Dr. Rossi: We have agreed on one issue for five years. Happy customers will ultimately decide the fate of your new fire. That is why I do not understand why you cannot persuade the customer of the year long test to come forward and give his opinion of his savings using the E-Cats.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I read from your enemies that they do not accept the results of the ERV because they have made different measures: but this is ridiculous, it is as if a team refuses the results recorded by the official referee because they have a personal referee that has measured differently !!!
Go ahead, Andrea, get rid of them and go on with the production of the E-Cat !
Caterine
let’s talk about a 6 kW electric power Quark installed in my apartment:
1) should it in any case be connected to the grid?
2) if yes, when 6 kW are not used, what happens? let’s assume I am consuming only 4 kWh, the remainig 2 kWh are necessarily sent to the grid? (and therefore I need to set up up a contract with the distributor for he to buy my electricity)? Or Q is capable of modulating the production according to the need in any moment?
3) If not, will a normal car battery be enough to operate the Quark?
Waiting Q with impatience….
“Cherokee-related firms and officers have contributed at least $267,600 to state legislative and political campaigns and at least $80,700 to federal candidates from New Jersey since 1999.”
I want you to know I have been following you since 2011 and wish the best for you! If you would answer the following questions if you can, it would be appreciated.
1. Who paid the electricity bill for the e-cat during the 352 day test?
2. Was the amount of heat produced sufficient for the customers needs?
3. Was the customers need for heat approximately 1 MW? If no, what was the customers need?
4. Did the electricity bill correspond with measured performance of the e-cat?
Kenko:I have taken samples to be analyzed, as I already said, during the 352 days. The results of the analysis so far are confidential.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
I cannot give any information related to the litigation on course, but, if I am not wrong, the address where the test has been made is contained in our published complaint.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
Since the 1 year test is over and the fuel changed, has any of the ash been analysed? If so, is it possibe to reveal the analysis?
TIA
kenko
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Somebody wrote that if the E-Cat really was making 1 MWh/h all people around would have been burnt or something.
Comments or are you gonna spam this ?
Jeb
Hank Mills:
1- F8
2- no
3- no
4- no
5- patent in preparation
6- yes
7- can’t answer in positive or negative
8- no; by the way, if you read well our complaint, my answers on this blog your head shpuld be cleared enough.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi:
I see how you are fighting like a lion against the behemoth Cherokee, that is moving all the power they have to try to steal your IP. This is a veritable Goliath against David duel…win for us, because we want the E-Cat manufactured and they want not to manufacture E-Cats, they want only to manufacture toilet paper, as you correctly say.
May God help you,
Delano
You has replied thus to one very recent question about the ERV test:
“The results are coherent with what I have repeatedly written on this blog during the 352 days of test: the plant has worked mostly in SSM mode.”
This basically says it all. There’s no need to publish any ERV really
1) You don’t need to feel obligated to provide precise characteristics of the E-Cat X (or Quark). A rough preliminary summary, subject to change, would be extremely welcome! Would you be willing to give out a description that doesn’t include performance metrics?
2) You have several other patents pending in addition to the granted patent, “Fluid Heater.” Have you been given any indication by your patent attorney or the patent office how soon these patents may be granted?
3) I’ve been doing additional reading on hydrogen loading in the past week and have a ton of concepts bouncing around in my head: Van der Waals forces at the surface, interstitial sites between atoms in the nickel lattice, a-phase & b-phase loading, the creation of elastic tension by hydrogen atoms in the lattice, micro-void formation where re-formation of atomic hydrogen to molecular hydrogen can occur, extensive surface modification resulting in cracks and micro-cavities, and how pressure and temperature play a part in all of this. You were very correct that there was not one exhaustive text on the loading of hydrogen into nickel powder. But there is a good bit of information out there scattered about in various papers. Do you have any thoughts in general about this topic you can share?
4) Since you cannot provide the ERV report at this time, is there anyway you could publish your own data that was collected and the figures you derived?
5) Have you ever mechanically created a hole, pore, or cavity on a sample of nickel and then successfully induced a nuclear reaction at the location?
6) Has Industrial Heat observed self-sustaining behavior from the E-Cat replications they built themselves?
7) Have you directly measured an alpha particle flux with a charged particle detector from an E-Cat in operation? If so, can you describe what you detected? Second only to self sustained heat production, I think this would be absolute, beyond refutable evidence that could be used in court. Of course if the alphas are thermalized mostly in the micro-cavities, they might not escape to then penetrate through a small aperture in the reactor.
8) A long time ago you mentioned that you might in the future release images/video of the massive melt down of a reactor that produced a megawatt of power for ten seconds which melted ceramic. The video could be a morale booster from some of your supporters whom are having brain splitting headaches right now. Would you consider releasing it?
Thank you for your time and continued willingness to move forward to commercialize this technology.
Dear Andrea Rossi
Let’s talk of serious things.
After the results of the 1 year test of the 1 MW E-Cat are such plants for sale ? Where can we find the characteristics ? Are you already able to manufacture them, even if not in massive production ?
Thank you,
I.C.
Patrick Ellul:
The Report will be published after it will have been disclosed in the Court.
Everything you are reading now is just toilet paper, diffused by professionals of the same and the ones they have paid for.
I can only repeat what my Attorney wrote in our press release, it is that we are pleased by the results. The results are coherent with what I have repeatedly written on this blog during the 352 days of test: the plant has worked mostly in SSM mode. As all the visitors have seen.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
How many pages long is the ERV report and how many measured data points does it contain?
You can surely tell us that 🙂
Work hard and warm regards.
Patrick
Can you give an idea what % of the symphony is produced directly in Electricity?
A: 0.01-1
B: 1.0-10
C: F8, but I’ve seen mostly A and sometimes B for some time, while experimenting. It works very intermittent, and it is hard to predict.
D: We have to make a test in a container for at least one year.
Are there still ongoing experiments in order to generate thrust? Does this seem a fruitful branch for the future, or is it more a side effect?
now that the performance-test is over and the world knows the brave, secret customer, can you share some photos of the whole story ?
Something like ‘making of’ ??
Some sweating, clueless technicians during installation – some photos of Andrea Rossi and team with an Xmas-tree on the eCat – some humorless, sceptic looking safety-inspector before ‘permit to operate’ was granted – all these are quite interesting to the audience and would not interfere with the arm wrestling in court.
Dear Andrea:
We trust to what you said about the litigation, because what you say makes sense, what they say does not.
You will win and we will have the E-Cat. They are interested only to sell toilet paper in change of gold, you are struggling to make real things.
We trust in you.
Thank you for your hard work.
Fred
Dr Joseph Fine:
You have made pre-disclosure of the last version of the Cat ! Now, you jeopardized the possibility to patent it. I am sure this is a “concertation” with IH against me !!!
Heartbroken Regards,
A.R.
Soknoi:
I will defend myself saying the truth in Court, bringing evidence of it and making a good product.
There is nothing else to do.
We are not getting damages because people is intelligent.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Can you report on the status of the robots used for production? Have any been delivered or set up?
Thanks
Bernie Morrissey
Dr. Rossi: We have agreed on one issue for five years. Happy customers will ultimately decide the fate of your new fire. That is why I do not understand why you cannot persuade the customer of the year long test to come forward and give his opinion of his savings using the E-Cats.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I read from your enemies that they do not accept the results of the ERV because they have made different measures: but this is ridiculous, it is as if a team refuses the results recorded by the official referee because they have a personal referee that has measured differently !!!
Go ahead, Andrea, get rid of them and go on with the production of the E-Cat !
Caterine
Dr Andrea Rossi
Did I understand well, that the E-Cat QuarkX will produce heat, light and electricity ?
Cheers,
Ronald
Dear Dr. Rossi
let’s talk about a 6 kW electric power Quark installed in my apartment:
1) should it in any case be connected to the grid?
2) if yes, when 6 kW are not used, what happens? let’s assume I am consuming only 4 kWh, the remainig 2 kWh are necessarily sent to the grid? (and therefore I need to set up up a contract with the distributor for he to buy my electricity)? Or Q is capable of modulating the production according to the need in any moment?
3) If not, will a normal car battery be enough to operate the Quark?
Waiting Q with impatience….
My best regards and simpathy
Giovanni
Andrea, have you seen this?
https://animpossibleinvention.com/2016/04/12/and-heres-the-opposite-hypothesis-on-the-rossi-ih-affair/#comment-4566
Cherokee and its 27 (!!!) business entities were investigated by the New Jersey Office of Inspector General in February 2008
http://nj.gov/comptroller/news/oig/pdf/Meadowlands%20Remediation%20and%20Redevelopment%20Project.pdf
“Cherokee-related firms and officers have contributed at least $267,600 to state legislative and political campaigns and at least $80,700 to federal candidates from New Jersey since 1999.”
Scary.
/Ron
Andrea Rossi
I want you to know I have been following you since 2011 and wish the best for you! If you would answer the following questions if you can, it would be appreciated.
1. Who paid the electricity bill for the e-cat during the 352 day test?
2. Was the amount of heat produced sufficient for the customers needs?
3. Was the customers need for heat approximately 1 MW? If no, what was the customers need?
4. Did the electricity bill correspond with measured performance of the e-cat?
Thank you for any answers you can share,
D
Dr Joseph Fine:
1- yes
2- it can if wanted
3- no for safety reasons
4- not yet ( F8 )
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jeb:
He,he,he…
Obviously the heat was used.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Janine:
Thank you for the link.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Kenko:I have taken samples to be analyzed, as I already said, during the 352 days. The results of the analysis so far are confidential.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
I cannot give any information related to the litigation on course, but, if I am not wrong, the address where the test has been made is contained in our published complaint.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Can you tell us the address of the Customer that used the 1 MW E-Cat during the test ?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dear Dr. Rossi,
Since the 1 year test is over and the fuel changed, has any of the ash been analysed? If so, is it possibe to reveal the analysis?
TIA
kenko
Dr Rossi,
Have you had an opportunity to read comments from blogger Sifferkoll.
http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/the-rossi-darden-apcoworldwide-saga-why-is-it-good-to-not-release-the-cop50-erv-lenr-report/
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Somebody wrote that if the E-Cat really was making 1 MWh/h all people around would have been burnt or something.
Comments or are you gonna spam this ?
Jeb
Andrea Rossi, Koen Vandewalle:
In an earlier post, Koen Vandewalle asked “what percent of the ‘Symphony’ is produced directly in electricity”.
Without giving a specific percentage: (other than 0 or 100%)
1: Does the ‘Symphony’ produce any of its electricity directly?
Or, in other words:
2: Does it produce all of its electricity indirectly?
3: Can the produced (or stored) electricity be used to support some of the input power requirements of the Symphony?
4: Have you finished a new “Unfinished Symphony”?
(Unfinished due to potential further improvements.)
Continuing regards,
Joseph Fine
Delano:
Thank you for your sympathy.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hank Mills:
1- F8
2- no
3- no
4- no
5- patent in preparation
6- yes
7- can’t answer in positive or negative
8- no; by the way, if you read well our complaint, my answers on this blog your head shpuld be cleared enough.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Alexvs:
Thank you for the correction:
the correct link is
http://www.leonardocorporation.com
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Schroedinger’s Cat:
You are substantially right. It was one year that I was saying we were working mainly in SSM.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Alexvs:
Try again. Or go directly to http://ecat.com/
Try, try again,
Joseph Fine
Dear Andrea Rossi:
I see how you are fighting like a lion against the behemoth Cherokee, that is moving all the power they have to try to steal your IP. This is a veritable Goliath against David duel…win for us, because we want the E-Cat manufactured and they want not to manufacture E-Cats, they want only to manufacture toilet paper, as you correctly say.
May God help you,
Delano
You has replied thus to one very recent question about the ERV test:
“The results are coherent with what I have repeatedly written on this blog during the 352 days of test: the plant has worked mostly in SSM mode.”
This basically says it all. There’s no need to publish any ERV really
Dear Mr. Rossi
The link http://www.leonardocorp1996.com does not work.
Greetings
Alexvs
Dear Andrea,
1) You don’t need to feel obligated to provide precise characteristics of the E-Cat X (or Quark). A rough preliminary summary, subject to change, would be extremely welcome! Would you be willing to give out a description that doesn’t include performance metrics?
2) You have several other patents pending in addition to the granted patent, “Fluid Heater.” Have you been given any indication by your patent attorney or the patent office how soon these patents may be granted?
3) I’ve been doing additional reading on hydrogen loading in the past week and have a ton of concepts bouncing around in my head: Van der Waals forces at the surface, interstitial sites between atoms in the nickel lattice, a-phase & b-phase loading, the creation of elastic tension by hydrogen atoms in the lattice, micro-void formation where re-formation of atomic hydrogen to molecular hydrogen can occur, extensive surface modification resulting in cracks and micro-cavities, and how pressure and temperature play a part in all of this. You were very correct that there was not one exhaustive text on the loading of hydrogen into nickel powder. But there is a good bit of information out there scattered about in various papers. Do you have any thoughts in general about this topic you can share?
4) Since you cannot provide the ERV report at this time, is there anyway you could publish your own data that was collected and the figures you derived?
5) Have you ever mechanically created a hole, pore, or cavity on a sample of nickel and then successfully induced a nuclear reaction at the location?
6) Has Industrial Heat observed self-sustaining behavior from the E-Cat replications they built themselves?
7) Have you directly measured an alpha particle flux with a charged particle detector from an E-Cat in operation? If so, can you describe what you detected? Second only to self sustained heat production, I think this would be absolute, beyond refutable evidence that could be used in court. Of course if the alphas are thermalized mostly in the micro-cavities, they might not escape to then penetrate through a small aperture in the reactor.
8) A long time ago you mentioned that you might in the future release images/video of the massive melt down of a reactor that produced a megawatt of power for ten seconds which melted ceramic. The video could be a morale booster from some of your supporters whom are having brain splitting headaches right now. Would you consider releasing it?
Thank you for your time and continued willingness to move forward to commercialize this technology.
Sincerely,
Hank
Kenko:
He,he,he,he…
F8 = before I can give precise characteristics about the E-Cat QuarkX, I need to complete the R&D on course.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Isobel:
1- yes
2- http://www.leonardocorp1996.com
3- yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi
Let’s talk of serious things.
After the results of the 1 year test of the 1 MW E-Cat are such plants for sale ? Where can we find the characteristics ? Are you already able to manufacture them, even if not in massive production ?
Thank you,
I.C.
F8??? Could you you refresh me as to what F8 is to infer plz. I remembeer F9. Any other F*’s I should recall?
Kenko
Patrick Ellul:
The Report will be published after it will have been disclosed in the Court.
Everything you are reading now is just toilet paper, diffused by professionals of the same and the ones they have paid for.
I can only repeat what my Attorney wrote in our press release, it is that we are pleased by the results. The results are coherent with what I have repeatedly written on this blog during the 352 days of test: the plant has worked mostly in SSM mode. As all the visitors have seen.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
How many pages long is the ERV report and how many measured data points does it contain?
You can surely tell us that 🙂
Work hard and warm regards.
Patrick
Koen Vandewalle:
F8
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi,
EUREKA !
Really ?
Anyway, the bottle is open.
Cheers !
Koen
Koen Vandewalle:
None of them.
F8.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi,
Can you give an idea what % of the symphony is produced directly in Electricity?
A: 0.01-1
B: 1.0-10
C: F8, but I’ve seen mostly A and sometimes B for some time, while experimenting. It works very intermittent, and it is hard to predict.
D: We have to make a test in a container for at least one year.
Are there still ongoing experiments in order to generate thrust? Does this seem a fruitful branch for the future, or is it more a side effect?
Kind Regards,
Koen
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for the link!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
have published
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/04/apr-13-2016-what-has-changed-andrea.html
with your kind answers.
I am asking:
what is more interesting technically than a catalyst?
Answer: an other, better catalyst.
For example an energy catalyst.
I define catalysis as synergy
peter
DvH:
He,he,he…
I’ll see what I can do, but if you go to
http://www.leonardocorp1996.com
can find a lot of photos.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Mr Rossi,
now that the performance-test is over and the world knows the brave, secret customer, can you share some photos of the whole story ?
Something like ‘making of’ ??
Some sweating, clueless technicians during installation – some photos of Andrea Rossi and team with an Xmas-tree on the eCat – some humorless, sceptic looking safety-inspector before ‘permit to operate’ was granted – all these are quite interesting to the audience and would not interfere with the arm wrestling in court.
greetings from the other side of the atlantic
dvh
Fred:
Thank you, but I cannot comment on this.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
John:
Thank you,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
You said a true thing: what will count will be only your products on the market.
Cheers
John
Dear Andrea:
We trust to what you said about the litigation, because what you say makes sense, what they say does not.
You will win and we will have the E-Cat. They are interested only to sell toilet paper in change of gold, you are struggling to make real things.
We trust in you.
Thank you for your hard work.
Fred
Dr Joseph Fine:
You have made pre-disclosure of the last version of the Cat ! Now, you jeopardized the possibility to patent it. I am sure this is a “concertation” with IH against me !!!
Heartbroken Regards,
A.R.
W:
Yes, absolutely yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi:
Is still in good standing and promising the QuarkX ? This is more important than the IH saga.
Cheers
W.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I admit the following video inspired me to come up with the name “E-Cat Symphony”.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeoT66v4EHg
What do you think of “Nora’s” musical debut?
With Harmony,
Joseph Fine
Stephen:
Very interesting.
Thank you for the links.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Soknoi:
I will defend myself saying the truth in Court, bringing evidence of it and making a good product.
There is nothing else to do.
We are not getting damages because people is intelligent.
Warm Regards,
A.R.