 Volts, you could provide the average power to the battery so that each cell was operating at its storage voltage. The battery could accommodate the changes in the electrical load.
By keeping the cells at the nominal storage voltage, the life of the LiPo battery would be extended. Thus, you would have a means of handling those difficult loads that currently are eluding you.
Thoughts?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Have you been able to:
1. Make a limited quantity production run for the NGU units?
2. Have you tested the NGU units to verify that they will not suffer the same problem(s) as the SKLep SSM units?
Peter Thomas:
Thank you for the information and for your support,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven N. Karels,
I think we are going to make an useful job,
Warm Regards,
A.R.