Assume I want to use a 1kW eCat NGU Power Generator in a static location, e.g. mounted to a wall.
Questions:
1. Will it correctly function with the long side vertical? If so, Pointing Up or Down?
2. Will it correctly function with the long-side horizontal? If so, is there a side that must be pointing up?
Francesco Poscetti,
Thank you for your support !
My health, thanks to God, is perfect, so far, I hope yours as well,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
P.S.
Your comment is the # 71 000 of this blog
Dear Andrea
Ecat seems to have diverse application possibilities and a few limiting properties.
These limitations must be taken into account for maximum success.
I mention a few conditions here:
A. Ecat largely requires inverter functions that convert its DC to current AC.
B. Ecat’s property that causes it to turn off in the event of an overload requires that this situation be avoided in order to achieve safe and economical operation.
C. What best limits overload becomes decisive here.
D. This can be achieved most easily where there is a possibility of grid connection.
Ecat can then deliver its capacity to the grid and have a built-in limitation against exceeding this.
High electricity needs of Ecat owners are then supplied from the grid, without risking overloading of their own Ecat.
(The value of received and delivered energy must be accounted for by the grid owner/energy plant.)
E. For the many possible grid-free applications, C. becomes a task that can be added by an advanced inverter that can also register and disconnect one or more loads before critical overloads occur.
This again requires a combination with a rechargeable battery that delays the possibility that an excessively large load will affect Ecat.
The tasks in A to E can be handled with known technology that can probably be improved by AI.
Are possible solutions to the conditions mentioned here in A and B now under consideration?
Ron Stringer:
The address you cited is not and never has been an address of ours; anyway, if you have comments to do you must send them to this blog, not by email,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi,
I can’t wait for the first Ecats to be delivered to those who pre-ordered them, and I hope to be among the first to receive my order (it was very old).
I imagine the initial production run will necessarily be limited, but it will need to adapt quickly to all the new orders, which will grow exponentially.
Reference Sceptic Guy
September 17, 2025 at 1:31 AM
Does the Ecat generate “overunit” ( OU ) energy ?
I understand that Sceptic Guy was asking about over-unity, that is, does the Ecat NGU output more energy than it consumes, usually in the form of fuel.
I’d like to ask you a question, theoretically if you put an E cat on the international space station in zero gravity inside the space station would it work ?for sure ,probably or probably not ?will the ecat work in a vacuum? a vacuum chamber on earth?
Piergiorgio:
Thank you for your suggestion: I will pass it on to our IT guy, although this blog is totally public and all the comments of it are public, therefore here are not issues related to the confidentiality.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I’m not IT expert, but I noticed that this blog runs a HTTP protocol instead a safer HTTPS.
Now, because as you said some days ago “the war has been initiated”, I would invite you to speak to your IT staff to fix this issue and overall increase, if necessary, this site security.
A quite simple cyberattak could easily cut the communication line between you and your readers. No good in this moment.
Here below some refarence (sorry it’s in italian)
Perché scegliere HTTPS rispetto a HTTP?
Sicurezza
I messaggi HTTP sono in chiaro, il che significa che le parti non autorizzate possono accedervi e leggerli facilmente su Internet. Al contrario, HTTPS trasmette tutti i dati in forma crittografata. Quando gli utenti inviano dati sensibili, possono essere certi che nessuna terza parte possa intercettarli attraverso la rete. È preferibile scegliere HTTPS per proteggere informazioni potenzialmente sensibili come i dati della carta di credito o le informazioni personali dei clienti.
Of course there will be competitors, but when Ecats start being delivered, Leonardo and partner will start with big advantage which is a product ready to go and lots of preorders lined up. I think it will take time for competitors to get organized, and Leonardo has a chance to be far ahead of the chasing pack.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
even if the ecat would be allowed to use it for ohmic load, it would have an enourmous impact in the market. Just heating, cooking and heat for industrial applications are the main consumer of energy in the world.
Important is that the ecat reaches the market, the sooner the better.
R.Brand
I think that as soon as the Ecat will enter the market all the guys that are saying they have ready a similar product to go, even collecting financing, will buy an Ecat, make a reverse engineering with minor variations and go to the market and more financing collection as well…be careful…to defend a patent in Court costs millions and lasts years !
David
In my opinion, things like Ecats for cars, planes, boats, space craft, etc. are not important at this time. I think now you must keep your focus on the job in front of you. The important thing is to get the first Ecat products out into the marketplace, and get your business moving. Evolution of the technology will naturally occur as more R&D is done over time. Do you agree?
Regards,
Ecat Enthusiast
Nils Fryklund:
I edited your comment because the word “fule” in English does not exist; I hope my editing is correct, otherwise please rephrase with other words than “fule”. If my editing is coherent with your meaning, the answer is:
nothing is easy, but it is possible,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Nils Fryklund:
1. yes
2. yes
3. part manual, part by robots
4. I do not understand your question: please rephrase
Thank you for your wishes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
1. Are your whole team working together with your partner?
2. Are the partner used to manufacture big series?
3. Is the montage half-manual or have the partner already installed robots?
4. Is it easy to get all objects to E-cat fule?
I wish you good luck with the new fire!
Best regards
Nils Fryklund
Dott.A.T.
I think you significantly underestimate the costs of the solar expansion needed to match the 3kW ECAT, even if this seems like overkill for most people. Of course it will depend where in the world you are, an equatorial climate is likely to need less battery storage to meet home demand. However here in the UK you would need a huge upgrade to battery capacity to store that amount of solar. Even so in the winter there will be times when you won’t be covering demand and need to draw from the grid. Not so with an ECAT which produces constantly.
You neglect installation costs other than some materials, however the vast majority of people can’t do this. The solar expansion would require scaffolding and lots of wiring to add the extra capacity. For the ECAT I imagine the installation will be dead simple for a trained electrician, especially if it is offered with a standard solar MC4 connector it should be plug and play depending on inverter capacity.
We have a small 3.8kW solar system and a 9.5kWh battery. We plan to add a 1kW ECAT to the inverter which has capacity as we planned to add more panels when we extend our roof. I’m confident that $2500 would be significantly cheaper than any solar upgrade, for which we would definitely need to add battery capacity which still wouldn’t cover winter demand. The real question for me would be certification, in the UK we have MCS certification which is required for all equipment to be integrated by a solar installer.
Dear Dott. A.T.
I think the discussion is interesting.
I think in your calculation you are missing some points. It’s not enough to buy the PV panels and keep it in the basement.
You need a good place for them. For example your roof. And you need someone that installs them there. With all the connections. Same for maintenance.
Another point is that PV requires way more accumulation capacity (because of the long hours without sun compared with the management of some short usage peak for the e-cat).
These points in my opinion change the numbers significantly.
You should check the prices for turn-key roof-top PV systems with accumulation.
Then you compare it with e-cat plus a way smaller accumulation system.
Then there are maintenance costs. On you roof.
Maybe the PV is still cheaper. Maybe not.
And anyway you are assuming that you have a roof available for a lot of panels. Not everyone has it.
Dott.A.T.:
The convenience depends on the specific situations that any pre-order sender must consider and calculate. I remind to all that the pre-orders are not binding and that they can be cancelled anytime without money changing place.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi, dear friends of the forum,
a purely economic consideration, addressed to Dr. Rossi, but also to anyone considering using eCat for domestic energy production.
We intend to compare the costs of using the ECAT with a battery-inverter system (to exploit all the energy produced by storing it during periods of low usage).
Assuming the pre-existence of a battery-inverter photovoltaic system,
assuming the expertise to perform the installation/design,
taking into account the cost of a 3kW ECA, €7,500, plus cabling, monitoring and control systems, cables, and accessories for connection to the home grid (a conservative €500), for a total assumed cost of €8,000.
Considering 10 years of operation of the device,
excluding logistical factors, such as available space.
Given that
– the cost of a 400W nominal solar panel is currently around €70 (see sites such as Tecnomat or similar)
– given the inconsistency of solar compared to the ECA, we conservatively assume an equivalent solar power of 15 or 20 kW in panels. Nominal
Total cost of panels (20,000 / 400) * 70 = 3,500
Assuming the cost of any system expansions (inverter, cables, monitoring, accessories) of €2,000 more than the existing system, for a total of €5,500.
Given the expected performance of the panels for a period of more than 10 years (up to 20),
the cost difference is still approximately €2,000 (30%) compared to an eCat system.
Confirming that interest in eCat is enormous due to the intrinsic value of this new discovery/technology,
I would be interested in hearing an opinion and purely economic advice on the cost effectiveness for a family from Dr. Rossi and all the forum participants.
Best regards.
___________
Caro Dott. Rossi, cari amici del forum,
una considerazione di ambito puramente economico, non unicamente rivolta al Dott. Rossi, ma a chiunque consideri l’utilizzo dell’eCat per la produzione di energia domestica.
Si intende paragonare i costi in relazione all’utilizzo dell’ecat con un impianto ad inverter con batteria (per lo sfruttamento della intera energia prodotta accumulandola durante i momenti di minor utilizzo)
Assumendo la pre-esistenza di un impianto fotovoltaico ad inverter con batteria,
assumendo di avere le competenze per fare la installazione/progettazione
tenendo presente il costo di un ecat di 3kW , 7500€ , più cablature, sistemi di monitoraggio e controllo, cavi e accessori per la connessione alla rete domestica (500€ conservativi verso il basso), per un totale assunto di 8000€
considerando 10 anni di funzionamento del dispositivo,
escludendo fattori logistici, quali lo spazio disponibile
Visto che
– il costo di un pannello solare da 400W nominali è attualmente sui 70€ (vedi siti quali Tecnomat o simili)
– data l’incostanza del solare rispetto all’ecat si assume conservativamente un equivalente potenza solare di 15 o 20 kW in pannelli , nominale
Costo totale dei pannelli (20000 / 400) * 70 = 3500
Assumendo un costo di eventuali ampliamenti dell’impiani (inverter , cavi, monitoraggio, accessori) di +2000€ rispetto all’esistente, per un totale di 5500€.
Data l’attesa di rendimento dei pannelli per un periodo superiore ai 10 anni (fino a 20),
Il delta di costo è comunque di circa 2000€ (30%) rispetto ad un impianto ad eCat.
Confermando che l’interesse per l’ecat è comunque enorme per l’intrinseco valore della nuovo scoperta/tecnologia,
mi farebbe piacere avere comunque una opinione, e un consiglio puramente economico sulla convenienza dei costi per una famiglia, da parte del Dott. Rossi e di tutti i partecipanti al forum
More questions about Ecat tilt based on my question of 2024-11-18. ie, If it (the Ecat) was mounted with a tilt but yet stationary and stable would it work? AR yes.
1) The Ecat will start up and operate normally in any orientation, upside-down, on its side, irrespective of compass orientation, etc, as long as it is stationary and stable?
2) Where Q1 is true, the start up orientation becomes the zero reference for the deviation range plus/ minus 20 deg?
3) Where Q1 is true, if it was necessary to reorient the Ecat by more than 20 deg it should be switched off first?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Assume I want to use a 1kW eCat NGU Power Generator in a static location, e.g. mounted to a wall.
Questions:
1. Will it correctly function with the long side vertical? If so, Pointing Up or Down?
2. Will it correctly function with the long-side horizontal? If so, is there a side that must be pointing up?
Svein:
Thank you for your suggestions, that we are taking in consideration
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Francesco Poscetti,
Thank you for your support !
My health, thanks to God, is perfect, so far, I hope yours as well,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
P.S.
Your comment is the # 71 000 of this blog
Ciao Andrea,
come va la tua salute?
Un forte abbraccio,
Francesco Poscetti.
Hi Andrea, how’s your health? A big hug!
Francesco Poscetti.
Dear Andrea
Ecat seems to have diverse application possibilities and a few limiting properties.
These limitations must be taken into account for maximum success.
I mention a few conditions here:
A. Ecat largely requires inverter functions that convert its DC to current AC.
B. Ecat’s property that causes it to turn off in the event of an overload requires that this situation be avoided in order to achieve safe and economical operation.
C. What best limits overload becomes decisive here.
D. This can be achieved most easily where there is a possibility of grid connection.
Ecat can then deliver its capacity to the grid and have a built-in limitation against exceeding this.
High electricity needs of Ecat owners are then supplied from the grid, without risking overloading of their own Ecat.
(The value of received and delivered energy must be accounted for by the grid owner/energy plant.)
E. For the many possible grid-free applications, C. becomes a task that can be added by an advanced inverter that can also register and disconnect one or more loads before critical overloads occur.
This again requires a combination with a rechargeable battery that delays the possibility that an excessively large load will affect Ecat.
The tasks in A to E can be handled with known technology that can probably be improved by AI.
Are possible solutions to the conditions mentioned here in A and B now under consideration?
Regards Svein
Ron Stringer:
The address you cited is not and never has been an address of ours; anyway, if you have comments to do you must send them to this blog, not by email,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi, I get messages that the info@leonardo.com mailbox is full – is there something that could be done about that?
Ron Stringer
Jean Dufour:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Does the Ecat still contain Ni and H ?
JD
Italo R.:
Thank you for your support,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi,
I can’t wait for the first Ecats to be delivered to those who pre-ordered them, and I hope to be among the first to receive my order (it was very old).
I imagine the initial production run will necessarily be limited, but it will need to adapt quickly to all the new orders, which will grow exponentially.
Kind Regards,
Italo R.
Ambrogio:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven Nicholes Karels:
I answered,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Reference Sceptic Guy
September 17, 2025 at 1:31 AM
Does the Ecat generate “overunit” ( OU ) energy ?
I understand that Sceptic Guy was asking about over-unity, that is, does the Ecat NGU output more energy than it consumes, usually in the form of fuel.
Steve
Dr Rossi,
still in schedule to begin the deliveries within this year ?
Cheers
Ambrogio
Sceptic Guy:
It depends on which semantics and scientific system you connect with the concept of “unit”,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Does the Ecat generate “overunit” ( OU ) energy ?
Todd Burkett:
I am not able to answer,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I’d like to ask you a question, theoretically if you put an E cat on the international space station in zero gravity inside the space station would it work ?for sure ,probably or probably not ?will the ecat work in a vacuum? a vacuum chamber on earth?
Piergiorgio:
Thank you for your suggestion: I will pass it on to our IT guy, although this blog is totally public and all the comments of it are public, therefore here are not issues related to the confidentiality.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
I’m not IT expert, but I noticed that this blog runs a HTTP protocol instead a safer HTTPS.
Now, because as you said some days ago “the war has been initiated”, I would invite you to speak to your IT staff to fix this issue and overall increase, if necessary, this site security.
A quite simple cyberattak could easily cut the communication line between you and your readers. No good in this moment.
Here below some refarence (sorry it’s in italian)
Perché scegliere HTTPS rispetto a HTTP?
Sicurezza
I messaggi HTTP sono in chiaro, il che significa che le parti non autorizzate possono accedervi e leggerli facilmente su Internet. Al contrario, HTTPS trasmette tutti i dati in forma crittografata. Quando gli utenti inviano dati sensibili, possono essere certi che nessuna terza parte possa intercettarli attraverso la rete. È preferibile scegliere HTTPS per proteggere informazioni potenzialmente sensibili come i dati della carta di credito o le informazioni personali dei clienti.
Piergiorgio
@David Rubinstein
Of course there will be competitors, but when Ecats start being delivered, Leonardo and partner will start with big advantage which is a product ready to go and lots of preorders lined up. I think it will take time for competitors to get organized, and Leonardo has a chance to be far ahead of the chasing pack.
Regards, Ecat Enthusiast
David Rubinstein:
That’s a point,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
R.Brand:
Thank you for your opinion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
even if the ecat would be allowed to use it for ohmic load, it would have an enourmous impact in the market. Just heating, cooking and heat for industrial applications are the main consumer of energy in the world.
Important is that the ecat reaches the market, the sooner the better.
R.Brand
I think that as soon as the Ecat will enter the market all the guys that are saying they have ready a similar product to go, even collecting financing, will buy an Ecat, make a reverse engineering with minor variations and go to the market and more financing collection as well…be careful…to defend a patent in Court costs millions and lasts years !
David
Ecatenthusiast,
Good point,
Gianbattista
Ecat Enthusiast:
I agree,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
In my opinion, things like Ecats for cars, planes, boats, space craft, etc. are not important at this time. I think now you must keep your focus on the job in front of you. The important thing is to get the first Ecat products out into the marketplace, and get your business moving. Evolution of the technology will naturally occur as more R&D is done over time. Do you agree?
Regards,
Ecat Enthusiast
Maurice:
I am not able to answer, because this will not depend on me,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Do you think that sooner or later the Ecat technology will be applied also to the electric vehicles ?
Maurice
Nils Fryklund:
Oh, now I understand ! Thank you for rephrasing.
The answer is: yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea!
About question 4. I spelled it wrong, I ment fuel.
For example fuel, as nickel, litium, aluminium hydride and vacuum tubes.
Best regards
Nils Fryklund
Nils Fryklund:
I edited your comment because the word “fule” in English does not exist; I hope my editing is correct, otherwise please rephrase with other words than “fule”. If my editing is coherent with your meaning, the answer is:
nothing is easy, but it is possible,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea!
My last question:
4. Is it easy to buy/obtain all objects you need to manufacture the E-Cat in full ?
Nils Fryklund
Nils Fryklund:
1. yes
2. yes
3. part manual, part by robots
4. I do not understand your question: please rephrase
Thank you for your wishes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea!
1. Are your whole team working together with your partner?
2. Are the partner used to manufacture big series?
3. Is the montage half-manual or have the partner already installed robots?
4. Is it easy to get all objects to E-cat fule?
I wish you good luck with the new fire!
Best regards
Nils Fryklund
Ambrogio:
1- yes
2- no
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
1- have the important September tests been started already ?
2- if yes, can you anticipate the results so far ?
Best
Ambrogio
Rick:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Are the certifications you already got valid also for solar applications ?
Rick
Dott.A.T.
I think you significantly underestimate the costs of the solar expansion needed to match the 3kW ECAT, even if this seems like overkill for most people. Of course it will depend where in the world you are, an equatorial climate is likely to need less battery storage to meet home demand. However here in the UK you would need a huge upgrade to battery capacity to store that amount of solar. Even so in the winter there will be times when you won’t be covering demand and need to draw from the grid. Not so with an ECAT which produces constantly.
You neglect installation costs other than some materials, however the vast majority of people can’t do this. The solar expansion would require scaffolding and lots of wiring to add the extra capacity. For the ECAT I imagine the installation will be dead simple for a trained electrician, especially if it is offered with a standard solar MC4 connector it should be plug and play depending on inverter capacity.
We have a small 3.8kW solar system and a 9.5kWh battery. We plan to add a 1kW ECAT to the inverter which has capacity as we planned to add more panels when we extend our roof. I’m confident that $2500 would be significantly cheaper than any solar upgrade, for which we would definitely need to add battery capacity which still wouldn’t cover winter demand. The real question for me would be certification, in the UK we have MCS certification which is required for all equipment to be integrated by a solar installer.
Dear Dott. A.T.
I think the discussion is interesting.
I think in your calculation you are missing some points. It’s not enough to buy the PV panels and keep it in the basement.
You need a good place for them. For example your roof. And you need someone that installs them there. With all the connections. Same for maintenance.
Another point is that PV requires way more accumulation capacity (because of the long hours without sun compared with the management of some short usage peak for the e-cat).
These points in my opinion change the numbers significantly.
You should check the prices for turn-key roof-top PV systems with accumulation.
Then you compare it with e-cat plus a way smaller accumulation system.
Then there are maintenance costs. On you roof.
Maybe the PV is still cheaper. Maybe not.
And anyway you are assuming that you have a roof available for a lot of panels. Not everyone has it.
Best,
Alessandro
Dott.A.T.:
The convenience depends on the specific situations that any pre-order sender must consider and calculate. I remind to all that the pre-orders are not binding and that they can be cancelled anytime without money changing place.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi, dear friends of the forum,
a purely economic consideration, addressed to Dr. Rossi, but also to anyone considering using eCat for domestic energy production.
We intend to compare the costs of using the ECAT with a battery-inverter system (to exploit all the energy produced by storing it during periods of low usage).
Assuming the pre-existence of a battery-inverter photovoltaic system,
assuming the expertise to perform the installation/design,
taking into account the cost of a 3kW ECA, €7,500, plus cabling, monitoring and control systems, cables, and accessories for connection to the home grid (a conservative €500), for a total assumed cost of €8,000.
Considering 10 years of operation of the device,
excluding logistical factors, such as available space.
Given that
– the cost of a 400W nominal solar panel is currently around €70 (see sites such as Tecnomat or similar)
– given the inconsistency of solar compared to the ECA, we conservatively assume an equivalent solar power of 15 or 20 kW in panels. Nominal
Total cost of panels (20,000 / 400) * 70 = 3,500
Assuming the cost of any system expansions (inverter, cables, monitoring, accessories) of €2,000 more than the existing system, for a total of €5,500.
Given the expected performance of the panels for a period of more than 10 years (up to 20),
the cost difference is still approximately €2,000 (30%) compared to an eCat system.
Confirming that interest in eCat is enormous due to the intrinsic value of this new discovery/technology,
I would be interested in hearing an opinion and purely economic advice on the cost effectiveness for a family from Dr. Rossi and all the forum participants.
Best regards.
___________
Caro Dott. Rossi, cari amici del forum,
una considerazione di ambito puramente economico, non unicamente rivolta al Dott. Rossi, ma a chiunque consideri l’utilizzo dell’eCat per la produzione di energia domestica.
Si intende paragonare i costi in relazione all’utilizzo dell’ecat con un impianto ad inverter con batteria (per lo sfruttamento della intera energia prodotta accumulandola durante i momenti di minor utilizzo)
Assumendo la pre-esistenza di un impianto fotovoltaico ad inverter con batteria,
assumendo di avere le competenze per fare la installazione/progettazione
tenendo presente il costo di un ecat di 3kW , 7500€ , più cablature, sistemi di monitoraggio e controllo, cavi e accessori per la connessione alla rete domestica (500€ conservativi verso il basso), per un totale assunto di 8000€
considerando 10 anni di funzionamento del dispositivo,
escludendo fattori logistici, quali lo spazio disponibile
Visto che
– il costo di un pannello solare da 400W nominali è attualmente sui 70€ (vedi siti quali Tecnomat o simili)
– data l’incostanza del solare rispetto all’ecat si assume conservativamente un equivalente potenza solare di 15 o 20 kW in pannelli , nominale
Costo totale dei pannelli (20000 / 400) * 70 = 3500
Assumendo un costo di eventuali ampliamenti dell’impiani (inverter , cavi, monitoraggio, accessori) di +2000€ rispetto all’esistente, per un totale di 5500€.
Data l’attesa di rendimento dei pannelli per un periodo superiore ai 10 anni (fino a 20),
Il delta di costo è comunque di circa 2000€ (30%) rispetto ad un impianto ad eCat.
Confermando che l’interesse per l’ecat è comunque enorme per l’intrinseco valore della nuovo scoperta/tecnologia,
mi farebbe piacere avere comunque una opinione, e un consiglio puramente economico sulla convenienza dei costi per una famiglia, da parte del Dott. Rossi e di tutti i partecipanti al forum
I migliori saluti.
Steve D:
1- no
2- see 1
3- see 1
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi
More questions about Ecat tilt based on my question of 2024-11-18. ie, If it (the Ecat) was mounted with a tilt but yet stationary and stable would it work? AR yes.
1) The Ecat will start up and operate normally in any orientation, upside-down, on its side, irrespective of compass orientation, etc, as long as it is stationary and stable?
2) Where Q1 is true, the start up orientation becomes the zero reference for the deviation range plus/ minus 20 deg?
3) Where Q1 is true, if it was necessary to reorient the Ecat by more than 20 deg it should be switched off first?
Thank you
Greg Leonard:
As I said, depends on the specific situation,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Apologies AR for my typo.
I meant a stack of 20 NGU to give 240V.
How long to start the whole stack?
regards
Greg Leonard
Jean Paul Renoir:
Correct, for the reasons I already explained here,
Warm Regards,
A.R.