.

*by*

* U.V.S.Seshavatharam*

* Honorary faculty, I-SERVE, Alakapuri,*

* Hyderabad-35, Telangana, India*

* Email: seshavatharam.uvs@gmail.com*

* .*

* S. Lakshminarayana*

* Dept. of Nuclear Physics, Andhra University,*

* Visakhapatnam-03, AP, India*

* Email: lnsrirama@gmail.com*

.

Read the whole article

Download the ZIP file

.

**Abstract**

In the early publications, with reference to final unification, the authors suggested that

1) There exists a strong interaction elementary charge of magnitude, es~4.72058686E-19 C.

2) Like quarks, the strong interaction elementary charge is experimentally undetectable and can be called as ‘invisible elementary nuclear charge’.

3) There exists a gravitational constant associated with strong interaction, Gs~3.329560807E28 m3/kg/sec2.

4) There exists a gravitational constant associated with electromagnetic interaction, Ge~2.374335472E37 m3/kg/sec2. Based on these concepts, an attempt is made to understand the mystery of origin of ‘discrete’ angular momentum of electron in hydrogen atom. Proceeding further, estimated value of Newtonian gravitational constant is GN~6.67985603E-11 m3/kg/sec2.

.

Read the whole article

Download the ZIP file

.

Todd Burkett:

Any source will be available ( I mean really available ) we will make 20% less.

We have plenty of margin.

Warm Regards,

A.R.

Dear Andre

You said you plan to price the energy at 80% of other energy sources

Such as the price of gas? I assume whatever price is available at that location?

And what about other new energy technologies that may compete directly for the same business such as brilliant light power ? if they bring something to market?

The reason I ask is because it seems both your companies are a similar place as far as commercial availability , are you willing and prepared to compete with another energy source that is significantly cheaper than commonly available now ?

Lars Lindberg:

No, the QuarkX will focus on heat.

We are testing three QuarkXes.

Warm Regards,

A.R.

Dear Mr. Rossi,

will the light from the QuarkX be useful?

How many QuarkX are you testing at the same time?

Dear Prof U.V.S.Seshavatharam,

Dear Prof S. Lakshminarayana,

This provides a way of thinking that allows to find an explanation for the thrust of the QuarkX.

I wonder in which models is taken into account the absolute speed of elementary particles in the universe, and what could be the role of the influences caused by differences in speed of these particles.

Sorry if I did not understand the paper. My optional Calculus co-processor was not included when I arrived in this world. So I’m stuck with the older graphics module.

It seems to me that as the LHC can realize more powerfull collisions, then the more and heavier particles are to be found. Maybe the LHC creates these particles, just as a pump can create extra volume in a liquid when it cavitates.

It makes all the calculations and models prevailing in approximately static state are not really valid at high speeds.

Kind Regards,

Koen