Multiple ECats (thousands of elementary ECats) can operate autonomously. They generate DC output, and their power summation occurs at DC. Therefore, there is no need for mutual synchronization of the ECat controllers.
Power summation from each elementary ECat in the first conversion stage is performed at DC using DC/DC converters.
Next, in the second conversion stage, using DC/AC converters, the power summation occurs at AC (50 Hz). At this stage, mutual synchronization of the controllers is required to achieve in-phase power summation.
Ambrogio:
I think so, but probably they will be the last to be delivered, for many reasons: economical, post-sale organization, and others,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKtbw7vOciA
Physicists Turned Light Into Solid Matter – Now You Can Touch It
I still beleive that the smallest NGU core is 10 watts. This means that a one megawatt NGU unit contains 100,000 10 watt cores. But how are all these cores coordinated? This 1 megawatt plant is formed into a supersolid of light: an exciton polariton condensate.
How does this work? A mouse core gets a command from the controller. The mouse changes its nature to conform with the command from the controller. Al the other 100,000 cat cores reform there actions to act just like the mouse unit. They all are now following the command that was given by the mouse core.
I have seen proof in the LION experiments that such processes are occurring when hexagonal imprints of pico-clusters leave their lattice imprints on the insides of diamond.
see 15:20 of this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqAqhp2uR7k&t=14s
1. Have all known problems with the NGU devices relative to the Grid power unit been resolved?
2. Have all required Power generators for the first Grid power unit been fabricated, delivered?
3. How many Grid power units will be built this year?
Dear Eng. Rossi,
I would like to share a few reflections arising from a technical interest and long-standing attention to energy-related topics, without any intention of questioning the operating principle of your system, which I take as established.
When energy production is based on physical processes not yet fully formalized within standard physics, historical experience shows that the main challenges usually concern not the basic functionality, but rather repeatability, long-term stability, and system behavior as operating power is scaled up.
It is well known that many physical phenomena behave in a linear and well-controlled manner at low power levels, while non-linear, secondary, or difficult-to-model effects may emerge when higher power levels are reached or when the system is operated continuously at maximum output.
From this perspective, I find particularly interesting your reported choice of a low unit power (around 10 W), which appears to ensure stable operation without observable side effects on the surrounding environment or electrical infrastructure.
My question, from the point of view of a potential user rather than a theorist, concerns optimal usage modes when multiple units are combined or when the system is employed at higher overall power levels. By way of example only, I consider three possible usage profiles:
1. Prudent and distributed use
A user operates a system capable of several kW nominal output, but uses it at moderate average loads, avoiding continuous operation at maximum power. The electrical installation is carefully designed, with particular attention to grounding and mass distribution.
2. Aggressive and continuous use
A user attempts to exploit the maximum available power continuously, possibly producing a constant surplus to feed into the grid, with little attention paid to grounding quality or load management. In such a scenario, at least in principle, operational stress or reliability issues could emerge that are difficult to interpret.
3. Hybrid and conservative use
The generator is combined with other energy sources (for example photovoltaic panels) and with energy storage systems, minimizing direct operating time of the device. The entire installation is strongly referenced to ground over a large and well-engineered area.
My question is therefore straightforward:
which of these usage profiles do you consider most consistent with long-term stability and technically correct operation of the system?
More generally, do you believe that load management, grounding, and duty cycle play a significant role in maximizing the reliability of the device?
Thank you for your attention.
Kind regards,
Camillo
Dear Axil,
Multiple ECats (thousands of elementary ECats) can operate autonomously. They generate DC output, and their power summation occurs at DC. Therefore, there is no need for mutual synchronization of the ECat controllers.
Power summation from each elementary ECat in the first conversion stage is performed at DC using DC/DC converters.
Next, in the second conversion stage, using DC/AC converters, the power summation occurs at AC (50 Hz). At this stage, mutual synchronization of the controllers is required to achieve in-phase power summation.
Camillo:
Thank you for your akalysis.
Answers:
1. all the issues you analyzed have to be taken in consideration
2. yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven Nicholes Karels:
1. yes, so far
2. no
3. I am not able to answer
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ambrogio:
I think so, but probably they will be the last to be delivered, for many reasons: economical, post-sale organization, and others,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Axil:
Thank you for yor insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKtbw7vOciA
Physicists Turned Light Into Solid Matter – Now You Can Touch It
I still beleive that the smallest NGU core is 10 watts. This means that a one megawatt NGU unit contains 100,000 10 watt cores. But how are all these cores coordinated? This 1 megawatt plant is formed into a supersolid of light: an exciton polariton condensate.
How does this work? A mouse core gets a command from the controller. The mouse changes its nature to conform with the command from the controller. Al the other 100,000 cat cores reform there actions to act just like the mouse unit. They all are now following the command that was given by the mouse core.
I have seen proof in the LION experiments that such processes are occurring when hexagonal imprints of pico-clusters leave their lattice imprints on the insides of diamond.
see 15:20 of this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqAqhp2uR7k&t=14s
Click on this link or place it in your command line and execute.
See what the AI think of this posit
https://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&aep=1&q=I+still+beleive+that+the+Smallest+NGU+core+is+10+watts.+This+means+that++a+one+megawatt+NGU+unit+contains+100%2C000+10+watt+cores.+But+how+are+all+these+cores+coordinated%3F+This+1+megawatt+plant+is+formed+into+a+supersolid+of+light%3A+an+exciton+polariton+condensate.++%EF%BB%BF+%EF%BB%BFHow+does+this+work%3F+A+mouse+core+gets+a+command+from+the+controller.+The+mouse+changes+its+nature+to+conform+with+the+command+from+the+controller.+Al+the+other+100%2C000+cat+cores+reform+there+actions+to+act+just+like+the+mouse+unit.+They+all+are+now+following+the+command+that+was+given+by+the+mouse+core.++%EF%BB%BF+%EF%BB%BFI+have+seen+proof+in+the+LION+experiments+that+such+processes+are+occurring+when+hexagonal+imprints+of+pico-clusters+leave+their+lattice+imprints+on+the+insides+of+diamond.+%EF%BB%BF+%EF%BB%BFsee+15%3A20+of+this+video&nem=143&ntc=1&fbs=&mstk=AUtExfCp1ttbbvdvBe-FUrK4ze-bKRGl6sDyiYBym_1bVk8b8mPv8JisszgiePwzA2cQdx63KhDJaDyoCWD7WWVRzoquIXfrf1kK7JBFdtUl6_0aO2mIbUdvJhk4XHtyP1df7-8gHFFwX1kUYaW1cs_of8jV4AaNSx1Y34EWkBBaFhmcu-roUvE3njZXuK_wVo-VdzCG12V5WIHlwwlvZ7hv4_WETbe-2at9_codSW2ujgwGQ11Z1GQB6TUWpSI_NRxEU9U0k0i9jh0XXr43SlK7SDBbFz49a5pdWcrHOhJvDNunc4_Pp5umuqGFMCHSQrstwERDkajr0czZwq0&csuir=1
Dr Rossi,
Do you think that the 10 W Ecat NGU will hit the market ?
Ambrogio
Dear Andrea Rossi,
1. Have all known problems with the NGU devices relative to the Grid power unit been resolved?
2. Have all required Power generators for the first Grid power unit been fabricated, delivered?
3. How many Grid power units will be built this year?
Dear Eng. Rossi,
I would like to share a few reflections arising from a technical interest and long-standing attention to energy-related topics, without any intention of questioning the operating principle of your system, which I take as established.
When energy production is based on physical processes not yet fully formalized within standard physics, historical experience shows that the main challenges usually concern not the basic functionality, but rather repeatability, long-term stability, and system behavior as operating power is scaled up.
It is well known that many physical phenomena behave in a linear and well-controlled manner at low power levels, while non-linear, secondary, or difficult-to-model effects may emerge when higher power levels are reached or when the system is operated continuously at maximum output.
From this perspective, I find particularly interesting your reported choice of a low unit power (around 10 W), which appears to ensure stable operation without observable side effects on the surrounding environment or electrical infrastructure.
My question, from the point of view of a potential user rather than a theorist, concerns optimal usage modes when multiple units are combined or when the system is employed at higher overall power levels. By way of example only, I consider three possible usage profiles:
1. Prudent and distributed use
A user operates a system capable of several kW nominal output, but uses it at moderate average loads, avoiding continuous operation at maximum power. The electrical installation is carefully designed, with particular attention to grounding and mass distribution.
2. Aggressive and continuous use
A user attempts to exploit the maximum available power continuously, possibly producing a constant surplus to feed into the grid, with little attention paid to grounding quality or load management. In such a scenario, at least in principle, operational stress or reliability issues could emerge that are difficult to interpret.
3. Hybrid and conservative use
The generator is combined with other energy sources (for example photovoltaic panels) and with energy storage systems, minimizing direct operating time of the device. The entire installation is strongly referenced to ground over a large and well-engineered area.
My question is therefore straightforward:
which of these usage profiles do you consider most consistent with long-term stability and technically correct operation of the system?
More generally, do you believe that load management, grounding, and duty cycle play a significant role in maximizing the reliability of the device?
Thank you for your attention.
Kind regards,
Camillo
Neri Accornero:
The report will be published soon,
Warm Regards,
A.R.